The prognostic value of an early response in chemoradiation of locally advanced rectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14134-e14134
Author(s):  
John Ploeen ◽  
Jan Lindebjerg ◽  
Jens Christian Riis Joergensen ◽  
Anders Kristian Moeller Jakobsen
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
End Of Treatment

e14134 Background: Preoperative chemoradiation is standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, and there is an obvious need for new methods of assessing the effect. Evaluation by clinical examination with endoscopy is controversial. In most papers the assessment of effect has been performed after the end of treatment. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical value of an examination during chemoradiation. Methods: The study included 128 patients with histopathologically verified rectal cancer. Further inclusion criteria were a T3 tumor with a circumferential margin ≤ 5 mm by MRI or a T4 tumor, a distance of < 10 cm from the anal verge and localized diseased only by abdominal and chest CT scan. The treatment was 50.4 Gy/28 fractions or the same treatment with the addition of endorectal brachytherapy 10 Gy/2 fractions in a randomized trial. The concomitant chemotherapy was UFT 300 mg/m2 and L-leucovorin 22.5 mg daily. Both drugs were given five days a week. Clinical examination with endoscopy was performed week 4 during treatment. The clinical effect was classified into complete response (CR) or not complete response with clinical residual tumor (NCR). The patients were operated eight weeks after end of treatment and the pathological tumor response was classified according to Mandard (TRG). Results: CR was found in 14% of the patients. Comparison with TRG showed that 82% with CR had TRG1 as compared to the NCR group where only 9% had TRG1 (p<10-4). The risk of lymph node metastasis was also different with 94% pN0 in the group with CR compared to 57% in the NCR group (p=0.02). The rate of CR translated to a major difference in the risk of recurrence (local and distant). No patients with CR experienced recurrence as compared to 19% in the NCR group (p<0.05). The CR also correlated with cancer specific survival. None of the patients with CR died from rectal cancer with a median observation time of 36 months compared to 30% in the NCR group. Conclusions: CR is a major prognostic parameter in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation. Early CR should be considered in the selection of patients for Watchful Waiting.

scholarly journals Nomogram for predicting pathological complete response and tumor downstaging in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on the basis of a randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-241
Author(s):  
Jian-Wei Zhang ◽  
Yue Cai ◽  
Xiao-Yu Xie ◽  
Hua-Bin Hu ◽  
Jia-Yu Ling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Circumferential Extent ◽  
Tumor Downstaging

Abstract Background Preoperative fluoropyrimidine with radiotherapy was regarded as the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The model for predicting pCR in LARC patients was based on standard treatment only. This study aimed to establish a nomogram with pretherapeutic parameters and different neoadjuvant regimens for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) and tumor downstaging or good response (ypT0-2N0M0) after receiving neoadjuvant treatment in patients with LARC based on a randomized clinical trial. Methods Between January 2011 and February 2015, 309 patients with rectal cancer were enrolled from a prospective randomized study (NCT01211210). All pretreatment clinical parameters were collected to build a nomogram for predicting pCR and tumor downstaging. The model was subjected to bootstrap internal validation. The predictive performance of the model was assessed with concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. Results Of the 309 patients, 53 (17.2%) achieved pCR and 132 (42.7%) patients were classified as tumor downstaging with ypT0-2N0M0. Based on the logistic-regression analysis and clinical consideration, tumor length (P = 0.005), tumor circumferential extent (P = 0.036), distance from the anal verge (P = 0.019), and neoadjuvant treatment regimen (P &lt; 0.001) showed independent association with pCR following neoadjuvant treatment. The tumor length (P = 0.015), tumor circumferential extent (P = 0.001), distance from the anal verge (P = 0.032), clinical T category (P = 0.012), and neoadjuvant treatment regimen (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with good tumor downstaging (ypT0-2N0M0). Nomograms were developed to predict the probability of pCR and tumor downstaging with a C-index of 0.802 (95% confidential interval [CI], 0.736–0.867) and 0.730 (95% CI, 0.672–0.784). Internal validation revealed good performance of the calibration plots. Conclusions The nomogram provided individual prediction responses to different preoperative treatment for patients with rectal cancer. This model might help physicians in selecting an optimized treatment, but warrants further external validation.

scholarly journals Mutational and Clinical Predictors of Pathologic Complete Response in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea L. Russo ◽  
David P. Ryan ◽  
Darrell R. Borger ◽  
Jennifer Y. Wo ◽  
Jackie Szymonifka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Predictors

A multicenter phase Ib/II study of DNA-PK inhibitor peposertib (M3814) in combination with capecitabine and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS144-TPS144
Author(s):  
Paul Bernard Romesser ◽  
Emma B. Holliday ◽  
Tony Philip ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ib

TPS144 Background: Perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision, is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, 1/3 of these patients still develop distant metastases, indicating the need for more effective therapies. In addition, strategies that increase pathological complete response rates are needed to enable non-surgical management of LARC. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) regulates a key DNA damage repair pathway for double-strand break repair. Peposertib (M3814), a potent, selective, orally administered DNA-PK inhibitor, has been shown to potentiate the effect of ionizing radiation in a human colon cancer xenograft model and several colon cancer cell lines. Peposertib is being investigated in several different trials across multiple indications. This Phase Ib/II study (NCT03770689) aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the neoadjuvant treatment combination of peposertib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with LARC. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed and resectable Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma are eligible. Induction chemotherapy is permitted, but residual disease must first be documented by MRI, digital rectal examination and endoscopy. Patients who received other anticancer therapies or those with prior pelvic RT are excluded. At open-label Phase Ib (open), 18–30 patients (n = 3 per cohort) will receive peposertib + capecitabine (orally, 825 mg/m2 twice daily [BID]) + RT (45–50.4 Gy), 5 days/week. Peposertib 50 mg once daily (QD) was the starting dose. Additional dose levels will range between 100─800 mg QD. Dose escalation is determined by the safety monitoring committee and guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model. At Phase II (planned), 150 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive oral capecitabine (825 mg/m2 BID) + RT (45–50 Gy), with either oral peposertib (recommended phase II dose [RP2D] or placebo, QD for 5 days/week. Primary objectives are to define a maximum tolerated dose and RP2D (Phase Ib), and to evaluate the efficacy of peposertib + capecitabine + RT in terms of pathological/clinical complete response (Phase II). Secondary objectives include assessment of antitumor activity (Phase Ib), quality of life outcomes (Phase II), and PK of peposertib, and the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy (both phases). To date, one patient has received peposertib 50 mg QD, six patients peposertib 100 mg QD, three patients peposertib 150 mg QD, and three patients peposertib 250 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT03770689.

scholarly journals Pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil? Which is better?

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. v85
Author(s):  
X. Hernández-Yagüe ◽  
E. Canals-Subirats ◽  
G. Mateu Esquerda ◽  
C. Auñón Sanz ◽  
A. Maroto Genover ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document