Adjuvant CMFVP versus adjuvant CMFVP plus ovariectomy for premenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
S E Rivkin ◽  
S Green ◽  
J O'Sullivan ◽  
A B Cruz ◽  
M D Abeloff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Premenopausal Patients ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To determine whether the addition of surgical ovariectomy to standard chemotherapy prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred fourteen premenopausal patients with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled between July 1979 and July 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive either of the following: (1) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (2) bilateral ovariectomy followed by CMFVP. RESULTS The median follow-up time is 7.7 years and the maximum 13.2 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (one-sided log-rank, P = .55 and .70, respectively). The 7-year survival rate is 71% on the CMFVP arm and 73% on CMFVP plus ovariectomy. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. CONCLUSION We conclude that, in this study, the addition of ovariectomy did not improve results over chemotherapy alone in the treatment of premenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer. Our sample size was too small to detect a small improvement. The death hazards ratio of CMFVP/CMFVP plus ovariectomy was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], .79 to 1.89).

Adjuvant CMFVP versus tamoxifen versus concurrent CMFVP and tamoxifen for postmenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2078-2085 ◽  
Author(s):  
S E Rivkin ◽  
S Green ◽  
B Metch ◽  
A B Cruz ◽  
M D Abeloff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Southwest Oncology Group ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To compare chemohormonal therapy, chemotherapy alone, and hormonal therapy alone in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes with respect to survival and disease-free survival (DFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eight hundred ninety-two postmenopausal women with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) from July 1979 to March 1989 and 74 by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) between June 1987 and March 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive the following: (1) tamoxifen 10 mg twice daily by mouth for 1 year; (2) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 IV weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone during weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (3) the combination of tamoxifen and CMFVP. RESULTS The median follow-up duration is 6.5 years, with a maximum of 12.8 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (log-rank, 2 df, P = .82 and .23, respectively). The 5-year survival rate is 77% for the tamoxifen arm, 78% for CMFVP, and 75% for the combination. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. Severe or worse toxicity was experienced by 56% of patients on CMFVP and 61% on CMFVP plus tamoxifen, compared with 5% on tamoxifen alone. CONCLUSION CMFVP chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with tamoxifen, has not been shown to be superior to tamoxifen alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer.

Chemotherapy versus tamoxifen versus chemotherapy plus tamoxifen in node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: results of a multicentric Italian study. Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemo-Hormone Therapy Cooperative Group.

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1310-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Boccardo ◽  
A Rubagotti ◽  
P Bruzzi ◽  
M Cappellini ◽  
G Isola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Tamoxifen Treatment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Between November 1, 1983 and June 30, 1987, 510 node-positive, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients have been randomly allocated to receive either chemotherapy (six intravenous [IV] cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil [CMF] courses followed by four IV epirubicin courses) or 5 years of tamoxifen treatment or a combination of both therapies. After a median follow-up of 40 months, patients receiving the combined treatment achieved the best results, and those treated with chemotherapy alone achieved the worst, the difference being particularly evident in postmenopausal women. However, while the concurrent use of chemotherapy and tamoxifen did improve the results achieved by chemotherapy alone, particularly in postmenopausal women and in those with four or more involved nodes, it did not significantly improve the results achieved by tamoxifen alone, particularly in patients with higher ER tumor concentrations. Side effects were more numerous and more severe in patients receiving chemotherapy (with or without tamoxifen). Our findings, although still preliminary, confirm that tamoxifen should be the treatment of choice for postmenopausal breast cancer patients with node-positive, ER-positive tumors. In addition, the findings suggest that tamoxifen may represent a safe alternative to chemotherapy (at least to the cytotoxic regimen we used) for younger women, provided they have ER-positive tumors. In patients with ER-positive tumors, the addition of chemotherapy to tamoxifen does not seem to improve significantly the effectiveness of tamoxifen alone.

Goserelin Versus Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil as Adjuvant Therapy in Premenopausal Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (24) ◽  
pp. 4628-4635 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Jonat ◽  
M. Kaufmann ◽  
W. Sauerbrei ◽  
R. Blamey ◽  
J. Cuzick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Research ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Association Study ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Research Association ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Premenopausal Patients ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: Current adjuvant therapies have improved survival for premenopausal patients with breast cancer but may have short-term toxic effects and long-term effects associated with premature menopause. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days for 2 years; n = 817) versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy (six 28-day cycles; n = 823) for adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. RESULTS: Analysis was performed when 684 events had been achieved, and the median follow-up was 6 years. A significant interaction between treatment and estrogen receptor (ER) status was found (P = .0016). In ER-positive patients (approximately 74%), goserelin was equivalent to CMF for disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.20). In ER-negative patients, goserelin was inferior to CMF for DFS (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.44). Amenorrhea occurred in more than 95% of goserelin patients by 6 months versus 58.6% of CMF patients. Menses returned in most goserelin patients after therapy stopped, whereas amenorrhea was generally permanent in CMF patients (22.6% v 76.9% amenorrheic at 3 years). Chemotherapy-related side effects such as nausea/vomiting, alopecia, and infection were higher with CMF than with goserelin during CMF treatment. Side effects related to estrogen suppression were initially higher with goserelin, but when goserelin treatment stopped, reduced to a level below that observed in the CMF group. CONCLUSION: Goserelin offers an effective, well-tolerated alternative to CMF in premenopausal patients with ER-positive and node-positive early breast cancer.

Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with tamoxifen for node-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1385-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Node Positive Disease ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Risk Of Relapse

PURPOSE Adjuvant tamoxifen has been shown to reduce relapse and mortality among node-positive post-menopausal breast cancer patients. The value of adding chemotherapy to tamoxifen is controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between July 1986 and April 1993, 1,266 postmenopausal breast cancer patients with node-positive disease were randomly assigned to receive one of four adjuvant therapy regimens: (A) tamoxifen alone for 5 years; (B) tamoxifen plus three courses of early cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) on months 1, 2, and 3; (C) tamoxifen plus delayed single courses of CMF on months 9, 12, and 15; (D) tamoxifen plus early and delayed CMF on months 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 15. The two-by-two factorial design allowed two direct comparisons: early CMF (B and D) versus no early CMF (A and C), and delayed CMF (C and D) versus no delayed CMF (A and B). Estrogen receptor (ER) status was known for all patients and was used to stratify the randomization. A total of 1, 212 patients (96%) were eligible and assessable. The median follow-up duration was 60 months. RESULTS The results of the two-by-two factorial comparisons were as follows: (1) early CMF added to tamoxifen significantly improved 5-year disease-free survival (DFS; 64% v 57%; hazards ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.95; P = .01); and (2) delayed CMF added to tamoxifen did not improve DFS (5-year DFS, 61% v 60%; HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.17; P = .77). For patients with ER-positive tumors, the addition of CMF, either early or delayed or both, reduced the relative risk of relapse by 22% to 36%. In contrast, for patients with ER-negative tumors, tamoxifen with delayed CMF was associated with a nonsignificant increased risk of relapse (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.76; P = .15). CONCLUSION Postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer should be offered combination chemotherapy in addition to tamoxifen. Tamoxifen should not be initiated before CMF, as this might be detrimental, especially for patients with ER-negative tumors.

scholarly journals ESR1-Stabilizing Long Noncoding RNA TMPO-AS1 Promotes Hormone-Refractory Breast Cancer Progression

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (23) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Mitobe ◽  
Kazuhiro Ikeda ◽  
Takashi Suzuki ◽  
Kiyoshi Takagi ◽  
Hidetaka Kawabata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Long Noncoding Rna ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

ABSTRACT Acquired endocrine therapy resistance is a significant clinical problem for breast cancer patients. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) as a critical modulator for cancer progression. Based on RNA-sequencing data of breast invasive carcinomas in The Cancer Genome Atlas database, we identified thymopoietin antisense transcript 1 (TMPO-AS1) as a functional lncRNA that significantly correlates with proliferative biomarkers. TMPO-AS1 positivity analyzed by in situ hybridization significantly correlates with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients. TMPO-AS1 expression was upregulated in endocrine therapy-resistant MCF-7 cells compared with levels in parental cells and was estrogen inducible. Gain and loss of TMPO-AS1 experiments showed that TMPO-AS1 promotes the proliferation and viability of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Global expression analysis using a microarray demonstrated that TMPO-AS1 is closely associated with the estrogen signaling pathway. TMPO-AS1 could positively regulate estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mRNA expression by stabilizing ESR1 mRNA through interaction with ESR1 mRNA. Enhanced expression of ESR1 mRNA by TMPO-AS1 could play a critical role in the proliferation of ER-positive breast cancer. Our findings provide a new insight into the understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying hormone-dependent breast cancer progression and endocrine resistance.

Use of LH-RH agonists in the treatment of breast disease

1989 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 271-281
Author(s):  
R. I. Nicholson ◽  
K. J. Walker
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Breast Disease ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Surgical Ablation ◽  
Current Application ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Premenopausal Patients ◽  
Combined Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Lh Rh

SynopsisThe effects of LH-RH agonists in advanced breast cancer patients are reviewed and compared to the efficacy of surgical ablation of the ovaries and X-ray induced menopause in the treatment of this disease. In both pre- and postmenopausal women, LH-RH agonists produce pituitary gland desensitisation and a fall in concentrations of LH and FSH. In premenopausal patients plasma progesterone and oestradiol levels fall to the castrate or postmenopausal range within three to four weeks. Tumour remissions have been observed in approximately 30% of premenopausal women (50% ER-positive) and approximately 10% of postmenopausal patients. The mechanism of action of LH-RH agonists is discussed and their current application to combined endocrine therapy, early breast cancer and mastalgia briefly outlined.

