Methylation RE in serum of patients with breast cancer and relation with molecular phenotype and worse prognostic factors.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 224-224
Author(s):  
J. Martínez-Galan ◽  
B. Torres-Torres ◽  
R. Del Moral ◽  
M. I. Núñez ◽  
S. Ríos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Therapy Resistance ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Molecular Phenotype ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal B

224 Background: To determine whether Estrogen Receptor (ESR1) (+) and ESR1(-) status relates to epigenetic changes in breast cancer-related genes and to correlate with molecular breast cancer subtypes. Methods: Since January/02 to June/05, we quantified methylation levels ERS1 gene in serum of 92 pts breast cancer. A PCR quantitative technique was used to analyze levels of methylation gene. We also examined and correlationed the expression of ESR1 in tumors by immunohistochemistry with molecular phenotype. Results: Median age was 58 years (32-88); 69% were postmenopausal women. Nodal involvement (N0; 63%, N1; 30%, N2; 7%), tumor size (T1; 58%, T2; 35%, T3; 4%, T4; 4%) and grade (G1; 20%, G2; 37%, G3; 30%). Of the cases, 37 pts (40%) were Luminal A (LA), 32 pts (33%) Luminal B (LB), 14 pts (15%) Triple-negative (TN) and 9pts (10%) HER2+. The methylated ESR1 in serum was significantly associated with ESR1(-) in breast tumors >80% (p=0.0179). Methylation ESR1 was preferably associated with TN (80%) and HER2+ (60%) subtype. Nevertheless unmethylation ESR1 was found more frequently in LA (71%) and LB (59%) phenotype. With a median follow up of 5 years, we found worse overall survival (OS) with more frequent ESR1 methylation gene (p>0.05), Luminal A; ESR1 Methylation OS at 5 years 81% vs 93% when was ESR1 Unmethylation. Luminal B; ESR1 Methylation 86% SG at 5 years vs 92% in Unmethylation ESR1. Triple negative; ESR1 Methylation SG at 5 years 75% vs 80% in unmethylation ESR1. HER2; ESR1 Methylation SG at 5 years was 66.7% vs 75% unmethylation ESR1. Conclusions: Gene promoter region hypermethylation is a significant event in primary breast cancer. However, its impact on tumor progression and potential predictive implications remain relatively unknown. Our study identifies the presence of variations in global levels of methylation promoters ESR1 genes in breast cancer with different phenotype classes and shows that these differences have clinical significance. Although numerous issues remain to be resolved, quantitative measurement of circulating methylated DNA may be of significance in the assessment and search of targeted therapy resistance related to ESR1 and HER2 status by epigenetic or transcriptional cancer therapy.

Epigenetic aspects of triple-negative in patients with breast cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1041-1041
Author(s):  
Joaquina Martínez-Galan ◽  
Sandra Rios ◽  
Juan Ramon Delgado ◽  
Blanca Torres-Torres ◽  
Jesus Lopez-Peñalver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtype ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal B

1041 Background: Identification of gene expression-based breast cancer subtypes is considered a critical means of prognostication. Genetic mutations along with epigenetic alterations contribute to gene-expression changes occurring in breast cancer. However, the reproducibility of differential DNA methylation discoveries for cancer and the relationship between DNA methylation and aberrant gene expression have not been systematically analysed. The present study was undertaken to dissect the breast cancer methylome and to deliver specific epigenotypes associated with particular breast cancer subtypes. Methods: By using Real Time QMSPCR SYBR green we analyzed DNA methylation in regulatory regions of 107 pts with breast cancer and analyzed association with prognostics factor in triple negative breast cancer and methylation promoter ESR1, APC, E-Cadherin, Rar B and 14-3-3 sigma. Results: We identified novel subtype-specific epigenotypes that clearly demonstrate the differences in the methylation profiles of basal-like and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing tumors. Of the cases, 37pts (40%) were Luminal A (LA), 32pts (33%) Luminal B (LB), 14pts (15%) Triple-negative (TN), and 9pts (10%) HER2+. DNA hypermethylation was highly inversely correlated with the down-regulation of gene expression. Methylation of this panel of promoter was found more frequently in triple negative and HER2 phenotype. ESR1 was preferably associated with TN(80%) and HER2+(60%) subtype. With a median follow up of 6 years, we found worse overall survival (OS) with more frequent ESR1 methylation gene(p>0.05), Luminal A;ESR1 Methylation OS at 5 years 81% vs 93% when was ESR1 Unmethylation. Luminal B;ESR1 Methylation 86% SG at 5 years vs 92% in Unmethylation ESR1. Triple negative;ESR1 Methylation SG at 5 years 75% vs 80% in unmethylation ESR1. HER2;ESR1 Methylation SG at 5 years was 66.7% vs 75% in unmethylation ESR1. Conclusions: Our results provide evidence that well-defined DNA methylation profiles enable breast cancer subtype prediction and support the utilization of this biomarker for prognostication and therapeutic stratification of patients with breast cancer.

