Increasing access to tobacco cessation support for cancer patients: Results of an institution-wide screening and referral program in an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1566-1566
Author(s):  
Mary E. Reid ◽  
Katharine Dobson Amato ◽  
Michael Zevon ◽  
Robert Reed ◽  
Pat Hysert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Tobacco Cessation ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Full Time ◽  
National Organizations ◽  
Phone Contact

1566 Background: Guidelines from ASCO and other national organizations recommend assessment of tobacco use and structured tobacco cessation support for cancer patients. However, most oncology providers fail to provide cessation assistance to cancer patients who use tobacco. Reported are results of a systematic approach to assessing tobacco use and delivering cessation support for cancer patients in a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: A standard set of evidence based tobacco assessment questions were incorporated into an automated electronic medical record based system delivered by nursing at initial consult and follow-up. Patients eligible for tobacco cessation support (i.e. patients self-reporting tobacco use within 30 days) were automatically referred to a dedicated tobacco cessation service providing primarily phone based cessation support. Results: Of approximately 11,900 patients screened over 26 months, 2,978 patients were automatically triaged for cessation support. Contact priority was given to newly diagnosed patients in tobacco related disease sites. Using 1.25 full time cessation specialists, 1,531 received only a standard tobacco cessation mailing and no further contacts were attempted by the cessation service. In 1447 patients with attempted phone contact by the cessation service, 1189 (82.2%) were reached within 5 contact attempts. In 1,189 patients contacted, 52 (4.4%) were inappropriate referrals, 245 (20.6%) were in an active quitting phase, 465 (39.1%) were willing to prepare, and only 24 (2.0%) refused any intervention at initial contact. At the most recent follow-up, 44 patients (3.7%) requested no further contact and 90 additional patients (7.6%) were lost to follow-up. In the 1,045 remaining patients, 338 (32.3%) reported quitting tobacco use. Notably, in the 1,531 patients with no phone contact by the cessation service, only 14 proactively contacted the cessation service for assistance. Conclusions: An institution wide program to automate the delivery of tobacco cessation services was feasible with high patient contact rates, low patient refusal, and moderately high tobacco cessation rates.

Evaluation of a dedicated institutional tobacco cessation service for thoracic clinic cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1603-1603
Author(s):  
Katharine Ann Dobson Amato ◽  
Michael Zevon ◽  
Pat Hysert ◽  
Robert Hysert ◽  
Stephanie Segal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Tobacco Cessation ◽  
Participation Rate ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Therapeutic Outcomes ◽  
High Risk Cancer ◽  
First Contact

1603 Background: Tobacco use by cancer patients is associated with poor therapeutic outcomes including increased toxicity, decreased quality of life, and decreased survival. Though recommendations provide for tobacco assessment and cessation for cancer patients, few oncologists provide cessation support. Presented are data from universal tobacco assessment and cessation program for patients presenting at a thoracic oncology clinic in a NCI Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Methods: A standard set of evidence based tobacco assessment questions were incorporated into an automated electronic medical record based system delivered by nursing at initial consult and at follow-up. Patients eligible for tobacco cessation support (i.e. patients self-reporting tobacco use within 30 days) were automatically referred to a dedicated tobacco cessation service. All referred patients are sent a standardized packet of cessation materials with telephone-based follow-up by trained cessation counselors. Results: A total of 980 new thoracic clinic patients were referred to the cessation service from January 2011 and October 2012. Two-thirds of the patients referred (n=728) referred into the system were current smokers and the remainder had quit in the 30 days prior to assessment. Among the 788 patients with contact attempts by the cessation service, 81.2% (n=640) were successfully contacted and only 2.5% (n=20) refused the offer of cessation support. At first contact, 75.6% (n=484) of patients reported continued current tobacco use. Follow-up calls were placed for 53.1% (n=340) of those who participated in the first contact an average of 39 days after the first successful contact. The follow-up had a 93.2% (n=317) participation rate which revealed that 33.3% (n=106) reported not smoking, an 8.9% increase since the first cessation service telephone call. Conclusions: Data demonstrate that an automated tobacco assessment and cessation service for thoracic oncology patients can effectively generate a large mandatory referral base with high patient interest in cessation, and that cessation support can be implemented and maintained in high risk cancer patients.

