scholarly journals Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Combination With Docetaxel and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Metastatic or Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: ECOG 5203

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18) ◽  
pp. 2947-2951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijing Sun ◽  
Mark Powell ◽  
Peter J. O'Dwyer ◽  
Paul Catalano ◽  
Rafat H. Ansari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose The combination of sorafenib with chemotherapy is well-tolerated and is associated with encouraging response rates in several malignances. Both docetaxel and cisplatin are active in gastric cancer. A phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of combined sorafenib, docetaxel, and cisplatin in patients with metastatic or advanced adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Patients and Methods Forty-four chemotherapy-naïve patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, of whom 80% had metastatic disease and two thirds had poorly differentiated gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, were enrolled. The treatment regimen was sorafenib 400 mg orally twice a day for 21 days, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, repeated every 21 days. The primary end point was response rate to the combination. Toxicity, overall survival, and progression-free survival were assessed as secondary end points. Results Eighteen of the 44 eligible and treated patients showed partial responses (41%; 90% CI, 28% to 54%). The median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (90% CI, 5.4 to 7.4 months). The median overall survival was 13.6 months (90% CI, 8.6 to 16.1 month). The major toxicity of this regimen was neutropenia, which reached grade 3 to 4 in 64% of patients. One patient experienced hemorrhage at the tumor site. Conclusion The combination of sorafenib, docetaxel, and cisplatin has an encouraging efficacy profile with tolerable toxicity. Additional studies of sorafenib with chemotherapy are warranted in gastric cancer.

scholarly journals Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin With or Without Veliparib in Patients With Pancreas Adenocarcinoma and a Germline BRCA/PALB2 Mutation

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (13) ◽  
pp. 1378-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen M. O’Reilly ◽  
Jonathan W. Lee ◽  
Mark Zalupski ◽  
Marinela Capanu ◽  
Jennifer Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Palb2 Mutation

PURPOSE Five percent to 9% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) develop in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 or PALB2 (g BRCA/PALB2+) mutation. Phase IB data from a trial that used cisplatin, gemcitabine, and veliparib treatment demonstrated a high response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) in this population. We designed an open-label, randomized, multicenter, two-arm phase II trial to investigate cisplatin and gemcitabine with or without veliparib in g BRCA/PALB2+ PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had untreated g BRCA/PALB2+ PDAC with measurable stage III to IV disease and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Treatment for patients in arm A consisted of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 intravenously on days 3 and 10; treatment for patients in arm B was the same as that for patients in arm A, and arm A also received veliparib 80 mg orally twice per day on days 1 to 12 cycled every 3 weeks. The primary end point was RRs of arm A and arm B evaluated separately using a Simon two-stage design. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, DCR, OS, safety, and correlative analyses. RESULTS Fifty patients were evaluated by modified intention-to-treat analysis. The RR for arm A was 74.1% and 65.2% for arm B ( P = .55); both arms exceeded the prespecified activity threshold. DCR was 100% for arm A and 78.3% for arm B ( P = .02). Median progression-free survival was 10.1 months for arm A (95% CI, 6.7 to 11.5 months) and 9.7 months for arm B (95% CI, 4.2 to 13.6 months; P = .73). Median OS for arm A was 15.5 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 24.3 months) and 16.4 months for arm B (95% CI, 11.7 to 23.4 months; P = .6). Two-year OS rate for the entire cohort was 30.6% (95% CI, 17.8% to 44.4%), and 3-year OS rate was 17.8% (95% CI, 8.1% to 30.7%). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities for arm A versus arm B were 13 (48%) versus seven (30%) for neutropenia, 15 (55%) versus two (9%) for thrombocytopenia, and 14 (52%) versus eight (35%) for anemia. CONCLUSION Cisplatin and gemcitabine is an effective regimen in advanced g BRCA/PALB2+ PDAC. Concurrent veliparib did not improve RR. These data establish cisplatin and gemcitabine as a standard approach in g BRCA/ PALB2+ PDAC.

