The impact of neoadjuvant weekly ixabepilone for high-risk prostate cancer: A phase I/II clinical trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 158-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi Lyn Layton ◽  
Angela Marie Plette ◽  
Joseph F. Renzulli ◽  
E. Bradley Miller ◽  
Howard Safran ◽  
...  

158 Background: Potential benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are tumor downstaging and treatment of micrometastatic disease. A prior study using docetaxel yielded no pathologic complete responses and concerns for increased operative morbidity. In Phase II studies, ixabepilone has promising activity in metastatic prostate cancer. Our study is a Phase I/II clinical trial evaluating neoadjuvant, weekly ixabepilone in men with high-risk prostate cancer opting for radical prostatectomy. Methods: Men with high risk prostate cancer defined as either Gleason 8-10, cT3 disease, high volume Gleason 4+3 and a palpable nodule or a PSA>20 ng/ml were eligible. Men received weekly ixabepilone 16-20/m2 for 12-16 weeks prior to surgery. Fifteen men underwent robotic prostatectomy; one patient who had an open prostatectomy. Initial PSA response, post-operative PSA values, pathology, and evaluation of adverse events were recorded. Results: We enrolled 16 men with a mean follow-up of 15.25 months at time of review. All had pretreatment Gleason scores of 4+3 or higher. With neoadjuvant treatment, PSA values decreased in 14/16 men (mean 46.8%); increased in 2/16 men. None reached an undetectable pre-operative PSA. Nine men experienced an adverse event requiring dose modification or cessation of chemotherapy (neuropathy or allergic reaction). Only 5/16 men completed planned treatment. Mean operative time, EBL, and hospital stay were 189 minutes, 184mL, and1.5 days, respectively; all consistent with institutional and national norms. Post surgery 15/16 (94%) had pT3 disease, 8/16 (50%) had a positive surgical margin and 2/16 (12.5%) had positive regional lymph nodes. There were no pathologic complete responses. Only 1/16 (6.25%) had a biochemical relapse. Conclusions: While a PSA response is achieved, there is substantial toxicity with neoadjuvant weekly ixabepilone. Men were able to undergo prostatectomy without increased morbidity after neoadjuvant therapy. Extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins remained common in this population with high-risk disease. Assessment of biochemical recurrence rates and time to treatment failure will require longer, planned follow-up.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS138-TPS138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hofman ◽  
Declan G. Murphy ◽  
Scott Williams ◽  
Tatenda Nzenza ◽  
Alan Herschtal ◽  
...  

TPS138 Background: Disease persistence or relapse following curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy of high-risk prostate cancer is not uncommon. This is attributable, in part, to a failure of accurate staging with diagnostic imaging being insensitive for detection of small volume metastatic disease. Prostate-specific-membrane-antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a new whole body scanning technique that enables visualisation of prostate cancer with high sensitivity. The hypotheses of this study are that PSMA-PET/CT (a) has improved diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional imaging, (b) should be used as a first-line diagnostic test for staging, (c) the improved diagnostic accuracy will result in significant management impact and (d) provides economic benefits when incorporated into the management algorithm. Methods: This is a 300 patient phase III multi-centre randomized study of patients with untreated high-risk prostate cancer defined by Gleason grade group 3-5, PSA ≥ 20ng/ml or clinical stage ≥ T3. Patients are randomized to Gallium-68-PSMA11 PET/CT or conventional imaging, consisting of computer tomography of the abdomen/pelvis and bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT. Patients with negative, equivocal or oligometastatic disease cross-over to receive the other imaging arm. The primary objective is to compare the accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT to conventional imaging for detecting nodal or distant metastatic disease. Accuracy is defined by a pre-defined “ground truth” scoring system incorporating histopathologic, imaging and clinical follow-up at six months post randomisation. Secondary objectives include comparing management impact, the number of equivocal studies, the incremental value of second-line imaging in patients who cross-over, health economics, radiation exposure, inter-observer agreement and safety of PSMA-PET/CT. Longer term follow-up will also assess the prognostic value of a negative PSMA-PET/CT. 294 of 300 (98%) patients randomised at time of abstract submission. Clinical trial information: 12617000005358.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Suk Suk Kwon ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Arnav Srivast ◽  
Thomas L Jang ◽  
Singer A Eric ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: While early radiotherapy (eRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) has shown to improve oncologic outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) in a recent clinical trial, controversy remains regarding its benefit. We aimed to illustrate national trends of post-RP radiotherapy and compare outcomes and toxicities in patients receiving eRT vs. observation with or without late radiotherapy (lRT). Methods: Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 2001 to 2011, we identified 7557 patients with high-risk pathologic features after RP (≥ pT3N0 and/or positive surgical margins). Our study cohort was consisted of patients receiving RT within 6 months of surgery (eRT), those receiving RT after 6 months (IRT), and those never receiving RT (observation). Another subcohort, delayed RT (dRT), encompassed both IRT and observation. Trends of post-RP radiotherapy were compared using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Cox regression models identified factors predictive of worse survival outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analyses compared the eRT and the dRT groups. Results: Among those with pathologically confirmed high-risk PCa after RP, 12.7% (n=959), 13.2% (n=1710), and 74.1% (n=4888) underwent eRT, lRT, and observation without RT, respectively. Of these strategies, the proportion of men on observation without RT increased significantly over time (p=0.004). Multivariable Cox regression model demonstrated similar outcomes between the eRT and the dRT groups. At a median follow up of 5.9 years, five-year overall and cancer-specific survival outcomes were more favorable in the dRT group, when compared to the eRT group. Radiation related toxicities, including urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and urethral stricture, were higher in the eRT group when compared to the lRT group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that a blanket adoption of the eRT in high-risk PCa based on clinical trials with limited follow up may result in overtreatment of a significant number of men and expose them to unnecessary radiation toxicity.


Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (11) ◽  
pp. 1656-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Abern ◽  
Martha K. Terris ◽  
William J. Aronson ◽  
Christopher J. Kane ◽  
Christopher L. Amling ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document