Phase II study of intravenous vinorelbine plus hormone therapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14601-14601
Author(s):  
E. Silva ◽  
F. Silva

14601 Background: Vinorelbine (VRL) has been shown to be active in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) in Phase II studies, alone or in combination. Its moderate toxicity profile is well tolerated in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was the investigation of the efficacy of vinorelbine and its toxicity. Methods: Patients with metastatic prostate cancer, progressive after hormonal therapy, receive intravenous VRL 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, and hydrocortisone 40 mg/day. Previous chemotherapy was allowed if stopped 6 months before. 44 received VRL according to the protocol. Inclusion criteria: hormone refractory prostate cancer patients PSA >20; performance status WHO < 2. The primary endpoint was prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, pain, and WHO performance status. Their mean (range) age was 71 (45–80) years, their median prostate specific antigen (PSA) level was 286 (38–950) ng/ml, and the median Gleason score was 8 (7 to 9). 38 patients had had previous chemotherapy. Results: Among the 44 patients, 7 with less than 3 cycles were not evaluated. Patients received a mean (range) of 9 (3–44) cycles of therapy. 6 patients (14%) had not been dispensed prior chemotherapy and 38 (86%) had; 19 (43%) had 2 lines of chemotherapy and 19 (43%) had 1 line. The median follow-up was 13 months. There were no reported drug related Grade 3 toxicities. Only 2 patients required a blood transfusion. Tumour responses: 7 (16%); 17 (39%) PSA stable; 13 (29%) PSA progression, 7 not evaluated. Time of PSA response was 7 months; time to progression: 7 months. Conclusions: Vinorelbine (VRL) is a safe regimen in previous poly-chemotherapy treated hormone-refractory prostate cancer elderly patients and even with response and efficacy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (34) ◽  
pp. 8724-8729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Hussain ◽  
Catherine M. Tangen ◽  
Primo N. Lara ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Daniel P. Petrylak ◽  
...  

Purpose The epothilones are a new class of tubulin-polymerizing agents with activity in taxane-sensitive and resistant tumor models. We evaluated ixabepilone (BMS-247550) in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods Eligible patients had chemotherapy-naive metastatic HRPC, a Zubrod performance status of 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. All patients received BMS-247550 at 40 mg/m2 over 3 hours every 3 weeks. The primary end point was proportion of patients achieving a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Results Forty-eight patients with metastatic HRPC were registered. Forty-two patients were eligible, with a median age of 73 years and a median PSA level of 111 ng/mL; 78% had bone-only or bone and soft tissue metastases, and 88% had objective radiologic disease progression at registration. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 16 and three patients, respectively. All grade 4 toxicities were neutropenia or leukopenia. The most frequent grade 3 AEs were neuropathy (eight patients), hematologic toxicity (seven patients), flu-like symptoms, and infection (five patients each). There were no grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia or grade 5 AEs. There were 14 confirmed PSA responses (33%; 95% CI, 20% to 50%); 72% of PSA responders had declines greater than 80%, and two patients achieved an undetectable PSA. The estimated median progression-free survival is 6 months (95% CI, 4 to 8 months), and the median survival is 18 months (95% CI, 13 to 24 months). Conclusion Ixabepilone has demonstrated activity in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic HRPC. Major toxicities were neutropenia and neuropathy. Further testing to define its activity relative to standard therapy is warranted.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5152-5152
Author(s):  
T. Kolevska ◽  
C. J. Ryan ◽  
V. Huey ◽  
L. Weisberg ◽  
S. Wang ◽  
...  

5152 Background: Many patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer have poor tolerance to treatment. Docetaxel chemotherapy was shown to improve survival but has substantial toxicity, requires steroid administration, may cause poorly reversible neuropathy and requires long infusion times, all limiting its use. Nab-paclitaxel, an albumin-bound nanopaticle form of paclitaxel, delivers paclitaxel without steroids, requires only 30 minutes infusion time and has favorable toxicity profile that may be more tolerable but effective in patients with prostate cancer. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of nab-paclitaxel in first line chemotherapy of men with castration resistant prostate cancer. Methods: nab-paclitaxel was given iv100 mg/m2 weekly x 3 of 4 weeks cycles. Main eligibility criteria include: hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer, no prior chemotherapy, performance status 0–2. Primary endpoint was efficacy based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. PSA response was PSA decrease of >50%, progressive disease (PD) was PSA increase of >25%, stable disease (SD) was <25% PSA increase or <50% decrease sustained longer that 8 weeks. Results: There are 38 patients enrolled, 35 were evaluable for response. Median age was 71 years old (range 57–86). One patient discontinued the treatment after 1 infusion due to toxicity (elevated ALT). PSA response was seen in 9 (25%) patients and SD in 15 patients (43%), with an overall response rate of 25% and clinical benefit of 68%. Seven patients received treatment for ≥ 6 months with minimal toxicity (range 6–10 months). Grade 3 related hematologic toxicity was reported in 7 (18%) patients (4 anemia, 4 neutropenia), grade 3 related non-hematologic toxicity was reported in 6 patients (1 hypokalemia, 1 muscle weakness, 2 fatigue, 1 fever, 1 neuropathy, 1 ALT elevation). Conclusions: Nab-paclitaxel has activity in patients with metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer. This regimen was well tolerated, and may be useful in patients who are not suitable candidates for docetaxel based therapy. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14650-14650
Author(s):  
H. Akaza ◽  
I. Ikemoto ◽  
M. Namiki ◽  
M. Usami ◽  
M. Kobayashi ◽  
...  