Chemosensitivity and endocrine sensitivity prediction by MammaPrint and BluePrint in the Neoadjuvant Breast Registry Symphony Trial (NBRST).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Pat W. Whitworth ◽  
Mark Gittleman ◽  
Stephanie Akbari ◽  
Lisette Stork ◽  
Femke De Snoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Excision Biopsy ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Prior Therapy

29 Background: Classification into molecular subtypes is important for the selection of therapy for patients with breast cancer. Previous analyses demonstrated that breast cancer subtypes have distinct clinical outcome (Gluck, BCRT 2013). The aim of the prospective NBRST study is to measure chemosensitivity as defined by pathologic complete response (pCR), or endocrine sensitivity as defined by partial response (PR) and metastasis-free survival in molecular subgroups. Methods: The study includes women aged 18 to 90 with histologically proven breast cancer, who are scheduled to start neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET), and who provide written informed consent. Additional inclusion criteria include no excision biopsy or axillary dissection, no confirmed distant metastatic disease, and no prior therapy for breast cancer. Treatment is at the discretion of the physician adhering to NCCN approved regimens. Results: Of 336 patients, T1-4 N0-3, had definitive surgery and the overall pCR rate was 24%. 32/167 (19%) IHC/FISH ERPR+/Her2- patients were reclassified by BluePrint (31 Basal). 43/95 (45%) IHC/FISH Her2+ patients were reclassified by BluePrint (25 Luminal and 18 Basal). 3/74 (3%) IHC/FISH triple-negative patients were not Basal by BluePrint. Of 45 (13%) patients classified as Luminal A 32 received NCT; one patient (3%) had a pCR; 13 patients received NET and 9 (70%) had a PR. Of 116 (35%) patients classified as Luminal B, 111 received NCT and seven (6%) had a pCR. The pCR rate (17/149 (11%)) in IHC/FISH ERPR+/HER2- patients was higher. Fifty-five (16%) are BluePrint HER2 and received NCT (51 plus trastuzumab); 27 (49%) had a pCR compared to 35/95 (37%) in IHC/FISH HER2+ patients. One-hundred twenty (36%) are BluePrint Basal and received NCT; 46 (38%) had a pCR, similar to the pCR percentage seen in the 74 patients designated triple-negative by IHC/FISH. Conclusions: Molecular subtyping using MammaPrint and BluePrint leads to a reclassification of 23% (78/336) of tumors. BluePrint reclassification resulted in better grouping of patients into expected response groups compared to local surrogate subtyping with immunostains.