Leuprorelin Acetate Every-3-Months Depot Versus Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil As Adjuvant Treatment in Premenopausal Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The TABLE Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18) ◽  
pp. 2509-2515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Schmid ◽  
Michael Untch ◽  
Valentin Kossé ◽  
Grigorij Bondar ◽  
Leonid Vassiljev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Positive Node ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Lhrh Agonist ◽  
Leuprorelin Acetate ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Premenopausal Patients ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose Ovarian suppression with luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists is an effective adjuvant treatment for premenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) –positive breast cancer. Whereas monthly LHRH agonist therapy has been well established, the value of every-3-months (3-monthly) formulations is unclear. Patients and Methods This randomized phase III trial was performed to compare the 3-monthly depot LHRH agonist leuprorelin acetate (LAD-3M; n = 299) and chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF; n = 300) in pre- or perimenopausal patients with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer. Results With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, recurrence-free survival was similar for patients treated with LAD-3M or CMF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.51; P = .15). There was no substantial heterogeneity in the relative treatment effect among subgroups defined by age, progesterone receptor (PR) status, nodal status, hormone levels, or menstrual recovery after treatment. Exploratory overall survival analysis favored LAD-3M (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.99; P = .005). Chemotherapy-related adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, and alopecia were more common with CMF, whereas symptoms of estrogen suppression such as hot flushes and sweating were initially more pronounced with LAD-3M. Conclusion The 3-monthly depot LHRH-agonist leuprorelin acetate is an effective adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive, node-positive breast cancer that is not inferior to CMF.

Adjuvant Clodronate Treatment Does Not Reduce the Frequency of Skeletal Metastases in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiina Saarto ◽  
Carl Blomqvist ◽  
Pekka Virkkunen ◽  
Inkeri Elomaa
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Skeletal Metastases ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Final Population ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: Bisphosphonates have effectively reduced the development and progression of bone metastases in advanced breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine whether bone metastases could be prevented by adjuvant clodronate treatment in patients with primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1990 and 1993, 299 women with primary node-positive breast cancer were randomized to clodronate (n = 149) or control groups (n = 150). Clodronate 1,600 mg daily was given orally for 3 years. All patients received adjuvant therapy: premenopausal six cycles of CMF chemotherapy and postmenopausal antiestrogens (randomized to tamoxifen 20 mg or toremifene 60 mg/d for 3 years). Seventeen patients were excluded from the analyses because of major protocol violations. The final population was 282 patients. Intent-to-treat analyses were also performed for all major end points. The follow-up time was 5 years for all patients. RESULTS: Bone metastases were detected equally often in the clodronate and control groups: 29 patients (21%) versus 24 patients (17%) (P = .27). The development of nonskeletal recurrence was significantly higher in the clodronate group compared with controls: 60 patients (43%) versus 36 patients (25%) (P = .0007). The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were also significantly lower in the clodronate group than in the controls (OS, 70% v 83%, P = .009; DFS, 56% v 71%, P = .007, respectively). In multivariate analyses, clodronate remained significantly associated with DFS (P = .009). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant clodronate treatment does not prevent the development of bone metastases in node-positive breast cancer patients. However, clodronate seems to have a negative effect on DFS by increasing the development of nonskeletal metastases.

Prognostic and predictive value of topoisomerase II alpha in a randomized trial comparing CMF to CEF in premenopausal women with node positive breast cancer (NCIC CTG MA.5)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 533-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. P. O’Malley ◽  
S. Chia ◽  
D. Tu ◽  
L. E. Shepherd ◽  
M. N. Levine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii Alpha ◽  
Cancer Society ◽  
Global Test ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

533 Background: It has been suggested that Topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) status rather than Her-2/neu status may predict response to anthracycline chemotherapy in breast cancer. Methods: In MA.5, 710 premenopausal women with node positive breast cancer were randomized to receive adjuvant CEF (epirubicin 60 mg/m2 & 5-FU 500 mg/m2 both IV, days 1 & 8, and cyclophosphamide 75 mg/m2 p.o. days 1 through 14); vs CMF (methotrexate 40 mg/m2 & 5-FU 600 mg/m2 both IV days 1 & 8 and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 p.o. days 1 through 14), all for six 28-day cycles. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from paraffin embedded specimens from 447 (63%) of these patients. TOP2A was measured by fluorescence-in-situ hybridization (FISH), classifying tumors into 3 groups by TOP2A/CEP 17 ratios: amplified (Amp) if ratio ≥2; deleted (Del) if ratio < 0.8; normal (N) if ratio 0.8 to 2. Cox models assessed interaction between treatment and TOP2A, adjusting for age, nodal status, ER, HER-2/neu status, grade, surgery and tumor size. Results: Thirty-one patients (6.9%) had tumours with Del TOP2A; 53 (11.9%) with Amp TOP2A; and 353 (81.2%) with N TOP2A. 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 48%, 51%, and 61% for patients with Del, Amp and N TOP2A respectively (p=0.22 adjusted global test). 5-year overall survival (OS) was 55%, 61% & 75% for patients with Del, Amp, and N TOP2A (p=0.67 adjusted global test). HRs for DFS and OS by treatment and TOP2A are presented in the table . Conclusions: TOP2A status was a significant predictive factor for benefit from CEF treatment for OS. Although there was a trend for TOP2A status predicting improved DFS with CEF, the test for interaction was not significant. In adjusted analysis TOP2A did not reach significance as a prognostic factor for DFS or OS. (This study was supported by the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (CBCRA), the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) and the Canadian Cancer Society.) [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document