scholarly journals Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Combination With Either Vorinostat or Placebo for First-Line Therapy of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh S. Ramalingam ◽  
Michael L. Maitland ◽  
Paul Frankel ◽  
Athanassios E. Argiris ◽  
Marianna Koczywas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Anticancer Effects

Purpose Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, exerts anticancer effects by both histone and nonhistone–mediated mechanisms. It also enhances the anticancer effects of platinum compounds and taxanes in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. This phase II randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of vorinostat in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated stage IIIB (ie, wet) or IV NSCLC were randomly assigned (2:1) to carboplatin (area under the curve, 6 mg/mL × min) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2 day 3) with either vorinostat (400 mg by mouth daily) or placebo. Vorinostat or placebo was given on days 1 through 14 of each 3-week cycle to a maximum of six cycles. The primary end point was comparison of the response rate. Results Ninety-four patients initiated protocol therapy. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the two arms. The median number of cycles was four for both treatment arms. The confirmed response rate was 34% with vorinostat versus 12.5% with placebo (P = .02). There was a trend toward improvement in median progression-free survival (6.0 months v 4.1 months; P = .48) and overall survival (13.0 months v 9.7 months; P = .17) in the vorinostat arm. Grade 4 platelet toxicity was more common with vorinostat (18% v 3%; P < .05). Nausea, emesis, fatigue, dehydration, and hyponatremia also were more frequent with vorinostat. Conclusion Vorinostat enhances the efficacy of carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC. HDAC inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy for treatment of NSCLC.

Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin or Carboplatin, With or Without Cetuximab, As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 5777-5784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Butts ◽  
David Bodkin ◽  
Edward L. Middleman ◽  
Craig W. Englund ◽  
David Ellison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab added to first-line gemcitabine/platinum in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsIn this noncomparative, randomized trial, chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent/metastatic NSCLC (stage IV or stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion) were eligible. Patients received cisplatin (75 mg/m2IV, every 3 weeks) or carboplatin (area under the concentration-versus-time curve of 5 intravenously [IV], every 3 weeks), and gemcitabine (1,250 or 1,000 mg/m2IV, days 1 and 8) plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2IV day 1, followed by 250 mg/m2weekly), in arm A, or chemotherapy alone, in arm B. Response rate was the primary end point; safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary end points.ResultsSixty-five patients were randomly assigned to arm A and 66 to arm B. Partial responses were observed in 18 patients (27.7%; 95% CI, 17.3 to 40.2) in arm A and 12 (18.2%; 95% CI, 9.8 to 29.6) in arm B. Median progression-free survival was 5.09 months for arm A (95% CI, 4.17 to 5.98) and 4.21 months (95% CI, 3.81 to 5.49) in arm B. Median overall survival was 11.99 months (95% CI, 8.80 to 15.18) and 9.26 months (95% CI, 7.43 to 11.79) in arms A and B, respectively. Overall toxicity was acceptable and consistent with the profiles of the individual agents.ConclusionFirst-line treatment with cetuximab plus gemcitabine/platinum is well tolerated and can be administered safely in patients with advanced NSCLC. Differences in response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival suggest that the addition of cetuximab to platinum/gemcitabine may improve clinical outcomes. Larger studies are in progress to address this hypothesis.

A phase II study of gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination followed by sequential gefitinib monotherapy in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19040-e19040
Author(s):  
K. Kasahara ◽  
T. Kita ◽  
K. Shibata ◽  
K. Nishi ◽  
Y. Ishiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Small Cell Lung

