A phase II trial of second-line axitinib following prior antiangiogenic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 314-314
Author(s):  
Mairead Geraldine McNamara ◽  
Anne M Horgan ◽  
Alex Aspinall ◽  
Eric Xueyu Chen ◽  
Kelly Burak ◽  
...  

314 Background: Second-line options in treatment of HCC are limited. Axitinib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of VEGFRs 1, 2, and 3, PDGFR and c-KIT that warrants exploration in HCC. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, two-stage phase II trial of axitinib in advanced HCC. Eligible patients (pts) are Child-Pugh A/B7, with measurable progressive disease after TKIs/antiangiogenic drugs. Axitinib starts at 5 mg bid orally, titrated to 10 mg bid as tolerated. Treatment continues to progression (PD) or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoint is response defined by reduction in size by RECIST 1.1 on CT scan at 16 wks, secondary endpoints to compare response by RECIST 1.1 to Choi criteria and modified RECIST, explore dynamic imaging models, feasibility, safety, PFS and overall survival. Results: We present results of 15 (of 29) pts enrolled from 01/11 - 09/12. Median age; 62y (range 18-78) with ECOG PS 0 (5 pts), 1 (10 pts) with prior therapy of Temsirolimus/Bevacizumab (2 pts), sorafenib (13 pts). A planned safety/futility interim analysis was passed. Most common axitinib-related AEs were hypertension (HTN) (60%), hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) (60%), diarrhea (60%), fatigue (50%). Most common axitinib-related grade 3 (G3) AEs were HTN (20%) and diarrhea (20%). There were no G3 HFSR. There was 1 G4 hyperbilirubinaemia. 60% of pts had dose interruptions due to AEs; most common reasons included fatigue (20%), HTN (10%), and HFSR (10%). 20% required dose reductions, 14% of pts tolerated dose escalation above 5 mg bid. As of 09/12, 8 pts remain on study, 7 pts discontinued (4pts: PD, 3pts: AEs). Med duration of treatment; 4.0 mo (range 6 d - 15.5 mo). Out of 9 evaluable for response, there was 1 confirmed PR per RECIST 1.1; 3 other pts had tumor reduction; 10%, 22%, 23%, 2 PR by Choi criteria and none by modified RECIST. Early on-treatment perfusion changes were noted on functional imaging. Of the 9 pts with evaluable AFP response, 3 (33%) had >50% decrease from baseline. 11 pts are still alive, 4 pts are deceased secondary to PD. Conclusions: Axitinib is tolerated and has shown preliminary efficacy in this VEGF pretreated HCC pt population.This is early analysis and updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01334112.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4092-4092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mairead Geraldine McNamara ◽  
Lisa W Le ◽  
Anne M Horgan ◽  
Alex Aspinall ◽  
Kelly W Burak ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (10) ◽  
pp. 1620-1627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mairéad G. McNamara ◽  
Lisa W. Le ◽  
Anne M. Horgan ◽  
Alex Aspinall ◽  
Kelly W. Burak ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4088-4088
Author(s):  
Ahmed Omar Kaseb ◽  
Humaid Obaid Al-Shamsi ◽  
Jeffrey Morris ◽  
Michiko Iwasaki ◽  
Lianchun Xiao ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4504-4504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert John Motzer ◽  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
Silvia Falcon ◽  
Thomas Cosgriff ◽  
...  

4504 Background: Sequential SUN (tyrosine kinase inhibitor, TKI) until progression of disease (PD) followed by EVE (mTOR inhibitor) is standard therapy for patients with mRCC. This open-label, multicenter, phase II trial compared 1st-line EVE to 1st-line SUN (NCT00903175). Sequential EVE→SUN was also compared with standard SUN→EVE. Methods: Patients with mRCC (clear or non-clear cell) naive to prior systemic therapy were randomized 1:1 to either 1st-line EVE 10 mg/day or SUN 50 mg/day (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off) until PD. Patients then crossed over and continued on the alternate drug until PD. Primary objective was to assess PFS noninferiority of 1st-line EVE to 1st-line SUN; defined as an observed hazard ratio (HR)1st EVE/SUN ≤1.1. Overall survival (OS), combined 1st-line and 2nd-line PFS, and safety were secondary end points. Results: From10/09 to 6/11, 471 patients enrolled (EVE→SUN, n = 238; SUN→EVE, n = 233). Median age was 62 years, 85.4% had clear-cell RCC, and MSKCC favorable/intermediate/poor risk was 30/56/14%. Median follow-up was 22.7 months. A total of 53.7% of patients who discontinued 1st-line EVE entered into 2nd-line SUN and 51.6% of patients who discontinued 1st-line SUN entered into 2nd-line EVE. Median PFS (95% CI) was 7.9 (5.6-8.2) months for 1st-line EVE and 10.7 (8.2-11.5) months for 1st-line SUN. HR1st EVE/1st SUN (95% CI) was 1.43 (1.15-1.77). Median OS (95% CI) was 22.4 (19.7-NA) months for EVE→SUN and 32.0 (20.5-NA) months for SUN→EVE; HREVE-SUN/SUN-EVE (95% CI) was 1.24 (0.94-1.64). A trend in favor of SUN→EVE for OS was observed, but will need to be confirmed with final OS analysis. Additional efficacy results for secondary end points are forthcoming. Common treatment-emergent adverse events for 1st-line EVE vs SUN, respectively, were stomatitis (53% vs 57%), fatigue (45% vs 51%), and diarrhea (38% vs 57%). Conclusions: Noninferiority of PFS for 1st-line EVE compared with SUN was not achieved in this randomized phase II trial of mRCC patients. The treatment paradigm remains SUN→EVE since the sequence achieved optimal clinical benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT00903175.


2016 ◽  
pp. 773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Kaseb ◽  
Jeffrey Morris ◽  
Michiko Iwasaki ◽  
Humaid Al-Shamsi ◽  
Kanwal Raghav ◽  
...  

Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Kenta Motomura ◽  
Yoshiyuki Wada ◽  
Yoshitaka Inaba ◽  
Yasunari Sakamoto ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a targeted antiangiogenic agent may leverage complementary mechanisms of action for the treatment of advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Avelumab is a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody with clinical activity in various tumor types; axitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3. We report the final analysis from VEGF Liver 100 (NCT03289533), a phase 1b study evaluating safety and efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib in treatment-naive patients with aHCC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eligible patients had confirmed aHCC, no prior systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, and Child-Pugh class A disease. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks plus axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Endpoints included safety and investigator-assessed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) for HCC. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-two Japanese patients were enrolled and treated with avelumab plus axitinib. The minimum follow-up was 18 months as of October 25, 2019 (data cutoff). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 16 patients (72.7%); the most common (≥3 patients) were hypertension (<i>n</i> = 11 [50.0%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (<i>n</i> = 5 [22.7%]), and decreased appetite (<i>n</i> = 3 [13.6%]). No grade 4 TRAEs or treatment-related deaths occurred. Ten patients (45.5%) had an immune-related AE (irAE) of any grade; 3 patients (13.6%) had an infusion-related reaction (IRR) of any grade, and no grade ≥3 irAE and IRR were observed. The objective response rate was 13.6% (95% CI: 2.9–34.9%) per RECIST 1.1 and 31.8% (95% CI: 13.9–54.9%) per mRECIST for HCC. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Treatment with avelumab plus axitinib was associated with a manageable toxicity profile and showed antitumor activity in patients with aHCC.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian R. Molina ◽  
Nathan R. Foster ◽  
Thanyanan Reungwetwattana ◽  
Garth D. Nelson ◽  
Andrew V. Grainger ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document