scholarly journals Changes in fatigue, barriers, and predictors towards physical activity in advanced cancer patients over a period of 12 months—a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Frikkel ◽  
M. Beckmann ◽  
N. De Lazzari ◽  
M. Götte ◽  
S. Kasper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Psychological Conditions ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose Physical activity (PA) is recommended to improve advanced cancer patients’ (ACP) physical functioning, fatigue, and quality of life. Yet, little is known about ACPs’ attitude towards PA and its influence on fatigue and depressiveness over a longer period. This prospective, non-interventional cohort study examined ACPs’ fatigue, depression, motivation, and barriers towards PA before and after 12 months of treatment among ACP Methods Outpatients with incurable cancer receiving treatment at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center reporting moderate/severe weakness/tiredness during self-assessment via MIDOS II were enrolled. Fatigue (FACT-F), depression (PHQ-8), cancer-related parameters, self-assessed PA behavior, motivation for and barriers against PA were evaluated (T0). Follow-up data was acquired after 12 months (T1) using the same questionnaire. Results At follow-up, fatigue (p=0.017) and depressiveness (p=0.015) had increased in clinical relevant extent. Physically active ACP did not show significant progress of FACT-F (p=0.836) or PHQ-8 (p=0.799). Patient-reported barriers towards PA remained stable. Logistic regression analyses identified motivation as a positive predictor for PA at both time points (T0, β=2.152, p=0.017; T1, β =2.264, p=0.009). Clinically relevant depression was a negative predictor for PA at T0 and T1 (T0, β=−3.187, p=0.044; T1, β=−3.521, p=0.041). Conclusion Our findings emphasize the importance of psychological conditions in physical activity behavior of ACP. Since psychological conditions seem to worsen over time, early integration of treatment is necessary. By combining therapy approaches of cognitive behavioral therapy and exercise in interdisciplinary care programs, the two treatment options might reinforce each other and sustainably improve ACPs’ fatigue, physical functioning, and QoL. Trial registration German Register of Clinical Trials, DRKS00012514, registration date: 30.05.2017

Time to put it out – nurse-facilitated tobacco treatment in a comprehensive cancer center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A Katz ◽  
Sarah L Mott ◽  
Jane A Utech ◽  
Autumn C Bahlmann ◽  
Kimberly A Dukes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Smoking Cessation Counseling ◽  
Index Visit ◽  
Tobacco Treatment ◽  
Implementation Period

Abstract Few cancer patients receive guideline-concordant care for treatment of tobacco dependence. The purpose of this pilot trial was to obtain preliminary estimates of effectiveness of an evidence-based practice intervention on the delivery of tobacco treatment and cessation outcomes in cancer patients. We conducted a pragmatic implementation trial with a before-after design in 119 current or recently quit adult smokers with cancer who met with a clinician at a single National Cancer Institute designated comprehensive cancer center (CCC) (n = 61 pre-implementation, n = 58 post-implementation). We used a multi-component strategy based on the Chronic Care Model to implement National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for smoking cessation. Smoking cessation counseling during the index visit was assessed by exit interview and patients were interviewed by phone to assess cessation outcomes at 3-month follow-up. Performance of cessation counseling and 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) were compared across the pre- and post-implementation periods using log-logistic regression, accounting for clustering by nursing staff. More patients had received assistance in quitting at the index visit during the post-implementation period compared to the pre-implementation period (30 vs. 10%, p < .01). At 3-month follow-up, 38 and 14% of participants had discussed smoking cessation medication with a CCC healthcare professional and 57 and 27% of participants had used pharmacotherapy, respectively (p < .01 for both comparisons). Seven-day PPA at 3-month follow-up was similar in both periods, however (14 vs. 12%, respectively). A multi-component tobacco treatment intervention increased the proportion of smokers who received assistance in quitting smoking during usual cancer care but did not improve cessation outcomes.

scholarly journals Can Cancer Diagnosis Help in Quitting Tobacco? Barriers and Enablers to Tobacco Cessation Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients from a Tertiary Cancer Center in South india

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-352
Author(s):  
Bincy Mathew ◽  
E. Vidhubala ◽  
Arvind Krishnamurthy ◽  
C. Sundaramoorthy
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Tobacco Cessation ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Potential Threat ◽  
Diagnosis Of Cancer ◽  
Readiness To Quit

