Altered fractionated radiotherapy is cost-effective in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: An economic analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 90–03

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6007-6007
Author(s):  
A. A. Konski ◽  
M. Bhargavan ◽  
J. Owen ◽  
R. Paulus ◽  
J. Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Fractionated Radiotherapy

6007 Background: RTOG 9003 compared altered fractionated radiotherapy (AIFX) to standard radiotherapy (SFX). Overall and disease-free survival was improved in the AIFX schedules but with increased toxicity. The specific aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of AIFX to SFX. Methods: Costs data included Medicare Part A and Part B costs from all providers—inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, home health, hospice, and physicians and other Part B providers were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for patients treated on RTOG 9003 from 1992–1996. Claims were restricted to those with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer. We calculated 56-month expected discounted costs for each arm of the trial in 1996 dollars, with Kaplan-Meier sampling average estimates of survival probabilities for each month and mean monthly costs. Costs were discounted back to the time of entry onto the trial, using an annual discount rate of 3% and indexed to 1996 dollars using the Consumer Price Index. The analysis was performed from a payer’s perspective. Incremental cost-effective ratios were calculated comparing AIFX schedules to SFX. Results: Of the 1,130 patients entered, 1,073 patients were analyzable for outcomes and Medicare cost data and clinical outcomes were available for 130 patients. The expected mean 56-month cost and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) compared to SFX are presented in the table . Sensitivity analysis and 95% confidence ellipses will be presented. Conclusions: Although more toxic altered fractionated radiotherapy schedules were found to be cost-effective using a willingness to pay of $50,000/life year in patients >65 years old. These results need to be confirmed in a cohort of younger patients. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Beyond race: The impact of ethnicity on the treatment outcome of locally advanced head and neck cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16500-16500
Author(s):  
C. J. Calfa ◽  
M. Escalon ◽  
S. Zafar ◽  
E. Lopez ◽  
V. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Impact

16500 Background: Self identified racial groups share an unequal burden of head and neck cancer . Recent evidence suggests that outcome among races is different and the causes are multifactorial. Nonetheless, differences among ethnic groups have not been reported. Herein, we decided to analyze differences in treatment response and outcome among our white and Hispanic patient population treated for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Methods: Patients were identified using the tumor registry. We reviewed retrospectively the data from medical records. 100 white Hispanics (WH) and 50 white non-Hispanics (WNH) diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck cancer and treated at our institution from 2004 to 2005, were eligible for the study. Standard statistical analysis, including Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazard models were used. P value of <0.05 was considered for statistical significance. Results: Preliminary results reveal that, in our study population, median age at diagnosis, gender, performance status (ECOG 0–2) and squamous cell histology did not differ significantly between the two groups. Stage 4 at diagnosis was more commonly observed in Hispanics as opposed to WNH (85.7% vs 68.6%) (P = 0.1). Surgery was more commonly used as an initial treatment option in Hispanics than WNH (42.8% vs 28.6%) (P = 0.18) while chemotherapy was less likely to be used (78.6% vs. 91.4%) (P = 0.15). Hispanics were more likely to smoke than WNH (P = 0.0003) and were equally exposed to chronic alcohol use. Patients from the Hispanic group were more likely to respond to therapy than whites by Chi-squared analysis but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). No differences were seen in disease free survival. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median overall survival was 16 months for Hispanics vs. 25 months for whites but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.26). Final analysis will be available at the time of the annual meeting. Conclusion: In our experience, a trend for decrease overall survival was noted in the Hispanic ethnic group. This may be in part due to more advanced stage at presentation. Nonetheless, in order to definitively answer this question, further research is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Twice-a-day fractionated radiotherapy with chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-346
Author(s):  
Kumiko KARASAWA ◽  
Nahoko KOJIMA ◽  
Kengo HIMEI ◽  
Yuko KANEYASU ◽  
Midori KITA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Fractionated Radiotherapy

Compliance, toxicity and efficacy in weekly versus 3-weekly cisplatin concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Muzumder ◽  
Nirmala Srikantia ◽  
Ganesha Dev Vashishta ◽  
Avinash H. Udayashankar ◽  
John Michael Raj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiation ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Weekly Cisplatin

