Dose and schedule selection for the anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibody ticilimumab in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8032-8032 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gomez-Navarro ◽  
A. Sharma ◽  
V. Bozon ◽  
C. Bulanhagui ◽  
D. Pavlov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Dose Regimen ◽  
Multiple Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Clinical Dose ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

8032 Background: Ticilimumab therapy has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in pts with metastatic melanoma. Its indirect, immune-mediated antitumor effects pose unique challenges for dose/regimen selection. Methods: It was our original intention to select the clinical dose/regimen of ticilimumab based on (1) clinical safety and tolerability and (2) attainment of target plasma concentrations derived from pre-clinical work using an ex vivo assay of ticilimumab-induced enhancement of cytotoxic T-cell function. Because numerous pts with metastatic melanoma experienced clinical benefit (i.e., durable objective responses [OR] and/or long-term survival) in early clinical trials of ticilimumab, we are using (1) safety and tolerability and (2) clinical benefit to guide dose/regimen selection. Data for evaluating these criteria come from a single-dose Phase 1 trial (0.01, 0.1, 1, 3, 6, 10 and 15 mg/kg) and an ongoing multiple-dose Phase 1/2 trial in pts with melanoma (Phase 1 portion: 3, 6 and 10 mg/kg Q1M; Phase 2 portion: 10 mg/kg Q1M and 15 mg/kg Q3M). Results: In the single-dose Phase 1 trial, 10 mg/kg was the Protocol-defined MTD but a high rate of clinical benefit was seen in the 15 mg/kg dose cohort (6/6 pts). Because the DLTs seen at 15 mg/kg (Gr 3 diarrhea, Gr 3 rash) were moderate and resolved completely within 3 months of dosing, 15 mg/kg Q3M was proposed as a safe and tolerable dose and is being studied in the Phase 2 portion of the multiple-dose Phase 1/2 trial. The Phase 1 portion of the multiple-dose Phase 1/2 trial revealed that 10 mg/kg is safe and tolerable with monthly dosing so 10 mg/kg Q1M is also being studied in the Phase 2 portion of the trial. At the end of the Simon Optimum-defined Stage 1 of the Phase 2 portion of the ongoing trial, the OR rate (3/18 pts) is the same for both dosing regimens. However, with 15 mg/kg Q3M, Gr 3/4 adverse events were less frequent (6% versus 34%). Conclusions: 15 mg/kg Q3M is proposed as the clinical dose/regimen for ticilimumab in metastatic melanoma. This dose/regimen appears to have anti-tumor activity approximately equal to 10 mg/kg Q1M but it appears to have a superior safety profile. [Table: see text]

Phase 1 trial of ADI-PEG20 plus cisplatin in patients with pretreated metastatic melanoma or other advanced solid malignancies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuyang Yao ◽  
Filip Janku ◽  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
John Stewart ◽  
Sapna Pradyuman Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Solid Malignancies

scholarly journals Phase 1 Trial of a Single Dose of Recombinant Human Interleukin–12 in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Patients with 100–500 CD4 Cells/μL

2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (4) ◽  
pp. 1070-1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Jacobson ◽  
David Hardy ◽  
Elizabeth Connick ◽  
Jessica Watson ◽  
Michael DeBruin
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Interleukin 12 ◽  
Cd4 Cells ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus

Efficacy of a Single Dose versus a Multiple Dose Regimen of Mebendazole against Hookworm Infections among School Children: a Randomized Open-label Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tegegne Eshetu ◽  
Mulugeta Aemero ◽  
Ayalew Jejaw
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Dose Regimen ◽  
Multiple Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Preventive Chemotherapy ◽  
Dose Treatment ◽  
School Aged Children ◽  
Multiple Dose Regimen ◽  
Hookworm Infections

