scholarly journals Pediatric and Adolescent Extracranial Germ Cell Tumors: The Road to Collaboration

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (27) ◽  
pp. 3018-3028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Olson ◽  
Matthew J. Murray ◽  
Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo ◽  
James C. Nicholson ◽  
Deborah F. Billmire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Heterogeneous Distribution ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Staging Systems ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients

During the past 35 years, survival rates for children with extracranial malignant germ cell tumors (GCTs) have increased significantly. Success has been achieved primarily through the application of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens; however, clinical challenges in GCTs remain. Excellent outcomes are not distributed uniformly across the heterogeneous distribution of age, histologic features, and primary tumor site. Despite good outcomes overall, the likelihood of a cure for certain sites and histologic conditions is less than 50%. In addition, there are considerable long-term treatment-related effects for survivors. Even modest cisplatin dosing can cause significant long-term morbidities. A particular challenge in designing new therapies for GCT is that a variety of specialists use different risk stratifications, staging systems, and treatment approaches for three distinct age groups (childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood). Traditionally, pediatric cancer patients younger than 15 years have been treated by pediatric oncologists in collaboration with their surgical specialty colleagues. Adolescents and young adults with GCTs often are treated by medical oncologists, urologists, or gynecologic oncologists. The therapeutic dilemma for all is how to best define disease risk so that therapy and toxicity can be appropriately reduced for some patients and intensified for others. Further clinical and biologic insights can only be achieved through collaborations that do not set limitations by age, sex, and primary tumor site. Therefore, international collaborations, spanning different cooperative groups and disciplines, have been developed to address these challenges.

Ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing chemotherapy as first-line salvage therapy in germ cell tumors: response and survival.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 2559-2563 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A McCaffrey ◽  
M Mazumdar ◽  
D F Bajorin ◽  
G J Bosl ◽  
V Vlamis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Median Survival Time ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
First Line ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing chemotherapy as first-line salvage treatment for patients with germ cell tumors (GCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-six patients with advanced GCT resistant to one prior cisplatin-containing regimen were treated with a salvage chemotherapy regimen of ifosfamide, cisplatin, and either vinblastine or etoposide (VeIP/VIP). RESULTS Twenty of 56 (36%) assessable patients achieved a complete response (CR). Thirteen (23%) are alive and continuously free of disease at a median follow-up time of 52 months; the median survival duration was 18 months. Among patients with a testis primary tumor site and a prior CR to first-line therapy, 65% are alive and 41% continuously disease-free, and the median survival time has not been reached. In contrast, for patients with an extragonadal primary tumor or with a testis primary tumor site and an incomplete response (IR) to first-line therapy, 31% are alive and 15% continuously free of disease, with a median survival time of 12 months (P < .03). CONCLUSION Ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing therapy achieves a durable CR in a minority of patients with resistant GCT as first-line therapy. Patients with a primary testis site who relapsed from a CR to first-line cisplatin therapy have a better prognosis than patients with an extragonadal primary tumor site or an IR to first-line therapy. Risk-directed clinical trials to improve response and survival in both subsets are warranted.

Treatment patterns and long-term clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with nonmetastatic gastric cancer: Results from the non-interventional EVIDENCE registry study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 307-307
Author(s):  
Jiafu Ji ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Weiping Zhou ◽  
Lin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Registry Study ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Free Survival

