Results of a cluster randomized trial to evaluate a nursing lead supportive care intervention in newly diagnosed breast and colorectal cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6035-6035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Sussman ◽  
Doris Howell ◽  
Daryl Bainbridge ◽  
Kevin Brazil ◽  
Susan Schiff ◽  
...  

6035 Background: Patient transitions during the early phases of cancer care from initial diagnosis through oncology consultation are often poorly coordinated resulting in unmet need, poor continuity, and resultant distress. It has been proposed that better coordination of care during this period would improve the care experience from the patient’s perspective. We designed a randomized trial to test a community based nursing lead coordination of care intervention in newly diagnosed breast and colorectal cancer patients. Methods: Cluster randomized control trial in 193 newly diagnosed breast and colorectal cancer patients enrolled through surgical practices within 7 days of cancer surgery in Toronto, Canada. Surgical practices were randomized between a standardized nursing intervention and a control group involving usual care practices. The intervention consisted of a standardized in person supportive care assessment with ongoing supportive care by telephone or in person that included linkage to community services using protocol specified guidelines according to identified needs. The primary outcomes measured at 8 weeks were validated patient reported outcomes (PROs) of 1) unmet need (SCNS) and 2) continuity of care (CCCQI). Secondary outcomes included 1) quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), 2) health resource utilization, and 3) level of uncertainty with care trajectory (MUIS) at 8 weeks. Results: 121 breast and 72 colorectal patients were randomized through 28 surgical practices. The intervention group had a median of 6 nursing contacts over the study period. There were no differences between groups on PROs of unmet need, continuity of care, quality of life, or uncertainty. Health service utilization did not differ between groups. Conclusions: A specialized oncology nursing intervention early in the care trajectory did not result in improved supportive care outcomes for patients. [Table: see text]

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-378
Author(s):  
Anne Walling ◽  
Jane Weeks ◽  
Katherine Kahn ◽  
Diana Tisnado ◽  
Nancy Keating ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 893-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Yi Tung ◽  
Tung-Bo Chao ◽  
Yu-Hua Lin ◽  
Shu-Fen Wu ◽  
Hui-Yen Lee ◽  
...  

In this study, we sought to explore the prevalence of depression and fatigue in colorectal cancer patients during and after treatment to examine how these variables affect quality of life (QoL). In total, 170 patients with colorectal cancer participated in this study. The study population was divided into two groups: one receiving treatment and another that had finished treatment. The results showed that depression and fatigue measurements were higher in patients receiving treatment. Depression was a strong and significant predictor of QoL in both groups, whereas fatigue was not, with the exception of the symptom score. These findings underscore the importance of early detection and management of depression and fatigue during the treatment and survival stages of patients with colorectal cancer. Our findings indicate that health care professionals should provide appropriate nursing intervention to decrease depression and fatigue and enhance patient QoL.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Sánchez-Gundín ◽  
Cristina Martín-Sabroso ◽  
Ana M. Fernández-Carballido ◽  
D. Barreda-Hernández ◽  
Ana I. Torres-Suárez

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Li ◽  
S Z Y Ooi ◽  
T Woo ◽  
P H M Chan

Abstract Aim To identify the most relevant clinical factors in the National Bowel Cancer Audit (NBOCA) that contribute to the variation in the quality of care provided in different hospitals for colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery. Method Data from 36,116 patients with colorectal cancer who had undergone surgery were retrospectively collected from the NBOCA and analysed from 145 and 146 hospitals over two years. A validated multiple linear regression was performed to compare the identified clinical factors with various quality outcomes. The quality outcomes defined in this study were the length of hospitalisation, 2-year mortality, readmission rate, 90-day mortality, and 18-month stoma rate. Results Four clinical factors (laparoscopy rate, abdominal-perineal-resection-of-rectum (APER), pre-operative radiotherapy and patients with distant metastases) were shown to have a significant (p < 0.05) impact on the length of hospitalisation and 18-month stoma rate. 18-month stoma rate was also significantly associated with 2-year mortality. External validation of the regression model demonstrated the Root-Mean-Square-Error of 0.811 and 4.62 for 18-month stoma rate and 2-year mortality respectively. Conclusions Hospitals should monitor the four clinical factors for patients with colorectal cancer during perioperative care. Clinicians should consider these factors along with the individual patients’ history when formulating a management plan for patients with colorectal cancer.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 547-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Giesinger ◽  
Georg Kemmler ◽  
Verena Mueller ◽  
August Zabernigg ◽  
Beate Mayrbaeurl ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document