Abstract Background: Despite the existence of a population-based control program using single dose albendazole or mebendazole as a preventive chemotherapy, hookworm transmission remains high. It causes a negative impact on the growth and school performance of children. In connection to this preventive chemotherapy, different studies produced conflicting results. This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of single (500mg) versus multiple doses (100mg twice a day during three consecutive days) of mebendazole against hookworm infections among school-aged children. Methods: This randomized open-label clinical trial took place among school-aged children (6-14 years old) in Burie and Debre Elias towns, Northwest Ethiopia. Using simple randomization, eligible hookworm-positive children were allocated (1:1) to either a single or multiple dose treatment arms. Stool samples were collected and processed using McMaster method at baseline and follow-up period (14-21 days after treatment). Only laboratory technicians were blinded. The cure and egg reduction rates which were assessed after 14-21 days of treatment were the primary and secondary therapeutic outcome measures against hookworm infections, respectively. An independent t-test was used to compare group means, and logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratio (OR). P-value < 0.05 at 95% CI was considered statistically significant. Result: 108 children, 54 in each treatment arm had completed baseline data and received allocated treatment. 103 children had completed follow-up data records and included for the final efficacy analysis. Cure rate against hookworm was significantly higher in the multiple dose (96.1%) than in the single dose (30.8%) with OR=55.125; 95% CI: 11.92-254.9; P < 0.001. The egg reduction rate in the multiple dose treatment arm (99.5%) was also significantly higher than in the single dose arm (68.9%) with difference t (101) =5.38; 95% CI 230.95-505.36; P < 0.001. Conclusion: The single dose regimen of mebendazole for the treatment of hookworm infections showed poor cure and egg reduction rates, while the multiple dose revealed satisfactory. Although multiple dose regimen administration is a bit more complex than the single dose, we strongly encourage replacing it with multiple dose regimen during deworming programs in hookworm endemic areas. Trial registration: This trial is registered in www.pactr.org, # PACTR201911466695052.

Efficacy of a Single dose versus a Multiple Dose Regimen of Mebendazole against Hookworm Infections among School Children: A Randomized Single-Blinded Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tegegne Eshetu ◽  
Mulugeta Aemero ◽  
Ayalew Jejaw
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Dose Regimen ◽  
Multiple Dose ◽  
Reduction Rate ◽  
Infection Intensity ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Preventive Chemotherapy ◽  
School Aged Children ◽  
Multiple Dose Regimen ◽  
Hookworm Infections

Abstract Background : Despite the existence of population-based control program using single dose albendazole or mebendazole as a preventive chemotherapy, Hookworm disease transmissions remains high. It causes a negative impact on the growth and school performance of children. In connection to this preventive chemotherapy, different studies produced conflicting results. This study evaluated the efficacy of single (500mg) versus multiple doses (100mg twice a day during three consecutive days) of mebendazole against Hookworm infections among school aged children. Methods : This randomized single-blinded clinical trial took place among school-aged children (6-14 years old) in Burie and Debre Elias towns, Northwest Ethiopia. Using simple randomization, eligible Hookworm positive children were allocated (1:1) to either a single or multiple doses treatment arm. Stool samples were collected and processed using McMaster method at baseline and follow-up period (14-21 days after treatment). Main outcome measures : The cure rate against Hookworm and egg reduction rate for determining the changes in infection intensity were the main outcome measures after 14-21 days following dosing. An independent t-test was used to compare group means, and logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratio (OR). P-value < 0.05 at 95% CI was considered statistically significant. Result: 109 children were participated in both treatment arms. Cure rate against Hookworm was significantly higher in the multiple dose (96.1%) than in the single dose (30.8%) with (OR=55.125; 95% CI: 11.92-254.9; P < 0.001). The egg reduction rate in the multiple dose treatment arm (99.5%) was also significantly higher than in the single dose arm (68.9%) with difference (t (101) =5.38; 95% CI 230.95-505.36; P < 0.001). Conclusion : The single dose regimen of mebendazole for the treatment of Hookworm infection showed poor efficacy, while the multiple dose revealed satisfactory efficacy. Moreover, infection intensity reduction was not achieved following single dosing. Therefore, we strongly recommend replacing the single dose mebendazole regimen with multiple dose regimen during deworming program in hookworm endemic areas. Trial registration : This trial is registered in www.pactr.org , # PACTR201911466695052

