scholarly journals Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors: use in depression

1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 737-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. N. Ferrier ◽  
T. Silverstone ◽  
D. Eccleston

This short review outlines the clinical profile of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs). There has been much recent publicity and promotion of this group of drugs and this review attempts to give a balanced account of their current place in the treatment of depression. Although a large number of preclinical and clinical trials have been carried out many questions and problems remain – it is important to proceed carefully and carry out (and replicate) controlled independent clinical trials. The views of general psychiatrists and GPs about these drugs in normal clinical practice will be the acid test – this will be particularly important in view of their cost.

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 601-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Alderman ◽  
James D. Hundertmark ◽  
Tanya W. Soetratma

Objective: To report two cases of perhexiline toxicity associated with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment. Clinical picture: Serum perhexiline concentrations progressively increased after a 69-year-old man was concurrently prescribed paroxetine for the treatment of depression. An 84-year-old woman was admitted to hospital with severe, symptomatic perhexiline toxicity associated with fluoxetine treatment. Treatment: In both cases, perhexiline therapy was suspended and treatment with SSRIs was withdrawn. Outcome: Serum perhexiline concentrations declined following the withdrawal of paroxetine in one case, but in the case of the second patient perhexiline concentrations were extremely slow to decrease, resulting in referral to a rehabilitative care unit for convalescence. Conclusions: Serum perhexiline concentrations may be elevated during concurrent treatment with SSRIs, potentially resulting in severe toxicity.


1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 782-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence J Cohen ◽  
Sally K Guthrie

OBJECTIVE: To present an overview and evaluation of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of depression. INTRODUCTION: One responsibility of the AHCPR is the development and periodic review and update of clinical practice guidelines. This process is undertaken by an independent panel composed of groups of clinicians and other experts from the private sector. Their findings are published in a four-volume, softcover set of booklets. DATA SOURCE AND EVALUATION: Volume 2 in the four-volume set includes a comprehensive compilation, synthesis, and critical evaluation of the studies of different treatments for depression. Studies included for evaluation were randomized, prospective clinical trials that were pertinent to all topics concerning the treatment of depression. In some areas, the opinions of the panel were included due to a paucity of data from well-controlled clinical trials. Each AHCPR guideline was followed by a code that indicated whether the strength of evidence supporting that guideline was based on good or fair research-based evidence, or whether it was based primarily on panel members' opinions. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to drug treatment, the guidelines are good. However, since these guidelines were published in 1993 they might be considered somewhat dated because more antidepressants have become available in the interim. Overall, the AHCPR guidelines reflect an extensive review of the literature provided by the panel, as well as input from a highly respected group of reviewers. The panel included physicians, a nurse, a social worker, a psychologist, and a consumer representative. Unfortunately, a pharmacist was not included on the panel. Input from pharmacy practitioners would have been valuable.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Anding Xu ◽  
Zefeng Tan ◽  
◽  

Hypertension is the most important of the prevalent and modifiable risk factors for stroke. Based on evidence, blood pressure (BP) lowering is recommended in guidelines for the prevention of stroke. However, there are still some uncertainties in the guidelines for controlling BP and preventing stroke in patients with previous cerebrovascular events, such as the goal BP, who to treat and which class of BP-lowering drugs to use. This article discusses these questions by reviewing guidelines and corresponding clinical trials, with the aim of reducing the gap between guidelines and clinical practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 777-784
Author(s):  
David Korman

Monoclonal antibody (MAB) conjugates with cytostatic agents (ADC) are intended for selective delivery of a cytostatic agent to a tumor cell. Three ADC have been approved for clinical use (gemtuzumab ozogamicin, brentuximab vedotin, trastuzumab-DM1); a few dozens of other ADC are undergoing clinical trials. Several derivatives of natural substances (antibiotics and inhibitors of microtubules) having a high antitumor activity are used as cytostatic agents included in ADC. They are inapplicable in clinical practice as self-sustained drugs due to their considerable toxicity. Of great importance for the implementation of the ADC effect is the character of a linker connecting MAB with a cytostatic agent and ensuring selective intracellular release after ADC internalization. The structure, mechanisms of action, and the results of clinical trials of a number of ADC are considered here as an illustration (by way of example). The development of ADC can help introduce new effective cytostatic agents into clinical practice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeid Noohi ◽  
André Do ◽  
Dominique Elie ◽  
Artin A. Mahdanian ◽  
Ching Yu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Thiago Bosco Mendes ◽  
◽  
Iago Navas Perissinotti

Author(s):  
Nina Zila ◽  
Christoph Hoeller ◽  
Verena Paulitschke

SummaryIn malignant diseases, targeting of immune checkpoints successfully changed the therapeutic landscape and helped to unleash anti-tumor T cell responses, resulting in durable clinical outcomes, but only in up to 50% of patients. The success of these therapies and the need to overcome intrinsic and acquired therapy resistance stimulated research to identify new pathways and targets. Numerous clinical trials are currently evaluating novel checkpoint inhibitors or recently developed strategies like modulating the tumor microenvironment, mostly in combination with approved therapies. This short review briefly discusses promising therapeutic targets, currently still under investigation, with the chance to realize clinical application in the foreseeable future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document