Time Course and Predictors of Symptoms After Primary Prostate Cancer Therapy

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 3979-3986 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Talcott ◽  
Judith Manola ◽  
Jack A. Clark ◽  
Irving Kaplan ◽  
Clair J. Beard ◽  
...  

Purpose: Understanding the distinctive patterns of treatment-related dysfunction after alternative initial treatments for early prostate cancer (PC) may improve patients’ choice of treatment and later help them adjust to its consequences. We characterized the time course of treatment complications while adjusting for potentially confounding pretreatment factors hindering other observational studies. Patients and Methods: In a prospective cohort study of 417 men we assessed urinary, bowel, and sexual function from before primary treatment to 24 months after. To control for potential confounding, we measured sociodemographic and PC prognostic factors, medical comorbidity, and pretreatment function commonly affected by PC and its treatment. Results: Patients who underwent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), radical prostatectomy (RP), and brachytherapy (BT) differed significantly in sociodemographic factors, cancer prognostic factors, and pretreatment symptom status, especially sexual function. Urinary incontinence increased sharply after RP, while bowel problems and urinary irritation/obstruction rose after EBRT and BT. Sexual dysfunction increased in all patients, particularly after radical prostatectomy, and nerve-sparing surgical technique had little apparent benefit. There was no change in urinary function and little change in overall bowel function after 12 months, but the time course of sexual dysfunction varied by treatment and, for bowel function, by symptom. Multiple regression modeling confirmed that treatment influences all 24-month outcomes, but residual confounding persisted. Conclusion: Pretreatment function and the primary treatment modality for early stage PC strongly predict the affected organ systems and time course of dysfunction. With this information, patients and their physicians may refine their choice of treatment and better anticipate its consequences.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigita Liutkauskiene ◽  
Karolina Martinaityte ◽  
Rasa Malonyte ◽  
Kristina Jureniene ◽  
Saulius Grizas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: According to the majority of retrospective analyses and meta-analyses published in recent years, radical prostatectomy is a more effective treatment method than radical radiotherapy. The objective of this study was to assess whether the treatment method influences the survival of patients with early prostate cancer and to evaluate the impact of patient-dependent and prostate cancer-dependent prognostic factors on the choice of radical treatment method of prostate cancer.Methods: Medical records of selected patients were reviewed. Inclusion criteria involved histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma; localised or locally advanced prostate cancer diagnosed in 2008-2012; no distant metastases at the time of initial diagnosis; medical records maintain comprehensive data on treatment and follow-up. The influence of prognostic factors on the choice of treatment method was assessed by making comparisons between groups using the Chi-square test.Results: More favorable prognostic factors were found in the RP treatment group compared to the RT treatment group: patients aged 60 years and younger accounted for 35% in the RP group, and 18% - in the RT group, with increasing age the number of RP decreased and the number of RT increased (p < 0.001); score of 3-4 points of CCI was set in 36% patients in the RP group, and 6% - in the RT group, with increasing CCI score, the number of RP decreased and the number of RT increased (p < 0.001); baseline PSA level of 10 ng/ml and less was found in 67% patients in the RP group, and 52% - in the RT group, with increasing PSA level, the number of RP decreased and the number of RT increased (p < 0.001). Gleason score did not influence the choice of treatment method (p = 0.24).Conclusions: Prognostic factors of localised or locally advanced prostate cancer influenced the choice of treatment method. In case of more favorable prognostic factors, radical prostatectomy was more often chosen.


2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Keun Kim ◽  
Atalla Alatawi ◽  
Abulhasan Sheikh ◽  
Ibrahim Alabdulaali ◽  
Ali Abdel Raheem ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Hyo Woo ◽  
Dong Il Kang ◽  
Yun-Sok Ha ◽  
Amirali Hassanzadeh Salmasi ◽  
Jeong Hyun Kim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 1297-1303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Pozo ◽  
Virginia Hernández ◽  
Carlos Capitán ◽  
Enrique de la Peña ◽  
Guillermo Fernández-Conejo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1917-1925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal S. Langlais ◽  
Janet E. Cowan ◽  
John Neuhaus ◽  
Stacey A. Kenfield ◽  
Erin L. Van Blarigan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-49
Author(s):  
Mário Pereira-Lourenço ◽  
Duarte Vieira e Brito ◽  
João Pedro Peralta ◽  
Ricardo Godinho ◽  
Paulo Conceiçao ◽  
...  

Introduction: Patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) are active participants in the choice of treatment. Objectives: To access the effects of social and demographic factors in the choice of treatment in cases of localized PCa, in a Portuguese population. Methods: Identification of all patients with the diagnosis of localized PCa in the last four years in an oncological centre. Evaluation of the effects of sociodemographic factors (age, profession, literacy, marital status, district and number of inhabitants of the place of residence) in the choice of treatment. Results: 300 patients with localized PCa were evaluated: 17.3% (n = 52) opted for radical prostatectomy (RP); 39,3% had (n = 118) external radiotherapy; brachytherapy in 29.3% (n = 88) and other options (active surveillance, cryotherapy and hormonal therapy) in 14.1% (n = 42). In relation to surgical treatment (RP) the following results were obtained: a) > 70 years: 3.9% (n = 5); ≤ 70 years: 27.5% (n = 47), p < 0.001; b) primary sector: 10.3% (n = 3); secondary sector: 16.2% (n = 27); tertiary sector: 24.1% (n = 21); quaternary sector: 8.3% (n = 1), p = 0.296; c) marital status married: 17.9% (n = 47); single: 0% (n = 0); divorced: 25.0% (n = 5); widow: 0% (n = 0), p = 0.734; d) residency in a city: 14.1% (n = 13); city > 4000 habitants: 22.7% (n = 15); city ≤ 4000 habitants: 16.9% (n = 24), p = 0.701. Using multinomial regression with age (p = 0.001), district (p = 0.035), marital status (p = 0.027) and profession (0.179), this model explained 17.2%-28.4% of therapeutic choices (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The main socioeconomical factor that influence treatment choice was age. Unmarried patients over 70 years choose less radical prostatectomy. Other sociodemographic factors have minor influence in the choice of the treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document