P53 as a predictor of tumor burden in lymph nodes (LN) in colon cancer (Cca) patients (pts) undergoing sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping (M)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3617-3617
Author(s):  
R. Sehgal ◽  
S. Saha ◽  
D. Wiese ◽  
R. Parker ◽  
W. Huang ◽  
...  

3617 Background: p53 and LN status(S) are important prognostic markers in Cca. Our study was done to evaluate whether p53 S could predict tumor burden in LNs in Cca undergoing SLNM. Methods: Pts with Cca underwent SLNM to determine the LN S. A portion of tumor was used for detection of p53 S by IHC.p53 Histo Score (HS) was defined as (Intensity of stain in cells from 0–4 +1) × (% cells staining). HS of 180 was taken as cut off for significance based on previous studies on solid tumors. Metastatic foci in SLNs and nonSLNs were measured in greatest diameter by ocular micrometer. For overall tumor burden in SLNs and nonSLNs,all metastatic foci were added for each pt. Results: SLNM was successful in 100% of the 117 consecutive pts with Cca. Pts with distant metastasis (mets) (18) and skip mets (9) were excluded. Of the remaining 90 pts,39% were SLN positive (+ve) and 61% were SLN negative (-ve). HS of ≤ 180 was found in 66% and HS >180 was found in 34% of the pts. In 55 SLN -ve pts 76% had HS ≤ 180 while 24% had HS >180. In 35 SLN +ve pts, 49% had HS of ≤ 180 and 51% had HS >180. ( Table ) Of SLN +ve pts, size of metastatic tumor in LNs was available in 86% of pts. Average (av.) non SLN met size was 0.95 cms in pts with HS ≤ 180 and 3.4 cms in pts with HS > 180. Av. SLN met size was 0.63 cms in pts with HS ≤ 180 and 0.9 cms in pts with HS>180 ( Table ). No statistical significance was found among T stage of pts with HS >180 vs ≤ 180. Conclusion: Pts with p53 HS >180 showed significantly greater tumor burden in both SLNs and non SLNs as compared to pts with HS ≤ 180. Also probability of having SLN -ve disease is higher in pts with HS ≤ 180 as compared to pts with HS >180 in Cca. Thus,even in SLN -ve pts, high HS may indicate a worse prognosis. Hence,a high p53 HS might predict pts with Cca having higher tumor burden in LNs and thus identify an aggressive subgroup of pts. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14509-14509
Author(s):  
S. Grewal ◽  
S. Saha ◽  
M. Patel ◽  
R. Sehgal ◽  
R. Parker ◽  
...  

14509 Background: Lymph Node (LN) status is the most important prognostic factor in colon cancer (Cca). Angiogenesis Index (AI) has been studied as a prognostic marker in various solid tumors with conflicting results. Hence, a retrospective analysis was done to evaluate the role of AI as a prognostic marker in Cca. Methods: Pts with Cca who underwent SLNM to determine LN status were included. A portion of tumor was sent for tumor marker analysis including p53, Thrombospondin-1 and CD31 by IHC. AI was derived for each specimen by summing the biomarker specific score for the three tumor markers. AI of -ve 6 was taken as cut off for significance based on previous studies on solid tumors. Metastatic foci in SLNs and non-SLNs were measured in greatest diameter by ocular micrometer; and were added for each pt to estimate overall tumor burden in SLNs and non-SLNs. Results: A total of 111 consecutive pts with Cca were included in the study. SLNM was successful in 100% pts. Pts with distant metastasis (mets) (n=18), Tis (n=1) and skip mets (n=9) were excluded from final analysis. Out of the remaining 83 pts, an AI of -6 or less was found in 22 pts (26.5%) while 61 pts (73.5%) had AI of more than (>) -6. Of the 61 pts with AI > -6, 37.7% pts were SLN +ve while 62.3% pts were SLN -ve (p=0.05)( Table 1A ). Of the 22 pts with AI less than or -6, 45.5% pts were SLN +ve and 54.5% pts were SLN -ve (p=0.65). Size of the metastatic tumor burden in lymph nodes was available in 69.7% of SLN +ve pts. Total average tumor burden for pts with AI > -6 (n=15) was 2.04cm as compared to 1.48cm in pts with AI of -6 or less (n=8)(p=0.66). Average SLN met size was 0.73cm in pts with AI > -6 and 0.63cm in pts with AI of -6 or less (p=0.66)( Table 1B ). Conclusions: AI did not correlate with nodal positivity or tumor burden in LNs in pts with Cca. LN status remains the most important prognostic marker in Cca. Further larger trials are required to determine the role of AI as a prognostic marker in Cca. [Table: see text] [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolein Ankersmit ◽  
Martijn W. Heymans ◽  
Otto Hoekstra ◽  
Stijn L. Vlek ◽  
Linda J. Schoonmade ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Mikko Vuoristo ◽  
Timo Muhonen ◽  
Virve Koljonen ◽  
Susanna Juteau ◽  
Micaela Hernberg ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1249-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. B. Rivet ◽  
M. G. Mutch ◽  
J. H. Ritter ◽  
A. A. Khan ◽  
J. S. Lewis ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14046-e14046
Author(s):  
Sukamal Saha ◽  
Mohammed Nawaf Kanaan ◽  
Mohammad Mozayen ◽  
Philip Gafford ◽  
Mohammed Saifullah Shaik ◽  
...  

e14046 Background: Unlike other solid tumors, tumor size (TS) is not a part of the TNM staging system for colon cancer. Our goal is to correlate TS with TNM staging, nodal positivity (NP), and 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients (pts) with invasive colon cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) vs. conventional surgery (CS). Methods: A retrospective review of 681 pts with invasive adenocarcinoma of the colon were reviewed and divided into two groups of pts (SLNM and CS). These groups were subdivided according to the size of the tumor in four groups (0-2, 2-4, 4-6 and more than 6 cm). 461 pts underwent SLNM between 1996-2010 compared to 220 pts who underwent CS between 1996-2006. The pathology reports reviewed for TS (the maximum diameter of the primary tumor), T staging, and NP. The OS was calculated from the social security database. Then all data was compared between both groups. Results: Pts with tumors <2cm were mainly T1+T2 (72%, 70%), whereas tumors >6 cm, majority of pts wereT3+T4 (94%, 85%). T1+T2 percentage consistently decreased as TS increased, and T3+T4 percentage was increasing consistently with increased TS (Table 1A). NP according to TS for SLNM pts were (16%, 53%, 56%, 48%) NP and for CS pts were (15%, 32%, 34%, 39%). In both groups, NP increased as TS increased compared to 0-2 cm group. The overall NP in both groups was 47% and 31% (Table 1B). OS for SLNM and CS pts were calculated in each group according to TS. Overall SLNM pts had better OS when compared to CS pts (65 %, 54%). Conclusions: Increasing TS was consistent with increasing T staging for both SLNM and CS pts. NP and OS were worse with increased TS for SLNM and CS pts. SLNM pts had higher NP and better outcome in OS when compared to CS pts, hence TS should be considered as a prognostic factor in pts with adenocarcinoma of the colon. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document