Interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cell therapy of solid tumors: analysis of toxicity and management guidelines.

1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
K A Margolin ◽  
A A Rayner ◽  
M J Hawkins ◽  
M B Atkins ◽  
J P Dutcher ◽  
...  

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Extramural IL2/LAK Working Group treated 93 patients with 114 cycles of high-dose intravenous (IV) interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells in three phase II trials. Thirty-six patients had metastatic melanoma, 35 had metastatic renal cell cancer, and 22 had colorectal cancer. All patients had a Karnofsky performance status greater than or equal to 80% and normal laboratory tests and organ function, and had received no more than one prior form of immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Objective responders were eligible to receive up to two additional courses of therapy at 12-week intervals. The most frequent toxicities were a capillary leak syndrome resulting in marked extravascular fluid shifts, and hypotension requiring treatment with large volumes of IV fluids and vasopressor agents. Laboratory and clinical evidence of hepatic and renal dysfunction were virtually universal. Intensive care-level support was routinely provided and the toxicity observations confirmed the need for this level of care. The life-threatening toxicities were cardiac and pulmonary. Five of the 27 patients who experienced significant respiratory compromise required intubation and mechanical ventilatory support. Twenty patients developed cardiac arrhythmias, the majority of which were supraventricular. There was a single episode of ventricular tachycardia requiring cardioversion. Four patients had transient cardiac ischemia, and an additional four had myocardial infarctions, one of which was fatal. With these exceptions, all toxicities were rapidly reversible. The occurrence of only a single therapy-related death and a very low incidence of other irreversible or life-threatening events is comparable to the level of toxicities often observed in other phase II trials. Although the intensity of this regimen limits this approach to a subset of cancer patients with excellent performance status and adequate organ function, because of the frequency and apparent durability of complete responses, this treatment warrants further investigation.

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 2292-2298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Sosman ◽  
Carole Carrillo ◽  
Walter J. Urba ◽  
Lawrence Flaherty ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
...  

Purpose High-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) induces responses in 15% to 20% of patients with advanced melanoma; 5% to 8% are durable complete responses (CRs). The HLA-A2–restricted, modified gp100 peptide (210M) induces T-cell immunity in vivo and has little antitumor activity but, combined with high-dose IL-2, reportedly has a 42% (13 of 31 patients) response rate (RR). We evaluated 210M with one of three different IL-2 schedules to determine whether a basis exists for a phase III trial. Patients and Methods In three separate phase II trials, patients with melanoma received 210M subcutaneously during weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10 and standard high-dose IL-2 during weeks 1 and 3 (trial 1), weeks 7 and 9 (trial 2), or weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10 (trial 3). Immune assays were performed on peripheral-blood mononuclear cells collected before and after treatment. Results From 1998 to 2003, 131 patients with HLA-A2–positive were enrolled. With 60-month median follow-up time, the overall RR for 121 assessable patients was 16.5% (95% CI, 10% to 26%); the RRs were 23.8% in trial 1 (42 patients), 12.5% in trial 2 (40 patients), and 12.8% in trial 3 (39 patients). There were 11 CRs (9%) and nine partial responses (7%), with 11 patients (9%) progression free at ≥ 30 months. Immune studies including assays of CD3-ζ expression and numbers of CD4+/CD25+/FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, CD15+/CD11b+/CD14– immature myeloid-derived cells, and CD8+gp100 tetramer-positive cells in the blood did not correlate with clinical benefit. Conclusion The results again demonstrate efficacy of high-dose IL-2 in advanced melanoma but did not demonstrate the promising clinical activity reported with vaccine and high-dose IL-2 in any of three phase II trials.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13516-13516 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Messmann ◽  
R. Amato ◽  
J. Hernandez-McClain ◽  
B. Conley ◽  
H. Rogers ◽  
...  

