Accelerated Treatment of Breast Cancer

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1993-2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank A. Vicini ◽  
Kathy L. Baglan ◽  
Larry L. Kestin ◽  
Chris Mitchell ◽  
Peter Y. Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Status ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Bed

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) restricted to the tumor bed, by means of an interstitial implant, and lasting 4 to 5 days after lumpectomy was prospectively evaluated in early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The goals of the study were to determine whether treatment time can be reduced and whether elective treatment of the entire breast is necessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1993 and January 2000, 174 cases of early-stage breast cancer were managed with lumpectomy followed by RT restricted to the tumor bed using an interstitial implant. Each brachytherapy patient was matched with one external-beam RT (ERT) patient derived from a reference group of 1,388 patients treated with standard BCT. Patients were matched for age, tumor size, histology, margins of excision, absence of an extensive intraductal component, nodal status, estrogen receptor status, and tamoxifen use. Median follow-up for both the ERT and brachytherapy groups was 36 months. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted in the 5-year actuarial rates of ipsilateral breast treatment failure or locoregional failure between ERT and brachytherapy patients (1% v 0%, P = .31 and 2% v 1%, P = .63, respectively). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences noted in rates of distant metastasis (6% v 3%, P = .24), disease-free survival (87% v 91%, P = .55), overall survival (90% v 93%, P = .66), or cause-specific survival (97% v 99%, P = .28). CONCLUSION: Accelerated treatment of breast cancer using an interstitial implant to deliver radiation to the tumor bed alone over 4 to 5 days seems to produce 5-year results equivalent to those achieved with conventional ERT. Extended follow-up will be required to determine the long-term efficacy of this treatment approach.

scholarly journals Intra-Operative Electron Radiation Therapy (IOERT) Anticipated Boost in Breast Cancer Treatment: An Italian Multicenter Experience

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 292
Author(s):  
Antonella Ciabattoni ◽  
Fabiana Gregucci ◽  
Karen Llange ◽  
Marina Alessandro ◽  
Francesca Corazzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Large Data ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Conservative Surgery ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Cosmetic Result ◽  
Tumor Bed

In breast cancer, the use of a boost to the tumor bed can improve local control. The aim of this research is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the boost with intra-operative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery and postoperative whole breast irradiation (WBI). The present retrospective multicenter large data were collected between January 2011 and March 2018 in 8 Italian Radiation Oncology Departments. Acute and late toxicity, objective (obj) and subjective (subj) cosmetic outcomes, in-field local control (LC), out-field LC, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Overall, 797 patients were enrolled. IOERT-boost was performed in all patients during surgery, followed by WBI. Acute toxicity (≥G2) occurred in 179 patients (22.46%); one patient developed surgical wound infection (G3). No patients reported late toxicity ≥ G2. Obj-cosmetic result was excellent in 45%, good in 35%, fair in 20% and poor in 0% of cases. Subj-cosmetic result was excellent in 10%, good in 20%, fair in 69% and poor in 0.3% of cases. Median follow-up was 57 months (range 12–109 months). At 5 years, in-field LC was 99.2% (95% CI: 98–99.7); out-field LC 98.9% (95% CI: 97.4–99.6); DFS 96.2% (95% CI: 94.2–97.6); OS 98.6% (95% CI: 97.2–99.3). In conclusion, IOERT-boost appears to be safe, providing excellent local control for early-stage breast cancer. The safety and long-term efficacy should encourage use of this treatment, with the potential to reduce local recurrence.

Inflammatory markers in early-stage breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11537-e11537
Author(s):  
Hilbrahim Petekkaya ◽  
Sercan Aksoy ◽  
Gizem Gecmez ◽  
Emre Kulahcioglu ◽  
Alexis K. Okoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stage Ia

e11537 Background: In a few number of studies a possible relationship between inflammatory markers and the prognosis, chemotherapy response and survival in breast cancer has been reported. The aim of this study is to point out the place of serum markers as a prognostic factor in early stage breast cancer. Methods: This study was conducted in Hacettepe University Cancer Institute. Patients operated and stage IA to III C for breast cancer between December 2009 and June 2012 were included the study. Before the any adjuvant therapy inflammation markers were studied. Results: A total of 704 patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 50 (25-92). 42,8% of the patients were premenopausal and 48,2% postmenopausal. The median follow up period for the whole study group was 22 months (3-287). We studied the CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, B2 microglobulin, LDH, albumin, and ferritin studied and values for each marker were grouped as high and normal. There was no statistically significant difference in disease free survival and overall survival for each marker who had high and normal levels. Conclusions: We did not found any inflammatory markers as a prognostic value. However our follow up time is short and we should be wait for more mature data.

