A phase I trial of S-1 plus vinorelbine in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19098-e19098
Author(s):  
H. Suyama ◽  
Y. Shigeoka ◽  
T. Igishi ◽  
S. Matsumoto ◽  
M. Kodani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

e19098 Background: We reported the efficacy of the combination treatment of tegafur-uracil (UFT) and vinorelbine (VNR) for the elderly patients (pts) (>70) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in ASCO 2007 (Abstract - No. 18075). Although the cisplatin-based doublets are still milestone for the pts with advanced NSCLC, non-platinum based doublet regimens remain as a matter of development judging from recent meta-analysis. Tegafur-5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine-potassium oxonate (S-1), a new oral fluoropyrimidine, has been studied extensively, and appears promising for various kinds of cancers including NSCLC. Thus, we conducted this phase I trial using VNR and new oral fluoropyrimidine, S-1. Methods: Pts with advanced NSCLC, who had received at least one prior platinum-containing regimen, were eligible. In this phase I study, VNR was infused on days 1 and 8, and S-1 was administered from day 2 to day 6 and from day 9 to day 13 of a 3-week cycle. The starting dose of S-1 was 80 mg/m2/day and, if necessary, the dose was decreased to 65 mg/m2/day; VNR was increased from 20 to 25 mg/m2 in this trial. Results: From August 14, 2007 to April 1, 2008, 8 pts enrolled in this study. Median age was 61 (range 49–75). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated during the first 6 weeks of the treatment. No DLT was observed at dose level I (80 mg/m2/day S-1, 20 mg/m2 VNR). At dose level II (80 mg/m2/day S-1, 25 mg/m2 VNR), DLT in the form of neutropenia, hyperglycemia and hyponatremia was observed in 3 of 5 pts. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the present treatment was 80 mg/m2/day S-1 and 25 mg/m2 VNR; the recommended tolerable dose for future phase II trials is therefore 80 mg/m2/day S-1 and 20 mg/m2 VNR. Conclusions: Three-week cycle of VNR (20 mg/m2), infused on days 1 and 8; S-1 (80 mg/m2/day), administered from day 2 to day 6 and from day 9 to day 13, is being examined in our phase II trial for first-or second-line treatment of NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine or Vinorelbine for Elderly Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The MILES-2P Studies

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (29) ◽  
pp. 4663-4669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Gridelli ◽  
Paolo Maione ◽  
Alfonso Illiano ◽  
Franco Vito Piantedosi ◽  
Adolfo Favaretto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

PurposeTwo phase I/II trials were done to evaluate the feasibility of cisplatin combined with gemcitabine or vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsPatients with advanced NSCLC who were older than 70 years of age and who had a performance status of 0 to 1 were eligible. Cisplatin was given on day 1 (a starting dose of 50 mg/m2with increasing increments of 10 mg/m2at each level) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) or vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. A two-stage flexible optimal design was applied in the phase II study, and unacceptable toxicity was the primary end point.ResultsOverall, 159 patients were enrolled: 38 in phase I and 121 in phase II studies. Cisplatin was feasible at 60 mg/m2with gemcitabine and at 40 mg/m2with vinorelbine. With the former combination, 50 of 60 (83.3%) patients were treated without unacceptable toxicity; objective responses were reported in 26 of 60 patients (43.5%; 95% CI, 30.6 to 56.8); median progression-free and overall survivals were 25.3 and 43.6 weeks, respectively. With the latter combination, 50 (82.0%) of 61 patients were treated without unacceptable toxicity; objective responses were reported in 22 of 61 patients (36.1%; 95% CI, 24.2 to 49.4); median progression-free and overall survivals were 21.1 and 33.1 weeks, respectively.ConclusionBoth cisplatin (60 mg/m2) plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (40 mg/m2) plus vinorelbine are feasible and active in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. The former combination, which provides a higher dose of cisplatin, deserves comparison versus single-agent chemotherapy in this setting of patients.

Phase I trial of docetaxel and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 750-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Millward ◽  
J Zalcberg ◽  
J F Bishop ◽  
L K Webster ◽  
A Zimet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior chemotherapy and to recommend a dose for phase II studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 who had not received prior chemotherapy received docetaxel over 1 hour followed by cisplatin over 1 hour with hydration. Dose levels studied were (docetaxel/cisplatin) 50/75, 75/75, 75/100, and 100/75 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. Colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support was not used. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and cisplatin were studied in the first cycle of therapy. Most patients (79%) had metastatic disease or intrathoracic recurrence after prior radiation and/or surgery. RESULTS Of 24 patients entered, all were assessable for toxicity and 18 for response. The MTD schedules were docetaxel 75 mg/m2 with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] in five of six patients), and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (DLTs in two of two patients, including one fatal toxicity). Limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and nonhematologic, principally diarrhea and renal. Two patients had neutropenic enterocolitis. Pharmacokinetics of both drugs were consistent with results from single-agent studies, which suggests no major pharmacokinetic interaction. Neutropenia was related to docetaxel area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC). An alternative schedule was investigated, with cisplatin being administered over 3 hours commencing 3 hours after docetaxel, but toxicity did not appear to be less. Independently reviewed responses occurred in eight of 18 patients (44%; 95% confidence interval, 22% to 69%), most following 75 mg/m2 of both drugs. CONCLUSION Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour is recommended for phase II studies. The responses seen in this phase I study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination in previously untreated advanced NSCLC.

