Propensity score matched comparison of intermediate-intensity chemotherapy induction versus intensive chemotherapy induction in elderly patients (age ≥ 60) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7097-7097
Author(s):  
Koichi Takahashi ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (25) ◽  
pp. 3110-3118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Serve ◽  
Utz Krug ◽  
Ruth Wagner ◽  
M. Cristina Sauerland ◽  
Achim Heinecke ◽  
...  

Purpose The prognosis of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still dismal even with intensive chemotherapy. In this trial, we compared the antileukemic activity of standard induction and consolidation therapy with or without the addition of the kinase inhibitor sorafenib in elderly patients with AML. Patients and Methods All patients received standard cytarabine and daunorubicin induction (7+3 regimen) and up to two cycles of intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation. Two hundred one patients were equally randomly assigned to receive either sorafenib or placebo between the chemotherapy cycles and subsequently for up to 1 year after the beginning of therapy. The primary objective was to test for an improvement in event-free survival (EFS). Overall survival (OS), complete remission (CR) rate, tolerability, and several predefined subgroup analyses were among the secondary objectives. Results Age, sex, CR and early death (ED) probability, and prognostic factors were balanced between both study arms. Treatment in the sorafenib arm did not result in significant improvement in EFS or OS. This was also true for subgroup analyses, including the subgroup positive for FLT3 internal tandem duplications. Results of induction therapy were worse in the sorafenib arm, with higher treatment-related mortality and lower CR rates. More adverse effects occurred during induction therapy in the sorafenib arm, and patients in this arm received less consolidation chemotherapy as a result of higher induction toxicity. Conclusion In conclusion, combination of standard induction and consolidation therapy with sorafenib in the schedule investigated in our trial is not beneficial for elderly patients with AML.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 290-299.e3
Author(s):  
Eun-Ji Choi ◽  
Je-Hwan Lee ◽  
Han-Seung Park ◽  
Jung-Hee Lee ◽  
Miee Seol ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4640-4640
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Mettivier ◽  
Luca Pezzullo ◽  
Stefano Rocco ◽  
Olimpia Finizio ◽  
Lucia Bene ◽  
...  

Abstract The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in elderly with age > 65 years is still debated. Various reported studies have valued the feasibility of intensive chemotherapy in these setting of patients. The aim of the our study is to value the difference in DFS and OS among 2 groups of elderly patients with AML treated with intensive chemotherapy (IC) or maintenance (M). From June 2001 to May 2005 we have accepted in our Division 45 patients affected by AML aged up to 65 years. 25 were male and 20 were female, with a median age of 75 years (range 67–86 years). 22 patients (12 M and 10 F, median age: 71 years) received intensive chemotherapy (I.C. Flag and MICE) and 23 (13 M and 10 F, median age: 78 years) received or maintenance therapy (low dose cytarabine) or only support. In IC group 11 patients (50%) have obtained to complete remission (CR) with a DSF and OS media of 7,5 and 6,3 months respectively, and a TRM rate of 27%. In the M group the CR has been documented in 6 patients (35%) treated with low dose of cytarabine, with a DFS and OS media of 6,9 and 4,4 months respectively (graph 1–2). This results have shown, as expected, a better CR rate in the IC group, but without any advantage in terms of OS and DFS when compared with the M group. Difference is not statistically significant between the two groups (p: 0.5). Despite a good CR rate, Intensive chemotherapy do not improves survival in elderly patients. This is probably due to the combination of either a high TRM in patients treated with intensive chemotherapy or a high relapse rate. New therapeutics strategies are needed to improve DFS and OS in these patients. Interesting is the use of specific monoclonal antibodies (anti CD33) in this poor risk disease especially in maintenance after a CR obtainable with a low intensive or low dose chemotherapy. Figure Figure


2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. 1767-1774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Maurillo ◽  
Francesco Buccisano ◽  
Alessandra Spagnoli ◽  
Maria Teresa Voso ◽  
Luana Fianchi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document