scholarly journals Outcome of Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treated With Doxorubicin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy As a Function ofHER2andTOP2AStatus

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (24) ◽  
pp. 3881-3886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Tubbs ◽  
William E. Barlow ◽  
G. Thomas Budd ◽  
Eric Swain ◽  
Peggy Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Amplification ◽  
Amplification Ratio

PurposeAmplification and deletion of the TOP2A gene have been reported as positive predictive markers of response to anthracycline-based therapy. We determined the status of the HER2 and TOP2A genes in a large cohort of breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C).Patients and MethodsTOP2A/CEP17 and HER2/CEP17 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) were performed on tissue microarrays (TMAs) constructed from 2,123 of the 3,125 women with moderate-risk primary breast cancer who received equivalent doses of either concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy with A plus C (n = 1,592) or sequential A followed by C (n = 1,533).ResultsAn abnormal TOP2A genotype was identified for 153 (9.4%) of 1,626 patients (4.0% amplified; 5.4% deleted). An abnormal HER2 genotype was identified for 303 (20.4%) of 1,483 patients (18.8% amplified; 1.6% deleted). No significant differences in either overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) were identified for TOP2A. In univariate analysis, OS and DFS rates were strongly and adversely associated only with higher levels of HER2 amplification (ratio ≥ 4.0). Survival was not associated with low-level HER2 amplification (ratio ≥ 2; OS hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; P = .39; DFS HR, 1.07; P = .62), but it was associated for a ratio ≥ 4 (OS HR, 1.45; P = .03; DFS HR, 1.38; P = .033), in which analysis was adjusted for menopausal status, hormone receptor status, treatment, number of positive nodes, and tumor size.ConclusionIn this population of patients with early-stage breast cancer who were treated with adjuvant AC chemotherapy, TOP2A abnormalities were not associated with outcome. HER2 high-level amplification was a prognostic marker in anthracycline-treated patients.

Modeling longer-term efficacy of neratinib in the extended adjuvant setting for early-stage breast cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12011-e12011
Author(s):  
Mark D. Danese ◽  
Marc Halperin ◽  
Deepa Lalla ◽  
Bin Yao ◽  
John Crown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Link Function ◽  
Adjuvant Setting ◽  
Term Efficacy ◽  
Interaction Terms ◽  
Parametric Survival

e12011 Background: Long-term efficacy in the extended adjuvant setting requires a long follow-up. In the ExteNET trial, neratinib was given for a year and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) assessed at 2 and 5 years. In women with HER2+ hormone receptor positive (HR+) cancer who initiated neratinib, the observed difference in iDFS between neratinib and placebo at 5 years (4.5%) was greater than at 2 years (3.7%). The objective of these analyses was to extrapolate the effect of neratinib on iDFS beyond 5 years in patients with HER2+/HR+ early stage breast cancer who initiated treatment after receiving adjuvant trastuzumab. Methods: We analyzed the 5-year follow-up of the ExteNET trial using flexible spline-based parametric survival models to project iDFS risk at 10 years. Analyses included only HR+ patients. Several model specifications were explored including various combinations of the following variables: treatment as a time varying covariate, nodal status (0, 1-3, ≥4 nodes), and months from last trastuzumab treatment to randomization. The regression models included different combinations of interaction terms, either a proportional hazards or a proportional odds (PO) link function, and either 2 or 6 knots. The model fit was compared using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results: In general, the fit statistics among the 16 models were comparable; however, the model with the lowest AIC included no interaction terms, 2 knots, and the PO link function. The mean iDFS event rate at 10 years was estimated to be 12.2% for neratinib and 18.9% for placebo for a difference of 6.8% (range across 16 models: 6.8%-7.8%). The recurrence rate and the difference between treatment groups were largest in women with ≥4 positive nodes. Conclusions: Based on these analyses, the projected 10-year difference in iDFS between placebo and neratinib patients seems likely to persist. However, because the data was limited to 5 years, we could not include the effect of hormonal therapy cessation. Also, low event rates in the node negative group may require longer follow-up to evaluate. In absence of longer-term data for neratinib, flexible parametric survival modeling of the iDFS suggests that the effect of neratinib therapy may remain stable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document