In vitro chemosensitivity assay for patients with gynecologic sarcoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20513-e20513
Author(s):  
A. Santin ◽  
J. Varughese ◽  
J. Lea
2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurie Markman

Unfortunately, no reliable evidence-based data have shown any in vitro chemosensitivity assay strategy to be clinically useful in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer, despite frequent use. Several clinical trials have been proposed with the potential to support or refute the relevance of these approaches.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 312-312
Author(s):  
J. Franko ◽  
M. M. Bilimoria ◽  
S. Chalikonda ◽  
D. A. Iannitti

312 Background: Gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) represent the mainstay of chemotherapeutic options for pancreatic cancer. Currently, approximately 40% of patients with pancreatic cancer receive chemotherapy. Relapse is common after resection and adjuvant therapy, and response rates are low in patients with advanced/metastatic disease. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of in vitro drug sensitivity or resistance to these agents in pancreatic cancer and explore the clinical implication of in vitro assessment. Methods: From August 2006 to January 2010, 74 specimens from patients with primary/metastatic pancreatic cancer were tested for response to gemcitabine, 5-FU, and their combination using an in vitro chemosensitivity assay (ChemoFx, Precision Therapeutics, Pittsburgh, PA). Tumors were classified as sensitive or resistant based on in vitro dose response curves. Results: Thirty-four of the 74 tumor specimens (46%) exhibited in vitro chemosensitivity to gemcitabine, 5-FU, or their combination. Fourteen tumors (19%) were sensitive to gemcitabine, and 12 (16%) to 5-FU. Of the 60 patient specimens resistant to gemcitabine, 4 (7%) were sensitive to 5-FU. Conversely, of the 62 specimens resistant to 5-FU, 6 (10%) were sensitive to gemcitabine. Eight of the 74 specimens (11%) were sensitive to both gemcitabine and 5-FU and 56 (76%) were resistant to both agents. Of these 56 specimens, 16 (29%) showed sensitivity to the gemcitabine/5-FU combination. Conclusions: The ChemoFx data indicates a high (76%) in vitro resistance rate to traditional chemotherapy. In vitro chemosensitivity to gemcitabine only partially overlaps with that of 5-FU and the gemcitabine/5-FU combination. Thus, tumors resistant to one drug, were not necessarily resistant to the other and vice versa. Further correlation with clinical outcomes is needed to determine the clinical efficacy of the ChemoFx assay. [Table: see text]


1991 ◽  
Vol 165 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert T. Gerhardt ◽  
James P. Perras ◽  
Bernd-Uwe Sevin ◽  
Edgar Petru ◽  
Reinaldo Ramos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
L. M. Weisenthal ◽  
R. H. Shoemaker ◽  
J. A. Marsden ◽  
P. L. Dill ◽  
J. A. Baker ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.Y. Yeh ◽  
S.Y. Chang ◽  
D.S. Yu ◽  
C.P. Ma ◽  
S.H. Han

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 229-229
Author(s):  
J. Franko ◽  
M. M. Bilimoria ◽  
S. Chalikonda ◽  
D. A. Iannitti

229 Background: Gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with or without oxaliplatin are used to manage advanced or recurrent pancreatic cancer. Options are limited for patients who do not respond to these agents. This study determined the pattern of response to alternative agents using an in vitro chemotherapy assessment. Methods: From August 2006 to January 2010, 113 tumor specimens from pancreatic cancer patients were tested for response to gemcitabine, 5-FU, oxaliplatin, docetaxel, or irinotecan using an in vitro chemosensitivity assay (ChemoFx, Precision Therapeutics, Inc., Pittsburgh PA). Tumors were classified as sensitive or resistant based on in vitro dose response curves. Results: Thirty-five percent of tumors exhibited in vitro chemosensitivity to irinotecan, 23% to gemcitabine, 19% to 5-FU, 9% to oxaliplatin, and 8% to docetaxel. For tumors resistant to gemcitabine, 23% were sensitive to irinotecan, 6% (4/72) to 5-FU, 3% (2/68) to oxaliplatin, and 2% (1/64) to docetaxel (Table). Of the 68 tumors resistant to both gemcitabine and 5-FU, 11/59 (19%) were sensitive to irinotecan, 2/61 (3%) to oxaliplatin, and 0/57 (0%) to docetaxel. Forty-nine tumors were resistant to all tested agents. Conclusions: ChemoFx analysis of pancreatic cancer patient specimens indicates a high resistance rate to gemcitabine and 5-FU. The sensitivity of 19% of the gemcitabine/5-FU resistant specimens to irinotecan suggests that some patients who do not respond to standard therapy may respond to irinotecan. The potential of ChemoFx to identify the potentially most effective therapy in pancreatic cancer patients will be examined in future studies. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document