scholarly journals Tayside–Fife clinical trial of cognitive–behavioural therapy for medication-resistant psychotic symptoms

2003 ◽  
Vol 182 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Durham ◽  
Moyra Guthrie ◽  
R. Victor Morton ◽  
David A. Reid ◽  
Linda R. Treliving ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Psychotic Symptoms ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Supportive Psychotherapy ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Clinical Nurse ◽  
Clinical Nurse Specialists ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

BackgroundEvidence for the efficacy of cognitive–behavioural therapy for schizophrenia is promising but evidence for clinical effectiveness is limited.AimsTo test the effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural therapy delivered by clinical nurse specialists in routine practice.MethodOf 274 referrals, 66 were allocated randomly to 9 months of treatment as usual (TAU), cognitive–behavioural therapy plus TAU (CBT) or supportive psychotherapy plus TAU (SPT) and followed up for 3 months.ResultsTreatment effects were modest but the CBT condition gave significantly greater improvement in overall symptom severity than the SPT or TAU conditions combined (F (1,53)=4.14; P=0.05). Both the CBT and SPT conditions combined gave significantly greater improvement in severity of delusions than did the TAU condition (F (1,53)=4.83; P=0.03). Clinically significant improvements were achieved by 7/21 in the CBT condition (33%), 3/19 in the SPT condition (16%) and 2/17 in the TAU condition (12%).ConclusionsCognitive–behavioural therapy delivered by clinical nurse specialists is a helpful adjunct to routine care for some people with chronic psychosis.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy augmentation in major depression treatment (ECAM study): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. e006359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsuo Nakagawa ◽  
Mitsuhiro Sado ◽  
Dai Mitsuda ◽  
Daisuke Fujisawa ◽  
Toshiaki Kikuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Depression ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Depression Care ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

IntroductionMajor depression is a serious mental disorder that causes substantial distress and impairment in individuals and places an enormous burden on society. Although antidepressant treatment is the most common therapy provided in routine practice, there is little evidence to guide second-line therapy for patients who have failed to respond to antidepressants. The aim of this paper is to describe the study protocol for a randomised controlled trial that measures the clinical effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) as an augmentation strategy to treat patients with non-psychotic major depression identified as suboptimal responders to usual depression care.Methods and analysisThe current study is a 16-week assessor-blinded randomised, parallel-groups superiority trial with 12-month follow-up at an outpatient clinic as part of usual depression care. Patients aged 20–65 years with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) Major Depressive Disorder who have experienced at least one failed trial of antidepressants as part of usual depression care, will be randomly assigned to receive CBT plus treatment as usual, or treatment as usual alone. The primary outcome is the change in clinician-rated 17-item GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD) score at 16 weeks, and secondary outcomes include severity and change in scores of subjective depression symptoms, proportion of responders and remitters, safety and quality of life. The primary population will be the intention-to-treat patients.Ethics and disseminationAll protocols and the informed consent form comply with the Ethics Guideline for Clinical Research (Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare). Ethics review committees at the Keio University School of Medicine and the Sakuragaoka Memorial Hospital approved the study protocol. The results of the study will be disseminated at several research conferences and as published articles in peer-reviewed journals. The study will be implemented and reported in line with the CONSORT statement.Trial registration numberUMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000001218.

scholarly journals Clinical effectiveness of online computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 195 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. de Graaf ◽  
S. A. H. Gerhards ◽  
A. Arntz ◽  
H. Riper ◽  
J. F. M. Metsemakers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Severe Depression ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

BackgroundComputerised cognitive–behavioural therapy (CCBT) might offer a solution to the current undertreatment of depression.AimsTo determine the clinical effectiveness of online, unsupported CCBT for depression in primary care.MethodThree hundred and three people with depression were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Colour Your Life; treatment as usual (TAU) by a general practitioner; or Colour Your Life and TAU combined. Colour Your Life is an online, multimedia, interactive CCBT programme. No assistance was offered. We had a 6-month follow-up period.ResultsNo significant differences in outcome between the three interventions were found in the intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses.ConclusionsOnline, unsupported CCBT did not outperform usual care, and the combination of both did not have additional effects. Decrease in depressive symptoms in people with moderate to severe depression was moderate in all three interventions. Online CCBT without support is not beneficial for all individuals with depression.

scholarly journals Assessing telephone-delivered cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) and web-delivered CBT versus treatment as usual in irritable bowel syndrome (ACTIB): a multicentre randomised trial

