Arsenic Trioxide in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Phase II Multicenter Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (16) ◽  
pp. 2465-2471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Vey ◽  
Andre Bosly ◽  
Agnes Guerci ◽  
Walter Feremans ◽  
Herve Dombret ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arsenic Trioxide ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Moderate Activity ◽  
Loading Dose ◽  
Median Response ◽  
System Risk

Purpose Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of arsenic trioxide in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Patients and Methods MDS patients diagnosed according to standard French-American-British criteria received a loading dose of 0.3 mg/kg per day of arsenic trioxide for 5 days followed by a maintenance dose of 0.25 mg/kg arsenic trioxide twice weekly for 15 weeks. Patients were divided into two cohorts: lower-risk MDS (International Prognostic Scoring System risk category low or intermediate 1) and higher-risk MDS (International Prognostic Scoring System risk category intermediate 2 or high). Modified International Working Group criteria were used for response evaluation. Results Of 115 patients enrolled and treated in the study, 67% of patients were transfusion dependent at baseline; median age was 68 years. Most treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate. The overall rate of hematologic improvement (intent-to-treat) was 24 (19%) of 115, including one complete and one partial response in the higher-risk cohort. The hematologic response rates were 13 (26%) of 50 and 11 (17%) of 64 in patients with lower-risk and higher-risk MDS, respectively. Major responses were observed in all three hematologic lineages; 16% of RBC transfusion-dependent patients and 29% of platelet transfusion-dependent patients became transfusion independent. At data cut off, the median response duration was 3.4 months, with responses ongoing in nine patients. Conclusion Arsenic trioxide treatment consisting of an initial loading dose followed by maintenance therapy has moderate activity in MDS, inducing hematologic responses in both lower- and higher-risk patients. This activity combined with a manageable adverse effect profile warrants the additional study of arsenic trioxide, particularly in combination therapy, for the treatment of patients with MDS.

Phase II Multicenter Study of Arsenic Trioxide in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (16) ◽  
pp. 2456-2464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
James Slack ◽  
John D. Hainsworth ◽  
James Mason ◽  
Mansoor Saleh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arsenic Trioxide ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Primary Response ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Moderate Activity ◽  
Expected Time ◽  
Transfusion Independence ◽  
Risk Patients

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of arsenic trioxide monotherapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Patients and Methods Patients received arsenic trioxide (0.25 mg/kg/d) on 5 consecutive days per week for 2 weeks, followed by 2 weeks’ rest (one cycle). Two patient cohorts were established according to International Prognostic Scoring System risk category: lower-risk (low or intermediate-1) or higher-risk MDS (intermediate-2 or high). For lower-risk MDS, hematologic improvement (HI) was the primary response end point. For higher-risk MDS, additional end points included complete or partial remission. Based on the expected time to response, patients receiving two or more cycles were prospectively evaluated. Results Hematologic adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia. Two patients died during the study due to treatment-related toxicities. Most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic events were pneumonia, fatigue, hemorrhage, pain, and dyspnea. Among patients who received one or more doses (n = 70) or completed two or more cycles (n = 51), the HI rates were 34% and 39% in lower-risk patients, and 6% and 9% in higher-risk patients, respectively; the overall major HI rates were 20% and 22%. One higher-risk patient achieved a complete remission (3%). Major HIs were observed in all hematologic lineages; erythroid responses were the most common. Transfusion independence or reduction by ≥ 50% occurred in 33% of patients dependent on RBC transfusions. The overall median duration of HI was 6.8 months (range, 2 to 40 months). Conclusion Arsenic trioxide monotherapy has moderate activity against MDS, with a manageable adverse effect profile. The further study of arsenic trioxide in MDS, particularly in combination with other agents, is warranted.

scholarly journals Early lenalidomide treatment for low and intermediate-1 International Prognostic Scoring System risk myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q) before transfusion dependence

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 1789-1797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther N. Oliva ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Maria Antonietta Aloe Spiriti ◽  
Antonella Poloni ◽  
Agostino Cortelezzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
System Risk

scholarly journals Outcome of Lower-Risk Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes Without 5q Deletion After Failure of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (14) ◽  
pp. 1591-1597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Park ◽  
Jean-François Hamel ◽  
Andrea Toma ◽  
Charikleia Kelaidi ◽  
Sylvain Thépot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents ◽  
Erythroid Response