Navitoclax (ABT-263) Plus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR): A Phase 1 Study In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2455-2455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
Lode J. Swinnen ◽  
Jianning Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Abstract 2455 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule, binds with high affinity (Ki ≤1nM) to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, promoting apoptosis. In vitro, navitoclax shows potent targeted cytotoxicity (EC50 ≤ 1μM) against T and B lymphoid malignancies that over-express Bcl-2. A phase 1 trial demonstrated oral navitoclax monotherapy to be well-tolerated and to have anti-tumor activity in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, thrombocytopenia (TCP) was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Phase 3 studies showed improved outcomes in CLL pts with the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) combination, and a phase 2 trial showed bendamustine/rituximab (BR) to be effective for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Navitoclax enhanced R (monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy) efficacy in preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma. Methods: This is an ongoing, international, phase 1 dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral navitoclax in combination with FCR (Arm A) or BR (Arm B) in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL. Secondary objectives are efficacy endpoints (PFS, ORR, TTP, OS, duration of response). Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance score ≤1, ANC ≥100/μL, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL. Preliminary results are reported. After obtaining informed consent, pts were assigned to Arm A or Arm B based on physician preference, each consisting of 28-day dose-escalation cycles with once-daily, pre-infusion, navitoclax treatment on Days 3–5 of Cycle 1 and Days 1–3 of subsequent cycles. In both arms, R was 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Cycle 1; and 500 mg/m2 on Day 2 of Cycle 2 and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles. In Arm A, F 25 mg/m2 and C 175 mg/m2 were dosed on Days 2–4 in Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1–3 in subsequent cycles. In Arm B, B was dosed at 70 mg/m2 on Days 2 and 3 of Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1 and 2 in subsequent cycles. Navitoclax starting dose was 110 mg daily. Dose escalation to the next cohort (200 mg) was according to a continuous reassessment model. Tumor responses were evaluated using NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Pts could continue on navitoclax therapy for 1 yr in the absence of progressive disease or significant toxicity. Results: As of July 2010, 7 pts enrolled in the initially prioritized Arm B (BR+navitoclax); all completed the first cohort of 110 mg (median age 60 yr [range 55–72]). Study sites are currently enrolling pts in Arm A (FCR+navitoclax); 2 pts have enrolled to date. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–7). One pt had a DLT of elevated AST (Arm B, 110 mg cohort) and 1 pt had a DLT of neutropenic fever (Arm A, 110 mg cohort). In Arm B, neither TCP nor neutropenia have been DLTs. For the 7 pts with navitoclax-related AEs, the most common were diarrhea (3 pts), nausea (5 pts), and fatigue (3 pts). Seven pts remain on study; 2 pts discontinued due to disease progression and 2 withdrew per physician preference. In Arm B, preliminary antitumor best responses were assessable in 4 pts who received 2 cycles; 1 CRi in a pt with del17p- (based on lymph node [LN] response and no morphologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow), 2 unconfirmed CRs (based on LN response and no bone marrow at this time), and 1 PR in a pt with del17p- (this pt subsequently received an allogeneic stem cell transplant). Preliminary PK results for the Arm B 110 mg cohort indicated that navitoclax PK was similar in Cycle 1 (navitoclax+BR) and Cycle 2 (navitoclax alone), and appeared comparable to PK in the navitoclax monotherapy study. Conclusions: Early results show that the combination of navitoclax with BR is well-tolerated, without DLTs of TCP or neutropenia, and show evidence of anti-tumor activity. Data are limited in the FCR portion of the study. The maximum tolerated dose of navitoclax has not been reached. Accrual is ongoing and following completion of the dose-escalation components of this study, expanded cohorts of pts will be assessed using the recommended phase 2 dose of navitoclax to further assess the tolerability and dose, and to continue to explore for efficacy signals in combinations. Preliminary data in combination with BR are encouraging. Disclosures: Kipps: Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Wierda: Abbott: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jones: Glaxo Smith-Kline: Consultancy; Abbott: Research Funding. Swinnen: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yang: Abbott: Employment. Cui: Abbott: Employment. Busman: Abbott: Employment. Krivoshik: Abbott: Employment. Enschede: Abbott: Employment. Humerickhouse: Abbott: Employment.

