scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of stenting as a bridge to surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14032-e14032
Author(s):  
Fayez A. Quereshy ◽  
Jensen T.C. Poon ◽  
Wai Lun Law

e14032 Background: Stenting as a bridge to surgery has been increasingly applied in cases of acute left-sided colonic obstruction. This study aims to evaluate both the short and long-term outcomes associated with colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in patients with obstructing adenocarcinoma of the colon. Methods: Patients with potentially curable acute left-sided colonic obstruction treated with stenting as a bridge to surgery (28) or with emergency surgical resection (39) from January 1998 to December 2008 were identified using a prospectively maintained database. Short-term data on post-operative mortality, morbidity, necessity of intensive care, and length of hospital stay were compared. Disease-free and overall survival data were also analyzed. Results: Patients within the two study arms had similar demographic profiles. Patients receiving preoperative stenting had a higher likelihood of a laparoscopic resection (p<0.001). Further, the emergency surgery group had a higher rate of post-operative complications (p=0.024), rate of ICU admission (p=0.013), and longer total length of stay (9 vs. 12 days, p=0.001). With a median follow-up of 26.5 and 31.3 months for the stenting and surgical resection groups respectively, there was no difference in overall and disease-free survival (overall survival = 30 vs. 31 months, p=0.858; DFS = 13 vs. 12 months, p=0.989). As well, there was no difference in the rate of systemic recurrences (8 vs. 13, p=0.991). Conclusions: Stenting as a bridge to surgery is a safe treatment strategy in the management of patients with acute left-sided colonic obstruction with improved short-term outcomes and comparable long-term oncologic results.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 144-144
Author(s):  
Boo Gyeong Kim ◽  
Byung-Wook Kim ◽  
Joon Sung Kim ◽  
Sung Min Park ◽  
Keun Joon Lim ◽  
...  

144 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical and oncologic outcome of ESD for differentiated EGC of an expanded indication compared to surgical resection. Methods: Retrospective analyses were performed in patients who underwent ESD or surgical resection for EGC of an expanded indication from 2006 and 2008 in Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, and St. Paul’s Hospital. First arm study was performed according to pre-ESD diagnosis including pathologic diagnosis and endoscopic findings. Second arm study was obtained from post-ESD final pathologic result. All the patients were checked with endoscopy and stomach CT regularly at least 5 years. Clinical outcomes, disease free survival and overall survival were compared between the ESD group and surgical resection group in each arm. Results: In first arm study, 41 patients who received ESD and 106 patients who received surgical resection were enrolled. Metachronous recur was found in 4 patients among ESD group and in 2 patients among surgical resection group during the follow up period. There was no local recurrence in both groups. The disease free survival was not different between the two groups (ESD vs surgical resection; 87.8 vs 95.3%, p=0.291). The 5-year overall survival rate was 100% in both groups. In second arm study, 74 patients who received ESD and 165 patients who received surgical resection were enrolled. Metachronous recur was found in 5 patients among ESD group and in 2 patients among surgical resection group during the follow up period. Local recurrence did not occur in both groups. Surgical resection group was superior to ESD group in disease free survival (97.6% vs 87.6%, p=0.002). The 5-year overall survival rate was 100% in both groups. Conclusions: ESD for EGC might be acceptable considering the overall survival rates. However, intensive surveillance should be performed to find the metachronous recur after ESD.


Author(s):  
Han Wu ◽  
Runsen Jin ◽  
Su Yang ◽  
Bernard J Park ◽  
Hecheng Li

Abstract OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive thoracic surgery has evolved with the introduction of robotic platforms. This study aimed to compare the long-term and short-term outcomes of the robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for anatomic lung resection. METHODS We searched published studies that investigated RATS and VATS in anatomic lung resection. Long-term outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) and short-term outcomes (30-day mortality, postoperative complications, conversion rate to open surgery and lymph node upstaging) were extracted. The features were compared and tested as hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) at a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Twenty-five studies with 50 404 patients (7135 for RATS and 43 269 for VATS) were included. The RATS group had a longer disease-free survival than the VATS group (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.59–0.97; P = 0.03), and the overall survival showed a similar trend but was not statistically significant (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.57–1.05; P = 0.10). The RATS group showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.38–0.81; P = 0.002). No significant difference was found in postoperative complications (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.87–1.16; P = 0.94), the conversion rate to open surgery (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.56–1.52; P = 0.75) and lymph node upstaging (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.52–1.54; P = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS RATS has comparable short-term outcomes and potential long-term survival benefits for anatomic lung resection compared with VATS.


