A randomized trial of personalized peptide vaccine (PPV) plus low-dose estramustine (EMP) versus full-dose EMP in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3007-3007
Author(s):  
M. Noguchi ◽  
H. Uemura ◽  
H. Kumon ◽  
Y. Nasu ◽  
Y. Hirao ◽  
...  

3007 Background: Personalized selection of the right peptides for each patient could be a novel peptide-based immunotherapy for boosting anti-cancer immunity in many patients (pts). This randomized study evaluated the anti-tumor effect and safety of PPV plus a low-dose EMP compared with full dose EMP for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods: This was a randomized (1:1), open labeled, cross-over study in pts with HRPC. Pts were randomized to arm A; PPV plus low-dose EMP (280 mg/day) or arm B; full dose EMP (560 mg/day) according to age and PSA levels. In arm A, prevaccination plasma were measured for their IgG levels for each of the 14 or 12 candidate peptides which can induce HLA-A2 or A24-restricted CTL activity against cancer cells followed by biweekly subcutaneous administration of the top four peptides (3mg each) showing the strongest IgG responses. Disease progression (PD) was defined as three consecutive and 125% increase from baseline PSA levels at least two weeks apart or objective PD by RECIST criteria. After PD, pts were treated with the opposite regime. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival and toxicity. The planned sample size was 80. Results: A total of 54 pts from 4 institutions were enrolled between June 2006 and December 2008. The accural into arms A and B was 27 and 27 pts, respectively. The main pts characteristics are (arm A/B): median age 71/69 years, EOCG performance status 0/1 96%/4% and 100%/0%, HLA A2/A24/A2A24 40%/32%/28% and 54%/27%/19%, median PSA 27/25 ng/ml, and metastatic HRPC 96%/85%. All pts were evaluable for their response at the time of interim analysis. The personalized peptide vaccination was well tolerated with no major adverse effects. Increased levels of IgG responses to the vaccinated peptides were observed in 20 of 23 (87%) patients tested. The median PFS time was 246 days in the arm A group and 85 days in the arm B, respectively. The PFS time in the arm A was statistically longer than that in the arm B (log-rank test: p = 0.0007, hazard ratio: 0.27, 95%CI: 0.12 to 0.615). Conclusions: PPV plus low-dose EMP was associated with improvement in PSA-based PFS compared to full-dose EMP alone. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2000 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-484
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Kobayashi ◽  
Yoshimasa Jo ◽  
Motoyasu Ikegami ◽  
Yoji Furukawa ◽  
Masaaki Morioka ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Orlando ◽  
M. Chacón ◽  
G. Salum ◽  
D.R. Chacón

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14601-14601
Author(s):  
E. Silva ◽  
F. Silva

14601 Background: Vinorelbine (VRL) has been shown to be active in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) in Phase II studies, alone or in combination. Its moderate toxicity profile is well tolerated in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was the investigation of the efficacy of vinorelbine and its toxicity. Methods: Patients with metastatic prostate cancer, progressive after hormonal therapy, receive intravenous VRL 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, and hydrocortisone 40 mg/day. Previous chemotherapy was allowed if stopped 6 months before. 44 received VRL according to the protocol. Inclusion criteria: hormone refractory prostate cancer patients PSA >20; performance status WHO < 2. The primary endpoint was prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, pain, and WHO performance status. Their mean (range) age was 71 (45–80) years, their median prostate specific antigen (PSA) level was 286 (38–950) ng/ml, and the median Gleason score was 8 (7 to 9). 38 patients had had previous chemotherapy. Results: Among the 44 patients, 7 with less than 3 cycles were not evaluated. Patients received a mean (range) of 9 (3–44) cycles of therapy. 6 patients (14%) had not been dispensed prior chemotherapy and 38 (86%) had; 19 (43%) had 2 lines of chemotherapy and 19 (43%) had 1 line. The median follow-up was 13 months. There were no reported drug related Grade 3 toxicities. Only 2 patients required a blood transfusion. Tumour responses: 7 (16%); 17 (39%) PSA stable; 13 (29%) PSA progression, 7 not evaluated. Time of PSA response was 7 months; time to progression: 7 months. Conclusions: Vinorelbine (VRL) is a safe regimen in previous poly-chemotherapy treated hormone-refractory prostate cancer elderly patients and even with response and efficacy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15649-15649
Author(s):  
S. Hoshi ◽  
K. Numahata ◽  
K. Hoshi ◽  
K. Suzuki ◽  
K. Ono ◽  
...  