Prognostic factors of ado-trastuzumab emtansine treatment in patients with metastatic HER-2 positive breast cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522092408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deniz Tataroglu Ozyukseler ◽  
Mustafa Basak ◽  
Seval Ay ◽  
Aygül Koseoglu ◽  
Serdar Arıcı ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Trastuzumab Emtansine ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Cancer Antigen ◽  
Free Survival

Background Ado-trastuzumab emtansine is an antibody-drug conjugate that combines the cytotoxic activity of emtansine with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted antitumor features of trastuzumab. Objective We conducted a study of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine. By evaluating progression-free survival, overall survival, and response rates, we aimed to find prognostic factors of trastuzumab emtansine treatment. Methods Our study is a single-center, retrospective, observational study. We have clinical data from 78 patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine for metastatic breast cancer, from May 2016 through May 2019, at Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar Education and Research Hospital, Medical Oncology Department. Our objective is to assess the survival and response rates in trastuzumab emtansine-treated individuals and the factors associated with survival. The factors we analyzed were cancer antigen 15-3 sensitivity, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status, presence or absence of visceral metastases, presence or absence of cranial metastases, and treatment-associated thrombocytopenia. Results Among 78 patients, median progression-free survival was 7.8 months, and overall survival was 21.1 months. Twenty of the patients had an objective tumor response. The results showed that trastuzumab emtansine was tolerable with a manageable safety profile and consistent with the results of the previous literature. Mostly seen adverse events were anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and increased levels of alkaline phosphatase. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status = 2 had worse progression-free survival and overall survival compared to ones with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status < 2; progression-free survival and overall survival are worse in cancer antigen 15-3-sensitive breast cancer patients. According to our findings, treatment-associated thrombocytopenia was a significant prognostic factor for survival. Patients with thrombocytopenia had 12 months progression-free survival, whereas patients without thrombocytopenia had only 4.1 months progression-free survival. In like manner, overall survival was much better in the thrombocytopenia-experienced patients as 29.5 versus 11.8 months. Conclusions Trastuzumab emtansine prolongs progression-free survival and overall survival with a manageable safety profile. Thrombocytopenia, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status, and cancer antigen 15-3 are correlated with progression-free survival and/or overall survival.

A multicenter phase II study of thalidomide in combination with interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14636-14636 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Farray ◽  
J. I. Clark ◽  
T. Kuzel ◽  
J. P. Dutcher
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

14636 Background: Thalidomide, a drug with immune modulating and anti-angiogenic properties has shown activity in relapsed/refractory MRCC; furthermore, early phase I data of oral thalidomide with subcutaneous low-dose IL-2 showed the combination to be safe. The potential anti-tumor activity of this combination formed the basis of this study. Methods: The aim of this multi-center, open label, phase II study was to determine the efficacy and safety of thalidomide and IL-2 given in combination. Patients (pts) with untreated clear cell MRCC with measurable disease and previous nephrectomy were eligible. Two 6-week cycles of thalidomide and IL-2 were planned. Each cycle consisted of thalidomide started at 200 mg orally daily and titrated to 400 mg daily on the 4th day for 6 weeks; IL-2 was started one week post initiation of thalidomide at a dose of 7mIU/m2 subcutaneously days 1–5 for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off therapy. Therapy was to be continued until progression, if there was at least stable disease (SD). Planned accrual was 53 patients. Results: 11 pts were enrolled. The trial was terminated early due to lack of responses. Median age was 57 years (51–66). All pts had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or better. The only grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (3 pts), neuropathy (1 pt), anorexia (1 pt), dyspnea (1 pt), edema (1 pt); these required dose reductions as per protocol. There were no objective responses: 3 pts had SD, 8 pts had progressive disease (PD). The 3 pts with SD completed 4, 4, and 6 cycles of therapy respectively; of the 8 pts with PD, 3 completed two cycles, and 5 completed one cycle of therapy. Conclusions: The combination of thalidomide and low-dose IL-2 was well tolerated, but in this trial did not show anti-tumor activity in patients with clear cell MRCC. We thank Celgene for support of this trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Nintedanib Plus Pemetrexed/Cisplatin in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Phase II Results From the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled LUME-Meso Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31) ◽  
pp. 3591-3600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Grosso ◽  
Nicola Steele ◽  
Silvia Novello ◽  
Anna K. Nowak ◽  
Sanjay Popat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Double Blind