scholarly journals Targeting Refractory Sarcomas and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in a Phase I/II Study of Sirolimus in Combination with Ganetespib (SARC023)

Sarcoma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
AeRang Kim ◽  
Yao Lu ◽  
Scott H. Okuno ◽  
Denise Reinke ◽  
Ophélia Maertens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Mtor Inhibition ◽  
Nerve Sheath Tumors ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors ◽  
Nerve Sheath ◽  
Patient Reported

Purpose. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas. Combining Hsp90 inhibitors to enhance endoplasmic reticulum stress with mTOR inhibition results in dramatic MPNST shrinkage in a genetically engineered MPNST mouse model. Ganetespib is an injectable potent small molecule inhibitor of Hsp90. Sirolimus is an oral mTOR inhibitor. We sought to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended dose of ganetespib and sirolimus in patients with refractory sarcomas and assess clinical benefits in patients with unresectable/refractory MPNSTs. Patients and Methods. In this multi-institutional, open-label, phase 1/2 study of ganetespib and sirolimus, patients ≥16 years with histologically confirmed refractory sarcoma (phase 1) or MPNST (phase 2) were eligible. A conventional 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used for phase 1. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures were evaluated. Primary objectives of phase 2 were to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of this combination in MPNSTs. Patient-reported outcomes assessed pain. Results. Twenty patients were enrolled (10 per phase). Toxicities were manageable; most frequent non-DLTs were diarrhea, elevated liver transaminases, and fatigue. The recommended dose of ganetespib was 200 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 with sirolimus 4 mg orally once daily with day 1 loading dose of 12 mg. In phase 1, one patient with leiomyosarcoma achieved a sustained partial response. In phase 2, no responses were observed. The median number of cycles treated was 2 (1–4). Patients did not meet the criteria for clinical benefit as defined per protocol. Pain ratings decreased or were stable. Conclusion. Despite promising preclinical rationale and tolerability of the combination therapy, no responses were observed, and the study did not meet parameters for further evaluation in MPNSTs. This trial was registered with (NCT02008877).

Phase 1 trial of seclidemstat (SP-2577) in patients with relapsed/refractory Ewing sarcoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11514-11514
Author(s):  
Damon R. Reed ◽  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Bhuvana Setty ◽  
Leo Mascarenhas ◽  
Paul A. Meyers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Tumor Shrinkage ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Grade 3