Purpose Most anemic patients with non-deleted 5q lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), with a response rate of approximately 50%. Second-line treatments, including hypomethylating agents (HMAs), lenalidomide (LEN), and investigational drugs, may be used after ESA failure in some countries, but their effect on disease progression and overall survival (OS) is unknown. Here, we analyzed outcome after ESA failure and the effect of second-line treatments. Patients and Methods We examined an international retrospective cohort of 1,698 patients with non-del(5q) lower-risk MDS treated with ESAs. Results Erythroid response to ESAs was 61.5%, and median response duration was 17 months. Of 1,147 patients experiencing ESA failure, 653 experienced primary failure and 494 experienced relapse after a response. Primary failure of ESAs was associated with a higher risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) progression, which did not translate into an OS difference. Of 450 patients (39%) who received second-line treatment, 194 received HMAs, 148 received LEN, and 108 received other treatments (MISC), whereas 697 received RBC transfusions only. Five-year AML cumulative incidence was 20.3%, 20.3%, and 11.3% for those receiving HMAs, LEN, and MISC, respectively ( P = .05). Five-year OS for patients receiving HMA, LEN, and MISC was 36.5%, 41.7%, and 51%, respectively ( P = .21). In a multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, revised International Prognostic Scoring System score, and progression at ESA failure, there was no significant OS difference among the three groups. Conclusion In this large, multicenter, retrospective cohort of patients with non-del(5q) lower-risk MDS treated with ESAs, none of the most commonly used second-line treatments (HMA and LEN) significantly improved OS. Early failure of ESAs was associated with a higher risk of AML progression.

scholarly journals IDH1 Mutation Is an Independent Inferior Prognostic Indicator for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

2017 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Wang ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Ningning Shan ◽  
Xiaohui Sui ◽  
Hongzhi Xu
Keyword(s):  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Idh1 Mutation ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Genomic Sequencing ◽  
Sequencing Technologies ◽  
Idh Mutations ◽  
System Risk

Background: Genomic sequencing technologies have identified isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in haematological malignancies. The prognostic implications of somatic IDH mutation (mIDH) in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remain controversial. Methods: Mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 were detected using genomic sequencing technologies in 97 patients with MDS. Results: Seven (7.2%) mutations were identified: 3 in IDH1 (all R132C) and 4 in IDH2 (3 R140Q and 1 R140L). The frequency of mutation was 16.6% (2/12) in refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB)-1 and 14.7% (5/34) in RAEB-2. IDH1/2 mutations were closely associated with higher bone marrow blast counts (median 10.0 vs. 2.3%; p = 0.019) and lower absolute neutrophil counts (median 0.44 × 109/L vs. 1.21 × 109/L; p = 0.027). All IDH mutations were mutually exclusive and heterozygous. IDH mutations were not significantly correlated with any specific karyotype. Patients with IDH1 mutations exhibited shorter overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS; p = 0.039 and p = 0.042, respectively), whereas IDH2 mutations did not affect OS or PFS (p = 0.560 and p = 0.218, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that IDH1 mutation (p = 0.018; hazard ratio [HR] 4.735; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.299-17.264), karyotype risk (p = 0.036; HR 1.619; 95% CI 1.033-2.539) and the revised International Prognostic Scoring System risk category (p < 0.0001; HR 2.122; 95% CI 1.401-3.213) were independent inferior prognostic factors. Conclusions:IDH1 mutation is associated with a poor prognosis.

Additional Prognostic Value of Bone Marrow Histology in Patients Subclassified According to the International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Verburgh ◽  
R. Achten ◽  
B. Maes ◽  
A. Hagemeijer ◽  
M. Boogaerts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Prognostic System ◽  
Bone Marrow Histology

Purpose: The most recent and powerful prognostic instrument established for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), which is primarily based on medullary blast cell count, number of cytopenias, and cytogenetics. Although this prognostic system has substantial predictive power in MDS, further refinement is necessary, especially as far as lower-risk patients are concerned. Histologic parameters, which have long proved to be associated with outcome, are promising candidates to improve the prognostic accuracy of the IPSS. Therefore, we assessed the additional predictive power of the presence of abnormally localized immature precursors (ALIPs) and CD34 immunoreactivity in bone marrow (BM) biopsies of MDS patients. Patients and Methods: Cytogenetic, morphologic, and clinical data of 184 MDS patients, all from a single institution, were collected, with special emphasis on the determinants of the IPSS score. BM biopsies of 173 patients were analyzed for the presence of ALIP, and CD34 immunoreactivity was assessable in 119 patients. Forty-nine patients received intensive therapy. Results: The presence of ALIP and CD34 immunoreactivity significantly improved the prognostic value of the IPSS, with respect to overall as well as leukemia-free survival, in particular within the lower-risk categories. In contrast to the IPSS, both histologic parameters also were predictive of outcome within the group of intensively treated MDS patients. Conclusion: Our data confirm the importance of histopathologic evaluation in MDS and indicate that determining the presence of ALIP and an increase in CD34 immunostaining in addition to the IPSS score could lead to an improved prognostic subcategorization of MDS patients.

scholarly journals TP53 in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5392
Author(s):  
Yan Jiang ◽  
Su-Jun Gao ◽  
Benoit Soubise ◽  
Nathalie Douet-Guilbert ◽  
Zi-Ling Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Therapy Strategies