Gut ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2018-317805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazel Anne Everitt ◽  
Sabine Landau ◽  
Gilly O’Reilly ◽  
Alice Sibelli ◽  
Stephanie Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Social Adjustment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of two modes of cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) for IBS compared with treatment as usual (TAU) in refractory IBS.DesignA three-arm randomised controlled trial assessing telephone-delivered CBT (TCBT), web-based CBT (WCBT) with minimal therapist support, and TAU. Blinding participants and therapists was not possible. Chief investigator, assessors and statisticians were blinded. Participants were adults with refractory IBS (clinically significant symptoms for ≥12 months despite first-line therapies), recruited by letter and opportunistically from 74 general practices and three gastroenterology centres in London and South of England between May 2014 to March 2016. Co-primary outcomes were IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) at 12 months.Results558/1452 (38.4%) patients screened for eligibility were randomised: 76% female: 91% white: mean age 43 years. (391/558) 70.1% completed 12 months of follow-up. Primary outcomes: Compared with TAU (IBS-SSS 205.6 at 12 months), IBS-SSS was 61.6 (95% CI 33.8 to 89.5) points lower (p<0.001) in TCBT and 35.2 (95% CI 12.6 to 57.8) points lower (p=0.002) in WCBT at 12 months. Compared with TAU (WSAS score 10.8 at 12 months) WSAS was 3.5 (95% CI 1.9 to 5.1) points lower (p<0.001) in TCBT and 3.0 (95% CI 1.3 to 4.6) points lower (p=0.001) in WCBT. All secondary outcomes showed significantly greater improvement (p≤0.002) in CBT arms compared with TAU. There were no serious adverse reactions to treatment.ConclusionBoth CBT interventions were superior to TAU up to 12 months of follow-up.Trial registration numberISRCTN44427879.

scholarly journals Physical exercise and internet-based cognitive–behavioural therapy in the treatment of depression: Randomised controlled trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 207 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mats Hallgren ◽  
Martin Kraepelien ◽  
Agneta öjehagen ◽  
Nils Lindefors ◽  
Zangin Zeebari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Exercise ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Medical Practitioner ◽  
Work Capacity ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
General Medical Practitioner ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Moderate Depression ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

BackgroundDepression is common and tends to be recurrent. Alternative treatments are needed that are non-stigmatising, accessible and can be prescribed by general medical practitioners.AimsTo compare the effectiveness of three interventions for depression: physical exercise, internet-based cognitive–behavioural therapy (ICBT) and treatment as usual (TAU). A secondary aim was to assess changes in self-rated work capacity.MethodA total of 946 patients diagnosed with mild to moderate depression were recruited through primary healthcare centres across Sweden and randomly assigned to one of three 12-week interventions (trail registry: KCTR study ID: KT20110063). Patients were reassessed at 3 months (response rate 78%).ResultsPatients in the exercise and ICBT groups reported larger improvements in depressive symptoms compared with TAU. Work capacity improved over time in all three groups (no significant differences).ConclusionsExercise and ICBT were more effective than TAU by a general medical practitioner, and both represent promising non-stigmatising treatment alternatives for patients with mild to moderate depression.

scholarly journals Group cognitive-behavioural therapy for schizophrenia

2006 ◽  
Vol 189 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Barrowclough ◽  
Gillian Haddock ◽  
Fiona Lobban ◽  
Steve Jones ◽  
Ron Siddle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Positive Symptom ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

BackgroundThe efficacy of cognitive–behavioural therapy for schizophrenia is established, but there is less evidence for a group format.AimsTo evaluate the effectiveness of group cognitive – behavioural therapy for schizophrenia.MethodIn all, 113 people with persistent positive symptoms of schizophrenia were assigned to receive group cognitive – behavioural therapy or treatment as usual. The primary outcome was positive symptom improvement on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales. Secondary outcome measures included symptoms, functioning, relapses, hopelessness and self-esteem.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the cognitive-behavioural therapy and treatment as usual on measures of symptoms or functioning or relapse, but group cognitive – behavioural therapy treatment resulted in reductions in feelings of hopelessness and in low self-esteem.ConclusionsAlthough group cognitive – behavioural therapy may not be the optimum treatment method for reducing hallucinations and delusions, it may have important benefits, including feeling less negative about oneself and less hopeless for the future.

scholarly journals Cognitive–behavioural therapy for refractory psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia resistant to atypical antipsychotic medication

2005 ◽  
Vol 186 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia R. Valmaggia ◽  
Mark van der Gaag ◽  
Nicholas Tarrier ◽  
Marieke Pijnenborg ◽  
Cees J. Slooff
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Psychotic Symptoms ◽  
Positive Symptoms ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Supportive Counselling ◽  
Treatment Refractory

BackgroundThere is increasing evidence that cognitive–behavioural therapy can be an effective intervention for patients experiencing drug-refractory positive symptoms of schizophrenia.AimsTo investigate the effects of cognitive–behavioural therapy on in-patients with treatment-refractory psychotic symptoms.MethodManualised therapy was compared with supportive counselling in a randomised controlled study. Both interventions were delivered by experienced psychologists over 16 sessions of treatment. Therapy fidelity was assessed by two independent raters. Participants underwent masked assessment at baseline, after treatment and at 6 months' follow-up. Main outcome measures were the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Psychotic Symptoms Rating Scale. The analysis was by intention to treat.ResultsParticipants receiving cognitive–behavioural therapy had improved with regard to auditory hallucinations and illness insight at the post-treatment assessment, but these findings were not maintained at follow-up.ConclusionsCognitive–behavioural therapy showed modest short-term benefits over supportive counselling for treatment-refractory positive symptoms of schizophrenia.