Author(s):  
Fausto Rosa ◽  
Federica Galiandro ◽  
Riccardo Ricci ◽  
Dario Di Miceli ◽  
Giuseppe Quero ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Peritoneal metastases carry the worst prognosis among all sites of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. In recent years, the advent of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has improved survival for selected patients with limited peritoneal involvement. We report the evolution of CRS and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases at a tertiary referral center over a 10-year period. Methods Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing CRS and HIPEC were included and retrospectively analyzed at a tertiary referral center from January 2006 to December 2015. Main outcomes included evaluation of grade III/IV complications, mortality rate, overall and disease-free survival, and prognostic factors influencing survival on a Cox multivariate analysis. Results Sixty-seven CRSs were performed on 67 patients during this time for colorectal peritoneal metastases. The median patient age was 57 years with 55.2% being female. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 7, with complete cytoreduction achieved in 65 (97%) cases. Grade > 2 complications occurred in 6 cases (8.9%) with no mortality. The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 41 months, with a 3-year overall survival of 43%. In case of complete cytoreduction, median overall and disease-free survival were 57 months and 36 months respectively, with a 3-year disease-free survival of 62%. Complete cytoreduction and nonmucinous histology were key factors independently associated with improved overall survival. Conclusions CRS and HIPEC for limited peritoneal metastases from CRC are safe and effective, with acceptable morbidity. In selected patients, it offers a highly favorable long-term outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eline M de Groot ◽  
Sylvia van der Horst ◽  
B Feike Kingma ◽  
Lucas Goense ◽  
Pieter C van der Sluis ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Initial results of the ROBOT, which randomized between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and open transthoracic esophagectomy (OTE), showed significantly better short-term postoperative outcomes in favor of RAMIE. However, it is not yet clarified if RAMIE is equivalent to OTE regarding long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to report the long-term oncological results of the ROBOT trial in terms of survival and disease-free survival. This study is a follow-up study of the ROBOT trial, which was a randomized controlled trial comparing RAMIE to OTE in 112 patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer. Both the trial protocol and short-term results were previously published. The primary outcome of the current study was 5-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival and recurrence patterns. Analysis was by intention to treat. During the recruitment period, 109 patients were included in the survival analysis (RAMIE n = 54, OTE n = 55). Majority of patients had clinical stage III or IV (RAMIE 63%, OTE 55%) and received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (80%). Median follow-up was 60 months (range 31–60). The combined 5-year overall survival rates for RAMIE and OTE were 41% (95% CI 27–55) and 40% (95% CI 26–53), respectively (log rank test P = 0.827). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 42% (95% CI 28–55) in the RAMIE group and 43% (95% CI 29–57) in the OTE group (log rank test P = 0.749). Out of 104 patients, 57 (55%) developed recurrent disease detected at a median of 10 months (range 0–56) after surgery. No statistically difference in recurrence rate nor recurrence pattern was observed between both groups. Overall survival and disease-free survival of RAMIE are comparable to OTE. These results continue to support the use of robotic surgery for esophageal cancer.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
JianGang Wang ◽  
JingXia Kong ◽  
Xing Zheng ◽  
Xin Yu

