Lupus Nephritis: Induction Therapy

Lupus ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
TM Chan

Effective induction therapy is of pivotal importance in minimizing renal parenchymal damage by the active immune-mediated inflammatory processes in severe proliferative lupus nephritis. Preservation of nephron mass is prerequisite to long-term renal survival. Data from US-based studies have shown improved efficacy with induction treatment comprising corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide, compared with corticosteroid treatment alone. Data from European studies have shown similar efficacy with a modified treatment regimen, in which smaller doses of cyclophosphamide were given at weekly or fortnightly intervals over a shortened treatment duration, and the treatment related adverse effects appeared less frequent with the reduced-dose regimen. We have also reported that sequential immunosuppression with prednisolone and oral cyclophosphamide as induction followed by azathioprine maintenance was associated with a high incidence of remission and relatively favourable long-term renal outcome in Chinese patients. However, cyclophosphamide treatment is associated with considerable adverse effects, which could be potentially fatal. Mycophenolate mofetil selectively inhibits lymphocyte proliferation, and thus targets an instrumental step in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. There is accumulating evidence that the combined use of mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroid presents an effective treatment for severe proliferative lupus nephritis in different ethnic groups, and is associated with much fewer adverse effects compared with cyclophosphamide-based regimens. Recent data from our group also demonstrate the long-term efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in preserving renal survival, when used continuously as both induction and maintenance therapy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 526-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farah Tamirou ◽  
David D'Cruz ◽  
Shirish Sangle ◽  
Philippe Remy ◽  
Carlos Vasconcelos ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo report the 10-year follow-up of the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial comparing azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as maintenance therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis, and to test different definitions of early response as predictors of long-term renal outcome.MethodsIn 2014, data on survival, kidney function, 24 h proteinuria, renal flares and other outcomes were collected for the 105 patients randomised between 2002 and 2006, except in 13 lost to follow-up.ResultsDeath (2 and 3 in the AZA and MMF groups, respectively) and end-stage renal disease (1 and 3, respectively) were rare events. Time to renal flare (22 and 19 flares in AZA and MMF groups, respectively) did not differ between AZA and MMF patients. Patients with good long-term renal outcome had a much more stringent early decrease of 24 h proteinuria compared with patients with poor outcome. The positive predictive value of a 24 h proteinuria <0.5 g/day at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months for a good long-term renal outcome was excellent (between 89% and 92%). Inclusion of renal function and urinalysis in the early response criteria did not impact the value of early proteinuria decrease as long-term prognostic marker.ConclusionsThe long-term follow-up data of the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial do not indicate that MMF is superior to AZA as maintenance therapy in a Caucasian population suffering from proliferative lupus nephritis. Moreover, we confirm the excellent positive predictive value of an early proteinuria decrease for long-term renal outcome.Trial registration numberNCT00204022.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Phelisa Sogayise ◽  
Udeme Ekrikpo ◽  
Ayanda Gcelu ◽  
Bianca Davidson ◽  
Nicola Wearne ◽  
...  

Background. Lupus nephritis (LN) can be complicated with requirement for kidney replacement therapy and death. Efficacy of induction therapies using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCYC) has been reported from studies, but there is limited data in Africans comparing both treatments in patients with proliferative LN. Methods. This was a retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN diagnosed and treated with either MMF or IVCYC in a single centre in Cape Town, South Africa, over a 5-year period. The primary outcome was attaining complete remission after completion of induction therapy. Results. Of the 84 patients included, mean age was 29.6 ± 10.4 years and there was a female preponderance (88.1%). At baseline, there were significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and presence of glomerular crescents between both groups ( p ≤ 0.05 ). After completion of induction therapy, there was no significant difference in remission status (76.0% versus 87.5%; p = 0.33 ) or relapse status (8.1% versus 10.3%; p = 0.22 ) for the IVCYC and MMF groups, respectively. Mortality rate for the IVCYC group was 5.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up compared to 1.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up for the MMF group ( p = 0.11 ), and there was no significant difference in infection-related adverse events between both groups. Estimated GFR at baseline was the only predictor of death (OR: 1.0 [0.9–1.0]; p = 0.001 ). Conclusion. This study shows similar outcomes following induction treatment with MMF or IVCYC in patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN in South Africa. However, a prospective and randomized study is needed to adequately assess these outcomes.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. e0212068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Parodis ◽  
Huihua Ding ◽  
Agneta Zickert ◽  
Guillaume Cosson ◽  
Madiha Fathima ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1070-1076
Author(s):  
Chi Chiu Mok ◽  
Ling Yin Ho ◽  
Shirley King Yee Ying ◽  
Man Chi Leung ◽  
Chi Hung To ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo report the 10-year outcome of lupus nephritis (LN) treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or tacrolimus (TAC) induction in a randomised controlled trial.MethodsPatients with active LN were treated with MMF or TAC combined with high-dose prednisolone. Responders were switched to azathioprine (AZA) at month 6. Clinical outcomes at 10 years (renal flares, renal function decline and mortality) were assessed. Factors affecting prognosis were studied by Cox regression. Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (uPCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at different time points were evaluated for their prediction of a poor prognosis by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.Results150 patients were studied (age 35.5±12.8 years). Complete renal response rate was similar between MMF (59%) and TAC-treated patients (62%; p=0.71). AZA maintenance was given to 79% patients. After 118.2±42 months, proteinuric and nephritic renal flares occurred in 34% and 37% of the MMF, and 53% and 30% of the TAC groups of patients, respectively (p=0.49). The cumulative incidence of a composite outcome of ↓eGFR ≥30%, chronic kidney disease stage 4/5 or death at 10 years was 33% in both groups (p=0.90). Factors independently associated with a poor renal prognosis were first-time LN (HR 0.12 (0.031 to 0.39); p=0.01), eGFR (HR 0.98 (0.96 to 0.99); p=0.008) and no response at month 6 (HR 5.18 (1.40 to 19.1); p=0.01). ROC analysis revealed an uPCr >0.75 and eGFR of <80 mL/min at month 18 best predicted a poor renal prognosis.ConclusionsLong-term data confirmed non-inferiority of TAC to MMF as induction therapy of LN. An uPCr≤0.75 and eGFR of ≥80 mL/min at month 18 best predicted a favourable 10-year outcome and may be suitable targets for induction/consolidation therapy.Trial registration numberNCT00371319.


