Analysis of five-year survival rate in patients with proximal femoral tumours after total hip replacement

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19508-19508
Author(s):  
S. A. Saravanan ◽  
V. Sokolovski ◽  
V. Voloshin ◽  
M. Aliev ◽  
V. Zybikov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Pathological Fracture ◽  
Overall Survival Rate ◽  
Total Hip

19508 Background: To analyse the five-year survival rate in patients with proximal femoral tumours after total hip replacement. Methods: Between the period of 1994–2003, 50 patients were operated (Total Hip Replacement) for proximal femoral tumours at the Department of General Oncology (Bone & Soft tissue tuomurs), N. N. Blokhin Cancer Research Institute & Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation. The histological diagnoses included 14 - metastases, 10 - osteosarcoma, 8 - chondrosarcoma, 4 - Ewing’s sarcoma, 4 - Giant cell tumor, 3 - malignant fibrous histiocytoma, 2 paraosteal and 2 periosteal osteosarcoma, and 1 each from primary neuroectodermal tumor, myeloid disease, and aneurysmal bone cyst. The follow-up ranged from 1–9 years (mean follow-up 5 years). 21 patients (45.7%) had pathological fracture. The cause of the pathological fracture was metastasis in 12 patients (26%). 28 patients (60.8%), had soft tissue invasion. All the survival analyses were done using Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis method. Functional outcome was estimated using Enneking’s evaluation criteria. Results: The overall survival rate of patients was 66.7% at 5 years. 2 patients had local recurrence.12 patients had metastases after surgery. In that 11 patients were died. There was no evidence of disease in 32 patients. In 3 patients, we performed disarticulation of the hip joint because of the local recurrence. The overall survival rate of limb was 92.7% at 5 years. The overall survival rate of prostheses was 84.2% at 5 years. At the latest follow up, functional outcome was excellent in 15 (30%) patients, good in 27 (54%) patients, fair in 5 (10%) patients, poor in 3 (6%) patients. Conclusions: Though the extent of the muscle and bone resection is large, there is no doubt that endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur provides a good functional and oncological outcome when compared with the various other reconstructive surgeries. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Uncemented versus cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110122
Author(s):  
Wenlu Liu ◽  
Huanyi Lin ◽  
Xianshang Zeng ◽  
Meiji Chen ◽  
Weiwei Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Metal On Metal

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of primary metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM-TR) converted to uncemented total hip replacement (UTR) or cemented total hip replacement (CTR) in patients with femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA: 31B/C). Methods Patient data of 234 UTR or CTR revisions after primary MoM-TR failure from March 2007 to January 2018 were retrospectively identified. Clinical outcomes, including the Harris hip score (HHS) and key orthopaedic complications, were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months following conversion and every 12 months thereafter. Results The mean follow-up was 84.12 (67–100) months for UTR and 84.23 (66–101) months for CTR. At the last follow-up, the HHS was better in the CTR- than UTR-treated patients. Noteworthy dissimilarities were correspondingly detected in the key orthopaedic complication rates (16.1% for CTR vs. 47.4% for UTR). Statistically significant differences in specific orthopaedic complications were also detected in the re-revision rate (10.3% for UTR vs. 2.5% for CTR), prosthesis loosening rate (16.3% for UTR vs. 5.9% for CTR), and periprosthetic fracture rate (12.0% for UTR vs. 4.2% for CTR). Conclusion In the setting of revision of failed primary MoM-TR, CTR may demonstrate advantages over UTR in improving functional outcomes and reducing key orthopaedic complications.

scholarly journals Follow-up study of total hip replacement.

1989 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 503-506
Author(s):  
Kenichi Aramaki ◽  
Mitsuru Takeshita ◽  
Kohji Kuroda ◽  
Akio Nakamura ◽  
Yuji Fukahori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Follow Up Study

Patients on the waiting list for total hip replacement: a 1-year follow-up study

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 536-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margareta Bachrach-Lindström ◽  
Susanne Karlsson ◽  
Lars-Göran Pettersson ◽  
Torsten Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Waiting List ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Follow Up Study

SHALL IT BE BETTER, AS AN APPROACH FOR THR, POSTERIORLY OR LATERALLY; A CLINICO-FUNCTIONAL AND GAIT ANALYTICAL OUTCOME ANALYSIS, IN A PROSPECTIVE STUDY, IN THE SOUTH-INDIAN POPULATION.

2021 ◽  
pp. 71-75
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar C ◽  
Ganashree S ◽  
Arivoli S ◽  
Aswath C A ◽  
Rakesh Kumar B ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
South Indian Population ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
South Indian