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are heterogeneous for their morphology, clinical characteristics, survival of patients, and evolution to acute myeloid leukemia. Different prognostic scoring systems including the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), the Revised IPSS, the WHO Typed Prognostic Scoring System, and the Lower-Risk Prognostic Scoring System have been introduced for categorizing the highly variable clinical outcomes. However, not considered by current MDS prognosis classification systems, gene variants have been identified for their contribution to the clinical heterogeneity of the disease and their impact on the prognosis. Notably, TP53 mutation is independently associated with a higher risk category, resistance to conventional therapies, rapid transformation to leukemia, and a poor outcome. Herein, we discuss the features of monoallelic and biallelic TP53 mutations within MDS, their corresponding carcinogenic mechanisms, their predictive value in current standard treatments including hypomethylating agents, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and lenalidomide, together with the latest progress in TP53-targeted therapy strategies, especially MDS clinical trial data.

Validating the Lower-Risk MD Anderson Prognostic Scoring System (LR-PSS) and the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1720-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Paul Elson ◽  
Ramon V. Tiu ◽  
Yogen Saunthararajah ◽  
Anjali S. Advani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Information Criteria ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Multivariable Analyses ◽  
Md Anderson

Abstract Abstract 1720 Background: The myelodysplastic syndromes are commonly divided into lower- and higher-risk subtypes depending on blast percentage and International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score (0–1.0, low or Int-1, median overall survival (OS) 3.5–5.7 years). Because the IPSS is limited in its ability to identify poor prognosis lower-risk patients (pts), a prognostic scoring system specifically for lower-risk MDS pts (LR-PSS) was developed (Garcia-Manero Leukemia 2008) at MD Anderson (MDA), based on unfavorable (non-del(5q), non–diploid) cytogenetics, hemoglobin (hgb) <10g/dl, platelet count (plt) <50 k/uL or 50–200k/uL, bone marrow blast %≥4, and age ≥60 years. The IPSS-R (Greenberg Leuk Res 2011) improves upon the IPSS using novel cytogenetics classifications (Schanz EHA 2010) and a neutrophil cut-off of 800 k/uL. We validated the LR-PSS and the IPSS-R in a separate cohort of lower-risk MDS patients seen at Cleveland Clinic (CC) or at MDA not included in LR-PSS development. Methods: Of 1293 MDS patients identified at CC or MDA from 1991–2010, 664 had lower-risk disease and adequate data for analyses. OS was calculated from first date seen at either institution. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate median OS. Univariable analyses were performed using the log-rank test; multivariable analyses used a Cox proportional hazards model stratified by treatment center. Harrell's c index and the Akaike information criteria (AIC) were used to assess the discriminatory power of the models and relative goodness of fit, respectively. Results: Comparing CC to MDA, baseline values were similar except median age: 70 vs. 67 years (p=.02); time since diagnosis: 2.7 vs. 1.1 months (p<.0001); hgb <10: 51% vs. 43% (p=.05); plt <50k/uL: 30 vs. 24% (p=.06); ANC <1.5 k/uL: 27% vs. 36% (p=.01); blasts <4%: 75% vs. 65% (p=.003); WHO classification RA/RARS/RCMD/CMML: 11/15/26/12% vs. 16/9/45/0% (p<.0001). Cytogenetics were diploid: 61% vs. 66%; del(5q): 9% vs. 2%; del(20q): 3% vs. 5%; -Y: 4% vs. 2%, respectively (p=.5). Median OS was 36.8 months (95% C.I. 33–45) and median follow-up of patients still alive was 13.9 months (range 0.01–155). LR-PSS and IPSS-R classifications for CC and MDA Pts and OS are in Table 1 and Figure 1. In univariable analyses, The IPSS, LR-PSS, and IPSS-R were all predictive of OS (p=.002, <.0001, and <.0001, respectively). Multivariable analyses confirmed the overall predictive abilities of the prognostic tools and of Hgb, plt, age, and IPSS/IPSS-R cytogenetics (all p≤.03). Compared to the IPSS-R, the LR-PSS had the higher (better) Harrell's c value (.64 vs.63) and lower (better) AIC (2518 vs. 2525). The LR-PSS upstaged 156 pts (25%) from IPSS low or Int-1 to LR-PSS Category 3, and downstaged 47 pts (12%) from Int-1 to Category 1. The IPSS-R upstaged 164 pts (27%) from IPSS low or Int-1 to IPSS-R Categories ≥Intermediate, and downstaged 5 pts (1%) from Int-1 to Very Good. Conclusions: The LR-PSS and IPSS-R are valid tools for distinguishing among pts previously thought to have lower-risk disease by the IPSS, and identifying those who have better and worse survival. This latter group of pts may benefit from earlier interventions with disease-modifying therapies, and should be considered in trials targeting higher-risk MDS pts. The LR-PSS appears to provide slightly better prognostic information. Disclosures: Sekeres: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Maciejewski:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document