Background: Tobacco use contributes to almost 40% of the cancers in India. Considering the potential threat, many preventive measures have been instigated in the country. However, tobacco cessation for hospitalized cancer patients is an unexplored territory in India. This study aims to understand the quit status and to explore the reasons to quit or continue the use of tobacco after the diagnosis of head and neck cancer (HNC). Methods: HNC patients admitted between February and April 2016 were assessed for their tobacco use status. A DT was used to assess the psychological distress. Users were assessed for their readiness to quit and dependence on tobacco. An in-depth interview was conducted among 25 patients (seven current users and 18 recent quitters), and themes that emerged were discussed. Results: Of the 119 HNC patients, 71 were tobacco users and 48 had quit tobacco after the diagnosis. The reasons to quit were the perceived benefits of quitting, advice from the physicians, and awareness about cancer and its association with tobacco. In contrast, the reasons to continue the use of tobacco were attributed to coping mechanisms, nihilistic perception about the outcome of the cancer, and a lack of understanding about cancer and its association with tobacco. Conclusion: The recent quitters comprehended the benefits of quitting and were able to prioritize their needs after the diagnosis. However, one-third of the HNC patients continued to use tobacco even after the diagnosis of cancer. Hence, tobacco cessation services need to be integrated into oncology services for achieving better treatment outcomes.

scholarly journals Health workers’ perceptions on where and how to integrate tobacco use cessation services into tuberculosis treatment; a qualitative exploratory study in Uganda

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizeus Rutebemberwa ◽  
Kellen Nyamurungi ◽  
Surabhi Joshi ◽  
Yvonne Olando ◽  
Hadii M. Mamudu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Tobacco Cessation ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Health Facilities ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Tobacco Use Cessation ◽  
Tb Treatment

Abstract Background Tobacco use is associated with exacerbation of tuberculosis (TB) and poor TB treatment outcomes. Integrating tobacco use cessation within TB treatment could improve healing among TB patients. The aim was to explore perceptions of health workers on where and how to integrate tobacco use cessation services into TB treatment programs in Uganda. Methods Between March and April 2019, nine focus group discussions (FGDs) and eight key informant interviews were conducted among health workers attending to patients with tuberculosis on a routine basis in nine facilities from the central, eastern, northern and western parts of Uganda. These facilities were high volume health centres, general hospitals and referral hospitals. The FGD sessions and interviews were tape recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis and the Chronic Care Model as a framework. Results Respondents highlighted that just like TB prevention starts in the community and TB treatment goes beyond health facility stay, integration of tobacco cessation should be started when people are still healthy and extended to those who have been healed as they go back to communities. There was need to coordinate with different organizations like peers, the media and TB treatment supporters. TB patients needed regular follow up and self-management support for both TB and tobacco cessation. Patients needed to be empowered to know their condition and their caretakers needed to be involved. Effective referral between primary health facilities and specialist facilities was needed. Clinical information systems should identify relevant people for proactive care and follow up. In order to achieve effective integration, the health system needed to be strengthened especially health worker training and provision of more space in some of the facilities. Conclusions Tobacco cessation activities should be provided in a continuum starting in the community before the TB patients get to hospital, during the patients’ interface with hospital treatment and be given in the community after TB patients have been discharged. This requires collaboration between those who carry out health education in communities, the TB treatment supporters and the health workers who treat patients in health facilities.

Perceptions of barriers to patient financial hardship screening differ by provider role within gynecologic oncology outpatient care.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 317-317
Author(s):  
Jhalak Dholakia ◽  
Maria Pisu ◽  
Warner King Huh ◽  
Margaret Irene Liang
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Financial Hardship ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Patient Barriers

317 Background: Although approximately half of patients with gynecologic malignancy experience financial hardship (FH) during treatment, best practices to identify and assist patients with FH are lacking. To develop such practices, we assessed oncology provider and staff perspectives about FH screening and provision of assistance. Methods: An anonymous survey was conducted electronically within the Gynecologic Oncology outpatient office at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Potential barriers to patient FH screening and follow-up were assessed within 2 domains: 1) logistic barriers to incorporating FH screening and follow-up into outpatient workflow and 2) perceived patient barriers to FH screening. Responses were elicited on a 5-point Likert scale from ‘very’ to ‘not at all’ significant and dichotomized into significant and not significant barriers. Results: Of 43 providers approached, 37 responded (86% response rate) of which 14 were physicians (MD)/nurse practitioners (NP) and 23 were other staff members (i.e., clinical and research nurses, social workers, pharmacists, care coordinators, lay navigators, and financial counselors). Altogether, 38% worked in their current position for >5 years (n=14), 11% for 3-5 years (n=4), and 51% for <3 years (n=19). For logistic barriers to implementing FH screening and follow-up, the most frequently reported significant barriers included lack of personnel training (69%) and lack of available staff (62%), training regarding follow-up (72%), and case tracking infrastructure (67%). The most frequent significant perceived patient barriers were lack of knowledge of whom to contact (72%), concerns about impact on treatment if FH needs were identified (72%), and lack of patient readiness to discuss financial needs (62%.) Compared to MD/NP, staff members more often indicated the following as significant barriers: difficulty incorporating FH screening into initial visit workflow (31 % vs. 57%, p=0.03), overstretched personnel (29% vs 73%, p=0.005), and patient concerns about influence on treatment (62% vs 86%, p=0.01). Conclusions: Care team members identified barriers to patient FH screening across logistic and patient-centered domains, although MD/NP less so than other staff possibly reflecting different exposures to patient financial needs during clinical encounters or burden of workflow. Implementation of universal FH screening, dedicated personnel, convenient tracking mechanisms, and multi-disciplinary provider and staff training may improve recognition of patient FH and facilitate its integration into oncology care plans.

