Combretastatin A-4 phosphate (CA4P) carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: Final phase II trial results

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5502-5502 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Zweifel ◽  
G. Jayson ◽  
N. Reed ◽  
R. Osborne ◽  
B. Hassan ◽  
...  

5502 Background: CA4P is a vascular disrupting agent that in pre-clinical models can increase the efficacy of a variety of therapies. A dose escalation trial of CA4P given prior to carboplatin, paclitaxel or both showed the combination was well tolerated and responses were seen in several tumor types including 6/17 with relapsed ovarian cancer. The trial was therefore extended into a phase II trial in patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer. Methods: Patients with ovarian cancer that had relapsed and could start trial therapy within 6 months of their last platinum chemotherapy were given CA4P 63mg/m2 18–20 hours prior to paclitaxel 175mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5 repeated 3 weekly. If > 2 responses were seen in first 18 patients 43 patients were to be treated to confirm response rate>19%. Results: Five of the first 18 patients responded so the study was extended and closed after 44 patients were recruited, with full data available to date on 34. Weekly blood counts have demonstrated grade 3/4 neutropenia in 11 and thrombocytopenia in only 1 patient. Other grade > 2 toxicity seen in > 1 patient was fatigue, nausea / vomiting, pain, alopecia, rapidly reversible ataxia, diarrhoea, neuropathy and was little different to what would be expected with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Hypertension is the commonest CA4P related toxicity and was easily controlled by GTN, then prophylactic amlodipine. Responses according to GCIG criteria, have been seen in 11/34 (32%) patients with an additional unconfirmed PR. Conclusions: The addition of CA4P to paclitaxel and carboplatin is well tolerated and appears to produce a higher response rate in this patient population than if the chemotherapy was given without CA4P. A planned randomised trial will hopefully confirm this. [Table: see text]

2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Morgan ◽  
Timothy W. Synold ◽  
David Gandara ◽  
Franco Muggia ◽  
Sidney Scudder ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 2739-2744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Bécouarn ◽  
M Ychou ◽  
M Ducreux ◽  
C Borel ◽  
F Bertheault-Cvitkovic ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To evaluate the objective tumor response rate and safety profile of oxaliplatin when administered to patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 39 patients were entered onto this phase II trial. One patient was excluded for having had a second cancer, so the study was based on 38 patients. Patients were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 1, every 21 days. Patients were assessed for response every three courses. All clinical and radiologic data were reviewed by an external panel of experts, with their assessment being considered definitive. RESULTS Nine partial responses (PRs) were observed (response rate, 24.3%; 95% confidence interval, 11.8% to 41.2%). The median duration of response was 216+ days. Fifteen patients (40.5%) had stable disease and 13 (35.2%) had progressive disease. The median progression-free survival time for all patients was 126+ days (range, 21 to 447+). The main toxicity was peripheral sensory neuropathy. Grade 3 neurotoxicity (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [NCI-CTC]) was reported in 13%. Hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were mild. The incidence of grade 3 neutropenia was 5.2%, while that of grade 3 or 4 thrombopenia was 7.9%. Vomiting (grade 3 or 4) occurred in 7.9% of patients and grade 3 diarrhea in 2.6%. CONCLUSION This phase II study provides clear evidence of the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin monotherapy at this dose and schedule in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma.


2019 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 16-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Walsh ◽  
M. Kamrava ◽  
A. Rogatko ◽  
A.J. Li ◽  
I. Cass ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S628
Author(s):  
R.W. Holloway ◽  
A.A. Mendivil ◽  
J.E. Kendrick ◽  
L.N. Abaid ◽  
J.V. Brown ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1050-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda Garcia Garcia ◽  
Ana de Juan Ferré ◽  
Cesar Mendiola ◽  
Maria-Pilar Barretina-Ginesta ◽  
Lydia Gaba Garcia ◽  
...  

BackgroundBevacizumab is an approved treatment after primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer. However, there is limited information on bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy before interval debulking surgery.ObjectiveTo evaluate neoadjuvant bevacizumab in a randomized phase II trial.MethodsPatients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV high-grade serous/endometrioid ovarian cancer were randomized to receive four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without ≥3 cycles of bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. After interval debulking surgery, all patients received post-operative chemotherapy (three cycles) and bevacizumab for 15 months. The primary end point was complete macroscopic response rate at interval debulking surgery.ResultsOf 68 patients randomized, 64 completed four neoadjuvant cycles; 22 of 33 (67%) in the chemotherapy-alone arm and 31 of 35 (89%) in the bevacizumab arm (p=0.029) underwent surgery. The complete macroscopic response rate did not differ between treatment arms in either the intention-to-treat population of 68 patients (6.1% vs 5.7%, respectively; p=0.25) or the 55 patients who underwent surgery (8.3% vs 6.5%; p=1.00). There was no difference in complete cytoreduction rate or progression-free survival between the treatment arms. During neoadjuvant therapy, grade ≥3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy alone than with bevacizumab (61% vs 29%, respectively; p=0.008). Intestinal (sub)occlusion, fatigue/asthenia, abdominal infection, and thrombocytopenia were less frequent with bevacizumab. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 9% in the control arm versus 16% in the experimental arm in the month after surgery.ConclusionsAdding three to four pre-operative cycles of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable disease did not improve the complete macroscopic response rate or surgical outcome, but improved surgical operability without increasing toxicity. These results support the early integration of bevacizumab in carefully selected high-risk patients requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy for initially unresectable ovarian cancer.


2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anda M. Vlad ◽  
Raluca A. Budiu ◽  
Diana E. Lenzner ◽  
Yun Wang ◽  
Julia A. Thaller ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 417-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
D RISCHIN ◽  
K PHILLIPS ◽  
M FRIEDLANDER ◽  
P HARNETT ◽  
M QUINN ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document