scholarly journals Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Nightmares for Patients with Persecutory Delusions (Nites): An Assessor-Blind, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
pp. 070674371984742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryony Sheaves ◽  
Emily A. Holmes ◽  
Stephanie Rek ◽  
Kathryn M. Taylor ◽  
Alecia Nickless ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Persecutory Delusions ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

Objective:Nightmares are relatively common in patients experiencing psychosis but rarely assessed or treated. Nightmares may maintain persecutory delusions by portraying fears in sensory-rich detail. We tested the potential benefits of imagery-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for nightmares on nightmare severity and persecutory delusions.Method:This assessor-blind parallel-group pilot trial randomized 24 participants with nightmares and persecutory delusions to receive CBT for nightmares delivered over 4 weeks in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Assessments were at 0, 4 (end of treatment), and 8 weeks (follow-up). Feasibility outcomes assessed therapy uptake, techniques used, satisfaction, and attrition. The primary efficacy outcome assessed nightmare severity at week 4. Analyses were intention to treat, estimating treatment effect with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results:All participants offered CBT completed therapy (mean [SD], 4.8 [0.6] sessions) with high satisfaction, and 20 (83%) participants completed all assessments. Compared with TAU, CBT led to large improvements in nightmares (adjusted mean difference = −7.0; 95% CI, –12.6 to –1.3; d = –1.1) and insomnia (6.3; 95% CI, 2.6 to 10.0; d = 1.4) at week 4. Gains were maintained at follow-up. Suicidal ideation was not exacerbated by CBT but remained stable to follow-up, compared with TAU, which reduced at follow-up (6.8; 95% CI, 0.3 to 3.3; d = 0.7). CBT led to reductions in paranoia (–20.8; 95% CI, –43.2 to 1.7; d = –0.6), although CIs were wide. Three serious adverse events were deemed unrelated to participation (CBT = 2, TAU = 1).Conclusions:CBT for nightmares is feasible and may be efficacious for treating nightmares and comorbid insomnia for patients with persecutory delusions. It shows promise on paranoia but potentially not on suicidal ideation.

scholarly journals Cognitive–behavioural therapy for anxiety in dementia: pilot randomised controlled trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 206 (6) ◽  
pp. 509-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimee Spector ◽  
Georgina Charlesworth ◽  
Michael King ◽  
Miles Lattimer ◽  
Susan Sadek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Effective Treatments

BackgroundAnxiety is common and problematic in dementia, yet there is a lack of effective treatments.AimsTo develop a cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) manual for anxiety in dementia and determine its feasibility through a randomised controlled trial.MethodA ten-session CBT manual was developed. Participants with dementia and anxiety (and their carers) were randomly allocated to CBT plus treatment as usual (TAU) (n= 25) or TAU (n= 25). Outcome and cost measures were administered at baseline, 15 weeks and 6 months.ResultsAt 15 weeks, there was an adjusted difference in anxiety (using the Rating Anxiety in Dementia scale) of (–3.10, 95% CI −6.55 to 0.34) for CBT compared with TAU, which just fell short of statistical significance. There were significant improvements in depression at 15 weeks after adjustment (–5.37, 95% CI −9.50 to −1.25). Improvements remained significant at 6 months. CBT was cost neutral.ConclusionsCBT was feasible (in terms of recruitment, acceptability and attrition) and effective. A fully powered RCT is now required.

scholarly journals Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Auditory Hallucinations: Effectiveness and Predictors of Outcome in a Specialist Clinic

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Thomas ◽  
Susan Rossell ◽  
John Farhall ◽  
Frances Shawyer ◽  
David Castle
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Auditory Hallucinations ◽  
Psychotic Symptoms ◽  
Predictors Of Outcome ◽  
Formal Thought Disorder ◽  
Behavioural Treatment ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy has been established as an effective treatment for residual psychotic symptoms but a substantial proportion of people do not benefit from this treatment. There has been little direct study of predictors of outcome, particularly in treatment targeting auditory hallucinations. Method: The Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS) and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were administered pre- and post-therapy to 33 people with schizophrenia-related disorders receiving CBT for auditory hallucinations in a specialist clinic. Outcome was compared with pre-therapy measures of insight, beliefs about the origin of hallucinations, negative symptoms and cognitive disorganization. Results: There were significant improvements post-treatment on the PSYRATS and PANSS Positive and General Scales. Improvement on the PSYRATS was associated with lower levels of negative symptoms, but was unrelated to overall insight, delusional conviction regarding the origins of hallucinations, or levels of cognitive disorganization. Conclusions: Lack of insight and presence of formal thought disorder do not preclude effective cognitive-behavioural treatment of auditory hallucinations. There is a need to further understand why negative symptoms may present a barrier to therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document