Breast cancer subtype and screening sensitivity in the Quebec Mammography Screening Program

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-161
Author(s):  
Linda Perron ◽  
Sue-Ling Chang ◽  
Jean-Marc Daigle ◽  
Nathalie Vandal ◽  
Isabelle Theberge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Mammography Screening ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Mammography Screening Program ◽  
Screening Sensitivity

Objective In mammography screening, interval cancers present a problem. The metric ‘screening sensitivity’ monitors both how well a programme detects cancers and avoids interval cancers. To our knowledge, the effect of breast cancer surrogate molecular subtypes on screening sensitivity has never been evaluated. We aimed to measure the 2-year screening sensitivity according to breast cancer subtypes. Methods We studied 734 women with an invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2003 and 2007 after participating in one regional division of Quebec’s Mammography Screening Program. They represented 83% of all participating women with an invasive BC diagnosis in that region for that period. Tumours were categorized into ‘luminal A-like’, ‘luminal B-like’, ‘triple-negative’ and ‘HER2-positive’ subtypes. We used logistic regression and marginal standardization to estimate screening sensitivity, sensitivity ratios (SR) and sensitivity differences. We also assessed the mediating effect of grade. Results Adjusted 2-year screening sensitivity was 75.4% in luminal A-like, 66.1% in luminal B-like, 52.9% in triple-negative and 45.3% in HER2-positive, translating into sensitivity ratios of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.78–0.98) for luminal B-like, 0.70 (CI = 0.56–0.88) for triple-negative and 0.60 (CI = 0.39–0.93) for HER2-positive, when compared with luminal A-like. Grade entirely mediated the subtype-sensitivity association for triple negative and mediated it partly for HER2-positive. Screening round (prevalent vs. incident) did not modify results. Conclusion There was substantial variation in screening sensitivity according to breast cancer subtypes. Aggressive phenotypes showed the lowest sensitivity, an effect that was mediated by grade. Tailoring screening according to women’s subtype risk factors might eventually lead to more efficient programs.

scholarly journals Racial and Ethnic Differences in Breast Cancer Survival: Mediating Effect of Tumor Characteristics and Sociodemographic and Treatment Factors

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (20) ◽  
pp. 2254-2261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica T. Warner ◽  
Rulla M. Tamimi ◽  
Melissa E. Hughes ◽  
Rebecca A. Ottesen ◽  
Yu-Ning Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Purpose To evaluate the relationship between race/ethnicity and breast cancer–specific survival according to subtype and explore mediating factors. Patients and Methods Participants were women presenting with stage I to III breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2007 at National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers with survival follow-up through December 2009. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare breast cancer–specific survival among Asians (n = 533), Hispanics (n = 1,122), and blacks (n = 1,345) with that among whites (n = 14,268), overall and stratified by subtype (luminal A like, luminal B like, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 type, and triple negative). Model estimates were used to derive mediation proportion and 95% CI for selected risk factors. Results In multivariable adjusted models, overall, blacks had 21% higher risk of breast cancer–specific death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.45). For estrogen receptor–positive tumors, black and white survival differences were greatest within 2 years of diagnosis (years 0 to 2: HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.34 to 5.24; year 2 to end of follow-up: HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.00). Blacks were 76% and 56% more likely to die as a result of luminal A–like and luminal B–like tumors, respectively. No disparities were observed for triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–type tumors. Asians and Hispanics were less likely to die as a result of breast cancer compared with whites (Asians: HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.85; Hispanics: HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.95). For blacks, tumor characteristics and stage at diagnosis were significant disparity mediators. Body mass index was an important mediator for blacks and Asians. Conclusion Racial disparities in breast cancer survival vary by tumor subtype. Interventions are needed to reduce disparities, particularly in the first 2 years after diagnosis among black women with estrogen receptor–positive tumors.

Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) discrimination capacity of various pathologic complete response (pCR) definitions according to breast cancer subtypes.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 162-162
Author(s):  
Masaya Hattori ◽  
Keitaro Matsuo ◽  
Mari Ichikawa ◽  
Takashi Fujita ◽  
Masataka Sawaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Distant Disease ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal B