13516 Background: FolateImmune is a folate-receptor (FR)-targeted immunotherapy that induces an immune response against tumor cells by marking them with a folate-hapten conjugate. The conjugate is specifically designed to target FR, which is over-expressed in a variety of cancers. FolateImmune therapy is comprised of a vaccine fluorescein conjugate (EC90), an adjuvant (GP-0100), and a folate-hapten conjugate (EC17). Patients (pts) receive a series of subcutaneous (SQ) injections of EC90 vaccine to stimulate the production of antibodies to the fluorescein-hapten, followed by SQ injections of EC17, which forms a molecular bridge between the tumor cell and the endogenous circulating anti-fluorescein IgG antibody. This is thought to initiate an Fc-mediated immune response leading to antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and/or phagocytosis. IL-2 and IFN are utilized at low doses (7 MIU and 3 MIU, respectively) to further promote an immune response. The Phase Ib objective is to determine the safety of EC90 vaccine/EC17 folate-targeted therapy in combination with IL-2 and IFN. The previous phase I trial explored the safety of FolateImmune without cytokines. Methods: This phase 1b safety study treated eligible patients with FolateImmune therapy at dose levels of 1.2 mg EC90 and EC17 of 0.3 mg/kg. Results: As of Jan 2, 2007, all patients have tolerated therapy without significant toxicity. Grade 1–2 toxicity included: chills, fever, and nausea. One patient has had a minor response and continues on study. Laboratory studies revealed decline in circulating FR+ cells. Of 6 pts enrolled, 5 had a pathologic classification of renal cell cancer (RCC). Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest that FolateImmune therapy, with the addition of low dose cytokines, may be administered in a safe and well-tolerated manner. Phase II trials are planned for RCC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 3127-3132 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Yang ◽  
Richard M. Sherry ◽  
Seth M. Steinberg ◽  
Suzanne L. Topalian ◽  
Douglas J. Schwartzentruber ◽  
...  

Purpose: This three-arm randomized study compares response rates and overall survival of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) receiving high-dose or one of two low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) regimens. Patients and Methods: Patients with measurable metastatic RCC and a good performance status were randomized to receive either 720,000 U/kg (high-dose [HD]) or 72,000 U/kg (low-dose [LD]), both given by intravenous (IV) bolus every 8 hours. After randomly assigning 117 patients, a third arm of low-dose daily subcutaneous IL-2 was added, and an additional 283 patients were randomly assigned. Results: A total of 156 patients were randomly assigned to HD IV IL-2, and 150 patients to LD IV IL-2. Toxicities were less frequent with LD IV IL-2 (especially hypotension), but there were no IL-2-related deaths in any arm. There was a higher response proportion with HD IV IL-2 (21%) versus LD IV IL-2 (13%; P = .048) but no overall survival difference. The response rate of subcutaneous IL-2 (10%, partial response and complete response) was similar to that of LD IV IL-2, differing from HD IV (P = .033). Response durability and survival in completely responding patients was superior with HD IV compared with LD IV therapy (P = .04). Conclusion: Major tumor regressions, as well as complete responses, were seen with all regimens tested. IL-2 was more clinically active at maximal doses, although this did not produce an overall survival benefit. The immunological factors which constrain the curative potential of IL-2 to only a small percentage of patients need to be further elucidated.


1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 641-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Dutcher ◽  
E R Gaynor ◽  
D H Boldt ◽  
J H Doroshow ◽  
M H Bar ◽  
...  

Thirty-three patients with metastatic melanoma were treated in a phase II study with an intravenous continuous infusion (IVCI) of interleukin-2 (IL2) given with lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells. The dose of IL2 was the optimal priming dose for LAK-cell induction, followed by the maximally tolerated LAK-cell dose that could be given by an IVCI schedule as determined by a previous phase I trial. The CI schedule was chosen for evaluation because of a postulated reduction in toxicity with the possibility of administering a more prolonged IL2 infusion and because greater rebound lymphocytosis and LAK-cell generation had been reported using this dose and schedule. The 33 patients were similar in age, performance status, and sites of disease to those treated in previous IL2 trials. All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. One patient (3%) achieved a partial response of 10 months duration. There were no other clinically significant responses. Significant toxicity included hypotension requiring pressors (45%), dyspnea (36%), renal insufficiency (24%), hepatic dysfunction (66%), and cardiac arrhythmias (18%). These toxicities reversed with cessation of the infusion. There were four deaths during the first 30 days of treatment, three from infection (one related to central line, one related to LAK cells, one related to tumor), and one from tumor-related hemorrhage. Toxicity was unexpectedly high and at least comparable to that seen in previous studies using a high-dose IV bolus schedule of IL2. When comparing the IVCI schedule with high-dose bolus IL2 to LAK cells in nonrandomized but sequential studies in patients with advanced melanoma, it appears that CI IL2 is less efficacious.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7088-7088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kim ◽  
K. Goto ◽  
Y. Nishiwaki ◽  
K. Kubota ◽  
H. Omatsu ◽  
...  