307 Background: Although gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in China, important questions about optimal management remain unanswered. The EVIDENCE registry study evaluated data from patients with GC in China to assess the pattern of treatments and long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: Five cohorts of patients with different HER2 and metastatic (m) status were evaluated from April 2013 to June 2018 in this prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, real-world study. Data from patients with operable non-mGC are reported: Cohort III (HER2+) and Cohort V (HER2−). Outcome measures included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Cohorts III/V included 758 patients (Cohort III, 271; Cohort V, 487); 75.5% were male and the mean age was 58.8 years. The majority of Cohort III/V patients (538/758; 71.0%) received only adjuvant treatment, with 215/758 (28.4%) receiving S1+oxaliplatin. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant trastuzumab was administered to 43/758 patients (Cohort III, 42; Cohort V, 1). Radiation during neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment was administered to 23/758 (3.0%) patients. The median duration of follow-up was 515 days, during which 72 (9.5%) patients died due to progressive disease. OS rates (95% CI) for Cohorts III and V were 94% (89–96) and 95% (92–97) at 1 year, and 76% (67–83) and 70% (64–75) at 3 years, respectively. Respective EFS rates were 82% (76–87) and 86% (83–89) at 1 year, and 62% (53–70) and 57% (51–63) at 3 years; and respective DFS rates were 88% (82–93) and 86% (81–89) at 1 year and 69% (58–78) and 62% (55–68) at 3 years. Multivariate analysis indicated that the primary tumor site (p = 0.004) and overall cancer stage (p < 0.001) were associated with DFS. Regarding the primary tumor site, there was a trend towards better DFS for antrum tumors (hazard ratio 0.59; 95% CI 0.32–1.07) when evaluated against gastroesophageal junction tumors. Conclusions: This longitudinal analysis of clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of Chinese patients with non-mGC will provide critical information that will help to inform disease management. Clinical trial information: NCT01839500.

Childhood ovarian non‐seminomatous germ cell tumors: A Highly Curable Disease With Few Long‐Term Treatment‐Related Toxicities. Results of the French TGM95 study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossana Pavone ◽  
Hélène Pacquement ◽  
Marlène Pasquet ◽  
Hélène Sudour‐Bonnange ◽  
Fédéric Hameury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Long Term Treatment

Influence of Tumor Site and Histology on Long-Term Survival in 193 Children with Extracranial Germ Cell Tumors

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. De Backer ◽  
G. Madern ◽  
R. Pieters ◽  
P. Haentjens ◽  
F. Hakvoort-Cammel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

scholarly journals GCT-28. RECURRENCE PATTERN AND SURVIVAL FOR RELAPSED INTRACRANIAL NON-GERMINOMATOUS GERM CELL TUMORS: A SINGLE-INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii333-iii333
Author(s):  
Lei Wen ◽  
Zhaoming Zhou ◽  
Qingjun Hu ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
Mingyao Lai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Late Recurrence ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Recurrence Time ◽  
First Line ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract PURPOSE Intracranial non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs) have lower overall survival than germinoma because relatively higher recurrence usually occurs after first line therapy. METHODS Between January 2003 and December 2018, 111 consecutive patients diagnosed with NGGCTs reviewed. Those who progressed after first line therapy were included in this study. Data of first line treatment, salvage treatment, clinicopathological features and survival were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Totally, thirty patients (30/111, 27.0%) relapsed in our cohort, including 19 patients with accurate relapse information detail, and 11 patients who died of disease progression during follow up but without exact time and site of relapse. The median OS from diagnosis of the disease was 49.2 months (95% CI: 14.1 to 84.3 months) and 3-year OS was 54.3%. Patients who received both CSI and chemotherapy relapsed less than those who received reduced volume of radiotherapy or only CSI or only chemotherapy (22.5% vs. 45.5%, p=0.034). Of 19 patients who had detail information of recurrence time and site, the median time from diagnosis of disease to relapse was 9.5 months (2.2 to 72.1 months). Regarding to recurrence site, most patients relapsed in primary site (10/19, 52.6%) or distant intracranial (6/19, 31.6%). The recurrence site of other 3 patients were spinal (n=1), ventricular (n=1) and peritoneal (n=1). CONCLUSION Protracted follow-up is recommended because late recurrence is not uncommon. Primary tumor site and distant intracranial are the most prevalent relapsed location. Patients who relapsed could benefited from both CSI and salvage chemotherapy.