162 Background: pCR has been postulated to be correlated with long-term clinical benefits in some subtypes of breast cancer. Here, we analyzed the discriminatory ability and the predictive power of various pCR definitions for distant disease-free survival (DDFS) according to breast cancer subtypes. Methods: We analyzed 326 (114 Luminal A: ER+/PR+/HER2-, 44 Luminal B/HER2-: ER+/PR-/HER2-, 51 Luminal B/HER2+: ER+/PR+ and/or -/HER2+, 51 HER2: ER-/PR-/HER2+, and 66 Triple negative: ER-/PR-/HER2-) non-metastatic breast cancer patients (pts) who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our institution between January 2003 and June 2012. Four pCR definitions were used: ypT0ypN0, ypT0/isypN0, ypT0/isypN0/+, ypT<1micypN0/+. DDFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, and analyzed by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was used for comparing DDFS prediction models with and without various pCR definitions in addition to other covariates (tumor stage, nodal status, BMI, tumor grade, use of trastuzumab) as variables. Results: The pCR rate was comparatively low in Luminal A and high in HER2. 94.1% of HER2 and 74.5% of Luminal B/HER2+ received total 1 year of trastuzumab therapy. In multivariate analysis, no pCR definitions were associated with improved DDFS significantly in Luminal A, Luminal B/HER2-, Luminal B/HER2+ and HER2, whereas each pCR definition was associated with improved DDFS in Triple negative (ypT0ypN0: HR0.12, p=0.043, ypT0/isypN0: HR0.06, p=0.007, ypT0/isypN0/+: HR0.107, p=0.004, ypT<1micypN0/+: HR0.104, p=0.003). In the ROC curves analysis of triple-negative, a DDFS prediction model including pCR defined as ypT0/isypN0 showed the highest accuracy, but low statistical significance (AUC: 0.834 vs.0.749 p=0.076). Conclusions: pCR could discriminate good and poor prognosis groups only in Triple negative and pCR defined as ypT0/isypN0 has the potential to provide better discrimination in this subtype. The predictive power of pCR for long term clinical benefit in other subtypes may not be obvious due to the influence of effective adjuvant therapies.

scholarly journals Clinical subtypes of breast cancer in Thai women: a population-based study of Chiang Mai province

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
Patumrat Sripan ◽  
Hutcha Sriplung ◽  
Donsuk Pongnikorn ◽  
Surichai Bilheem ◽  
Shama Virani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Female Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Chiang Mai ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Female Breast

Abstract Background The change over time of distribution of breast cancer subtypes using population-based data has not been reported. Objective To describe the change over time of the distribution of female breast cancer by clinical subtype among the population in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Methods Data of breast cancer patients from Chiang Mai Cancer Registry, diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 were combined with immunohistochemical status from medical record, and used to describe the proportions of clinical breast cancer subtypes: (1) luminal A-like (ER+/PR+ and HER2-), (2) luminal B-like (ER+/PR+ and HER2+), (3) HER2 (ER- and PR- and HER2+), (4) triple-negative (ER- and PR- and HER2-). The distribution of breast cancer subtypes by age group was also described. Results Among 3,228 female breast cancer cases diagnosed during 2004–2013, the median age was 52 years and most patients presented at the regional stage. The unknown tumor subtype was lower than 25% in the periods 2008– 2009, 2010–2011, and 2012–2013. In those periods, the proportions of luminal A-like were 33%, 36%, and 48%; the proportions of luminal B-like were 14%, 20%, and 16%, the proportions of HER2 were 15%, 14%, and 13%; and the proportions of triple-negative were 16%, 14%, and 13%, respectively. In comparison with other groups, women aged ≥60 years had a significantly higher proportion of luminal A-like (P = 0.001), while women aged <40 years tended to have a higher proportion of triple-negative (P = 0.10). Conclusions The proportion of breast cancer with luminal subtypes is increasing. Thus, in the future, treatment protocols with a variety of hormone therapies should be provided in order to improve efficacy and coverage of treatment for this population.

scholarly journals Breast Cancer Subtypes among Iraqi Patients: Identified By Their ER, PR and HER2 Status

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-307
Author(s):  
Nada A.S. Alwan ◽  
Furat N. Tawfeeq ◽  
Faisal H. Muallah
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Progesterone Receptors ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Breast Carcinomas ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Her 2