Abstract Background To investigate the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the short-term and long-term outcomes including disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rate in patients with liver carcinoma who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) as primary treatment. Methods Data were collected from 137 patients with liver carcinoma who underwent attempted LH between August 2003 and April 2014. Patients were classified into three groups depending on their BMI according to the WHO’s definition of obesity for Asia-Pacific region: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/ m2, Group1), normal (18.5 ≤ BMI < 23 kg/m2, Group2), overweight (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2, Group3) respectively. Short-term and long-term outcomes including overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were compared across the BMI categories. Results Of the 137 patients, 14 were underweight, 65 were normal weight, and 58 were overweight. The overall conversion rate of 137 patients was 20.44%. Conversion rate in the three groups was 14.29%, 21.54% and 20.69% (P = 0.8284). The median follow-up duration was 26 months, 30 months, and 28 months, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay in the three groups were comparable (10.85 ± 4.04, 11.57 ± 5.56, and 10.88 ± 5.70, P = 0.76). The complications rate was much higher in Group 1 (42.85%) than that in Group 2 and Group 3 (20.08% and 17.2%, P = 0.048). Underweight patients were more likely to develop grade III or higher postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) as compared to normal and overweight patients (P = 0.042). Overweight patients had a longer 3- and 5-years DFS (41.4%, 36.2%) than those for underweight (21.4%, 14.3%) and normal weight (28.1%, 21.9%) patients (P = 0.048, and 0.025). Overweight patients had a longer 5-years OS (44.8%) than those for underweight (28.6%) and normal weight (28.0%) patients (P = 0.043). Conclusions Being underweight was associated with an increased perioperative complication and being overweight has a better 3-, 5-years DFS and 5-years OS than those in under and normal weight patients with liver carcinoma who underwent LH.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Gang Jian Wang ◽  
Jingxia Kong ◽  
Xing Zhen ◽  
Xin Yu

Abstract Background: To investigate the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the short-term and long-term outcomes including disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rate in patients with liver carcinoma who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) as primary treatment.Methods: Data were collected from 137 patients with liver carcinoma who underwent attempted LH between August 2003 and April 2014. Patients were classified into three groups depending on their BMI according to the WHO’s definition of obesity for Asia-Pacific region: underweight (BMI< 18.5kg/ m2, Group1), normal (18.5≤BMI< 23kg/m2, Group2), overweight (BMI≥ 23kg/m2, Group3) respectively. Short-term and long-term outcomes including overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were compared across the BMI categories.Results: Of the 137 patients, 14 were underweight, 65 were normal weight, and 58 were overweight. The overall conversion rate of 137 patients was 20.44 %. Conversion rate in the three groups was 14.29%, 21.54% and 20.69 % (P=0.8284). The median follow-up duration was 26 months, 30 months, and 28 months, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay in the three groups were comparable (10.85±4.04, 11.57±5.56, and 10.88±5.70, P=0.76). The complications rate was much higher in Group 1 (42.85%) than that in Group 2 and Group 3 (20.08% and 17.2%, P=0.048). Underweight patients were more likely to develop grade III or higher postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) as compared to normal and overweight patients (P=0.042). Overweight patients had a longer 3- and 5-years DFS (41.4%, 36.2%) than those for underweight (21.4%, 14.3%) and normal weight (28.1%, 21.9%) patients (P=0.048, and 0.025). Overweight patients had a longer 5-years OS (44.8%) than those for underweight (28.6%) and normal weight (28.0%) patients (P=0.043).Conclusions: Being underweight was associated with an increased perioperative complication and being overweight has a better 3-, 5-years DFS and 5-years OS than those in under and normal weight patients with liver carcinoma who underwent LH.


