Fitness and quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors and controls

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19502-19502
Author(s):  
K. Basen-Engquist ◽  
D. Lenihan ◽  
C. Carmack Taylor ◽  
K. Lu ◽  
H. Perkins ◽  
...  

19502 Background: It has been suggested that sedentary behavior during cancer treatment or effects of the treatment itself may decrease cardiorespiratory fitness in cancer survivors. However, few studies have tested whether cancer survivors actually have impaired cardiorespiratory fitness compared to similarly aged individuals who have not had cancer. We investigated whether endometrial cancer survivors had poorer fitness than women of similar age and activity level with no cancer history. Methods: The sample included endometrial cancer survivors in a pilot exercise study; all had been diagnosed with Stage I-IIIa disease and were at least 6 months post- treatment. Controls were recruited from a local multi-speciality clinic. Both groups had no contraindications to exercise and were sedentary. Cardiorespiratory fitness was measured by predicted maximal myocardial oxygen carrying capacity (MV02 max) on a submaximal ramped cycle ergometer test. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 (physical and mental component scores). Results: The study accrued 20 survivors (Mean age=58.6, SD=7.9; Mean BMI=30.5, SD=7.7) and 13 controls (Mean age=55.8, SD=7.6; Mean BMI=30.3, SD=7.0). In t-tests comparing survivors and controls, there were significant differences in predicted MV02 max (p=0.044) and physical aspects of quality of life (p=0.004), but not mental aspects of quality of life. After adjusting for age and BMI using ANCOVA, the p value for predicted MV02 max increased to 0.068, but differences in physical quality of life remained significant (see Table 1 ). Conclusions: Endometrial cancer survivors have diminished quality of life in the physical domain compared to women who have not had cancer; similar results were found for cardiorespiratory fitness, although the effect was attenuated after adjusting for BMI and age. The results suggest endometrial cancer survivors could benefit from exercise interventions to improve fitness and physical functioning. Table 1 : Fitness and quality of life of endometrial cancer survivors and controls. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander R. Lucas ◽  
Brian C. Focht ◽  
David E. Cohn ◽  
Maryanna D. Klatt ◽  
Janet Buckworth

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios A Koutoukidis ◽  
Rebecca J Beeken ◽  
Ranjit Manchanda ◽  
Matthew Burnell ◽  
Nida Ziauddeen ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo explore the effectiveness of a theory-based behavioral lifestyle intervention on health behaviors and quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors.’MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled pilot trial conducted in two UK hospitals enrolling disease-free stage I-IVA endometrial cancer survivors. Participants were allocated to an 8-week group-based healthy eating and physical activity intervention or usual care using 1:1 minimization. Participants were followed up at 8 and 24 weeks, with the 8-week assessment being blinded. Diet, physical activity, and quality of life were measured with the Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010, Stanford 7-Day Physical Activity Recall, and the EORTC Quality of life Questionnaire Core 30, respectively. We analyzed all eligible participants using the intention-to-treat approach in complete cases, adjusting for baseline values, body mass index, and age.ResultsWe enrolled 60 of the 296 potentially eligible endometrial cancer survivors (May - December 2015). Fifty-four eligible participants were randomized to the intervention (n=29) or usual care (n=31), and 49 had complete follow-up data (n=24 in the intervention and n= 25 in usual care). Intervention adherence was 77%. At 8 weeks, participants in the intervention improved their diet compared to usual care (difference in Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010 score 7.5 (95% CI: 0.1 to 14.9), P=0.046) but not their physical activity (0.1 metabolic equivalent-h/day 95% CI: (-1.6 to 1.8), P=0.879), or global quality of life score (5.0 (95% CI: -3.4 to 13.3), P=0.236). Global quality of life improved in intervention participants at 24 weeks (difference 8.9 (95% CI: 0.9 to 16.8), P=0.029). No intervention-related adverse events were reported.ConclusionsThe potential effectiveness of the intervention appeared promising. A future fully-powered study is needed to confirm these findings.Trial registration numberNCT02433080.


2014 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anke Smits ◽  
Alberto Lopes ◽  
Nagindra Das ◽  
Ruud Bekkers ◽  
Khadra Galaal

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Robertson ◽  
Elizabeth J. Lyons ◽  
Jaejoon Song ◽  
Matthew Cox-Martin ◽  
Yisheng Li ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grassyara Pinho Tolentino ◽  
Cláudio L. Battaglini ◽  
Selma Silva Araújo ◽  
Arturo Santana Otano ◽  
Délio Marques Conde ◽  
...  

Lung Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise Solberg Nes ◽  
Heshan Liu ◽  
Christi A. Patten ◽  
Sarah M. Rausch ◽  
Jeff A. Sloan ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meike Becker ◽  
Tetyana Malafy ◽  
Michaela Bossart ◽  
Karl Henne ◽  
Gerald Gitsch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document