Background: Breast cancer ranks the first among the Iraqi population since three decades and is currently forming a major public health problem being the second cause of death women. Novel management of breast cancer depends upon precise evaluation of their molecular subtypes; identified by Hormone (Estrogen and Progesterone) receptors and HER2 contents of the primary tumor.Objective: To assess the rates of the different molecular breast cancer subtypes in the examined tissue specimens belonging to females diagnosed with breast cancer in Iraq; correlating the findings with those reported in the literature at the regional and global levels.Patients and Methods: This retrospective study documented the findings of tissue biopsy examination belonging to 686 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Formalin fixed paraffin-embedded blocks were utilized to assess the availability of Estrogen receptors (ER), Progesterone receptors (PR) and HER2 expressions through semi quantitative immuno-histochemical staining technique. Breast carcinomas were classified into four main molecular subtypes: Luminal A: ER/PR(+) / HER2(-), Luminal B/Triple Positive: ER/PR(+) / HER2(+), Non-Luminal HER-2 enriched: ER/PR(-) / HER2(+) and Non-Luminal/Triple Negative: ER/PR(-) and HER2(-). Other phenotypes included: ER(+)/PR(-) / HER2(+), ER(-)/PR(+) / HER2 (+), ER (+)/PR (-) / HER2 (-) and ER (-)/PR (+) / HER2 (-).Results: Out of the exanimated cases of breast carcinomas, the registered rates of positive ER, PR and HER2 tumor contents in this study were 67.8%, 65.3% and 29.4% respectively. The main identified phenotype was the Luminal A in 309 cases (45%). That was followed by the Triple Negative in 107 cases (15.6%) and Triple Positive/Luminal B (96 cases, 14%), while 71 cases (10.3%) were HER2 enriched. The corresponding rates of the (E+/P-/H+), (E-/P+/H+), (E+/P-/H-) and (E-/P+/H-) subtypes were 3.1%, 2.0%., 5.7% and 4.2% respectively. Differences in in the expressions of these IHC molecular markers are illustrated among different countries.Conclusions: Due to the displayed variations in the socio-demographic characteristics and biological risk factors among patients in different populations, it is mandatory to identify the molecular marker subtypes of breast cancer expressions in order to assess the impact of management and response to therapy. The routine documentation of their patterns in the cancer registry reports and published research ensures the validity and reliability of the presented clinical data. الخلفية: سرطان الثدي يحتل المرتبة الأولى بين السكان العراقيين منذ ثلاثة عقود، ويشكل حاليا مشكلة صحية رئيسية حيث يعتبر السبب الثاني للوفاة عند النساء. تعتمد أسس العلاج الجديدة لسرطان الثدي على التقييم الدقيق لأنواعها الفرعية الجزيئية و التي تحددها مستويات مستقبلات هرمون (الاستروجين والبروجسترون) ومحتويات  HER2 في الورم الرئيسي. الهدف من الدراسة: تقييم معدلات مختلف الأنواع الفرعية لسرطان الثدي الجزيئي في عينات الأنسجة التي تم فحصها والتي تخص الإناث المصابات بسرطان الثدي في العراق؛ وربط النتائج مع تلك المسجلة على الصعيدين الإقليمي والعالمي المرضى والطرق: وثقت هذه الدراسة بأثر رجعي نتائج فحص خزعة الأنسجة التي تنتمي إلى 686 مريضة مشخصة بسرطان الثدي. واستخدمت لتقييم توافر مستقبلات الاستروجين (ER)، مستقبلات البروجسترون (PR) والتعبيرات HER2 من خلال تقنية الطيخ المناعي شبه الكمي. تم تصنيف سرطان الثدي إلى أربعة أنواع فرعية جزيئية رئيسية: Luminal A:  ER/PR(+) / HER2(-), Luminal B/Triple Positive:    ER/PR(+) / HER2(+), Non-Luminal HER-2 enriched: ER/PR(-) / HER2(+) and Non-Luminal/Triple Negative:   ER/PR(-) and HER2(-). و انواع اخرى ER(+)/PR(-) / HER2(+), ER(-)/PR(+) / HER2 (+), ER (+)/PR (-)  / HER2 (-) and ER (-)/PR (+) / HER2 (-). النتائج: من بين حالات سرطان الثدي المهددة، كانت المعدلات المسجلة لمحتوى الأورام الموجبة ER, PR و   HER2 في هذه الدراسة 67.8٪ و 65.3٪ و 29.4٪ على التوالي. وكان النمط الظاهري المحدد الرئيسي اللمعية A في 309 حالات (45٪). وأعقب ذلك السلبي الثلاثي في 107 حالات (15.6٪) وثلاثية إيجابية / لومينال B (96 حالة، 14٪)، في حين أن 71 حالة (10.3٪) كانت HER2 المخصب. وكانت المعدلات المقابلة من (E + / P- / H +)، (E / P + / H +)، (E + / P- / H-) و (E / P + / H-) فرعية 3.1٪، 2.0٪. ،   و 5.7٪ و 4.2٪ على التوالي. وتظهر الاختلافات في التعبير عن هذه العلامات الجزيئية بين مختلف البلدان. الاستنتاجات والتوصيات: نظرا للاختلافات المعروضة في الخصائص الاجتماعية الديموغرافية وعوامل الخطر البيولوجية بين المرضى في مختلف السكان، فمن الضروري تحديد الأنواع الفرعية الجزيئية من تعبيرات سرطان الثدي من أجل تقييم تأثير الاستجابة للعلاج . ان التوثيق الروتيني لأنماط سرطان الثدي في تقارير سجل السرطان والبحوث المنشورة يضمن صحة ودقة البيانات السريرية ذات العلاقة.

