scholarly journals Acute effects of treatment for prodromal symptoms for people putatively in a late initial prodromal state of psychosis

2007 ◽  
Vol 191 (S51) ◽  
pp. s88-s95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Ruhrmann ◽  
Andreas Bechdolf ◽  
Kai-Uwe Kühn ◽  
Michael Wagner ◽  
Frauke Schultze-Lutter ◽  
...  

BackgroundPeople in a putatively late prodromal state not only have an enhanced risk for psychosis but already suffer from mental and functional disturbancesAimsTo evaluate the acute effects of a combined supportive and antipsychotic treatment on prodromal symptomsMethodPutatively prodromal individuals were randomly assigned to a needs-focused intervention without (n=59) or with amisulpride (n=65). Outcome measures at 12-weeks effects were prodromal symptoms, global functioning and extrapyramidal side-effectsResultsAmisulpride plus the needs-focused intervention produced superior effects on attenuated and full-blown psychotic symptoms, basic, depressive and negative symptoms, and global functioning. Main side-effects were prolactin associatedConclusionsCoadministration of amisulpride yielded a marked symptomatic benefit. Effects require confirmation by a placebo-controlled study

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (S1) ◽  
pp. 5s-8s
Author(s):  
GP Reynolds

SummaryRecent advances in antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia have offered several new compounds which avoid many of the limitations of the classical antipsychotics. These so-called ‘atypical’ antipsychotics have fewer extrapyramidal side effects, greater efficacy against negative symptoms and greater efficacy in otherwise treatment-resistant patients. However, the mechanism of action of these atypical antipsychotics is still unclear. The several receptors currently implicated in the pharmacological profile of these atypical antipsychotics include subtypes of those for dopamine, serotonin, noradrenaline, and acetylcholine among others. The current hypotheses for possible mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotics are discussed along with the experimental correlates of antipsychotic efficacy in animal models.


2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
C Seller ◽  
L Koen ◽  
D J H Niehaus

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug indicated for the management of severely ill patients with schizophrenia who fail to respond adequately to standard antipsychotic treatment. It has demonstrated superior efficacy in treating both the positive and negative symptoms in treatment-refractory cases. It also has the added benefit of causing minimal extrapyramidal side- effects, producing no tardive dyskinesia and having little effect on prolactin levels


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S188-S188
Author(s):  
Lucie Metivier ◽  
Anais Vandevelde

Abstract Background Schizophrenia is a common and severe mental disorder. The actual treatment is neuroleptic. Clozapine (CLZ), the atypical antipsychotic leader, is the best treatment of the resistant schizophrenia. Neuroimaging studies are important to understand better the neurological effects of CLZ. The main goal of this study is to analyze actual data of anatomic imaging studies (MRI, DTI, fMRI, PET and SPECT), evaluate CLZ anatomical and functional brain effect on patients suffering resistant schizophrenia (SZ) in order to characterize the mode of action of CLZ, identify the neural bases of the CLZ treatment response and establish the link between the mode of action and CLZ and the treatment response on patients suffering resistant SZ. Methods We have analyzed literature using PUBMED database with the following keywords: « clozapine », « neuroimaging », »MRI », « DTI », « VBM », « functional magnetic resonnance imaging », « PET », « fMRI », « SPECT ». Results 51 studies were included. 10 on anatomical imagery and 41 on functional imagery. From an anatomic point of view, studies suggest best cerebral integrity on patients with CLZ treatment compared to other antipsychotics, on grey nuclei, prefrontal cortex and on white matter beams belonging to the fronto sub cortical network. LEROUX et col, OCZELIK et col. From the functional point of view, studies show a functional connectivity modulation and an action on the cerebral metabolism MOLINA et col, especially in the frontal cortex of patients that respond to CLZ treatment compared to patients who have received another antipsychotic treatment. The PET and SPECT studies show the CLZ action mechanism especially on the glutamatergic system FUKUYAMA et col. Concerning CLZ-treated patients’ response, many studies have shown a larger perfusion on the frontal cortex and thalamic region on patient responding to CLZ compared non-responders. MOLINA et col, ERTUGUL et col. About clinical evolution, the longitudinal studies show an amelioration of the psychotic symptoms (positive symptoms, negative symptoms, suicidal risk and cognitive alteration) on CLZ-treated patients compared than the ones who have been treated with another antispychotic. ARANGO et col, MOLINA et col. CLZ treatment allows a decrease of craving on patients who suffer cannabis usage disorders compared with patients who are treated with risperidone. MACHIELSEN et col. Discussion These results bring a new light on SZ psychopathological, on CLZ cerebral mechanism and open the debate of actual prescription recommendations. However, we won’t conclude with certainly due heterogeneity of the experimental design, as other studies are necessary to complete knowledge of this subject.


Author(s):  
Yu-Tao Xiang ◽  
Julie Kreyenbuhl ◽  
Faith B. Dickerson ◽  
Gabor S. Ungvari ◽  
Chuan‑Yue Wang ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.M. Leweke ◽  
D. Koethe ◽  
F. Pahlisch ◽  
D. Schreiber ◽  
C.W. Gerth ◽  
...  

