Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab as a Single Agent in First-Line Treatment of HER2-Overexpressing Metastatic Breast Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 719-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Vogel ◽  
Melody A. Cobleigh ◽  
Debu Tripathy ◽  
John C. Gutheil ◽  
Lyndsay N. Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line, single-agent trastuzumab in women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fourteen women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive first-line treatment with trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 2 mg/kg weekly, or a higher 8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 4 mg/kg weekly. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.2% to 34.4%), with seven complete and 23 partial responses. Response rates in 111 assessable patients with 3+ and 2+ HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were 35% (95% CI, 24.4% to 44.7%) and none (95% CI, 0% to 15.5%), respectively. The clinical benefit rates in assessable patients with 3+ and 2+ HER2 overexpression were 48% and 7%, respectively. The response rates in 108 assessable patients with and without HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis were 34% (95% CI, 23.9% to 45.7%) and 7% (95% CI, 0.8% to 22.8%), respectively. Seventeen (57%) of 30 patients with an objective response and 22 (51%) of 43 patients with clinical benefit had not experienced disease progression at follow-up at 12 months or later. The most common treatment-related adverse events were chills (25% of patients), asthenia (23%), fever (22%), pain (18%), and nausea (14%). Cardiac dysfunction occurred in two patients (2%); both had histories of cardiac disease and did not require additional intervention after discontinuation of trastuzumab. There was no clear evidence of a dose-response relationship for response, survival, or adverse events. CONCLUSION: Single-agent trastuzumab is active and well tolerated as first-line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer with HER2 3+ overexpression by IHC or gene amplification by FISH.

Gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10735-10735 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bensalem ◽  
K. Bouzid
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

10735 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) has shown efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted studies with GEM-based regimens to assess the efficacy and toxicity of GEM combined with other drugs in MBC. GEM was combined with docetaxel (DXL) in pre-treated MBC with an anthracycline-based regimen and GEM was combined with doxorubicin (DXR) in chemonaive patients (pts) with MBC. The studies’ objectives were to show clinically relevant hematologic toxicity and response rates among pts treated with GEM-DXL either in combination in pre-treated pts with anthracycline regimen or GEM-DXR in chemonaive pts with MBC to assess the efficacy of GEM in MBC either in neoadjuvant or first-line treatment. Methods: For GEM-DXL: 42 pts were enrolled; GEM: 1250 mg /m2 D1 & D8, DXL: 75 mg /m2 D1, every 21 days with classical premedication for DXL. For GEM-DXR: 51 pts were enrolled; GEM: 1250 mg /m2 D1 & D 8, DXR: 25 mg/m2 D1 & D8, every 21 days. Results: See table below. In the GEM-DXR group, surgery was performed in 30 pts, and 13 (43.2%) had histologically complete response. The median TTP in this group was 13.3 months (range, 2–53). Conclusions: GEM in MBC is very efficient and produced an interesting objective response and clinical benefit. This activity is consistent in either chemonaive pts or in pts with relapsing breast cancer. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Vinorelbine with or without Trastuzumab in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Single Institution Series

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athina Stravodimou ◽  
Khalil Zaman ◽  
Ioannis A. Voutsadakis
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Background. We report our experience with vinorelbine, a widely used chemotherapeutic, in unselected metastatic breast cancer patients treated in clinical routine. Patients and Methods. The data of all patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab during a six year period were reviewed. Patients received vinorelbine intravenous 25–30 mg/m2 or 60–80 mg/m2 orally in days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle. Results. Eighty-seven women were included. Sixty-two patients received vinorelbine alone and 25 patients received vinorelbine in combination with trastuzumab. In 67 patients this was the first line treatment for metastatic disease and in 20 patients it was 2nd or later line of treatment. The median TTP was six months (range: 1–45). The median overall survival was 11.5 months (range: 1–83). Seventy patients were evaluable for response. In patients receiving first line treatment 44.4% had a response while in the second and subsequent lines setting 12.5% of patients responded (P=0.001). Objective response was obtained in 63.6% of patients receiving concomitant trastuzumab and in 25% of patients receiving vinorelbine alone (P=0.0002). Conclusion. This study confirms a high disease control rate. Response rate and TTP were superior in first line treatment compared to subsequent lines.

