Prognosis and non-sentinel lymph node status of the breast cancer patients with micrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes.

140 Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a more sensitive and accurate nodal staging procedure than axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Because of detailed pathologic evaluation in SLNs, more nodal micrometastases have been identified. However, it remains controversial whether to perform ALND for patients with micrometastases in SLNs and their prognostic significance is also a matter of debate. The purpose of this study is to determine the non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) status and prognosis of the patients with micrometastatic SLNs. Methods: A prospective database of 1,012 clinically node-negative, T1-T2 breast cancer patients, who underwent SLNB from January 2002 to Dec 2010 at Keio University Hospital was analyzed. SLNs were detected using a combined method of isosulfun blue dye and small-sized technetium-99m-labeled tin colloid. Intraoperative frozen examination was performed with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. SLNs, fixed and embedded in paraffin, were additionally diagnosed with HE staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. Results: Micrometastases in SLNs were found in 69 (6.8%) of 1,012 patients. Thirty eight (55.1%) of 69 patients with micrometastatic SLNs underwent immediate or delayed ALND and revealed no NSLN metastasis. Among 31 (44.9%) patients with micrometastatic SLNs who omitted ALND and axillary radiation therapy, no axillary lymph node recurrence has been observed after a median follow-up of 50 months, although 29 patients (93.5%) in these 31 patients received adjuvant systemic therapy. There is no significant difference in recurrence free survival between the patients with micrometastatic and negative SLNs (98.0% vs. 95.7%, respectively). Conclusions: These date suggested that it may not be necessary to perform ALND for the patients with micrometastatic SLNs and the presence of micrometastases in SLNs may not worsen prognosis with proper systemic therapy.

Download Full-text

Non-sentinel lymph node status and prognosis of the breast cancer patients with micrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e11504 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e11504-e11504

Author(s):

H. Jinno ◽

T. Onishi ◽

M. Takahashi ◽

M. Sakata ◽

Y. Kitagawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Sentinel Lymph Node ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Axillary Lymph Node ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Lymph Node Status ◽

Axillary Lymph ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Significant Difference

e11504 Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become a standard therapy for clinically node-negative breast cancer patients and improvements of histopathological and molecular analysis of sentinel lymph node (SLN) have increased the rate of micrometastases identified. However it remains controversial whether to perform axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with micrometastases in SLNs and their prognostic significance is also a matter of debate. The purpose of this study is to determine the non- sentinel lymph node (NSLN) status and prognosis of the patients with micrometastatic SLNs. Methods: A prospective database of 666 breast cancer patients with the tumor size less than 3cm and clinical negative node, who underwent SLNB from January 2002 to July 2007 at Keio University Hospital was analyzed. SLNs were detected using a combined method of isosulfun blue dye and small-sized technetium-99m-labeled tin colloid. SLNs were diagnosed with standard hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. Results: Micrometastases in SLNs were found in 50 (7.5%) of 666 patients. Twenty nine (58.0%) of 50 patients with micrometastatic SLNs underwent ALND and revealed no NSLN metastasis. Among 21 (42.0%) patients with micrometastatic SLNs who skipped ALND, no axillary lymph node recurrence has been observed in the median follow-up time of 43 months, although 20 patients (95.2%) in 21 patients received adjuvant systemic therapy. There is no significant difference in recurrence free survival between the patients with micrometastatic and negative SLNs (98.0% vs. 95.7%, respectively). Conclusions: These date suggested that it may not be necessary to perform ALND for the patients with micrometastases in SLNs and the presence of micrometastases in SLNs may not be associated with prognosis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Status in Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

10.21203/rs.2.17922/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yizhen Zhou ◽

Lei Zhang ◽

Zining Jin ◽

Hailan Yu ◽

Siyu Ren ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Axillary Lymph Node ◽

Lymph Node Status ◽

Axillary Lymph ◽

Short Axis ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Axillary Ultrasound

Abstract Background:Axillary ultrasound (AUS) is one of the important bases for evaluating the axillary status of breast cancer patients. And it would be helpful for the reassessment of axillary lymph node status in these patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) and guide the selection of their axillary surgical options.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound,and to find out the factors related to the outcome of ultrasound.Methods:In this retrospective analysis, 172 patients (one bilateral breast cancer) with breast cancer and clinical positive axillary nodes, were enrolled. After NAC, all patients received mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). AUS was used before and after NAC to assess the axilla status. Results:Of the 173 axillae, 137 (79.19%) had pathological metastasis after NAC. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of axillary ultrasound in this cohort were 68.21%, 69.34%, 63.89%, 87.96% and 35.38% respectively. Univariate analysis showed that primary axillary lymph node(ALN) short axis, progesterone receptors, hormone receptors, the tumor status after NAC, tumor reduction rate, ALN short axis after NAC, physical examination of axilla after NAC and pN impacted the results of AUS(P = 0.000 ~ 0.040). Multivariate analysis of the above indicators showed that ALN short axis after NAC and pN associated with AUS results independently. Conclusion:AUS can accurately assess axilla status after NAC in most breast cancer patients. If the short axis of ALN≥10mm and AUS negative, SLNB could be chosen. However, AUS cannot detect residual lymph node disease after NAC in a short axis of the ALN <10mm.

Download Full-text