e19040 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VNR) combination have demonstrated activity as a 1st-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib (GEF) is effective as a 2nd-line treatment for NSCLC. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity for treatment of GEM+VNR followed by sequential GEF in elderly patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Primary endpoint is response rate, secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Methods: Eligibility required hitologically or cytologically comfirmed NSCLC, no prior therapy, measurable lesion(s), ECOG PS 0–2, age equal to or over 70 years, and adequate organ functions. Patients were received 3 cycles, each at 4-week intervals, of GEM (1000 mg/m2, d 1, 15) and VNR (25mg/m2 d 1, 15), followed by 250 mg of GEF daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Between June 2004 and November 2007, 60 pts were enrolled and 2 pts withdrew consent. Fifty-eight pts (35 male and 23 female, median age 77 years) were evaluated. Median number of GEM+VNR administrations was 3 (range 1–3). Median duration of GEF was 101 days (range 9–652 days). Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (29%), neutoropenia (40%), anemia (12%), febrile neutropenia (9%), and anorexia (9%) during GEM+VNR, anorexia (2%), and constipation (2%) during GEF. Best response rate of GEM+VNR was 17% and that after sequential GEF was 31%. Median PFS and median OS were 4.2 months and 12.6 months, respectively. Response rate, PFS, and OS were significantly favorable in female and never-smoker. Conclusions: Sequential treatment consisted with GEM+VNR and GEF was feasible with acceptable toxicities in elderly patients with NSCLC. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of B-cell lymphoma 2 homology 3 mimetic gossypol combined with docetaxel and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with high expression of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1862-1871
Author(s):  
Yuxiao Wang ◽  
Xuemei Li ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Mengxia Li ◽  
Nan Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Experimental Group

Summary Background Overexpression of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is an important cause of poor chemotherapeutic efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Gossypol, a new inhibitor of APE1, in combination with docetaxel and cisplatin is believed to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC with high APE1 expression. Methods Sixty-two patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Thirty-one patients in the experimental group received 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 75 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 with gossypol administered at 20 mg once daily on days 1 to 14 every 21 days. The control group received placebo with the same docetaxel and cisplatin regimen. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. Results There were no significant differences in PFS and OS between the experimental group and the control group. The median PFS (mPFS) in the experimental and control groups was 7.43 and 4.9 months, respectively (HR = 0.54; p = 0.06), and the median OS (mOS) was 18.37 and 14.7 months, respectively (HR = 0.68; p = 0.27). No significant differences in response rate and serious adverse events were found between the groups. Conclusion The experimental group had a better mPFS and mOS than did the control group, though no significant difference was observed. Because the regimen of gossypol combined with docetaxel and cisplatin was well tolerated, future studies with larger sample sizes should be performed.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Single-site Radiotherapy Plus PD-1 Inhibitors vs PD-1 Inhibitors for Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peiliang Wang ◽  
Tianwen Yin ◽  
Kaikai Zhao ◽  
Jinming Yu ◽  
Feifei Teng
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Sites

Abstract Purpose: Growing numbers of clinical trials test the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the number of irradiated sites is not uniform. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of single-site RT plus immunotherapy in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with smaller disease burdens and low tumor heterogeneity. Methods: We retrospectively identified oligometastatic NSCLC (≤4 metastatic sites) patients treated with PD-1 pathway inhibitors with or without RT to a single lesion in our institution between 2018 and 2020. The primary endpoints were the best objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) . Results: Of the 152 patients enrolled, 93 and 59 were identified as the ICI alone group and the ICI plus RT group, respectively. The addition of radiotherapy to ICI therapy significant increased the best ORR from 31.2% to 50.8%, p=0.015). The out-of-field (abscopal`) response rate could reach 41.3% (95% CI, 26.5%-56.1%) in the ICI plus RT group. Median progression-free survival was 8.9 months (95%CI, 4.7-13.1 months) with ICI alone versus 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.5-18.1 months) with ICI plus radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.568; p=0.035). In an exploratory subgroup analysis of PFS, the addition of RT brought greater benefits in patients with aged <65 years (p=0.016), patients with ECOG PS=0 (p=0.048), patients with 1-2 metastatic sites (p=0.024). No unexpected adverse events or significantly increased toxicities were observed in the experimental arm.Conclusion: Single-site RT plus anti-PD-1 inhibitors significantly increased systemic responses and improved survival outcomes in oligometastatic NSCLC patients.

scholarly journals Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-T790M Mutation-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated Within the Special Use Medication Program in Spain. OSIREX-spanish Lung Cancer Group

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariano Provencio ◽  
Josefa Terrasa ◽  
Pilar Garrido ◽  
Rosario García Campelo ◽  
Francisco Aparisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Egfr T790m