Phase II, Multicenter, Uncontrolled Trial of Single-Agent Sorafenib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory, Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (26) ◽  
pp. 4274-4280 ◽  
Author(s):  
George R. Blumenschein ◽  
Ulrich Gatzemeier ◽  
Frank Fossella ◽  
David J. Stewart ◽  
Lisa Cupit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
Small Cell Lung

PurposeSorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK mitogenic signaling pathway and the angiogenic receptor tyrosine kinases, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor β. We evaluated the antitumor response and tolerability of sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most of whom had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsThis was a phase II, single-arm, multicenter study. Patients with relapsed or refractory advanced NSCLC received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily until tumor progression or an unacceptable drug-related toxicity occurred. The primary objective was to measure response rate.ResultsOf 54 patients enrolled, 52 received sorafenib. The predominant histologies were adenocarcinoma (54%) and squamous cell carcinoma (31%). No complete or partial responses were observed. Stable disease (SD) was achieved in 30 (59%) of the 51 patients who were evaluable for efficacy. Four patients with SD developed tumor cavitation. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months, and median overall survival was 6.7 months. Patients with SD had a median PFS of 5.5 months. Major grades 3 to 4, treatment-related toxicities included hand-foot skin reaction (10%), hypertension (4%), fatigue (2%), and diarrhea (2%). Nine patients died within a 30-day period after discontinuing sorafenib, and one patient experienced pulmonary hemorrhage that was considered drug related.ConclusionContinuous treatment with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily was associated with disease stabilization in patients with advanced NSCLC. The broad activity of sorafenib and its acceptable toxicity profile suggest that additional investigation of sorafenib as therapy for patients with NSCLC is warranted.

Phase II Study of Weekly Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel as Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Chemotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Mie Kotake ◽  
Tomohito Kuwako ◽  
Hisao Imai ◽  
Yoshio Tomizawa ◽  
Kyoichi Kaira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Introduction: Treatment outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are poor due to limited treatment options. Objective: We conducted a multicenter, single-arm phase II study to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of weekly nab-PTX in patients with advanced NSCLC with failed cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC having adequate organ functions with a performance status of 0–1 were enrolled. A 100 mg/m2 dose of nab-paclitaxel was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), toxicity profile, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Between September 2013 and May 2016, 35 patients were enrolled. The ORR was 31.4%, and the DCR was 74.3%. The median PFS was 3.6 months, and the median OS was 11.4 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia (54.3%), leukopenia (42.9%), and anemia (11.4%). Two patients discontinued chemotherapy due to pneumonitis. Conclusions: Nab-PTX may be a later-line chemotherapeutic option for previously treated advanced NSCLC.

Phase I/II Study of Escalating Doses of Vinorelbine in Combination With Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 458-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Monnet ◽  
Patrick Soulié ◽  
Hubert de Cremoux ◽  
Sabine Saltiel-Voisin ◽  
Mohammed Bekradda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Platinum Compound ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE: Oxaliplatin is a platinum compound active in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and vinorelbine (VNB) is an active reference agent. This phase I/II study was performed to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the recommended dose (RD) of a VNB/oxaliplatin combination given to previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oxaliplatin was given at the fixed dose of 130 mg/m2 (2-hour intravenous [IV] infusion) on day 1. VNB was administered on days 1 and 8 (10-minute IV infusion), with doses starting at 22 mg/m2/d and escalated by 2 mg/m2 increments until MTD. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. No special hydration measures or prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were used. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (20 men, 7 women) received 110 cycles total at six different VNB dose levels. Neutropenia was the DLT. Although no patient experienced DLT at the highest dose level (32 mg/m2/d), multiple treatment delays (54% of cycles) and dose reductions (34% of cycles) were required at this dose level. Others toxicities were mainly limited to grade 1 peripheral neuropathy and grade 1/2 nausea/vomiting. The relative dose-intensity of administered VNB from dose levels 3 to 6 (26 to 32 mg/m2) remained stable, whereas grade 3/4 neutropenia increased. All patients were assessable for activity; there were 10 objective responses, including one complete response (37% response rate). CONCLUSION: The present combination can be safely administered in an outpatient setting. The RD is VNB 26 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1 every 3 weeks.

scholarly journals p53 gene therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary report of phase I trial

2000 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Toshivoshi Fujiwara ◽  
Masafumi Kataoka ◽  
Atsushi Nakamura ◽  
Noriaki Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Preliminary Report ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
P53 Gene ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document