Introduction: Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) or Total hip replacement (THR), as it is popularly called, attempts to mollify these basic clinical problems, in patients with a hip arthritic problem, which may be of a sequela to age-related degeneration, osteonecrosis, systemic disorder like Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or Ankylosing spondylosis (AS) or as a result of trauma and or an old infection. The basic pathology, is an unfavourable and abrading hip diarthrodial joint. The endeavour of the study was, to establish the efcacy of the Posterior vs Lateral approach for THA/THR, by studying their outcomes in primary THR. This prospective study was undertaken at Che Materials And Methods: ttinad Hospital and Research Institute (CARE), Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu district, Tamilnadu, In the Department of Orthopaedics from Jan 2017 to Dec 2020 (48 months). The Functional outcome of hip surgery was measured using the Harris Hip Score, Oxford hip score and the WOMAC. Rivermead visual gait analysis (RVGA) method was used post-operatively to assess the gait. The Biomechanical outcomes of Abductor Gait Component, were individually assessed by EMG studies. The Harris Hip Score, The Oxford Hip S Results: core and WOMAC score, when the lateral approach was compared to the posterior approach pre-op and post-op in the 12 months minimum follow-up period, the laterally approached group faired better. The VAS score was equivocal. The comprehensive RVGA assessment also showed marginally better results for the laterally approached group as was the case with the Trendelenburg test score. The EMG studies for the Gluteus Maximus, Medius and the lateral rotators of hip also favoured the outcomes for the laterally approach hips. The supremacy of the Lateral Approach, ove Conclusion: r Posterior Approach, cannot be adjudged in a short-term follow-up study. It is thus opined that the Lateral Approach may be statistically and data wise superior, but the patient satisfaction, which is a major factor, is almost the same in both the approach groups. The follow-up needs to be atleast for a decade for us to be able to come to any meaningful conclusion. With regards to surgery like the Total hip replacement, which have a longevity factor exceeding 10 years, studies have to be followed up for periods in excess of 10 years.

scholarly journals Cementless Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement in Children and Adolescents

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 858
Author(s):  
Giovanni Trisolino ◽  
Stefano Stallone ◽  
Francesco Castagnini ◽  
Barbara Bordini ◽  
Monica Cosentino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Implant Survivorship ◽  
Ceramic On Ceramic

Background: total hip replacement (THR) is a rare surgical option in children and adolescents with disabling hip diseases. The aim of this study is to report results from a retrospective cohort of patients aged 18 years or less who underwent cementless Ceramic-on-Ceramic (CoC) THR at a single institution, investigating clinical and radiographic outcomes, survival rates, and reasons for revision of the implants. Materials and methods: we queried the Registry of Prosthetic Orthopedic Implants (RIPO) to identify all children and adolescents undergoing THR between 2000 and 2019 at a single Institution. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing cementless CoC THR, aged less than 18 years at surgery, followed for at least 2 years. Sixty-eight patients (74 hips) matched all the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. We assessed the clinical and radiographic outcomes, the rate of complications, the survival rate, and reasons for revision of the implants. Results: The mean follow-up was 6.6 ± 4.4 years (range 2–20). The most frequent reason for THR was post-traumatic or chemotherapy-induced avascular necrosis (38%). The overall survival rate of the cohort was 97.6% (95% CI: 84.9–99.7%) at 5 years of follow-up, 94.4% (95% CI: 79.8–98.6%) at 10 years and 15 years of follow-up. Two THR in two patients (2.7%) required revision. With the numbers available, Cox regression analysis could not detect any significant interaction between preoperative or intraoperative variables and implant survivorship (p-value 0.242 to 0.989).” The average HOOS was 85 ± 14.3 (range 30.6–100). Overall, 23 patients (48%) reported excellent HOOS scores (>90 points), 21 patients (44%) reported acceptable HOOS scores (60–90 points) while 4 patients (8%) reported poor outcomes (<60 points). Twenty-one patients (43%) were regularly involved into moderate- to high-intensity sport activities (UCLA ≥ 6). Conclusions: Cementless CoC THR is a successful procedure in children and teenagers, having demonstrated high implant survivorship and low rates of complications and failure. A meticulous preoperative planning and implant selection is mandatory, to avoid implant malposition, which is the main reason of failure and revision in these cases. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of the THR on the psychosocial wellbeing of teenagers, as well as risks and benefits and cost-effectiveness in comparison to the hip preserving surgical procedures.

scholarly journals The five-year follow-up study of Lord total hip replacement.

1990 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-137
Author(s):  
Sakamichi Ikeda ◽  
Katsuro Iwasaki ◽  
Yutaka Nakajima
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Follow Up Study

Short-Term Clinical Assessment of Hip Hemi-Arthroplasty in 11 Dogs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renée Huggard ◽  
Grace Wicks ◽  
Gordon Corfield
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Salvage Procedure ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Pelvic Radiography ◽  
Hemi Arthroplasty

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to assess the short-term clinical outcome in dogs following a hip hemi-arthroplasty for the treatment of primary pathological disorders of the hip and as a salvage procedure following failure of the cup component of a total hip replacement. Materials and Methods Medical records of dogs that had a unilateral hip hemi-arthroplasty performed between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. Data collected included follow-up orthopaedic examinations performed at 0, 2, 8 and 52 weeks postoperatively, pelvic radiography at 0, 8 and 52 weeks postoperatively and an owner questionnaire (Helsinki chronic pain index [HCPI]). Results Eleven unilateral hip hemi-arthroplasty procedures were identified. The median age at time of surgery was 3.6 years (8 months–10 years) and the median follow-up time was 13 months (range: 2 months–3 years). The HCPI for all dogs at follow-up was median 8 ± 7.30 (range: 5–25). Total HCPI was < 12 for 7/10 dogs and ≥ 12 for 3 dogs. Pelvic radiographs at 1 year confirmed osteointergration of the femoral stem implant and no evidence of implant subsidence or progression of osteoarthritis. However, there was some evidence of mild lucency of the acetabular bed around the prosthetic femoral head and mild peri-acetabular sclerosis in four cases. Conclusion Hip hemi-arthroplasty provides a clinically acceptable treatment for disabling disease of the coxofemoral joint with 10/11 patients achieving acceptable short-term clinical function. Long-term assessment of the hip hemi-arthroplasty and comparison with total hip replacement is indicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document