scholarly journals OTHR-16. CONCURRENT USE OF APREPITANT AND IFOSFAMIDE IN PEDIATRIC CANCER PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii424-iii424
Author(s):  
Shelby Winzent ◽  
Nathan Dahl ◽  
Molly Hemenway ◽  
Rachel Lovria ◽  
Kathleen Dorris
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Hepatic Metabolism ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Concurrent Use ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients ◽  
Nongerminomatous Germ Cell Tumor ◽  
Neurokinin 1

Abstract BACKGROUND Aprepitant, a selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, is commonly used for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Its use with ifosfamide is controversial due to the putative risk of potentiating neurotoxicity via inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). The current literature examining this interaction is inconclusive, and little data exists in pediatrics. We seek to describe a single-institution experience with concurrent aprepitant and ifosfamide administration. METHODS A retrospective review of patients treated with ifosfamide and aprepitant from 2009–2018 was conducted. Data collected included demographics, tumor type, number of days of concurrent therapy, dosing, and documented of neurotoxicity. RESULTS Twenty patients aged 7–21 years (median 17 years) were identified. Diagnoses included thirteen sarcomas and seven CNS tumors (6 germ cell tumors; 1 intracranial sarcoma). Five patients received high dose ifosfamide (&gt;2,000mg/m2/day). The number of concurrent ifosfamide and aprepitant doses ranged from 2–18 (median, 8.5). Only one patient (5%) developed ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity: a 7-year-old female with a nongerminomatous germ cell tumor who presented with seizures and somnolence. She received methylene blue and returned to her neurologic baseline. She completed her ifosfamide course without incident. She was the only patient to require weight-based aprepitant dosing and to receive the liquid formulation. CONCLUSIONS Aprepitant should be used with caution when administered concurrently with ifosfamide due to the risk of neurotoxicity. However, the incidence of neurotoxicity in this retrospective pediatric cohort was low. This interaction may be more significant in younger patients due to age-related differences in hepatic metabolism, but further study is required.

Adjuvant therapy of ovarian germ cell tumors with cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin: a trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Williams ◽  
J A Blessing ◽  
S Y Liao ◽  
H Ball ◽  
P Hanjani
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Germ Cell Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia

PURPOSE This study was performed to determine the effectiveness of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with surgically resected ovarian germ cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS After tumor removal and thorough surgical staging, patients were enrolled on this study and treated with three courses of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP). Reassessment laparotomy was required of consenting, appropriate patients initially, but became an optional procedure in 1989. RESULTS Of 93 patients assessable on this trial, 89 are continuously free of germ cell cancer. At second-look laparotomy, two other patients were found to have small foci of immature teratoma; both remain clinically free of recurrence. One received subsequent alternate chemotherapy and one did not. Thus, 91 of 93 patients are currently free of germ cell cancer. Follow-up duration ranges from 4.0 to 90.3 months, with 67 patients monitored for longer than 2 years. Acute toxicity was moderate. One patient developed acute myelomonocytic leukemia 22 months after diagnosis. Another patient was noted to have a malignant lymphoma 69 months after protocol treatment. CONCLUSION Three courses of BEP will nearly always prevent recurrence in well-staged patients with completely resected ovarian germ cell tumors and should be given to all such patients. The development of acute leukemia as a complication of treatment is disturbing and mandates careful long-term follow-up, but is unusual and does not alter the risk-to-benefit ratio of treatment.

Comparison of treatment regimens for pediatric lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a Childrens Cancer Group study.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1368-1376 ◽  
Author(s):  
D G Tubergen ◽  
M D Krailo ◽  
A T Meadows ◽  
J Rosenstock ◽  
M Kadin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Localized Disease ◽  
Extent Of Disease