2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 3507-3512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Delozier ◽  
Marc Spielmann ◽  
Josette Macé-Lesec’h ◽  
Maud Janvier ◽  
Catherine Hill ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: In 1986, The Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer Breast Group initiated a multicenter randomized trial to assess the usefulness of long-term adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. Short-term adjuvant tamoxifen treatment was to be compared with lifelong adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were disease-free after 2 to 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment were eligible for the trial. From September 1986 to May 1995, 3,793 patients were randomized from France, Belgium, and Argentina. A total of 1,882 patients stopped tamoxifen (short-term group), and 1,911 patients were to continue tamoxifen for life (long-term group) at the same dose as previously prescribed. The protocol was modified in February 1997, limiting tamoxifen treatment to 10 years after randomization, thus giving a comparison between a 2- to 3-year treatment and a 12- to 13-year treatment. To date, the median duration of tamoxifen treatment is 30 months in the short-term group, and 70 months in the long-term group. RESULTS: Overall, longer tamoxifen treatment induced a 23% reduction in relapse rates, leading to a 7-year disease-free survival rate of 78%, compared with 72% in the shorter-treatment group. In contrast, overall survival did not differ between the two groups, with a 79% overall survival rate in both groups. This improvement in disease-free survival could be observed in node-positive patients (P = .001); however, it was not found in node-negative patients. Prolonged tamoxifen treatment corresponded to a significant increase in disease-free survival in estrogen receptor–positive patients (P = .03) as well as in estrogen receptor–negative patients (P = .05). Furthermore, longer treatment reduced contralateral breast cancers and did not increase the number of endometrial cancers. CONCLUSION: : Although no survival advantage was noted, patients did benefit from longer tamoxifen treatment over 3 years and had significantly better disease-free survival compared with patients who stopped hormonal treatment. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess these results. Most patients in the long-term group are still receiving treatment. Comparison of results as time passes will enable conclusions to be made on the value of long-term treatment over 5 years compared with 2 to 3 years.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Emma Rosenkrantz Hölmich ◽  
Rune Petring Hasselager ◽  
Michael Tvilling Madsen ◽  
Adile Orhan ◽  
Ismail Gögenur

The surgical stress response can accelerate clinical metastasis formation. Perioperative glucocorticoids might modulate this response and the metastatic process. We aimed to describe associations between perioperative glucocorticoids and long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. We searched four databases for eligible trials and performed meta-analyses on frequency and time-to-event data. We included sixteen studies that evaluated eight different cancer types. No association was found between perioperative glucocorticoids and recurrence in either the frequency meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.87–1.25), or in the time-to-event meta-analysis, hazard ratio (HR) 1.18, 95% CI (0.78–1.79). Increased 1-year overall survival, RR 0.70, 95% (0.51–0.97), and disease-free survival, RR 0.77, 95% CI (0.60–0.97), was found for the glucocorticoid group, but five years after surgery, overall survival was reduced for the glucocorticoid group, RR 1.64, 95% CI (1.00–2.71). An exploratory subgroup analysis revealed decreased overall survival, HR 1.78, 95% CI (1.57–2.03), for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery while receiving glucocorticoids. Perioperative glucocorticoids were not associated with recurrence after cancer surgery. We found neither beneficial or deleterious associations between glucocorticoids and overall survival or disease-free survival. The available evidence remains heterogenous; low in quality and amount; and cancer-specific at present.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5438
Author(s):  
Fu-Kai Hsu ◽  
Wen-Kuei Chang ◽  
Kuan-Ju Lin ◽  
Chun-Yu Liu ◽  
Wen-Liang Fang ◽  
...  

Background: Whether perioperative packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion is associated with inferior long-term outcomes after stomach cancer surgery remains controversial. Methods: This research used a retrospective cohort study. Patients with stage I~III stomach cancer undergoing tumor resection were collected at a tertiary medical center. Patient characteristics, surgical features and pathologic findings were gathered from an electronic medical chart review. The associations of perioperative pRBC transfusion with postoperative disease-free and overall survivals were evaluated using Cox regression analysis with an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Restricted cubic spline functions were employed to characterize dose-response relationships between the amount of transfusion and cancer outcomes after surgery. Results: Among the 569 patients, 160 (28.1%) received perioperative pRBC transfusion. Perioperative transfusion was associated with worse disease-free survival (IPTW adjusted HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.18–1.71, p < 0.001) and overall survival (IPTW adjusted HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05–1.55, p = 0.014). A non-linear dose-response relationship was noted between the amount of transfusions and worse disease-free or overall survival. Conclusions: Perioperative pRBC transfusion was associated with worse disease-free and overall survival after stomach cancer surgery, and strategies aiming to minimize perioperative transfusion exposure should be further considered to reduce the potential risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document