Purpose LUME-Meso is a phase II/III randomized, double-blind trial designed to assess efficacy and safety of nintedanib plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Phase II results are reported here. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients with unresectable, nonsarcomatoid MPM (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1), stratified by histology (epithelioid or biphasic), were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to up to six cycles of pemetrexed and cisplatin plus nintedanib (200 mg twice daily) or placebo followed by nintedanib plus placebo monotherapy until progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned. The median number of pemetrexed and cisplatin cycles was six; the median treatment duration for nintedanib was 7.8 months and 5.3 months for placebo. Primary PFS favored nintedanib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.91; P = .017), which was confirmed in updated PFS analyses (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.87; P = .010). A trend toward improved overall survival also favored nintedanib (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.29; P = .319). Benefit was evident in epithelioid histology, with a median overall survival gain of 5.4 months (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.21; P = .197; median [nintedanib v placebo], 20.6 months v 15.2 months) and median PFS gain of 4.0 months (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.82; P = .006; median [nintedanib v placebo], 9.7 v 5.7 months). Neutropenia was the most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse event (AE; nintedanib 43.2% v placebo 12.2%); rates of febrile neutropenia were low (4.5% in nintedanib group v 0% in placebo group). AEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 6.8% of those receiving nintedanib versus 17.1% of those in the placebo group. Conclusion Addition of nintedanib to pemetrexed plus cisplatin resulted in PFS improvement. AEs were manageable. The clinical benefit was evident in patients with epithelioid histology. The confirmatory phase III part of the study is ongoing.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of pathotropic nanoparticles bearing a dominant negative cyclin G1 construct for chemoresistant osteosarcoma and other sarcomas: Phase I, II, and III studies

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10513-10513 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Chawla ◽  
V. S. Chua ◽  
L. Fernandez ◽  
D. Quon ◽  
A. Saralou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Relationship ◽  
Dose Response Relationship ◽  
Free Survival

10513 Background: (1) To evaluate the safety/anti-tumor potential of intravenous (i.v.) Rexin-G in chemotherapy-resistant sarcoma (Phase I/II), and (2) to confirm the efficacy/safety of i.v. Rexin-G in chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma (Phase II). Methods: Twenty patients in the Phase I/II study and 22 patients in the Phase II study received 1–2 × 10e11 cfu Rexin-G i.v., 2–3 times a week for 4 weeks. Treatment was continued if the patient had < Grade 1 toxicity. Results: Treatment-related adverse events included chills (n=1), presyncope (n=1), photophobia (n=1) of Grade 1 severity, and fatigue (n=4) of Grade 1–2 severity. In the Phase I/II sarcoma study, 3/6 patients had stable disease at Dose Level 0, median progression free survival (PFS) was 5 weeks, and overall survival (OS) was 14 weeks, while 10/14 patients had stable disease at Dose Level I-II, median PFS was 16 weeks and median OS was 34 weeks. Cox regression analysis showed a dose-response relationship between PFS/OS and Rexin-G dosage (p = 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). The Table below shows the results for evaluable patients (n=17) in the Phase II study for osteosarcoma. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows a dose-response relationship between overall survival and Rexin-G dosage in the combined Phase I/II sarcoma and Phase II osteosarcoma studies (p = 0.02; n=42). Two patients achieved surgical remissions which are sustained for >26 weeks. Conclusions: These studies suggest that (i) intravenous Rexin-G is safe and well-tolerated, and (ii) Rexin-G controls tumor growth and prolongs progression-free survival and overall survival in a dose-dependent manner in chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma and sarcoma. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Multicenter phase II study of triplet combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 for advanced gastric cancer (OGSG 0703).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 124-124
Author(s):  
Kazumasa Fujitani ◽  
Yutaka Kimura ◽  
Hiroshi Imamura ◽  
Masahiro Gotoh ◽  
Shohei Iijima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Statistical Hypothesis ◽  
Multicenter Phase