PURPOSE Patients with lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (LB NHL) were randomized to treatment with either modified LSA2L2 or ADCOMP, which added daunorubicin (DAUN) and asparaginase (L-ASP) to the methotrexate (MTX), cyclophosphamide (CYT), vincristine (VCR), and prednisone (PRED) (COMP) regimen, in a clinical trial to determine the relative effectiveness and toxicity of the two regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with LB NHL were eligible for this randomized study if they were less than 22 years of age at diagnosis and had < or = 25% blasts in the bone marrow. Of 307 patients registered, 281 were fully eligible and assessable. Patients were stratified by extent of disease at diagnosis. RESULTS The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate for patients with localized disease was 84%, and for patients with disseminated disease, 67%. There were four relapses in 28 patients with localized disease. Two hundred six patients had mediastinal primary tumors and despite local radiation, 34 of 63 failures in these patients involved the primary tumor site with or without other involvement. After adjusting for extent of disease at diagnosis, the regimens did not differ significantly with respect to risk for adverse events. The acute toxicity was primarily neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with greater initial toxicity in patients on the LSA2L2 regimen. Three patients developed acute myelogenous leukemia. CONCLUSION Long-term EFS in children with LB NHL can be achieved in the majority of patients. Disease progression, which includes recurrence at the primary tumor site, is a major cause of treatment failure in patients with mediastinal presentations. Addition of DAUN and L-ASP to the COMP regimen does not produce a more effective treatment than LSA2L2.

A phase II/III randomized double-blind study of octreotide acetate LAR with axitinib versus octreotide acetate LAR with placebo in patients with advanced G1-G2 NETs of non-pancreatic origin (AXINET trial-GETNE-1107).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 360-360
Author(s):  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Marta Benavent ◽  
Paula Jiménez Fonseca ◽  
Daniel Castellano ◽  
Teresa Alonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Octreotide Lar ◽  
Octreotide Acetate

360 Background: Angiogenesis plays an important role in NET development and progression. Axitinib is a potent and selective VEGFR-1,2,3 inhibitor, with proven activity against several vascular-dependent solid tumors. The aim of this randomized, double-blind phase II/III study was to assess the efficacy of axitinib in patients with advanced G1-2 extra-pancreatic NETs. Methods: Eligible pts were randomized (1:1) to receive octreotide LAR (30 mg IM q4w) with axitinib (5 mg BID) or placebo BID until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pteswere stratified by time from diagnosis to study entry ( > or < 12m), primary tumor site (GI tract vs non-GI) and Ki-67 index (< 5% vs > 5%). Prior therapy with SSA, IFN and up to 2 lines of systemic treatment was allowed, but not prior VEGF- or VEGFR-targeted drugs. Clinical and/or radiological disease progression within 12 months prior to study entry was required. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to progression, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, biochemical response and safety. Results: 256 pts were randomized (106 in the Phase II part, and 150 additional pts in the Phase III part), 126 to axitinib and 130 to placebo. The main characteristics of the study population were: median age 61 years (range: 21-85), 52% male, PS 0-1 (64-35%), G1-2 (29%-71%), primary tumor site GI (40%)-Lung (17%)-Other (32%). Prior therapies included: SSA (46%), everolimus (13%), chemotherapy (13%), TACE (5%) and PRRT (2%). ORR was significantly higher in axitinib- vs placebo-treated patients (17.5% vs 3.8%, p = 0.0004). PFS per investigator assessment also favored axitinib vs placebo-treated patients, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (median PFS 17.2 vs 12.3 months, respectively, HR 0.816, p = 0.169). Grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs occurred more frequently in the axitinib vs placebo arm (52% vs 13.8%), and included hypertension (21% vs 6 %), cardiac disorders (3.2% vs 0.7%), diarrhoea (13% vs 1.5 %), asthenia (9% vs 3%) and nausea&vomiting (2% vs 0.7%). There were 3 treatment-related deaths, 1 in the axitinib arm (cardiac failure) and 2 in the placebo arm (myocardial infarction and hepatorenal syndrome). Conclusions: Although the study failed to demonstrate a significant PFS benefit per investigator assessment, axitinib in combination with octreotide LAR demonstrated activity and had a tolerable safety profile in patients with advanced G1-2 extra-pancreatic NETs. Data base cleaning and central blinded radiological PFS assessment are currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01744249.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document