CEA as a prognostic factor in locally advanced breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10705-10705
Author(s):  
N. Valeri ◽  
N. Battelli ◽  
C. Mariotti ◽  
A. Santinelli ◽  
W. Siquini ◽  
...  

10705 Background: CEA and CA 15.3 are most commonly used to evaluate disease progression in metastatic and recurrent breast cancer. Only few significant studies showed a potential predictive role of CEA and CA 15.3 in adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. We evaluated the correlation between tumour markers level at diagnosis and outcome in locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer (T > 3.5 cm and T4) at diagnosis entered the study. All patients had to have initial negative staging (chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasonography, bone scintigraphy and CT scan), whereas all patients who developed metastatic disease in sites which were uncertain during initial staging were excluded. Tumour markers at diagnosis were considered negative if CEA was inferior to 5 ng/ml and CA 15.3 inferior to 35 U/ml. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4–6 cycles with regimens containing Anthracyclines and Taxanes or FEC). Most of patients underwent radical mastectomy followed by sequential radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormonotherapy in hormonal responsive patients. Results: Fifty-three patients entered the study. At a median follow up of 73 months, 35 patients were disease free after adjuvant treatment (group A), whereas 18 patients developed metastatic disease during follow-up (group B). At diagnosis 14 patients had CA 15.3 greater than 34 U/ml (7 in group A and 7 in group B), 6 patients had CEA greater than 5 ng/ml (1 in group A and 5 in group B) and 18 patients had CEA or CA 15.3 greater than normal values (7 in group A and 11 in group B).We analyzed DFS and OS in patients with normal (CEA < 5 ng/ml, CA15.3 < 35 U/ml) and elevated (CEA ≥ 5 ng/ml, CA 15.3 ≥ 35 U/ml) tumour markers at diagnosis; DFS (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.03) were significantly reduced in patients with elevated CEA at diagnosis; differences were not statistically significant for CA 15.3 (p > 0.05). Conclusions: CEA levels before neoadjuvant treatment could represent an important prognostic factor and may influence the choice of treatment in locally advanced breast cancer patients . No significant financial relationships to disclose.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1599-1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Percivale ◽  
S Bertoglio ◽  
P Meszaros ◽  
G Canavese ◽  
F Cafiero ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To assess the role of radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS) using a handheld intraoperative gamma-detecting probe (GDP) to identify neoplastic disease after primary chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients injected with iodine 125-labeled monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-one patients with histologically documented LABC were treated with a combined modality approach. After three courses of primary chemotherapy and before modified radical mastectomy, the 125I-radiolabeled MAbs B72.3 (anti-TAG72) and FO23C5 (anti-carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA]) were administered to 11 patients (group A) and 10 patients (group B), respectively. At surgery, a GDP was used to locate the primary tumor and to assess possible tumor multicentricity and the presence of ipsilateral axillary metastases. Routine pathologic examination was performed in neoplastic and normal tissue specimens of all 21 patients. In addition, immunohistochemical assay for TAG72 and CEA expression was performed. RESULTS In group A patients, RIGS identified primary tumor in seven of 11 patients (63.3%) and unpalpable multicentric tumor lesions were located in two of four (50%). Positive axillary lymph nodes were histologically documented in eight of 11 patients (72.7%) and RIGS identified three of eight (37.5%). In group B, RIGS located the primary tumor lesion in four of 10 patients (40%); in two cases, the tumor was not clinically evident. Multicentricity was observed in one of two patients and lymph node involvement in three of nine (33.3%). No false-positive results were observed in either group A or B. CONCLUSION RIGS appears to be a safe and reliable technique. However, the MAbs used in this study are not sufficiently specific. RIGS represents a technique for which the full potential for intraoperative assessment of breast cancer lesions can be reached when more specific antibodies become readily available.


2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Berberoglu ◽  
E. Yildirim ◽  
O. Celen

It has been shown that serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) are increased in breast cancer patients. There are few data available on the reduction of serum levels of this cytokine following chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on serum concentrations of TNF-α and the relation to response rates in locally advanced breast cancer. Twenty consecutive patients with non-inflammatory stage III-B breast cancer achieving a partial or complete clinical response to three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by modified radical mastectomy were prospectively included in the study and evaluated. Sera were collected before the start and after the termination of chemotherapy. Serum concentrations of TNF-α were measured by an ELISA method. The pathological response rates were also evaluated and recorded. The control group consisted of 12 healthy age-matched women. The mean pre-treatment TNF-α value of breast cancer patients was 15.9±0.9 pg/mL while it was 5.8±1.7 pg/mL in the control group; the difference was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The serum levels of TNF-α were markedly decreased in patients with partial and complete responses compared to pre-treatment values (p<0.0001). There was also a difference in TNF-α levels in patients with partial vs complete responses (p<0.0001). The relative change between pre- and post-treatment values correlated significantly with the type of response (p=0.004). These results suggest that the serum concentration of TNF-α can be an indicator of response and could be used in clinical decision-making for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document