The association of clinical-pathologic factors and Oncotype Dx recurrence score (RS) in the outcome of early stage breast cancer.
55 Background: Oncotype Dx recurrence score (RS) is routinely used to guide systemic therapy based on the estimated risk for distant relapse. Patients with early stage disease are also at risk for locoregional recurrence, and in some instances local relapse is the only site of failure. The objective of this study is to evaluate patient outcomes in association with known clinical-pathologic risk factors and RS. Observations in context of known clinical-pathologic features and RS may have important clinical implications relative to adjuvant locoregional therapy. Methods: This is an IRB approved retrospective study that includes patients with unilateral breast cancer and in whom the RS was reported. A total of 716 patients met this defined criteria. Seventy two percent underwent breast conserving therapy (BCS) and 28% underwent mastectomy; 68% had stage I and the remaining had > Stage II disease.The clinical-pathologic variables including age, stage, BRCA mutation, extent of surgery, and RS were studied in evaluating patient outcomes. Results: The median age was 56 years (27 to 84 years). The overall distribution of RS reported as low (18), intermediate (19-30), and high ( > 31) was 59%, 31%, and 10%, respectively. This distribution ratio was no different among patients treated with BCS and mastectomy. However, among BRCA mutation carriers there was a higher incidence of the high RS.Overall, the median follow up was over 3 years, and 25% of the patients have been followed over 5 years. The 3-year and 5-year any relapse-free survival was 93% and 89%, respectively. Age was significantly associated with observed inferior any relapse-free survival; 85% and 91% in women < 40 years vs > 40 years, respectively (p = 0.018). On univariate analysis, RS had no significant association with local regional relapse free survival. Further, associations between the clinical-pathologic features and RS using multivariate analysis will be presented. Conclusions: Observations with early follow up do not suggest a select role of RS in guiding risk tailored local regional therapy. Longer follow will further our understanding of patients at risk for local regional relapse.