7088 Background: There is no standard treatment for relapsed SCLC. Irinotecan and etoposide has been studied in several phase II trials as active agents for relapsed SCLC. We reported the efficacy and tolerability of irinotecan combined with weekly cisplatin and etoposide (PE) in patients (pts) with sensitive relapsed SCLC (Goto, et al. Br J Cancer 2005). Methods: We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of PE/CPT regimen in pts with refractory relapsed SCLC, who had relapsed within 8 weeks after completion of first-line therapy. Pts must have measurable or assessable disease, age of 75 years or younger, performance status of 0 to 2 (ECOG), and adequate organ function. PE/CPT regimen consisted of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on day 1 at one-week intervals for 9 weeks (at least 6 weeks), etoposide 60 mg/m2 on days 1–3 on week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 (at least on week 1, 3, 5), and irinotecan 90 mg/m2 on day 1 on weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 (at least on week 2, 4, 6). After day 1 on week 2, G-CSF was administered on days when cytotoxic drugs were not given. Results: From May 2000 to January 2005, 30 pts were enrolled in this study. Pt characteristics were median age 64 years (range 44–75); 23 male and 7 female; 3 LD and 27 ED. Prior chemotherapy included PE in 13 pts, cisplatin and irinotecan in 7, carboplatin and etoposide in 5, and others in 5. 23 pts (77%) completed 6 or more weeks of chemotherapy. 2 CR and 19 PR were observed and the overall response rate was 70% (95% CI 50.6–85.3%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 60%, 73% and 47%, respectively. Grade 3/4 diarrhea was observed in only 7%. Coclusions: PE/CPT regimen was active and well tolerated for refractory relapsed SCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert O. Dillman ◽  
Neil M. Barth ◽  
Louis A. VanderMolen ◽  
Warren H. Fong ◽  
Khosrow K. Mahdavi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Vickers ◽  
Joyce Kuo ◽  
Barrie R. Cassileth

Purpose A substantial number of cancer patients turn to treatments other than those recommended by mainstream oncologists in an effort to sustain tumor remission or halt the spread of cancer. These unconventional approaches include botanicals, high-dose nutritional supplementation, off-label pharmaceuticals, and animal products. The objective of this study was to review systematically the methodologies applied in clinical trials of unconventional treatments specifically for cancer. Methods MEDLINE 1966 to 2005 was searched using approximately 200 different medical subject heading terms (eg, alternative medicine) and free text words (eg, laetrile). We sought prospective clinical trials of unconventional treatments in cancer patients, excluding studies with only symptom control or nonclinical (eg, immune) end points. Trial data were extracted by two reviewers using a standardized protocol. Results We identified 14,735 articles, of which 214, describing 198 different clinical trials, were included. Twenty trials were phase I, three were phase I and II, 70 were phase II, and 105 were phase III. Approximately half of the trials investigated fungal products, 20% investigated other botanicals, 10% investigated vitamins and supplements, and 10% investigated off-label pharmaceuticals. Only eight of the phase I trials were dose-finding trials, and a mere 20% of phase II trials reported a statistical design. Of the 27 different agents tested in phase III, only one agent had a prior dose-finding trial, and only for three agents was the definitive study initiated after the publication of phase II data. Conclusion Unconventional cancer treatments have not been subject to appropriate early-phase trial development. Future research on unconventional therapies should involve dose-finding and phase II studies to determine the suitability of definitive trials.


1989 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 111-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Stoter ◽  
S.D. Fosså ◽  
C. Rugarli ◽  
M. Symann ◽  
C. Jasmin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document