Relevance of serum HER2 extracellular domain (sECD) in EGF30008, a study of letrozole ± lapatinib in patients (pts) with hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1019-1019
Author(s):  
G. T. Platek ◽  
M. Koehler ◽  
R. Gagnon ◽  
L. O'Rourke ◽  
J. D. Maltzman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Predictive And Prognostic Value

1019 Background: Elevated baseline sECD (BsECD) correlates weakly with HER2 overexpression (HER2+). HR+ MBC. Lapatinib benefit was reported in pts with HER2+ tumors irrespective of BsECD status; BsECD status did not predict benefit for HER2- negative (HER2-ve) tumors. sECD levels and their predictive and prognostic value for progression-free survival (PFS) were further examined in a randomized, phase III trial of letrozole ± lapatinib. Methods: Pts (n=1286) with HR+ MBC were randomized to letrozole with placebo (P) or lapatinib (L). HER2 status was evaluated by FISH or IHC in archived tissue. sECD was measured by ELISA at baseline (n=1102 available samples), and every 4 wk. Pts were considered sECD+ if serum sECD was >15 ng/ml. Results: BsECD was positive in 14% (125/894) and 42% (87/208) of pts with HER2-ve and HER2+ tumors, respectively. Correlation between BsECD and FISH was weak but significant in HER2+ pts (R=0.35, p<0.0001) but not in HER2-ve pts (R=0.03, p=0.362). Unlike for HER2+ tumors, BsECD+ did not predict benefit in PFS from L in pts with HER2-ve tumors. HR: Hazard Ratio In pts with HER2- ve tumors, median ECD levels were stable in the P arm but increased slightly (4 ng/mL) in the L arm. In the HER2+ group, median levels in the P arm declined (3.5 ng/mL) but increased at 4 wk in L arm (3.4 ng/mL) and were stable thereafter. Conversion from sECD-ve to sECD+ was observed in both arms but did not correlate with outcome or provide predictive value. Data related to ECD status conversion will be reported. Conclusions: BsECD+ status correlates with HER2+ tumor status and may predict L benefit but BsECD+ status did not predict benefit in pts with HER2-ve tumors. On therapy changes in median sECD were small. Conversion from BsECD-ve to sECD+ did not predict L benefit and we could not confirm that evaluation of on treatment ECD status may help treatment decision. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Central assessment of ER, PgR and HER2 in BIG 1–98 evaluating letrozole (L) compared to tamoxifen (T) as initial adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 538-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. B. Rasmussen ◽  
M. M. Regan ◽  
A. E. Lykkesfeldt ◽  
P. Dell’Orto ◽  
B. Del Curto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Tumor Material

538 Background: The BIG 1–98 trial, a randomized double-blind Phase III trial, showed that L significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) as compared with T. It is uncertain whether benefit of aromatase inhibitors vs. T differs according to PgR and/or HER2 status of the tumor. A central assessment of ER, PgR and HER2 was undertaken for BIG 1–98 to investigate this question. Methods: Paraffin-embedded primary tumor material was evaluable for 3650 (74%) of the 4922 patients (pts) randomized to the 2 monotherapy arms (L or T for 5 years; 51 months median follow-up). ER and PgR were measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and positivity was defined as =1% immunoreactive cells. HER2 expression was determined by IHC and positivity was confirmed by FISH. Cox modeling estimated hazard ratios (HR) comparing L vs. T on DFS and assessed treatment-by-covariate interactions. Results: By central assessment, 86% and 10% of tumors were classified as ER+/PgR+ and ER+/PgR-, respectively. Among these (n=3533), 7% were ER+/HER2+. DFS was superior in pts with ER+/PgR+ vs. ER+/PgR- tumors and in pts with ER+/HER2- vs. ER+/HER2+ tumors. The benefit of L vs. T did not differ by PgR (P=.48) or HER2 status (P=.55). Conclusion: In postmenopausal patients with ER+ tumors (=1% immunoreactive cells), of which 10% were PgR- and 7% HER2+, both PgR- and HER2+ status were associated with poorer DFS. The benefit of L over T was observed in all ER+ patients irrespective of PgR or HER2 status. In patients with ER+ tumors, PgR and HER2 status do not appear to be selection criteria for treatment with L vs. T. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase III Trial of Sunitinib in Combination With Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine Monotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (23) ◽  
pp. 2870-2878 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Crown ◽  
Véronique Diéras ◽  
Elzbieta Staroslawska ◽  
Denise A. Yardley ◽  
Thomas Bachelot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains an incurable illness in the majority of cases, despite major therapeutic advances. This may be related to the ability of breast tumors to induce neoangiogenesis, even in the face of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Sunitinib, an inhibitor of key molecules involved in neoangiogenesis, has an established role in the treatment of metastatic renal cell and other cancers and demonstrated activity in a phase II trial in MBC. We performed a randomized phase III trial comparing sunitinib plus capecitabine (2,000 mg/m2) with single-agent capecitabine (2,500 mg/m2) in patients with heavily pretreated MBC. Patients and Methods Eligibility criteria included MBC, prior therapy with anthracyclines and taxanes, one or two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease or early relapse after a taxane plus anthracycline adjuvant regimen, and adequate organ function and performance status. The primary end point was progression-free survival, for which the study had 90% power to detect a 50% improvement (from 4 to 6 months). Results A total of 442 patients were randomly assigned. Progression-free survival was not significantly different between the treatment arms, with medians of 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.5 to 6.0) for the sunitinib plus capecitabine arm and 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 7.6) for the capecitabine monotherapy arm (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.58; one-sided P = .941). There were no significant differences in response rate or overall survival. Toxicity, except for hand-foot syndrome, was more severe in the combination arm. Conclusion The addition of sunitinib to capecitabine does not improve the clinical outcome of patients with MBC pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Capecitabine (X) and taxanes in patients (pts) with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Sequential vs. combined therapy results from a MOSG randomized phase III trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 570-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Soto ◽  
L. Torrecillas ◽  
S. Reyes ◽  
M. Ramirez ◽  
L. Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Weekly Cycles