14650 Background: S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine antitumor drug that combines three pharmacological agents: tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil;gimeracil, an inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; and potassium oxonate, which reduces gastrointestinal toxicity. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Methods: To be eligible patients (pts) had to have given informed consent, an age of <80 years, elevations of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) on three consecutive occasions despite effective hormonal therapy and antiandrogen withdrawal for at least 4 weeks, adequate organ function, a PS of 0–2, and a life expectancy of ≥3 months. S-1 was given orally at 40 mg/m2 b.i.d. for 28 consecutive days followed by a 14-day rest period. This 42-day cycle was repeated until confirmation of disease progression. Results: 32 pts were enrolled at 15 institutions. Their median age was 73 years (55 to 79). The median number of courses administered was 2.5 (1 to 11). On the basis of the change in the PSA level, 3 pts had a complete response (CR, <4 ng/ml), and 4 had a partial response (PR, ≥50% decrease), yielding a response rate of 21%. There was no change (NC) in 15 pts, and progressive disease (PD) in 10 pts. The median time to PSA progression was 71 days (95% CI: 44 to 161) overall, 234 days (152 to 435+) in the CR+PR group, and 157 days in the CR+PR+NC group. Grade 3 major toxicity comprised anorexia (3 pts) and anemia (2 pts). No toxicity-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: S-1 is active and well tolerated as a single agent in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Effectiveness and safety will be confirmed in subsequent large-scale phase II studies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 847-854
Author(s):  
Ronald Bartzatt

Cancer of the prostate are cancers in which most incidences are slow-growing, and in the U.S., a record of 1.2 million new cases of prostate cancer occurred in 2018. The rates of this type of cancer have been increasing in developing nations. The risk factors for prostate cancer include age, family history, and obesity. It is believed that the rate of prostate cancer is correlated with the Western diet. Various advances in methods of radiotherapy have contributed to lowering morbidity. Therapy for hormone- refractory prostate cancer is making progress, for almost all men with metastases will proceed to hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Smoking cigarettes along with the presence of prostate cancer has been shown to cause a higher risk of mortality in prostate cancer. The serious outcome of incontinence and erectile dysfunction result from the cancer treatment of surgery and radiation, particularly for prostate- specific antigen detected cancers that will not cause morbidity or mortality. Families of patients, as well as patients, are profoundly affected following the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Poor communication between spouses during prostate cancer increases the risk for poor adjustment to prostate cancer. The use of serum prostate-specific antigen to screen for prostate cancer has led to a greater detection, in its early stage, of this cancer. Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in American men, accounting for more than 29% of all diagnosed cancers and about 13% of all cancer deaths. A shortened course of hormonal therapy with docetaxel following radical prostatectomy (or radiation therapy) for high-risk prostate cancer has been shown to be both safe and feasible. Patients treated with docetaxel-estramustine had a prostate-specific antigen response decline of at least 50%. Cancer vaccines are an immune-based cancer treatment that may provide the promise of a non-toxic but efficacious therapeutic alternative for cancer patients. Further studies will elucidate improved methods of detection and treatment.


1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 513-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Figg ◽  
Kara Ammerman ◽  
Nicholas Patronas ◽  
Seth M. Steinberg ◽  
Ronald G. Walls ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 607-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
W K Kelly ◽  
H I Scher ◽  
M Mazumdar ◽  
V Vlamis ◽  
M Schwartz ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To evaluate the prognostic significance of pretreatment parameters and posttherapy declines in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in relation to the survival of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred ten assessable patients treated on seven sequential protocols at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) for hormone-refractory prostate cancer were evaluated for 29 different pretherapy and posttherapy parameters, including a posttherapy decline in PSA of 50% and 80% from baseline. RESULTS In the univariate analysis, initial Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 80% was associated with a favorable outcome (P = .005), while age, extent of disease on bone scan, and individual sites of metastatic disease were not significant. No difference in survival was observed between patients with measurable or assessable (bone only) disease. Initial hemoglobin (HGB; P = .0012), alkaline phosphatase (ALK; P = .0015), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; P = .0002) levels were significant discriminators, while the initial PSA was not. Using a landmark analysis, a significantly longer median survival rate was observed for patients with a > or = 50% decline in PSA (median not reached) versus patients with a less than 50% decline in PSA (median, 8.6 months; P = .0001). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that a > or = 50% decline in PSA (P = .0004) and the natural log of LDH (P = .0001) were the two most significant variables predicting survival. The model was confirmed on an independent data set from the Norwegian Radium Hospital (NRH) in Oslo, Norway. CONCLUSION The results suggest that posttherapy PSA declines can be used as a surrogate end point to evaluate new agents in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. The criteria for response need prospective validation in phase III trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document