Body mass index and mortality in men treated for locally advanced prostate cancer: An analysis of RTOG 85–31

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5128-5128
Author(s):  
J. A. Efstathiou ◽  
K. Bae ◽  
W. U. Shipley ◽  
G. E. Hanks ◽  
M. V. Pilepich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
All Cause Mortality

5128 Background: Greater body mass index (BMI) is associated with shorter time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure following radical prostatectomy. We investigated whether BMI is associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in a large randomized trial of men treated with radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for locally advanced prostate cancer. Methods: Between 1987 and 1992, 945 eligible men with locally advanced prostate cancer were enrolled on a phase III trial (RTOG 85- 31) and randomized to RT and immediate goserelin (Arm I) or RT alone followed by goserelin at relapse (Arm II). Height and weight data were available at baseline for 788 (83%) subjects. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationships between BMI and all-cause mortality, PCSM, and non-prostate cancer mortality. Covariates included age, race, treatment arm, history of prostatectomy, nodal involvement, Gleason score, clinical stage, and BMI. Results: The 5-year PCSM rate for men with BMI<25kg/m2 was 6.5%, compared to 13.1% and 12.2% in men with BMI=25-<30 and BMI=30, respectively (Gray’s p=0.005). In multivariable analyses, as shown in the Table , greater BMI was significantly associated with higher PCSM [for BMI=25-<30, hazard ratio (HR) 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–2.27, p=0.04; for BMI=30, HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.02–2.66, p=0.04]. BMI was not associated with non-prostate cancer or all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Greater baseline BMI is independently associated with higher PCSM in men with locally advanced prostate cancer. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the mechanism(s) for increased mortality and to assess whether weight loss after prostate cancer diagnosis alters disease course. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Does Body Mass Index Influence the Outcomes After Surgery for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer?

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15
Author(s):  
Chao-Yu Hsu ◽  
Steven Joniau ◽  
Raymond Oyen ◽  
Tania Roskams ◽  
Hein Van Poppel
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy and Radiotherapy for Older Men With Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 716-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin E. Bekelman ◽  
Nandita Mitra ◽  
Elizabeth A. Handorf ◽  
Robert G. Uzzo ◽  
Stephen A. Hahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

Purpose We examined whether the survival advantage of androgen-deprivation therapy with radiotherapy (ADT plus RT) relative to ADT alone for men with locally advanced prostate cancer reported in two randomized trials holds in real-world clinical practice and extended the evidence to patients poorly represented in the trials. Methods We conducted nonrandomized effectiveness studies of ADT plus RT versus ADT in three groups of patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2007 and observed through 2009 in the SEER-Medicare data set: (1) the randomized clinical trial (RCT) cohort, which included men age 65 to 75 years and was most consistent with participants in the randomized trials; (2) the elderly cohort, which included men age > 75 years with locally advanced prostate cancer; and (3) the screen-detected cohort, which included men age ≥ 65 years with screen-detected high-risk prostate cancer. We evaluated cause-specific and all-cause mortality using propensity score, instrumental variable (IV), and sensitivity analyses. Results In the RCT cohort, ADT plus RT was associated with reduced cause-specific and all-cause mortality relative to ADT alone (cause-specific propensity score–adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.49; all-cause propensity score–adjusted HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.67). Effectiveness estimates for the RCT cohort were not significantly different from those from randomized trials (P > .1). In the elderly and screen-detected cohorts, ADT plus RT was also associated with reduced cause-specific and all-cause mortality. IV analyses produced estimates similar to those from propensity score–adjusted methods. Conclusion Older men with locally advanced or screen-detected high-risk prostate cancer who receive ADT alone risk decrements in cause-specific and overall survival.

Intergroup randomized phase III study of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus radiation therapy (RT) in locally advanced prostate cancer (CaP) (NCIC-CTG, SWOG, MRC-UK, INT: T94-0110; NCT00002633).

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. CRA4504-CRA4504 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Warde ◽  
M. D. Mason ◽  
M. R. Sydes ◽  
M. K. Gospodarowicz ◽  
G. P. Swanson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Combined Modality ◽  
Disease Specific

CRA4504 Background: The impact of radiotherapy on overall survival (OS) in men with locally advanced CaP is unclear. The SPCG-7 trial recently showed a benefit to RT for CaP specific mortality. Our primary objective was to assess the effect of RT on OS when added to lifelong ADT in men with locally advanced CaP. Methods: Patients with T3/T4 (1057) or T2, PSA > 40 μ g/l (119) or T2 PSA > 20 μ g/l and Gleason ≥ 8 (25) and N0 /NX, M0 prostate adenocarcinoma were randomized to lifelong ADT (bilateral orchiectomy or LHRH agonist) with or without RT (65-69 Gy to prostate ± seminal vesicles with or without 45Gy to pelvic nodes). The primary endpoint was OS and secondary endpoints included disease specific survival (DSS), time to disease progression and quality of life. Results: 1205 patients were randomized from 1995 to 2005, 602 to ADT and 603 to ADT+RT (well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics). A protocol specified second interim analysis on OS was performed in Aug 2009 (data cut-off Dec 31 2008). The DSMC recommended release of the results to the Trial Committee for publication. The median follow-up is 6.0 years and 320 patients have died (175 ADT and 145 ADT+RT). 10% of patients had no follow-up data beyond 2006. The addition of RT to ADT significantly reduced the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.98, p=0.033). 140 patients died of disease and/or treatment (89 on ADT and 51 on ADT+RT) The disease specific survival HR was 0.57 (95% CI 0.41-0.81, p=0.001) favoring ADT+RT. The 10 year cumulative disease specific death rates were estimated at 15% with ADT+ RT and 23% with ADT alone. Grade ≥2 late GI toxicity rates were similar in both arms (proctitis, 1.3% ADT alone, 1.8% ADT+RT). Conclusions: The trial results indicate a substantial overall survival and disease specific survival benefit for the combined modality approach (ADT+RT) in the management of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer with no significant increase in late treatment toxicity. In view of this data combined modality therapy (ADT+RT) should be the standard treatment approach for these patients. Supported by NCI-US Grant #5U10CA077202-12, CCSRI Grant #15469. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document