Clinicopathological features and sites of recurrence according to breast cancer subtype in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 543-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. U. Lin ◽  
A. Vanderplas ◽  
M. E. Hughes ◽  
R. L. Theriault ◽  
S. B. Edge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtype ◽  
Screening Mammography ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cancer Subtypes

543 Background: Gene expression profiling has defined multiple breast cancer subtypes which can approximated using standard immunohistochemical markers. Methods: We assessed clinicopathological features and sites of recurrence for patients (pts) presenting to NCCN sites with stage I-III breast cancer from Jan 2000 to Dec 2006 where estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status were known. Tumors were grouped as luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, and HER2-), HER2+ (any ER or PR, and HER2+), or triple-negative (ER-, PR-, and HER2-). Chi-square compared proportions across tumors; univariate logistic regression estimated risk of first site of recurrence. Results: 12,858 pts met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up from NCCN presentation was 3.2 years. Subtype distribution was: triple-negative (TN) 17%; HER2+ 18%; luminal A 66%. Compared to pts with luminal A and HER2+ tumors, TN were younger (p<0.0001), more likely African-American (p<0.0001) and overweight (p=0.0006). TN and HER2+ tumors were less often detected by screening mammography (TN, 28.9%; HER2+, 33.6%; luminal A, 48.4%) and less likely to present as T1 (TN, 46.5%; HER2+, 50.5%; luminal A, 67.0%) or diagnosed as stage I (TN, 32.6%; HER2+ 33.2%; luminal A, 49.4%) than luminal A (all p<0.0001). Rate of node positivity was lowest in TN (TN, 37.1%; HER2+, 44.9%; luminal A, 38.1%; p<0.0001). 83% of TN tumors were high grade; 93% were invasive ductal histology. Extensive intraductal component and lymphovascular invasion were more often associated with HER2+, compared to TN or luminal A (p<0.0001). Recurrences were recorded for 1,235 pts. Relative to luminal A, TN and HER2+ were more likely to experience lung (TN, odds ratio [OR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50, 3.43; p=0.0001; HER2+, OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.05, 2.60; p=0.03) and brain (TN, OR 5.32, 95% CI 2.85, 9.91; p<0.0001; HER2+, OR 5.53, 95% CI 2.93, 10.43; p<0.0001) as first site of recurrence; bone was less likely (TN, OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.16, 0.33; p<0.0001; HER2+, OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.28, 0.53; p<0.0001). Conclusions: Clinicopathological features and patterns of recurrence differed significantly by subtype and may inform the design of future clinical trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Definition and Impact of Pathologic Complete Response on Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Various Intrinsic Breast Cancer Subtypes