AbstractAimWeekly low-dose cisplatin is routinely used in concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC), despite 3-weekly cisplatin being the standard of care. We compared compliance, toxicity and efficacy in weekly versus 3-weekly cisplatin CCRT in LAHNC.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, weekly cisplatin 50 mg flat dose was compared with 3-weekly cisplatin 100 mg/m2, when given in CCRT in LAHNC with curative intent. The study outcome was compliance, toxicity, loco-regional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsEighty-four patients received CCRT from January 2013 to June 2017, 40 in weekly and 44 in 3-weekly arm. There was no difference between the arms not completing scheduled radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Patient receiving 200 mg/m2 cisplatin is higher in 3-weekly arm compared with weekly arm (75 versus 40·9%; p<0·0015). Compared with 3-weekly arm, more patient in weekly arm developed grade ≥3 mucositis (52·5 versus 15·9%, p=0·0004), day care intravenous hydration (82·5 versus 38·6% <0·0001) and in-patient admission (55·0 versus 18·2%; p=0·0004). The 2-year LRC, DFS and OS in weekly versus 3-weekly arm were: 70 versus 61·4% (p=0·406); 67·5 versus 56·8% (p=0·314); 67·5 versus 61·4% (p=0·558), respectively. The median time to LRR, DFs and OS was not reached.ConclusionsWeekly cisplatin is comparable with 3-weekly cisplatin in terms of compliance, disease control and survival, but with increased grade 3 mucositis and higher admissions for supportive care.

Postoperative Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

1989 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Franchin ◽  
Antonino De Paoli ◽  
Carlo Gobitti ◽  
Giovanni Boz ◽  
Emilio Minatel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
Advanced Head

This retrospective study was conducted on 255 consecutive patients with locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx, treated at the Radiotherapy Department of Pordenone General Hospital between January 1975 and December 1985. All patients underwent radical surgery followed, after an interval ranging from 10 days to 2.9 months, by radiotherapy given either through a 6 MeV linear accelerator or a cobalt-60 unit. Field extension and dose delivered were comparable in relation to stage and involvement of the surgical resection margins. The aims of the study were to evaluate the survival rate and to analyze the clinical parameters which can influence the disease-free survival. The adjusted overall 5-year survival rate was 71%; stage, performance status at diagnosis, and site of the primary tumor were significant factors in determining patient prognosis, whereas Infiltration of resection margins was not significant in determining locoregional control of disease. Seventy-five patients relapsed and 67 died of cancer-related diseases whereas death in 52 patients was not related to the head and neck cancer. The combined modality treatment consisting of surgery followed by radiotherapy was well tolerated and proved to be effective in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck tumors.

scholarly journals Phase IIb trial comparing two concurrent cisplatin schedules in locally advanced head and neck cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 064-068
Author(s):  
Lekha Madhavan Nair ◽  
R. Rejnish Kumar ◽  
Kainickal Cessal Thomachan ◽  
Malu Rafi ◽  
Preethi Sara George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Weekly Cisplatin

Abstract Background: Concurrent chemoradiation with 3 weekly cisplatin (100 mg/m2) is the standard of care for locally advanced head and neck cancer. However, this regimen has been shown to be associated with lesser compliance and higher toxicities. Hence, there is a need to explore alternative concurrent cisplatin regimens. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicities of 3 weekly cisplatin (100 mg/m2) with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) concurrently with radiation in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Patients and Methods: This phase IIb trial randomized 56 patients with Stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx to Arm A or Arm B. Arm A received cisplatin 100 mg/m2 3 weekly and Arm B received cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly concurrently with radiation. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) and secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and acute toxicity. DFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method, and log-rank test was used to assess the difference in these distributions with respect to treatment. Results: The 2-year DFS in Arm A and Arm B was 64.5% and 52.8%, respectively (P = 0.67). The OS at 2 years was 71% and 61.1% in Arm A and Arm B, respectively (P = 0.61). There were no significant differences in acute hematological, renal, or mucosal toxicities between the two arms. Conclusion: This study showed a nonsignificant improvement in DFS and OS in the 3 weekly cisplatin arm over the weekly arm with comparable toxicities. The trial is registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI registration number: CTRI/2013/05/003703, URL-http://ctri.nic.in).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document