Prevalence of cancer-related fatigue in a population-based sample of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer survivors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9131-9131
Author(s):  
Jennifer M Jones ◽  
Doris Howell ◽  
Karin Lou Olson ◽  
Haiyan Jiang ◽  
Charles N Catton ◽  
...  

9131 Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most prevalent and distressing cancer-related symptom and has a greater negative impact on patients' daily activities and quality of life than other cancer-related symptoms, including pain and depression. However, the prevalence and severity of persistent CRF and related disability in the post-treatment survivorship period has seldom been examined in populations other than breast cancer. The primary objective of the study was to describe the prevalence of significant CRF and associated levels of disability in a mixed cancer population sample at 3 time points in the post-treatment survivorship trajectory. Methods: Based on cancer registry data, a self-administered mail based questionnaire using Dillman's Tailored Design Method was sent to 3 cohorts of disease-free cancer survivors (6-18 months; 2-3 years; and 5-6 years post-treatment) previously treated for non-metastatic breast, prostate or colorectal cancer. Fatigue was measured using the FACT-F and disability was measured with the WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule. Clinical information was extracted from chart review. Frequencies of significant fatigue by disease sites and time points were studied and compared using chi-square test. Disability between those with and without CRF was also compared using Cochran-Armitage trend test. Results: 1294 questionnaire packages were completed (63% response rate). The FACT-F score was 39.1+10.9; 29% (95% CI: [27%, 32%]) of the sample reported significant fatigue (FACT-F≤34) and this was associated with much higher levels of disability (p<0.0001). Breast (40% [35%, 44%]) and colorectal (33% [27%, 38%]) survivors had significantly higher rates of fatigue (≤34) compared to the prostate group (17% [14%, 21%]) (p<0.0001). Fatigue levels remained relatively stable across the 3 time points. Conclusions: CRF was a significant and debilitating symptom for a substantial minority of the respondents across all 3 time points. Effective CRF management strategies are needed and have the potential to significantly reduce morbidity associated with cancer and its treatments and to improve quality of life for the growing population of cancer survivors.

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (20) ◽  
pp. 1311-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel T Fuller ◽  
Michael C Hartland ◽  
Luke T Maloney ◽  
Kade Davison

ObjectiveTo systematically appraise and summarise meta-analyses investigating the effect of exercise compared with a control condition on health outcomes in cancer survivors.DesignUmbrella review of intervention systematic reviews.Data sourcesWeb of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and MEDLINE databases were searched using a predefined search strategy.Eligibility criteriaEligible meta-analyses compared health outcomes between cancer survivors participating in an exercise intervention and a control condition. Health outcomes were cardiovascular fitness, muscle strength, health-related quality of life, cancer-related fatigue and depression. Pooled effect estimates from each meta-analysis were quantified using standardised mean differences and considered trivial (<0.20), small (0.20–0.49), moderate (0.50–0.79) and large (≥0.80). Findings were summarised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.ResultsThere were 65 eligible articles that reported a total of 140 independent meta-analyses. 139/140 meta-analyses suggested a beneficial effect of exercise. The beneficial effect was statistically significant in 104 (75%) meta-analyses. Most effect sizes were moderate for cardiovascular fitness and muscle strength and small for cancer-related fatigue, health-related quality of life and depression. The quality of evidence was variable according to the GRADE scale, with most studies rated low or moderate quality. Median incidence of exercise-related adverse events was 3.5%.ConclusionExercise likely has an important role in helping to manage physical function, mental health, general well-being and quality of life in people undergoing and recovering from cancer and side effects of treatment.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42015020194.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9520-9520
Author(s):  
Ellen Ingalls Beckjord ◽  
Stephanie Nutt ◽  
Gijsberta J. Van Londen ◽  
Dana H. Bovbjerg ◽  
Carissa A. Low ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison M. Forti ◽  
Craig S. Cashwell ◽  
Robert Henson

The purpose of this study was to understand the relationship among mindfulness, self-kindness, alexithymia and quality of life in post-treatment breast cancer survivors and to examine whether self-kindness and alexithymia mediate the relationship between mindfulness and quality of life. Results suggested that the overall model accounted for significant variance in quality of life and that alexithymia partially mediated the relationship between mindfulness and quality of life. Implications for practice and further research are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document