Two-step joint PP- and PS-wave three-term amplitude-variation with offset inversion

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. T613-T625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qizhen Du ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Xianjun Meng ◽  
Chengfeng Guo ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reflection Coefficient ◽  
Wave Reflection ◽  
Coefficient Matrix ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Amplitude Variation ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Avo Inversion ◽  
Pp Wave

Three-term amplitude-variation with offset (AVO) inversion generally suffers from instability when there is limited prior geologic or petrophysical constraints. Two-term AVO inversion shows higher instability compared with three-term AVO inversion. However, density, which is important in the fluid-type estimation, cannot be recovered from two-term AVO inversion. To reliably predict the P- and S-waves and density, we have developed a robust two-step joint PP- and PS-wave three-term AVO-inversion method. Our inversion workflow consists of two steps. The first step is to estimate the P- and S-wave reflectivities using Stewart’s joint two-term PP- and PS-AVO inversion. The second step is to treat the P-wave reflectivity obtained from the first step as the prior constraint to remove the P-wave velocity related-term from the three-term Aki-Richards PP-wave approximated reflection coefficient equation, and then the reduced PP-wave reflection coefficient equation is combined with the PS-wave reflection coefficient equation to estimate the S-wave and density reflectivities. We determined the effectiveness of our method by first applying it to synthetic models and then to field data. We also analyzed the condition number of the coefficient matrix to illustrate the stability of the proposed method. The estimated results using proposed method are superior to those obtained from three-term AVO inversion.

Frequency-dependent spherical-wave nonlinear AVO inversion in elastic media

2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (2) ◽  
pp. 765-776
Author(s):  
Guangsen Cheng ◽  
Xingyao Yin ◽  
Zhaoyun Zong
Keyword(s):  
Reflection Coefficient ◽  
Wave Reflection ◽  
Fresnel Zone ◽  
Spherical Wave ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Elastic Media ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Avo Inversion ◽  
Well Location ◽  
The Stability

SUMMARY The plane-wave reflection coefficient (PRC) plays a remarkable role in conventional amplitude variation with offset (AVO) analysis and inversion. Compared with the widely exploited PRC that breaks down at the near- and supercritical incidence angles, the spherical-wave reflection coefficient (SRC) can overcome the influence of wide-angle reflection and give an accurate description of the actual seismic wave reflection phenomenon based on spherical-wave fronts. However, SRC is not widely used in AVO inversion due to its nonlinearity and computational complexity. In our study, the characteristics of frequency–depth-dependent monochromatic SRC are discussed and a novel three-parameter SRC is derived. Compared with the conventional six-parameter SRC, the novel three-parameter SRC improves the stability of spherical-wave AVO inversion. In addition, the concept of SRC within the Fresnel zone is proposed, and the accuracy of SRC within the Fresnel zone in the deep subsurface is tested. Finally, a nonlinear spherical-wave AVO inversion method for elastic media is proposed, which can make full use of all frequency components of wavelet. The robustness of the proposed method is verified by the application on synthetic seismogram with white Gaussian noise. The feasibility and practicability of this method are verified by comparing the spherical-wave AVO inversion results with the filtered well logs at the known well location.

Computation of dry-rock VP/VS ratio, fluid property factor, and density estimation from amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. R669-R679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Chen ◽  
Xiaojun Wang ◽  
Baocheng Wu ◽  
Hongyan Qi ◽  
Muming Xia
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Pore Fluid ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Amplitude Variation ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Fluid Identification ◽  
Fluid Property ◽  
Avo Inversion

