Addition of Rituximab to Standard Chemotherapy Improves the Survival of Both the Germinal Center B-Cell–Like and Non–Germinal Center B-Cell–Like Subtypes of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 4587-4594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Fu ◽  
Dennis D. Weisenburger ◽  
William W.L. Choi ◽  
Kyle D. Perry ◽  
Lynette M. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Germinal Center ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Germinal Center B Cell ◽  
Large B Cell

Purpose Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) includes at least two prognostically important subtypes (ie, germinal center B-cell–like [GCB] and activated B-cell–like [ABC] DLBCL), which initially were characterized by gene expression profiling and subsequently were confirmed by immunostaining. However, with the addition of rituximab to standard chemotherapy, the prognostic significance of this subclassification of DLBCL is unclear. Patients and Methods We studied 243 patient cases of de novo DLBCL, which included 131 patient cases treated with rituximab plus standard chemotherapy (rituximab group) and 112 patient cases treated with only standard chemotherapy (control group). The cases were assigned to GCB or non-GCB subgroups (the latter of which included both ABC DLBCL and unclassifiable DLBCL) on the basis of immunophenotype by using the Hans method. Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of the two patient groups were compared. Results The clinical characteristics of the patients in the rituximab and the control groups were similar. Compared with the control group, addition of rituximab improved the 3-year overall survival (OS; 42% v 77%; P < .001) of patients with DLBCL. Rituximab-treated patients in either the GCB or the non-GCB subgroups also had a significantly improved 3-year OS compared with their respective subgroups in the control group (P < .001). In the rituximab group, the GCB subgroup had a significantly better 3-year OS than the non-GCB subgroup (85% v 69%; P = .032). Multivariate analyses confirmed that rituximab treatment was predictive for survival in both the GCB and the non-GCB subgroups. Conclusion In this retrospective study, we have shown that the subclassification of DLBCL on the basis of the cell of origin continues to have prognostic importance in the rituximab era.

Randomized Phase II Study of R-CHOP With or Without Bortezomib in Previously Untreated Patients With Non–Germinal Center B-Cell–Like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31) ◽  
pp. 3538-3546 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Leonard ◽  
Kathryn S. Kolibaba ◽  
James A. Reeves ◽  
Anil Tulpule ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Germinal Center ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Germinal Center B Cell ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Large B Cell

Purpose To evaluate the impact of the addition of bortezomib to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) on outcomes in previously untreated patients with non–germinal center B-cell–like (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients and Methods After real-time determination of non-GCB DLBCL using the Hans immunohistochemistry algorithm, 206 patients were randomly assigned (1:1; stratified by International Prognostic Index [IPI] score) to six 21-day cycles of standard R-CHOP alone or R-CHOP plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 4 (VR-CHOP). The primary end point, progression-free survival (PFS), was evaluated in 183 patients with centrally confirmed non-GCB DLBCL who received one or more doses of study drug (91 R-CHOP, 92 VR-CHOP). Results After a median follow-up of 34 months, with 25% (R-CHOP) and 18% (VR-CHOP) of patients having had PFS events, the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.73 (90% CI, 0.43 to 1.24) with VR-CHOP ( P = .611). Two-year PFS rates were 77.6% with R-CHOP and 82.0% with VR-CHOP; they were 65.1% versus 72.4% in patients with high-intermediate/high IPI (HR, 0.67; 90% CI, 0.34 to 1.29), and 90.0% versus 88.9% (HR, 0.85; 90% CI, 0.35 to 2.10) in patients with low/low-intermediate IPI. Overall response rate with R-CHOP and VR-CHOP was 98% and 96%, respectively. The overall survival HR was 0.75 (90% CI, 0.38 to 1.45); 2-year survival rates were 88.4% and 93.0%, respectively. In the safety population (100 R-CHOP and 101 VR-CHOP patients), grade ≥ 3 adverse events included neutropenia (53% v 49%), thrombocytopenia (13% v 29%), anemia (7% v 15%), leukopenia (26% v 25%), and neuropathy (1% v 5%). Conclusion Outcomes for newly diagnosed, prospectively enrolled patients with non-GCB DLBCL were more favorable than expected with R-CHOP and were not significantly improved by adding bortezomib.

CD44 standard isoform expression is associated with diffuse large B cell lymphoma of non-germinal center B cell-like types

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18531-18531
Author(s):  
W. Kim ◽  
Y. Oh ◽  
C. Park
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Germinal Center ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Tumor Spread ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Germinal Center B Cell ◽  
Cd44s Expression ◽  
Large B Cell

18531 Background: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be subdivided into germinal center B cell-like (GCB) and non- germinal center B cell-like (Non-GC) types by immunohistochemical profiling. Previous studies showed better survival rate for the GCB groups. CD44 is necessary for tumor spread and metastasis and its expression is generally associated with unfavorable prognosis. We analyzed the expression and prognostic significance of standard isoform CD44s and its variant isoform CD44v6 in DLBCL types. Methods: Tissue microarray blocks were created from 52 nodal DLBCL with control tissue. Immunohistochemical staining for CD10, Bcl-6, MUM-1, CD44s, and CD44v6 were performed. The median follow-up period was 44 months. Results: Nodal DLBCLs were subclassified into GCB [CD10+ or CD10-/Bcl6+/MUM1+, n=17 (33%)] and non-GC subgroups [CD10-/Bcl6- or CD10-/Bcl6+/MUM1+, n=35 (67%)]. CD44s expression appeared more on non-GC cases of DLBCL (p=0.04). CD44s and CD44v6 did not result in any difference according to tumor stage, IPI scores, LDH levels. Upon survival analysis, CD44s and CD44v6 expression did not show any statistical correlation. Conclusions: CD44s expression may play a role during lymphomatogenesis of non-GC type DLBCL. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document