124 Background: Docetaxel combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is active in advanced gastric cancer, but not generally accepted because of its substantial toxicities. We conducted a multicenter phase II study of triplet combination using paclitaxel, cisplatin and S-1 (PCS) as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic measurable gastric cancer, a performance status < 2, age of 20-75 years, and adequate organ functions were given intravenous paclitaxel at 70 mg/m2 and cisplatin at 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15, plus oral S-1 at 40 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1 to 21, followed by 2-week rest, repeated every 5 weeks. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred, or the patient refused the therapy. Study endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) as primary, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Sample size of 40 patients was determined to reject the ORR of 55% under the expectation of 75% with a power of 80% and a one-sided α of 5%. Results: A total of 52 patients were enrolled in this study, among whom 49 were assessable for efficacy and 51 assessable for toxicity. ORR was 46.9% (95% CI: 32.5-61.7%). The median PFS and median OS were 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.1-7.0) and 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.3-16.1), respectively. Frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (51%), leucopenia (25%), anemia (20%), hyponatremia (16%), anorexia (14%), diarrhea (8%) and fatigue (8%). There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: Triplet combination chemotherapy with PCS demonstrated superior feasibility with promising antitumor activity, though which did not meet the statistical hypothesis, for advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II Trial of Biweekly Infusional Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid, and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 658-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
Akin Atmaca ◽  
Susanna Hegewisch-Becker ◽  
Dirk Jaeger ◽  
Sabine Hahnfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Intravenous Infusion ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To evaluate the toxicity and activity of infusional fluorouracil (FU), folinic acid (FA), and oxaliplatin, administered every 2 weeks in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Patients and Methods Forty-one previously untreated patients with measurable adenocarcinoma of the stomach were eligible for the study. Patients received FU 2.6 g/m2 (24-hour continuous infusion), FA 500 mg/m2 (2-hour intravenous infusion), and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (2-hour intravenous infusion) every 2 weeks for 6 weeks. Treatment was continued until progression of disease was observed. Results All patients were assessable for toxicity and 37 of 41 patients were assessable for response. Patient characteristics were: sex (male, 28; female,13), median age 60 years (range, 20 to 77 years), and median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. Response was evaluated every 6 weeks. Of 37 assessable patients, one complete and 15 partial remissions were observed (overall response rate, 43%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients (32%) and progressive disease in nine patients (24%). The median overall survival was 9.6 months. WHO grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in two patients (4.9%) and thrombocytopenia in one patient (2.4%). Other WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicities included diarrhea in three patients (7.3%) and vomiting in two patients (4.9%). There were no cases of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy and no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion Biweekly fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin is active and well-tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Response rates, time to progression, and overall survival were comparable to those achieved with other combination chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFOX6, with significantly less toxicity.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Regorafenib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117955491882544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Aljubran ◽  
Mahmoud A Elshenawy ◽  
Magdy Kandil ◽  
Muhammed N Zahir ◽  
Ahmed Shaheen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Background: Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of refractory advanced colorectal cancer. It was found in the clinical trials to have a modest benefit and significant toxicity. Our aim was to assess the outcome in our local clinic practice. Patients and methods: Records of patients with confirmed colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib were reviewed. Clinical, pathological, and molecular data were collected. Efficacy and factors of possible prognostic significance were analyzed. Results: A total of 78 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with regorafenib from February 2014 to February 2016 in 4 different institutions (median age: 50.5 years; male: 40 [51.3%]; KRAS mutant: 41 [52%]; right colonic primary: 18 [23%]). A total of 52 patients (66.7%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 to 1, whereas in 25 patients (32.1%) it was >1. In total, 58 patients (74%) had dose reduction. No patient achieved objective response, 15 patients (19%) achieved stable disease, and 56 patients (72%) had progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 6.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-3.3) and overall survival was 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.2-9.7). Only performance status of ⩽1 had a statistically significant impact on progression-free survival and overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Regorafenib in our clinical practice has equal efficacy to reported data from pivotal registration trials. Our data suggest that performance status is the most important prognostic factor in patients treated with regorafenib, suggesting a careful selection of patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document