11514 Background: Ewing sarcoma (ES), a rare bone and soft tissue sarcoma mainly of adolescents and young adults, is characterized by a chromosomal translocation resulting in a fusion oncoprotein. Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) has been shown to associate with the fusion oncoprotein and promote oncogenic transcriptional activity making LSD1 an attractive target for ES treatment. Seclidemstat is a novel, selective, reversible oral LSD1 inhibitor capable of inhibiting both LSD1’s catalytic and scaffolding functions. This is the first report of an LSD1 inhibitor in a Phase 1 trial focused exclusively on ES. Methods: SALA-002-EW16 is a Phase 1 trial of single agent seclidemstat in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) ES. This report describes the completed monotherapy dose escalation. Pts > 12 years received oral SP-2577 twice daily in 28-day cycles under fasting conditions at the assigned dose level. The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives include to determine maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results: As of December 30, 2020, 27 pts with R/R ES were enrolled. Pts received escalating doses of SP-2577 at 75 (n = 1), 150 (n = 2), 300 (n = 4), 600 (n = 6), 900 (n = 8), or 1200 mg PO BID (n = 6). The median age was 25 years (range 15–68), 63% were male, and pts had received a median of 3 (range 2–12) prior systemic therapies. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common ( > 5%) grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were vomiting (15%), abdominal pain (11%), and hypokalemia (11%). One pt (4%) with grade 3 pancreatitis reported a grade 4 AE of elevated lipase. All remaining grade 3 TRAEs, including hematological TRAEs, were reported in only one pt each. Four pts discontinued study for an AE (weight loss, pancreatitis, vomiting, abdominal pain). Three pts had a dose reduction. The first cycle dose-limiting toxicities were gastrointestinal-related AEs observed in 2 pts at 1200 mg BID. Thus, the MTD/RP2D was established as 900 mg BID. Peak plasma concentrations occurred at a median of 4 hours (h) post-dose and median terminal half-life was 6 h; exposure was dose proportional through 900 mg BID. One pt at 600 mg BID achieved a reduction in target lesions starting at end of C2 with further target lesion tumor shrinkage through end of C4 and C6 (maximum 76% tumor shrinkage) with coincident new non-target lesion appearance at end of C2. Of pts evaluable for response at the end of C2 (12 pts), two additional pts (16.7%) at 600 mg BID and 900 mg BID had overall stable disease. Conclusions: Seclidemstat has a manageable safety profile with proof-of-concept preliminary activity in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed/refractory ES. These data support the planned Phase 2 expansion of seclidemstat as single agent and in combination with chemotherapy in ES and other sarcomas that share similar translocations. Clinical trial information: NCT03600649.

scholarly journals Dose escalation phase 1 study of radiotherapy in combination with anti-cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 monoclonal antibody ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e000627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celine Boutros ◽  
Nathalie Chaput-Gras ◽  
Emilie Lanoy ◽  
Alicia Larive ◽  
Christine Mateus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
T Lymphocyte ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Phase 1 Study

BackgroundA synergy between radiotherapy and anti-cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody has been demonstrated preclinically. The Mel-Ipi-Rx phase 1 study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of radiotherapy combined with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.Patients and methodsA 3+3 dose escalation design was used with 9, 15, 18 and 24 Gy dose of radiotherapy at week 4 combined with 10 mg/kg ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses. Patients with evidence of clinical benefit at week 12 were eligible for maintenance with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 12 weeks starting at week 24 until severe toxicity or disease progression. The database lock occurred on April 30, 2019. Tumor growth rate of irradiated lesions and non-irradiated lesions were analyzed to assess the systemic immunologic antitumor response. Blood immune monitoring was performed before and during treatment to determine if radiotherapy could modify ipilimumab pharmacodynamics.Results19 patients received ipilimumab between August 2011 and July 2015. Nine patients received the four doses of ipilimumab. All patients received the combined radiotherapy. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in nine patients, the most common being colitis and hepatitis. No drug-related death occurred. Dose limiting toxicity occurred in two of six patients in the cohort receiving 15 Gy. The MTD was 9 Gy. Two patients had complete response, three had partial response response and seven had stable disease, giving an objective response rate of 31% and a clinical benefit rate of 75% at week 24. The median duration of follow-up was 5.8 years (Q1=4.5; Q3=6.8). The median overall survival (95% CI) was estimated at 0.9 years (0.5–2). The median progression-free survival (PFS) (95% CI) was 0.4 (0.2–1.4). Radiotherapy combined with ipilimumab was associated with increased CD4+ and CD8+ICOS+ T cells. Increased CD8+ was significantly associated with PFS.ConclusionWhen combined with ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg, the MTD of radiotherapy was 9 Gy. This combination of ipilimumab and radiotherapy appears to be associated with antitumor activity. Increased CD8+ was significantly associated with PFS. Thus, immune biomarkers may be useful for early response evaluation.Trial registration numberNCT01557114.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document