Survival in patients with esophageal cancer treated with surgery after chemoradiotherapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 98-98
Author(s):  
Ravi Shridhar ◽  
Jessica Freilich ◽  
Sarah Hoffe ◽  
William J. Fulp ◽  
Michael Chuong ◽  
...  

98 Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgical resection is the standard of care for treating advanced esophageal cancer. However, the role of surgery has come into question in recent studies. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of patients treated with CRT with or without surgery. Methods: An IRB-approved database was queried to identify esophageal cancer patients treated with CRT with or without surgical resection between 2000 and 2011. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis for OS and DFS were calculated with a Cox proportional hazard ratio model. Results: We identified 232 patients treated with CRT (122 without surgery, 110 with surgery). Surgery was associated with a significant increase in OS and DFS. Median and 5 year OS for surgical versus nonsurgical patients was 42.2 months, and 42.3% versus 20.4 months and 29%, respectively (p = 0.0003). Median and 5 year DFS for surgical versus nonsurgical patients was 16.8 months and 29% versus 8.4 months and 22.8% (p < 0.001). MVA for OS revealed that lower stage (p = 0.0098), tumor length <5 cm (p = 0.0059), and surgery (p<0.0001) were prognostic for significantly decreased mortality, while age, gender, histology, tumor location, radiation dose, and radiation technique were not prognostic. MVA for DFS showed that tumor length <5 cm (p = 0.0112), radiation technique (p = 0.0023), and surgery (p = 0.0007) were prognostic for significantly decrease mortality, while lower stage (p = 0.069) and squamous histology (p = 0.055) were trending for decreased mortality. Age, gender, radiation dose, and tumor location were not prognostic for DFS. Conclusions: Surgery after CRT is strongly associated with increased OS and DFS in our esophageal cancer patient population. While we highly recommend surgical resection as part of trimodality treatment, it should only be performed in high volume centers. Longer followup in the already conducted randomized trials involving squamous cell carcinomas are needed to better qualify the initial negative results and randomized trials are need to address the role of surgery for adenocarcinomas.

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Smith ◽  
Naveed H. Akhtar ◽  
Scott T. Tagawa

Purpose. To review existing literature on the role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with dose escalated radiation therapy.Methods and Materials. A PubMed search was undertaken to identify relevant articles.Results. Multiple recent studies were identified examining the role of ADT in the current era of radiation dose-escalation. Among the reviewed studies, varying radiation doses and techniques, ADT regimens, and patient selection criteria were utilized. Conflicting results were reported, with some studies demonstrating a benefit of delivering a higher radiation dose with ADT. Other studies failed to show significant benefits with the addition of ADT to dose-escalated RT.Conclusions. The benefit of adding ADT to dose-escalated RT is still uncertain. Prospective randomized trials, several of which are ongoing, are necessary to more adequately examine this issue. In the interim, physicians and patients should continue to utilize the existing data to weigh the risks and benefits of each approach to therapy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. S10
Author(s):  
M. Valmasoni ◽  
G. Zanchettin ◽  
A. Ruol ◽  
L. Faccio ◽  
M. Costantini ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 959-964
Author(s):  
Shantanu S. Pande ◽  
Nilendu Purandare ◽  
Ameya Puranik ◽  
Sneha Shah ◽  
Archi Agrawal ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Jun Park ◽  
Keun Soo Ahn ◽  
Yong Hoon Kim ◽  
Tae-Seok Kim ◽  
Jung Hee Hong ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 660-665
Author(s):  
Yelena Tyuryaeva

The article is devoted to various aspects of the use of intraluminal brachytherapy (IB) in treatment for esophageal cancer (EC). A critical review of the use of IB as a component of combined radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment regimens, for definitive CRT, as well as in palliative treatment of non-operable tumors of this localization is given. The contradictory data on the effectiveness of brachytherapy with locally distributed, inoperable EC are summarized. A separate section relates to the prospects for incorporating brachytherapy into combined treatment of early esophageal cancer. Carried out analysis testifies to the necessity of standardization of summary and daily doses of irradiation depending on the indications to the IB.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document