Abstract Background: AURA study reported 61% objective response rate and progression-free survival of 9.6 months with osimertinib in patients with EGFR/T790M+ non-small cell lung cancer. Due to lack of real-world data, we proposed this study to describe the experience with osimertinib in Spain.Methods: Post-authorization, non-interventional Special Use Medication Program, multicenter, retrospective study in advanced EGFR/T790M+ non-small cell lung cancer. 155 patients were enrolled (August 2016-December 2018) from 30 sites. Primary objective: progression-free survival. Secondary objectives: toxicity profile, objective response rate, and use of health service resources.Results: 70% women, median age 66. 63.9% were non-smokers and 99% had adenocarcinoma. Most had received at least one prior treatment (97%), 91.7% had received previous EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and 2.8% osimertinib as first-line treatment. At data cutoff, median follow-up was 11.8 months. 155 patients were evaluable for response, 1.3% complete response, 40.7% partial response, 31% stable disease and 11.6% progressive disease. Objective response rate was 42%. Median progression-free survival was 9.4 months. 49% reported an adverse event, the majority of which (78%) were grade 1 or 2. The resource cost study indicates early use is warranted. Conclusion: This study to assess the real-world clinical impact of osimertinib showed high drug activity in pretreated advanced EGFR/T790M+ non-small cell lung cancer, with manageable adverse events.Clinical trial registration number: NCT03790397

Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Metastatic Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1320-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Thomas ◽  
O. Castelnau ◽  
D. Paillotin ◽  
H. Léna ◽  
G. Robinet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of previously untreated patients with metastatic small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ≤ 2 and life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks. Paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) was infused over 3 hours, before carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 6; Calvert formula) infused over 1 hour, once every 3 weeks for six cycles maximum. Prednisolone, dexchlorpheniramine, and ranitidine were standard premedication. Response to treatment was assessed every two cycles, and nonresponding patients were withdrawn from the trial to receive standard chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients entering the study, 48 and 46 patients were assessable for toxicity and response, respectively. The overall response rate was 65%, with complete responses in three patients. Five patients had stable disease (11%) and 11 patients experienced progressive disease (24%). Median survival was 38 weeks, and median duration of response was 20 weeks. One-year survival was 22.5%. For a total of 232 cycles, grade 3 and 4 toxicity was 33% for neutropenia, 3.5% for thrombocytopenia, and 4% for anemia. Four patients had neutropenic fever (one toxic death). Nonhematologic toxicity was mainly grade 1 and 2 paresthesia (21% of patients); grade 3 myalgia/arthralgia was observed in 6.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: First-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in metastatic SCLC achieved a response rate and survival similar to standard regimens. With 1-day administration and a tolerable toxicity profile, this combination merits further investigation.

Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin With or Without Tirapazamine in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Southwest Oncology Group Trial S0003

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (36) ◽  
pp. 9097-9104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen K. Williamson ◽  
John J. Crowley ◽  
Primo N. Lara ◽  
Jason McCoy ◽  
Derick H.M. Lau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Tumor Hypoxia ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Purpose Tumor hypoxia confers chemotherapy resistance. Tirapazamine is a cytotoxin that selectively targets hypoxic cells. We conducted a phase III clinical trial to determine whether the addition of tirapazamine to paclitaxel and carboplatin offered a survival advantage when used in the treatment of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Of 396 patients registered, 367 eligible patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 (n = 181), which consisted of treatment every 21 days with paclitaxel 225 mg/m2/3 h, carboplatin (area under the curve = 6), and tirapazamine 260 mg/m2 in cycle 1 (which was escalated, if tolerable, to 330 mg/m2 in cycle 2), or arm 2 (n = 186), which consisted of paclitaxel and carboplatin as in arm 1 with no tirapazamine. Results Patient characteristics were similar between the two arms. There were no statistically significant differences in response rates, progression-free survival, or overall survival. Patients on arm 1 had significantly (P < .05) more abdominal cramps, fatigue, transient hearing loss, febrile neutropenia, hypotension, myalgias, and skin rash and were removed from treatment more often as a result of toxicity than patients in arm 2 (26% v 13%, respectively; P = .003). More than 40% of patients did not have the tirapazamine dose escalated, primarily because of toxicity. The trial was closed early after an interim analysis demonstrated that the projected 37.5% improvement in survival (8 v 11 months median survival) in arm 1 was unachievable (P = .003). Conclusion The addition of tirapazamine to paclitaxel and carboplatin does not result in improved survival in advanced NSCLC compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin alone but substantially increases toxicity.