Routine HIV Screening in Cancer Patients in the Emergency Department

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-95
Author(s):  
Terry W Rice ◽  
◽  
Patricia A. Brock ◽  
Carmen Gonzalez ◽  
Kelly W Merriman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Linkage To Care ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Routine Hiv Screening ◽  
Incident Cases

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) in cancer patients improves outcomes and reduces transmission of this oncogenic virus. HIV testing rates of cancer patients are similar to the general population (15-40%), despite the association with cancer. Our aim was to increase HIV screening in the Emergency Department(ED) of a comprehensive cancer center through a quality initiative. Testing increased significantly during the intervention (p<0.001; 0.15/day to 2.69/day). Seropositive HIV rate was 1.4% (12/852), with incidence of 0.3%. All patients were linked to care. Incident cases were between 36 and 55 years of age. Barriers encountered included confusion regarding the need for written consent for HIV testing, failure to consider ordering the test, and concerns regarding linkage to care.

scholarly journals A Collaborative Model for Facilitating the Delivery of Smoking Cessation Treatments to Cancer Patients: Results From Three Oncology Practices in South Carolina

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-124
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Kilpatrick ◽  
Kathleen B. Cartmell ◽  
Abdoulaye Diedhiou ◽  
K. Michael Cummings ◽  
Graham W. Warren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Tobacco Cessation ◽  
Dissemination And Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Cancer Centers

Introduction: Continued smoking by cancer patients causes adverse cancer treatment outcomes, but few patients receive evidence-based smoking cessation as a standard of care.Aim: To evaluate practical strategies to promote wide-scale dissemination and implementation of evidence-based tobacco cessation services within state cancer centers.Methods: A Collaborative Learning Model (CLM) for Quality Improvement was evaluated with three community oncology practices to identify barriers and facilitate practice change to deliver evidence-based smoking cessation treatments to cancer patients using standardized assessments and referrals to statewide smoking cessation resources. Patients were enrolled and tracked through an automated data system and received follow-up cessation support post-enrollment. Monthly quantitative reports and qualitative data gathered through interviews and collaborative learning sessions were used to evaluate meaningful quality improvement changes in each cancer center.Results: Baseline practice evaluation for the CLM identified the lack of tobacco use documentation, awareness of cessation guidelines, and awareness of services for patients as common barriers. Implementation of a structured assessment and referral process demonstrated that of 1,632 newly registered cancer patients,1,581 (97%) were screened for tobacco use. Among those screened, 283 (18%) were found to be tobacco users. Of identified tobacco users, 207 (73%) were advised to quit. Referral of new patients who reported using tobacco to an evidence-based cessation program increased from 0% at baseline across all three cancer centers to 64% (range = 30%–89%) during the project period.Conclusions: Implementation of quality improvement learning collaborative models can dramatically improve delivery of guideline-based tobacco cessation treatments to cancer patients.

Viral associated diarrhea in immunocompromised and cancer patients at a large comprehensive cancer center: a 10-year retrospective study

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Ghosh ◽  
Farida A. Malik ◽  
Roshni G. Daver ◽  
Jakapat Vanichanan ◽  
Pablo C. Okhuysen
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center

Length of Survival in Hospice for Cancer Patients Referred From a Comprehensive Cancer Center

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tallal Younis ◽  
Robert Milch ◽  
Nawal Abul-Khoudoud ◽  
David Lawrence ◽  
Amy Mirand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document