Single-agent docetaxel (TXT) as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11515-11515
Author(s):  
D. Guarneri ◽  
R. Ratti ◽  
A. Venturino ◽  
G. Addamo ◽  
Z. Coccorullo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Agent Treatment ◽  
First Line Treatment ◽  
Group 1

11515 Background: Historically anthracyclines have been considered the most active agents in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Docetaxel (TXT) has challenged this belief. Aims: Evaluate response rates, toxicity and time to progression in patients with MBC receiving single agent TXT as first line treatment. Methods: MBC patients received first line single agent treatment according to one of the following schedules: TXT 35 mg/m2 iv weekly for 6 wks q 8 wks (Group 1) or TXT 100 mg/m2 iv day 1 q 3 weeks (Group 2). Adjuvant chemotherapy was FAC (600,50,600) day 1 q 21 days for 6 courses in all cases so treated. Results: Conclusions: It appears that results with single agent TXT obtained in clinical practice are comparable to those reported in Phase II-III trials (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively ) using the same regimens. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

RIBBON-1: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab for First-Line Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative, Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1252-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Robert ◽  
Véronique Diéras ◽  
John Glaspy ◽  
Adam M. Brufsky ◽  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
First Line Treatment

Purpose This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) when combined with several standard chemotherapy regimens versus those regimens alone for first-line treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned in 2:1 ratio to chemotherapy plus BV or chemotherapy plus placebo. Before random assignment, investigators chose capecitabine (Cape; 2,000 mg/m2 for 14 days), taxane (Tax) -based (nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2, docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m2), or anthracycline (Anthra) -based (doxorubicin or epirubicin combinations [doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, or fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide]) chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. BV or placebo was administered at 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), 1-year survival rate, objective response rate, duration of objective response, and safety. Two independently powered cohorts defined by the choice of chemotherapy (Cape patients or pooled Tax/Anthra patients) were analyzed in parallel. Results RIBBON-1 (Regimens in Bevacizumab for Breast Oncology) enrolled 1,237 patients (Cape cohort, n = 615; Tax/Anthra cohort, n = 622). Median PFS was longer for each BV combination (Cape cohort: increased from 5.7 months to 8.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84; log-rank P < .001; and Tax/Anthra cohort: increased from 8.0 months to 9.2 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.80; log-rank P < .001). No statistically significant differences in OS between the placebo- and BV-containing arms were observed. Safety was consistent with results of prior BV trials. Conclusion The combination of BV with Cape, Tax, or Anthra improves clinical benefit in terms of increased PFS in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, with a safety profile comparable to prior phase III studies.

scholarly journals Current problems in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: focus on the role of docetaxel

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-107
Author(s):  
Filippo Montemurro
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Metastatic breast cancer is a very heterogeneous disease, both from a clinical and a biological point of view. Despite being still incurable, the expanding therapeutic repertoire has determined a progressive increase in median survival. We describe the clinical course of a 67-year-old woman with a locally advanced, hormone-receptor positive breast cancer with synchronous liver metastases. Single-agent docetaxel at the dose of 100 mg/m2 for 8 cycles determined a pathological complete remission in the breast and a near complete remission of liver metastases. After more than 4 years from diagnosis, the patient is alive and without signs of tumour progression. Based on this clinical case, we discuss management issues like the choice of the initial treatment, the use of monochemotherapy vs polychemotherapy, the worth of surgery of the primary tumour in patients with stage IV disease, and the issue of maintenance endocrine therapy. Furthermore, we reviewed the pivotal role of docetaxel in the management of advanced breast cancer. Whether monochemotherapy or polychemotherapy is felt to be an adequate choice in the clinical practice, docetaxel qualifies as one of the most active and manageable agents. Single agent activity ranging from 20-48% in terms of response rate has been reported in several clinical trials in patients treated in various clinical settings. Docetaxel-based combinations with other cytotoxic agents have become established in the first line treatment both in patients with anthracycline-resistant and anthracycline-sensitive metastatic breast cancer. Finally, docetaxel has been shown to be an optimal companion drug for biologically targeted agents like trastuzumab or bevacizumab, resulting in further treatment options.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document