Tirapazamine, Cisplatin, and Radiation Versus Cisplatin and Radiation for Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (TROG 02.02, HeadSTART): A Phase III Trial of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18) ◽  
pp. 2989-2995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Rischin ◽  
Lester J. Peters ◽  
Brian O'Sullivan ◽  
Jordi Giralt ◽  
Richard Fisher ◽  
...  

Purpose Promising results in a randomized phase II trial with the hypoxic cytotoxin tirapazamine (TPZ) combined with cisplatin (CIS) and radiation led to this phase III trial. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated stage III or IV (excluding T1-2N1 and M1) squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx were randomly assigned to receive definitive radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks) concurrently with either CIS (100 mg/m2) on day 1 of weeks 1, 4, and 7 or CIS (75 mg/m2) plus TPZ (290 mg/m2/d) on day 1 of weeks 1, 4, and 7 and TPZ alone (160 mg/m2/d) on days 1, 3, and 5 of weeks 2 and 3 (TPZ/CIS). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The planned sample size was 850, estimated to result in 334 deaths, which would provide 90% power to detect a difference in 2-year survival rates of 60% v 70% for CIS versus TPZ/CIS, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.69). Results Eight hundred sixty-one patients were accrued from 89 sites in 16 countries. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the 2-year OS rates were 65.7% for CIS and 66.2% for TPZ/CIS (TPZ/CIS – CIS: 95% CI, −5.9% to 6.9%). There were no significant differences in failure-free survival, time to locoregional failure, or quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Head and Neck. Conclusions We found no evidence that the addition of TPZ to chemoradiotherapy, in patients with advanced head and neck cancer not selected for the presence of hypoxia, improves OS.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e0116965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoaki Tsukahara ◽  
Akira Kubota ◽  
Yasuhisa Hasegawa ◽  
Hideki Takemura ◽  
Tomonori Terada ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 2092-2097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Elliott ◽  
James R. Wright ◽  
R. Suzanne Swann ◽  
Felix Nguyen-Tân ◽  
Cristiane Takita ◽  
...  

Purpose This multicentered phase III trial was designed to compare an emulsion containing trolamine against the usual supportive care within each participating institution for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Patients and Methods Patients with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: prophylactic trolamine emulsion, interventional trolamine emulsion, or declared institutional preference. The primary outcome was the reduction in grade 2 or higher skin toxicity, as per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported quality of life (QOL). Results From October 2000 to April 2002, 547 patients from 51 institutions were entered onto the trial. The average age was 59 years. Patients were predominately male (79%) and most continued to use tobacco products (52%). The rates of grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis were 79%, 77%, and 79% in the prophylactic, interventional, and institutional preference arms of the study, respectively. No significant differences in QOL were found. Conclusion The results of this trial demonstrate no advantage for the use of trolamine in reducing the incidence of grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis or improving patient-reported QOL. The use of 15 different local standards of care highlights the need to continue research that will result in evidence-based recommendations to reduce the burden of radiation dermatitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document