570 Introduction: Capecitabine (Xeloda [X]) shows synergy with taxanes and adding X to docetaxel (T) extends overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and progression free-survival (PFS) beyond T alone. Sequential single-agent therapy could confer convenience benefits and may be more appropriate than combination chemotherapy for some pts. Methods: Pts with anthracycline-pretreated MBC received 3-weekly cycles of 1 of the following regimens: X→taxane (X 1250mg/m2 bid d1–14, followed after progression (PD) by T 100mg/m2 or paclitaxel [P] 175mg/m2 day 1; X+P (X 825mg/m2 bid days 1–14 + P 175mg/m2 day 1) or X+T (X 825mg/m2 bid days 1–14 + T 75mg/m2 day 1). Results: Of the 368 pts enrolled, 91 are either still on therapy or not evaluable. The table shows baseline characteristics, efficacy and safety in evaluable pts. Median follow up is 15.5 months. Median doses for X in each arm (1st cycle vs. 8th cycle, mg/m2 bid): 1218 vs. 1054; 948 vs. 900; 846 vs. 751. Median doses for P and T (1st cycle vs. 8th cycle, mg/m2): 173 vs. 169 and 75 vs. 72, respectively. In the X→taxane arm, 58 pts (64%) received sequential taxane; the remainder did not receive a taxane, either because they were still on X, had CR or had rapid PD. Conclusions: RR is higher with XP and XT, but PFS and OS are similar at a median follow-up of 15.5 months. All regimens were well tolerated with minimal grade 4 AEs. Because there is no clear superiority of sequential vs. combined therapy, pt characteristics are likely to be used to decide which regimen is the most appropriate. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Phase III Study of Intravenous Vinorelbine in Combination With Epirubicin Versus Epirubicin Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403)

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2313-2320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Henning T. Mouridsen ◽  
Sven T. Langkjer ◽  
Jorn Andersen ◽  
Johanna Sjöström ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2 (950 mg/m2 from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses. Results Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P = .15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P = .048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P = .019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P = .50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms. Conclusion Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.

Progression-Free Survival for Real-World Use of Palbociclib in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Wilkie ◽  
M. Alexandra Schickli ◽  
Michael J. Berger ◽  
Maryam Lustberg ◽  
Raquel Reinbolt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

Phase III Trial of Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) Compared With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) As First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 1670-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Falcone ◽  
Sergio Ricci ◽  
Isa Brunetti ◽  
Elisabetta Pfanner ◽  
Giacomo Allegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Peripheral Neurotoxicity ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Resection ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) conducted a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan 165 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 day 1, fluorouracil 3,200 mg/m2 48-hour continuous infusion starting on day 1, every 2 weeks]) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Methods Selection criteria included unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary end point was response rate (RR). Results A total of 244 patients were randomly assigned. An increase of grade 2 to 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (0% v 19%; P < .001), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (28% v 50%; P < .001) were observed in the FOLFOXIRI arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% v 5%) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (12% v 20%) were not significantly different. Responses, as assessed by investigators, were, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively, complete, 6% and 8%; and partial, 35% and 58%, (RR, 41% v 66%; P = .0002). RR confirmed by an external panel was 34% versus 60% (P < .0001). The R0 secondary resection rate of metastases was greater in the FOLFOXIRI arm (6% v 15%; P = .033, among all 244 patients; and 12% v 36%; P = .017 among patients with liver metastases only). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were both significantly improved in the FOLFOXIRI arm (median PFS, 6.9 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .0006; median OS, 16.7 v 22.6 months; HR, 0.70; P = .032). Conclusion The FOLFOXIRI regimen improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with FOLFIRI, with an increased, but manageable, toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with favorable prognostic characteristics. Further studies of FOLFOXIRI in combination with targeted agents and in the neoadjuvant setting are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document