Time-lapse seismic data inversion for estimating reservoir parametersusing deep learning

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-91
Author(s):  
Harpreet Kaur ◽  
Zhi Zhong ◽  
Alexander Sun ◽  
Sergey Fomel

Geological carbon sequestration involves the injection of captured carbon dioxide (CO2) into sub-surface formations for long-term storage. The movement and fate of the injected CO2 plume is ofgreat concern to regulators as monitoring helps to identify potential leakage zones and determinesthe possibility of safe long-term storage. To address this concern, we design a deep learning frame-work for carbon dioxide (CO2) saturation monitoring to determine the geological controls on thestorage of the injected CO2. We use different combinations of porosities and permeabilities for agiven reservoir to generate saturation and velocity models. We train the deep learning model with afew time-lapse seismic images and their corresponding changes in saturation values for a particular CO2 injection site. The deep learning model learns the mapping from the change in the time-lapseseismic response to the change in CO2 saturation during the training phase. We then apply thetrained model to data sets comprising different time-lapse seismic image slices (corresponding todifferent time instances) generated using different porosity and permeability distributions that arenot part of the training to estimate the CO2 saturation values along with the plume extent. Theproposed algorithm provides a deep learning assisted framework for the direct estimation of CO2 saturation values and plume migration in heterogeneous formations using the time-lapse seismicdata. The proposed method improves the efficiency of time-lapse inversion by streamlining thelarge number of intermediate steps in the conventional time-lapse inversion workflow. This method also helps to incorporate the geological uncertainty for a given reservoir by accounting for the statis-tical distribution of porosity and permeability during the training phase. Tests on different examplesverify the effectiveness of the proposed approach

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrii Erich Torn ◽  
Farshid Torabi ◽  
Koorosh Asghari ◽  
Mehdi Mohammadpoor

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Xiaohan Yang ◽  
Degao Liu ◽  
Haiwei Lu ◽  
David J. Weston ◽  
Jin-Gui Chen ◽  
...  

A grand challenge facing society is climate change caused mainly by rising CO2 concentration in Earth’s atmosphere. Terrestrial plants are linchpins in global carbon cycling, with a unique capability of capturing CO2 via photosynthesis and translocating captured carbon to stems, roots, and soils for long-term storage. However, many researchers postulate that existing land plants cannot meet the ambitious requirement for CO2 removal to mitigate climate change in the future due to low photosynthetic efficiency, limited carbon allocation for long-term storage, and low suitability for the bioeconomy. To address these limitations, there is an urgent need for genetic improvement of existing plants or construction of novel plant systems through biosystems design (or biodesign). Here, we summarize validated biological parts (e.g., protein-encoding genes and noncoding RNAs) for biological engineering of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) traits in terrestrial plants to accelerate land-based decarbonization in bioenergy plantations and agricultural settings and promote a vibrant bioeconomy. Specifically, we first summarize the framework of plant-based CDR (e.g., CO2 capture, translocation, storage, and conversion to value-added products). Then, we highlight some representative biological parts, with experimental evidence, in this framework. Finally, we discuss challenges and strategies for the identification and curation of biological parts for CDR engineering in plants.


2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Szczerbanik ◽  
K. J. Scott ◽  
J. E. Paton ◽  
D. J. Best

The ‘Nijisseiki’ cultivar of Japanese pears (Pyrus pyrifolia) is also known as nashi in Australia. Nashi were exposed to levels of <0.005, 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0 µL/L of ethylene in air during 26 weeks storage at 0°C. Levels of ethylene as low as 0.01 µL/L increased chlorophyll loss and visual green colour. Increasing ethylene levels also increased softening and internal browning, although flesh spot decay was reduced in the presence of ethylene. While it would be worthwhile to remove ethylene during long-term storage of ‘Nijisseiki’ in air, another alternative, adding 2% carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, is suggested as a possible low cost means to overcome the ripening effect of ethylene.


HortScience ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R. Drake

`Anjou' pears (Pyrus communis L.) were placed in controlled-atmosphere (CA) storage immediately after harvest (<24 hours) or after a 10-day delay in refrigerated storage, and held there for 9 months at 1C. Oxygen in all atmospheres was 1.5% and CO2 was at either 1% or 3%. Atmospheres in the flow-through system were computer-controlled at ±0.1%. After removal from CA storage, pears were evaluated immediately and after ripening at 21C for 8 days. Pears stored in 3% CO2 were firmer, greener, and displayed less scald, internal breakdown, and stem-end decay than pears stored in 1% CO2. In addition, no internal discoloration of `Anjou' pears was evident when held with 3% CO2. `Anjou' pears held in 3%. CO2 retained the ability to ripen after long-term storage. A 10-day delay in atmosphere establishment had little or no influence on the long-term keeping quality or ripening ability of `Anjou' pears.


MRS Bulletin ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally M. Benson ◽  
Franklin M. Orr

Reducing CO2 emissions from the use of fossil fuel is the primary purpose of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). Two basic approaches to CCS are available.1,2 In one approach, CO2 is captured directly from the industrial source, concentrated into a nearly pure form, and then pumped deep underground for long-term storage (see Figure 1). As an alternative to storage in underground geological formations, it has also been suggested that CO2 could be stored in the ocean. This could be done either by dissolving it in the mid-depth ocean (1–3 km) or by forming pools of CO2 on the sea bottom where the ocean is deeper than 3 km and, consequently, CO2 is denser than seawater. The second approach to CCS captures CO2directly from the atmosphere by enhancing natural biological processes that sequester CO2 in plants, soils, and marine sediments. All of these options for CCS have been investigated over the past decade, their potential to mitigate CO2 emissions has been evaluated,1 and several summaries are available.1,3,4


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document