Estimating the fluid property factor and density from amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) inversion is important for fluid identification and reservoir characterization. The fluid property factor can distinguish pore fluid in the reservoir and the density estimate aids in evaluating reservoir characteristics. However, if the scaling factor of the fluid property factor (the dry-rock [Formula: see text] ratio) is chosen inappropriately, the fluid property factor is not only related to the pore fluid, but it also contains a contribution from the rock skeleton. On the other hand, even if the angle gathers include large angles (offsets), a three-parameter AVO inversion struggles to estimate an accurate density term without additional constraints. Thus, we have developed an equation to compute the dry-rock [Formula: see text] ratio using only the P- and S-wave velocities and density of the saturated rock from well-logging data. This decouples the fluid property factor from lithology. We also developed a new inversion method to estimate the fluid property factor and density parameters, which takes full advantage of the high stability of a two-parameter AVO inversion. By testing on a portion of the Marmousi 2 model, we find that the fluid property factor calculated by the dry-rock [Formula: see text] ratio obtained by our method relates to the pore-fluid property. Simultaneously, we test the AVO inversion method for estimating the fluid property factor and density parameters on synthetic data and analyze the feasibility and stability of the inversion. A field-data example indicates that the fluid property factor obtained by our method distinguishes the oil-charged sand channels and the water-wet sand channel from the well logs.

A simple approximation to the P‐wave reflection coefficient and its implication in the inversion of amplitude variation with offset data

Geophysics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhashis Mallick
Keyword(s):  
Reflection Coefficient ◽  
Wave Reflection ◽  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Linear Inversion ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Shear Moduli ◽  
Amplitude Versus Offset ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Two Parameters

I derive an approximate formula for the plane P‐wave reflection coefficient as a function of ray‐parameter. The approximation shows that the behavior of the P‐wave reflection coefficient at nonnormal angles of incidence is mainly controlled by two parameters: (1) [Formula: see text], the fluid‐fluid reflection coefficient (i.e., the reflection coefficient when the S‐wave velocities in both media are set to zero) and (2) Δμ/ρ, the ratio of the contrast in shear moduli to the average bulk density. I also show that the other formulas for the P‐wave reflection coefficient given by R. Bortfeld and R. Shuey can be approximately derived from my formula. I give numerical examples to demonstrate the accuracy of the formula. Using a least‐squares inversion of theoretical values for the reflection coefficients, I demonstrate that, in a linear inversion of amplitude versus offset data, Δμ/ρ is better estimated than the contrast in Poisson’s ratio, Δσ. Finally, comparing the exact reflection coefficient with Shuey’s approximation for typical shale and Class 1 gas‐sand models, I show that Shuey’s approximation under‐estimates the value of |Δσ| for such reflections.

Linearized amplitude variation with offset (AVO) inversion with supercritical angles

Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. E49-E55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Downton ◽  
Charles Ursenbach
Keyword(s):  
Reflection Coefficient ◽  
Critical Angle ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Phase Variation ◽  
Reflection Coefficients ◽  
Amplitude Variation ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Zoeppritz Equations ◽  
Avo Inversion ◽  
Angle Data

Contrary to popular belief, a linearized approximation of the Zoeppritz equations may be used to estimate the reflection coefficient for angles of incidence up to and beyond the critical angle. These supercritical reflection coefficients are complex, implying a phase variation with offset in addition to amplitude variation with offset (AVO). This linearized approximation is then used as the basis for an AVO waveform inversion. By incorporating this new approximation, wider offset and angle data may be incorporated in the AVO inversion, helping to stabilize the problem and leading to more accurate estimates of reflectivity, including density reflectivity.

Amplitude variation with offset inversion using the reflectivity method

Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. R185-R195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongxing Liu ◽  
Jingye Li ◽  
Xiaohong Chen ◽  
Bo Hou ◽  
Li Chen
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Transmission Losses ◽  
Amplitude Variation ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Avo Inversion ◽  
Propagation Effects ◽  
Reflectivity Method ◽  
Internal Multiples

Most existing amplitude variation with offset (AVO) inversion methods are based on the Zoeppritz’s equation or its approximations. These methods assume that the amplitude of seismic data depends only on the reflection coefficients, which means that the wave-propagation effects, such as geometric spreading, attenuation, transmission loss, and multiples, have been fully corrected or attenuated before inversion. However, these requirements are very strict and can hardly be satisfied. Under a 1D assumption, reflectivity-method-based inversions are able to handle transmission losses and internal multiples. Applications of these inversions, however, are still time-consuming and complex in computation of differential seismograms. We have evaluated an inversion methodology based on the vectorized reflectivity method, in which the differential seismograms can be calculated from analytical expressions. It is computationally efficient. A modification is implemented to transform the inversion from the intercept time and ray-parameter domain to the angle-gather domain. AVO inversion is always an ill-posed problem. Following a Bayesian approach, the inversion is stabilized by including the correlation of the P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, and density. Comparing reflectivity-method-based inversion with Zoeppritz-based inversion on a synthetic data and a real data set, we have concluded that reflectivity-method-based inversion is more accurate when the propagation effects of transmission losses and internal multiples are not corrected. Model testing has revealed that the method is robust at high noise levels.