Lupus ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Contreras ◽  
E Tozman ◽  
Nilay Nahar ◽  
David Metz

For the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis, long-term cyclophosphamide (CY) regimens are efficacious, however, at the expense of substantial toxicity. In the last decade, sequential regimens of short-term CY induction followed by either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA) maintenance have shown to be efficacious and safe reducing the long-term exposure to CY. In a maintenance study including predominantly Hispanics and African-Americans, the patients who received MMF and AZA maintenance had a higher cumulative probability of remaining free of the composite of death or chronic renal failure (CRF) compared to quarterly intravenous CY (IVCY) maintenance (89% in MMF, 80%, in AZA and 45% in IVCY). Likewise, MMF and AZA maintenance were associated with significantly lower incidence of severe infections (2% in each MMF or AZA, and 25% in IVCY), sustained amenorrhea (6% in MMF, 8% in AZA, and 32% in IVCY), and hospitalizations (one hospital-days per patient-year in each MMF or AZA, and 10 in IVCY). In a European induction study including predominantly Caucasians, patients who received any of two sequential regimens, low dose versus high dose IVCY induction both followed by AZA maintenance, had a high cumulative probability of remaining free of treatment failure (84% in low dose IVCY and 80% in high dose IVCY; treatment failure defined as a composite of free of corticosteroid resistant flare, nephrotic syndrome, doubling creatinine, and persistent elevated creatinine). Low dose IVCY and high dose IVCY induction were associated with low incidence of sustained amenorrhea (4% in each group) and severe infections (11% in low dose and 22% in high dose IVCY induction). Of interest, most of the severe infection episodes occurred while patients were receiving IVCY induction. Finally an Asian study demonstrated that patients with proliferative lupus nephritis could be effectively treated with short-term oral CY induction followed by AZA maintenance. The cumulative probability of complete remission was 76%. The relapse rate was only 11%. The incidence of permanent amenorrhea and infection were 8% and 33%, respectively. None of the Asian patients had an increase in serum creatinine level to double the baseline value. Maintenance therapies with MMF or AZA following short-term CY induction in a sequential regimen are efficacious and safe for the treatment of high-risk patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (8) ◽  
pp. 785-790

Background: Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) concomitant with corticosteroids demonstrated better outcomes in therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis albeit adverse effects may occur. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a newer oral medication for treating lupus nephritis. Objective: To compare renal outcomes between IVCY and MMF in conjunction with corticosteroid for induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis. Materials and Methods: The authors reviewed the medical records from four university hospitals of children who received prednisolone with either MMF or IVCY for induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis between 2005 and 2014 in the present retrospective cohort study. Results: Twenty-eight and 85 patients were included in the MMF and IVCY group, respectively. The respective mean age at MMF and IVCY initiation was 12.36±2.87 and 11.84±3.04 years. Renal remission was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.690). Non-nephrotic range proteinuria (adjusted OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.23 to 6.94, p=0.015), and high initial GFR (adjusted OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.14 to 7.56, p=0.026) were significantly associated with achieving renal remission. Both infectious (82.1%) and non-infectious complications (96.9%) were more common in the IVCY group. Neither death nor end-stage renal disease (ESRD) occurred during the induction therapy. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in renal remission whether children received MMF or IVCY for induction therapy of lupus nephritis; however, adverse events occurred less frequently in the MMF group. Keywords: Children, Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Mycophenolate, Cyclophosphamide, Induction


2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1289-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olugbenga E. Ayodele ◽  
Ikechi G. Okpechi ◽  
Charles R. Swanepoel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document