15649 Background: Low dose continuous chemotherapy (metronomic chemotherapy) is trying to many advanced cancers. Metronomic chemotherapy has important anti-angiogenic activity to tumor vessels. For patients who progressed after docetaxel, no standard options exist. We have experienced complete regression of bone metastases on super scan by low does cisplatin, UFT, diethylstilbestrol, and dexamethasone (CUDD) in a patient with HRPC (Int JCO, 8,118, 2003). Methods: CUDD consisting of weekly 5 mg/body of cisplatin plus 125 mg/body of diethylstilbestrol and daily 300–450 mg of UFT/day plus 0.5–1 mg of dexamethasone were given to 47 HRPC patients, (median and range of age: 66 and 52–72, respectively). The ECOG performance status was 0 to 1. Gleason score was 7 in 10 patients and 8 in 17 patients and 9 in 20 patients, respectively. Metastatic site was bone in 45 (EOD grade 1:10, 2:18, 3: 15, 4:2), lymph node in 8. Six cases became refractory to docetaxel were treated with CUDD plus CPM (50 mg/day). Results: Among the 45 patients assessable for bone metastasis, 12 (27 %) obtained marked improvement on bone scan. One was EOD grade 4 (super bone scan) and 9 were EOD grade 1–3. Eighteen (40 %) were stable and 15 (33%) progressed on bone scan. Among 8 patients of lymph node metastasis, 3 (38%) showed partial response, 2 (25%) no change and 3 (38%) progression. Twenty-five (53 %) out of 47 patients showed a PSA decline of 50% or greater. Among the 25 patients assessable for bone pain, 7 (28%) improved, 12 (48%) remained stable and 6 (24%) progressed. Their median response duration and median survival time were 8 months (range; 2 to 44 months) and 20 months (range, 4 to 48 months), respectively. Their median response duration was 3 months. Three of 6 refractory to docetaxel were responded to CUDD plus CPM. Their median response duration was 10 months. Conclusions: CUDD is effective in almost half of hormone refractory prostate cancer patients and has advantage of minimal side effect. Three of 6 docetaxel refractory cases also responded to CUDD plus CPM. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5161-5161
Author(s):  
C. McHugh ◽  
K. Madigan ◽  
A. Walsh ◽  
J. Fox ◽  
T. W. Leonard ◽  
...  

5161 Background: The primary objective of this study is to examine the pharmacodynamic effects of two different regimens of zoledronic acid, Orazol 20 mg tablets versus Zometa 4mg IV infusion once-monthly therapy on biomarkers in male bisphosphonate-naïve hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. Methods: The study is an open-label, multi-center phase II clinical trial to compare oral Orazol 20 mg tablets weekly, to infusions of intravenous Zometa 4mg monthly, in males with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, bone metastases, and no prior bisphosphonate treatment. Patients were assigned into one of three cohorts. The three treatments administered were IV Zometa, 4 mg, 15 minute infusion, Day 0 and Day 28; Orazol po, 20 mg, Days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49; and Orazol po, 20 mg, Days 0, 1, 2, 3, 28, 35, 42, and 49. The study population consisted of men with hormone refractory prostate cancer as evidenced by history of rising PSA levels (last 2 of 3 PSA levels must be above nadir), who are bisphosphonate-naive, and have radiographically-confirmed bone metastases. Efficacy assessments: The primary endpoints are the assessment of response of four biomarkers, urinary NTX, serum CTX, serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase, and serum calcium on days -7, 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, and 56. Secondary endpoints are assessments of performance and pain scores based on ECOG performance status, BPI, and analgesic use. Safety assessments include physical examinations, vital signs and body weight, hematology panel, urinalysis, and blood chemistry panel. Results: The results demonstrated a rapid decrease for all four biomarkers. This decrease was seen at seven days, and was sustained throughout the study. There were no statistically significant differences between any of the treatments in the primary and secondary endpoints. Conclusions: From the results of MER-101–03, Orazol weekly therapy appears to be as effective as Zometa, based on the biomarkers analyzed. Orazol offers a substantial improvement in therapy over IV infusion for patients, with efficacy that is at least comparable based on the results obtained here. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


1999 ◽  
pp. 296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Savarese ◽  
Mary-Ellen Taplin ◽  
Bonnie Marchesani ◽  
Willi Kreis ◽  
Wallace Akerley ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document