Amplitude variation with offset inversion using acoustic-elastic local solver

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. R251-R262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ligia Elena Jaimes-Osorio ◽  
Alison Malcolm ◽  
Ali Gholami
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Material ◽  
Point Sources ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Reflection Coefficients ◽  
Local Domain ◽  
Amplitude Variation ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Zoeppritz Equations ◽  
Avo Inversion ◽  
Full Domain

Conventional amplitude variation with offset (AVO) inversion analysis uses the Zoeppritz equations, which are based on a plane-wave approximation. However, because real seismic data are created by point sources, wave reflections are better modeled by spherical waves than by plane waves. Indeed, spherical reflection coefficients deviate from planar reflection coefficients near the critical and postcritical angles, which implies that the Zoeppritz equations are not applicable for angles close to critical reflection in AVO analysis. Elastic finite-difference simulations provide a solution to the limitations of the Zoeppritz approximation because they can handle near- and postcritical reflections. We have used a coupled acoustic-elastic local solver that approximates the wavefield with high accuracy within a locally perturbed elastic subdomain of the acoustic full domain. Using this acoustic-elastic local solver, the local wavefield generation and inversion are much faster than performing a full-domain elastic inversion. We use this technique to model wavefields and to demonstrate that the amplitude from within the local domain can be used as a constraint in the inversion to recover elastic material properties. Then, we focus on understanding how much the amplitude and phase contribute to the reconstruction accuracy of the elastic material parameters ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]). Our results suggest that the combination of amplitude and phase in the inversion helps with the convergence. Finally, we analyze elastic parameter trade-offs in AVO inversion, from which we find that to recover accurate P-wave velocities we should invert for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] simultaneously with fixed density.

Fracture-porosity inversion from P-wave AVOA data along 2D seismic lines: An example from the Austin Chalk of southeast Texas

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. B1-B7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullatif A. Al-Shuhail
Keyword(s):  
Aspect Ratio ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Amplitude Variation ◽  
Fracture Porosity ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
P Wave Velocity ◽  
Austin Chalk ◽  
Southeast Texas

Vertical aligned fractures can significantly enhance the horizontal permeability of a tight reservoir. Therefore, it is important to know the fracture porosity and direction in order to develop the reservoir efficiently. P-wave AVOA (amplitude variation with offset and azimuth) can be used to determine these fracture parameters. In this study, I present a method for inverting the fracture porosity from 2D P-wave seismic data. The method is based on a modeling result that shows that the anisotropic AVO (amplitude variation with offset) gradient is negative and linearly dependent on the fracture porosity in a gas-saturated reservoir, whereas the gradient is positive and linearly dependent on the fracture porosity in a liquid-saturated reservoir. This assumption is accurate as long as the crack aspect ratio is less than 0.1 and the ratio of the P-wave velocity to the S-wave velocity is greater than 1.8 — two conditions that are satisfied in most naturally fractured reservoirs. The inversion then uses the fracture strike, the crack aspect ratio, and the ratio of the P-wave velocity to the S-wave velocity to invert the fracture porosity from the anisotropic AVO gradient after inferring the fluid type from the sign of the anisotropic AVO gradient. When I applied this method to a seismic line from the oil-saturated zone of the fractured Austin Chalk of southeast Texas, I found that the inversion gave a median fracture porosity of 0.21%, which is within the fracture-porosity range commonly measured in cores from the Austin Chalk.