scholarly journals Results From the Phase III Randomized Trial of Onartuzumab Plus Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib in Previously Treated Stage IIIB or IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: METLung

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 412-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Spigel ◽  
Martin J. Edelman ◽  
Kenneth O’Byrne ◽  
Luis Paz-Ares ◽  
Simonetta Mocci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose The phase III OAM4971g study (METLung) examined the efficacy and safety of onartuzumab plus erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer selected by MET immunohistochemistry whose disease had progressed after treatment with a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive onartuzumab (15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) plus daily oral erlotinib 150 mg or intravenous placebo plus daily oral erlotinib 150 mg. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary end points included median progression-free survival, overall response rate, biomarker analysis, and safety. Results A total of 499 patients were enrolled (onartuzumab, n = 250; placebo, n = 249). Median OS was 6.8 versus 9.1 months for onartuzumab versus placebo (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.65; P = .067), with a greater number of deaths in the onartuzumab arm (130 [52%] v 114 [46%]). Median progression-free survival was 2.7 versus 2.6 months (stratified HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.20; P = .92), and overall response rate was 8.4% and 9.6% for onartuzumab versus placebo, respectively. Exploratory analyses using MET fluorescence in situ hybridization status and gene expression showed no benefit for onartuzumab; patients with EGFR mutations showed a trend toward shorter OS with onartuzumab treatment (HR, 4.68; 95% CI, 0.97 to 22.63). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were reported by 56.0% and 51.2% of patients, with serious AEs in 33.9% and 30.7%, for experimental versus control arms, respectively. Conclusion Onartuzumab plus erlotinib did not improve clinical outcomes, with shorter OS in the onartuzumab arm, compared with erlotinib in patients with MET-positive non–small-cell lung cancer.

scholarly journals Osimertinib in advanced EGFR-T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients treated within the Special Use Medication Program in Spain: OSIREX-Spanish Lung Cancer Group

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariano Provencio ◽  
Josefa Terrasa ◽  
Pilar Garrido ◽  
Rosario García Campelo ◽  
Francisco Aparisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Egfr T790m

Abstract Background AURA study reported 61% objective response rate and progression-free survival of 9.6 months with osimertinib in patients with EGFR/T790M+ non-small cell lung cancer. Due to lack of real-world data, we proposed this study to describe the experience with osimertinib in Spain. Methods Post-authorization, non-interventional Special Use Medication Program, multicenter, retrospective study in advanced EGFR/T790M+ non-small cell lung cancer. One hundred-fifty five patients were enrolled (August 2016–December 2018) from 30 sites. Primary objective: progression-free survival. Secondary objectives: toxicity profile, objective response rate, and use of health service resources. Results 70% women, median age 66. 63.9% were non-smokers and 99% had adenocarcinoma. Most patients had received at least one prior treatment (97%), 91.7% had received previous EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and 2.8% osimertinib as first-line treatment. At data cutoff, median follow-up was 11.8 months. One hundred-fifty five patients were evaluable for response, 1.3% complete response, 40.6% partial response, 31% stable disease and 11.6% disease progression. Objective response rate was 42%. Median progression-free survival was 9.4 months. Of the 155 patients who received treatment, 76 (49%) did not reported any adverse event, 51% presented some adverse event, most of which were grade 1 or 2. The resource cost study indicates early use is warranted. Conclusion This study to assess the real-world clinical impact of osimertinib showed high drug activity in pretreated advanced EGFR/T790M+ non-small cell lung cancer, with manageable adverse events. Trial registration Clinical trial registration number:NCT03790397.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document