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15) ◽  
pp. 1796-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter von Minckwitz ◽  
Michael Untch ◽  
Jens-Uwe Blohmer ◽  
Serban D. Costa ◽  
Holger Eidtmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal B

Purpose The exact definition of pathologic complete response (pCR) and its prognostic impact on survival in intrinsic breast cancer subtypes is uncertain. Methods Tumor response at surgery and its association with long-term outcome of 6,377 patients with primary breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane–based chemotherapy in seven randomized trials were analyzed. Results Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly superior in patients with no invasive and no in situ residuals in breast or nodes (n = 955) compared with patients with residual ductal carcinoma in situ only (n = 309), no invasive residuals in breast but involved nodes (n = 186), only focal-invasive disease in the breast (n = 478), and gross invasive residual disease (n = 4,449; P < .001). Hazard ratios for DFS comparing patients with or without pCR were lowest when defined as no invasive and no in situ residuals (0.446) and increased monotonously when in situ residuals (0.523), no invasive breast residuals but involved nodes (0.623), and focal-invasive disease (0.727) were included in the definition. pCR was associated with improved DFS in luminal B/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –negative (P = .005), HER2-positive/nonluminal (P < .001), and triple-negative (P < .001) tumors but not in luminal A (P = .39) or luminal B/HER2-positive (P = .45) breast cancer. pCR in HER2-positive (nonluminal) and triple-negative tumors was associated with excellent prognosis. Conclusion pCR defined as no invasive and no in situ residuals in breast and nodes can best discriminate between patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes. Patients with noninvasive or focal-invasive residues or involved lymph nodes should not be considered as having achieved pCR. pCR is a suitable surrogate end point for patients with luminal B/HER2-negative, HER2-positive (nonluminal), and triple-negative disease but not for those with luminal B/HER2-positive or luminal A tumors.

scholarly journals Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Influence of Molecular Subtypes on Treatment Response

2021 ◽  
Vol 107 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
D Aissaoui ◽  
M Bohli ◽  
R Ben Amor ◽  
J Yahyaoui ◽  
A Hamdoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Inflammatory Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a rare and very aggressive breast cancer with poor prognosis. The prevalence is different from a country to another. In Tunisia, it is about 5 to 7% of breast cancer. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiological and histopathological features of patients with inflammatory breast cancer and to evaluate the treatment response according to the molecular subtypes. Methods: This retrospective review identified 31 patients with no metastatic IBC treated in our radiotherapy department between December 2019 and November 2020. IBC was confirmed using the clinical criteria. Baseline clinic-pathological and treatment information was retrieved from medical records. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS V.20. Results: Median age was 51.3 years [27-68]. 48% of tumors were grade 3. The average tumor size was 36mm [10-90]. The histological type was ductal carcinoma in 97%. Vascular invasion was noted in 24 patients (77%). Thirty patients were classified as stage IIIB and one patient was IIIC. 74% were hormone receptor positive and 45% were HER2 positive. Luminal B was the predominant subtype (52%) followed by Her2 positive (32%), Luminal A (23%), and triple negative (3%) All patients had chemotherapy: neoadjuvant for 26 patients (84%) and adjuvant for 5 patients (16%). Nine patients (29%) had tumor pathological complete response (pCR). Partial response was observed in 18 patients (58%). Lymph node pCR was noted in 16% of cases (n=5). Endocrine therapy and trastuzumab were given to 76% and 45% of patients, respectively. The influence of the molecular subtype was not statistically significant on the response to neoadjuvant treatment. The highest rate of pCR were 43% for Her2positive, then 27%, 21% and 9% for Luminal B, Luminal A and Triple negative, respectively (p=0.2). Conclusion: Our study showed a high percentage of hormone receptor and Her2+ (74% and 45% respectively) in IBC. Luminal B was the most frequent subtype. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab improved the pCR rate: 44% for Her2positive. Triple negative showed poorer pCR than other breast cancer subtype without a significant difference. A larger study is warranted to confirm our findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document