Background:In contrast to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the phytocannabinoid cannabidiol does not exert psychotomimetic effects. Cannabidiol was suggested a re-uptake inhibitor of anandamide and potential antipsychotic properties have been hypothesized for it. We therefore performed a clinical trial to investigate thesis hypothesis and to clarify the underlying link to the neurobiology of schizophrenia.Methods:We performed an explorative, 4-week, double-blind, controlled clinical trial on the effects of purified cannabidiol in acute schizophrenia compared to the antipsychotic amisulpride. The antipsychotic properties of both drugs were the primary target of the study. Furthermore, side-effects and anxiolytic capabilities of both treatments were investigated.Results:42 patients fulfilling DSM-IV criteria of acute paranoid schizophrenia participated in the study. Both treatments were associated with a significant decrease of psychotic symptoms after 2 and 4 weeks as assessed by BPRS and PANSS. However, there was no statistical difference between both treatment groups. In contrast, cannabidiol induced significantly less side effects (EPS, increase in prolactin, weight gain) when compared to amisulpride.Conclusions:Cannabidiol revealed substantial antipsychotic properties in acute schizophrenia. This is in line with our suggestion of an adaptive role of the endocannabinoid system in paranoid schizophrenia, and raises further evidence that this adaptive mechanism may represent a valuable target for antipsychotic treatment strategies.The Stanley Medical Research Institute (00-093 to FML) and the Koeln Fortune Program (107/2000 + 101/2001 to FML) funded this study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s822-s822
Author(s):  
I. Martínez Molina ◽  
N. Gómez-Coronado Suárez de Venegas ◽  
P. Blanco Ramón

IntroductionAripiprazole depot is an atypical antipshycotic used to treat positive and negative symptoms of psychosis or acute mania.AimDescribe the reason why psychiatrists switch the current antipsychotic treatment on to aripiprazol depot, its tolerability and the reasons to stop aripiprazol depot treatment.MethodsDescriptive analysis based on a sample of 37 patients, aged 18–65 years, treated during one year with antipsychotics at two community mental health units.ResultsSwitching on to aripiprazole depot principal reasons: promote adherence (25%), persistence of symptoms (25%) and high levels of prolactin or sexual dysfunction (16.66%):– side effects of aripiprazole depot: insomnia (11.11%), inquietude (8.33%), sexual dysfunction (2.77%) and hypertensive crisis during administration (2.77%);– 83.33% of the patients are still taking it after one year. The most common reasons to stop or change it were the presence of secondaries (11.11%) and clinical exacerbation (5.55%).ConclusionsAripiprazole depot is well tolerated (even better than other antipsychotics). Common side effects are not severe and appear in a small percent of patients.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Gene Reports ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 100717
Author(s):  
T.V. Zhilyaeva ◽  
E.V. Akimova ◽  
A.V. Sergeeva ◽  
A.S. Blagonravova ◽  
G.E. Mazo

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1818-1818 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.L. Bakken ◽  
H. Martinsen ◽  
S. Friis ◽  
S. Lovoll ◽  
D.E. Eilertsen

IntroductionIn adults with intellectual disability and autism, psychosis is rarely detected due to misinterpretation of psychotic symptoms being autism or idiosyncratic communication. The patients can poorly communicate the delusions and hallucinations they experience. Observable indicators are therefore necessary.ObjectivesTo establish reliable and valid behavioural indicators of psychosis in adults with intellectual disability and autism.AimsThe aim was to investigate behavioural indicators of psychosis in adults with intellectual disability and autism.MethodsForty-three patients with intellectual disability and autism from a hospital-based study were recruited. Eight of these patients were assessed as having schizophrenia-like psychosis. They were further examined through a case-report study. Both statistical analysis and data from the case reports were included. Case report data were compared with scores from a validation study of the Psychopathology in Autism Checklist, PAC.ResultsBehavioural disorganisation, severe decreased global functioning, suspected hallucinations and decreased sociability were observed in the eight psychotic patients. The level of disorganisation was significantly higher in the psychotic patients than in the non-psychotic patients - this included patients with “plain” autism. Adequate treatment significantly decreased the level of disorganised behaviour.ConclusionsDisorganised behaviour, occurring concurrent with disorganised speech, severe decreased global functioning, suspected hallucinations and negative symptoms, were found to be reliable and valid indicators of psychosis.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 324-324
Author(s):  
M. Marin Mayor ◽  
N. Martinez Martin ◽  
E. Verdura Vizcaino ◽  
R.A. Codesal Julian

IntroductionChildhood or Early Onset Schizophrenia (EOS), defined as the onset of psychotic symptoms before the thirteenth birthday, represents a rare, clinically severe variant, associated with significant chronic functional impairment and poor response to antipsychotic treatment. Despite of that, in clinical practice, atypical agents have become the treatment of choice in patients with EOS.AimsTo review the different pharmacological strategies, in which an atypical antipsychotic was used in the management of EOS in childhood and adolescence.MethodsWe conducted a literature search of articles related to the use of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents with EOS in the last 20 years from the Medline database.ResultsSeveral atypical antipsychotics, such as Risperidone, Olanzapine, Quetiapine, Aripiprazol and Clozapine were consistently found to reduce the severity of psychotic symptoms in EOS when compared to placebo. Although Clozapine has demonstrated to be more efficacious than other atypical and typical antipsychotics, it remains the medication of last resort due to its profile of side effects. Finally, in general, children and adolescent have a higher risk of extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, prolactin elevation, sedation and metabolic effects of atypical antipsychotics than adults.ConclusionsAntipsychotics are the mainstay of treatment of EOS. Randomized controlled trials suggest a trend to superior efficacy for atypical antipsychotics over classic antipsychotic. Children and adolescents trend to be more sensible to antipsychotic side effects. Clinicians should be aware of this problem and be careful when monitoring this type of treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document