Marantic Endocarditis With Cardioembolic Strokes Mimicking Leptomeningeal Metastases in Breast Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (29) ◽  
pp. e743-e746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils D. Arvold ◽  
Liangge Hsu ◽  
Wendy Y. Chen ◽  
Laura R. Benzaquen ◽  
Stephanie E. Weiss
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi33-vi33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Chaul-Barbosa ◽  
Aki Morikawa ◽  
Sujata Patil ◽  
Adrienne Boire ◽  
Lilly Jordan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 8534
Author(s):  
Alessia Pellerino ◽  
Valeria Internò ◽  
Francesca Mo ◽  
Federica Franchino ◽  
Riccardo Soffietti ◽  
...  

The management of breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved in the last 20 years. The improvement of systemic therapy allows a remarkable control of extracranial disease. However, brain (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are frequent complications of advanced BC and represent a challenging issue for clinicians. Some prognostic scales designed for metastatic BC have been employed to select fit patients for adequate therapy and enrollment in clinical trials. Different systemic drugs, such as targeted therapies with either monoclonal antibodies or small tyrosine kinase molecules, or modified chemotherapeutic agents are under investigation. Major aims are to improve the penetration of active drugs through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) or brain–tumor barrier (BTB), and establish the best sequence and timing of radiotherapy and systemic therapy to avoid neurocognitive impairment. Moreover, pharmacologic prevention is a new concept driven by the efficacy of targeted agents on macrometastases from specific molecular subgroups. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and molecular factors involved in the selection of patients for local and/or systemic therapy, as well as the results of clinical trials on advanced BC. Moreover, insight on promising therapeutic options and potential directions of future therapeutic targets against BBB and microenvironment are discussed.


Neurology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Chamberlain ◽  
W. Boogerd

Gene Therapy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 1579-1589 ◽  
Author(s):  
WQ Yang ◽  
DL Senger ◽  
XQ Lun ◽  
H Muzik ◽  
ZQ Shi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (suppl 5) ◽  
pp. v50.3-v50
Author(s):  
Emilie Le Rhun ◽  
Fahed Zairi ◽  
Thomas Boulanger ◽  
Jérôme Barrière ◽  
Michel Fabbro ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 382-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Esteva ◽  
Lay-Tin Soh ◽  
Frankie Ann Holmes ◽  
William Plunkett ◽  
Christina A. Meyers ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 199 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Le Rhun ◽  
F. Zairi ◽  
M.C. Baranzelli ◽  
M. Faivre-Pierret ◽  
P. Devos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Takayuki Nakao ◽  
Takeshi Okuda ◽  
Mitsugu Fujita ◽  
Amami Kato

Background: Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) pose the most difficult form of cancer metastasis to treat and portend a poor prognosis. Standard treatment has yet to be established, and intrathecal chemotherapy and whole- brain radiotherapy are administered on an empirical basis. Case Description: We report on a 46-year-old woman with LM from human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. She was suffering from intractable headaches, severe nausea and vomiting, and cerebellar ataxia. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed diffuse enhancement of the meninges, mainly in the posterior cranial fossa, and compression of the cerebellum by the profoundly thickened meninges. The first step in the treatment was decompression of the posterior cranial fossa to relieve intracranial hypertension. After surgery, her symptoms immediately improved. The second step was treatment with lapatinib at 1250 mg and capecitabine 1200 mg, which dramatically improved her symptoms and disappeared diffuse abnormal signal enhancement on MRI. Conclusion: We treated a patient with LM from primary HER2-positive breast cancer who responded well to lapatinib plus capecitabine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document