Constrained nonlinear amplitude variation with offset inversion using Zoeppritz equations

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. R245-R255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Gholami ◽  
Hossein S. Aghamiry ◽  
Mostafa Abbasi
Keyword(s):  
Nonlinear Equations ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Simultaneous Estimation ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Amplitude Variation ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Zoeppritz Equations ◽  
Avo Inversion

The inversion of prestack seismic data using amplitude variation with offset (AVO) has received increased attention in the past few decades because of its key role in estimating reservoir properties. AVO is mainly governed by the Zoeppritz equations, but traditional inversion techniques are based on various linear or quasilinear approximations to these nonlinear equations. We have developed an efficient algorithm for nonlinear AVO inversion of precritical reflections using the exact Zoeppritz equations in multichannel and multi-interface form for simultaneous estimation of the P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, and density. The total variation constraint is used to overcome the ill-posedness while solving the forward nonlinear model and to preserve the sharpness of the interfaces in the parameter space. The optimization is based on a combination of Levenberg’s algorithm and the split Bregman iterative scheme, in which we have to refine the data and model parameters at each iteration. We refine the data via the original nonlinear equations, but we use the traditional cost-effective linearized AVO inversion to construct the Jacobian matrix and update the model. Numerical experiments show that this new iterative procedure is convergent and converges to a solution of the nonlinear problem. We determine the performance and optimality of our nonlinear inversion algorithm with various simulated and field seismic data sets.

Coupling in amplitude variation with offset and the Wiggins approximation

Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. N21-N33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristopher A. Innanen
Keyword(s):  
Wave Reflection ◽  
Elastic Parameter ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Converted Wave ◽  
Amplitude Variation ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Zoeppritz Equations ◽  
P Wave Velocity ◽  
Higher Order Corrections

Linear amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) approximations, which experience a reduction in accuracy as elastic parameter contrasts become large, may be adjusted with second- and higher-order corrections. Corrective terms can be expressed in many ways, but they only serve a meaningful purpose if they provide the same qualitative interpretability as did the linearization. Some aspects of nonlinear AVO can be understood, quantitatively and qualitatively, in terms of coupling — the interdependence of elastic parameter contrasts amongst themselves in their determination of reflection strengths. Coupling, for instance, explains the weak but nonnegligible dependence of the converted wave reflection coefficient on the lower half-space P-wave velocity. This fact can be exposed by expanding the solutions of the Zoeppritz equations in a particular hierarchy of series. Also explainable through this approach is the mathematical importance of what is sometimes referred to as the “Wiggins approximation,” under which [Formula: see text]. This special number is seen to coincide with a full decoupling of density contrasts from [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] contrasts at the second order. The decoupling persists across several variations of the nonlinear AVO approximations, including both expressions in terms of the relative changes [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text], and expressions in terms of single-parameter reflectivities.

Joint anisotropic amplitude variation with offset inversion of PP and PS seismic data

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. N31-N50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Lu ◽  
Yun Wang ◽  
Jingyi Chen ◽  
Ying An
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Local Minimum ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Amplitude Variation ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Avo Inversion ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Angle ◽  
Two Stages

With the increase in exploration target complexity, more parameters are required to describe subsurface properties, particularly for finely stratified reservoirs with vertical transverse isotropic (VTI) features. We have developed an anisotropic amplitude variation with offset (AVO) inversion method using joint PP and PS seismic data for VTI media. Dealing with local minimum solutions is critical when using anisotropic AVO inversion because more parameters are expected to be derived. To enhance the inversion results, we adopt a hierarchical inversion strategy to solve the local minimum solution problem in the Gauss-Newton method. We perform the isotropic and anisotropic AVO inversions in two stages; however, we only use the inversion results from the first stage to form search windows for constraining the inversion in the second stage. To improve the efficiency of our method, we built stop conditions using Euclidean distance similarities to control iteration of the anisotropic AVO inversion in noisy situations. In addition, we evaluate a time-aligned amplitude variation with angle gather generation approach for our anisotropic AVO inversion using anisotropic prestack time migration. We test the proposed method on synthetic data in ideal and noisy situations, and find that the anisotropic AVO inversion method yields reasonable inversion results. Moreover, we apply our method to field data to show that it can be used to successfully identify complex lithologic and fluid information regarding fine layers in reservoirs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document