Predictors of referral to outpatient specialty palliative care (SPC) in gynecologic cancer (GC) patients.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 159-159
Author(s):  
Rachel Ruskin ◽  
Michelle Renee Rowland ◽  
Katherine N Moore ◽  
Katrina Slaughter ◽  
Adam Walter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Sexual Dysfunction ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Multivariate Model ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Cross Sectional

159 Background: Prior studies in GC patients have described predictors of inpatient palliative care (PC) consultation, but predictors of outpatient SPC consultation have not been elucidated. We sought to identify factors predictive of referral and associated care outcomes. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of GC patients seen in the gynecologic oncology clinic at a comprehensive cancer center over a three month period. As a part of routine care, patients completed a symptom questionnaire. Patients previously seen at the outpatient PC clinic were compared to those who had not with respect to demographics, disease characteristics, symptom scores, and provider factors using univariate statistics. A multivariate model was created to identify independent predictors of referral. Results: 913 patients completed the symptom survey. 76 patients (8%) had been seen in the outpatient PC clinic. Disease factors associated with referral included site (p < 0.01), stage (p < 0.01), evidence of disease (p < 0.01), active treatment (p < 0.01), and time point in the disease trajectory (p < 0.01). Women with moderate to severe pain (p < 0.01), sadness (p = 0.03), distress (p < 0.01), fatigue (p < 0.01), neuropathy (p = 0.03), and sexual dysfunction (p < 0.01) were more likely to have seen PC. Marital status, number of symptoms, and patient provider were also predictive of referral (all p < 0.01). In a multivariate model, site, stage, number of symptoms, moderate to severe sexual dysfunction, and provider were independently associated with referral. Compared to women who had not been referred, patients seen in the PC clinic were more likely to have a health care proxy documented in the electronic medical record (p < 0.01). Among patients with related symptoms, patients referred to PC more often had an opioid prescribed for pain (p < 0.01) and medications prescribed for depression (p < 0.01), anxiety (p = 0.04), insomnia (p < 0.01), and fatigue (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Women with depression, anxiety, insomnia, and fatigue were more likely to receive pharmacologic treatment for these symptoms from a SPC provider. Future research should identify referral triggers for those patients most likely to benefit from outpatient SPC consultation.

How do palliative care needs vary across the disease trajectory in patients with gynecologic cancer?

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 106-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Ruskin ◽  
Michelle Renee Rowland ◽  
Katherine N Moore ◽  
Carolyn Lefkowits ◽  
Adam Walter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Social Needs ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Multiple Domains ◽  
Time Point

106 Background: The WHO’s integrated model emphasizes that palliative care (PC) should be provided concurrently with curative and life-prolonging care, with disease-directed treatments decreasing and PC increasing over time. This study aimed to understand how accurately this theoretical model matches the PC needs of gynecologic cancer (GC) patients. Methods: GC patients at a comprehensive cancer center completed a symptom and needs assessment questionnaire as part of routine care. Needs were divided into physical, emotional, social, practical, and informational domains. Patients reporting at least one symptom score ≥ 4/10 made the physical need domain positive. For the remainder of the categories, patients endorsing at least one need in a given domain made that domain positive. Time points in the illness trajectory were categorized as diagnosis, primary treatment, remission, and progression/recurrence. Univariate analyses were utilized to assess differences in needs at various time points. Results: Questionnaires from 1348 patient visits over 3 months were included. Patients had ovarian (39%), uterine (36%), cervical (16%), and vulvar (5%) cancer. Visits occurred around the time of diagnosis (6%), during primary therapy (28%), during remission (42%), and during disease progression or recurrence (23%). Physical needs were most common at diagnosis and during progression/recurrence (p < 0.01). Emotional needs (p < 0.01), social needs (p < 0.01), and informational needs (p < 0.01) all varied throughout the course of disease and were highest at diagnosis. At each time point, at least 65% of patients had one or more PC needs. Having needs in multiple domains ( ≥ 3) was associated with time point, with patients around the time of diagnosis having the highest rate of need in multiple domains (p < 0.01). Conclusions: GC patients have a broad range of PC needs across the trajectory of their illness. The WHO schema fails to capture the full scope of these needs and under-appreciates their prevalence earlier in the course of the disease. These results underscore the importance of training gynecologic oncologists in primary PC as well as increasing referrals to specialist PC providers.

Assessing caregiver satisfaction with care on an acute palliative care unit.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-51
Author(s):  
Ernie Mak ◽  
Patricia Murphy-Kane ◽  
Camilla Zimmermann
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Unit ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Joint Decision ◽  
Caregiver Satisfaction ◽  
Patients With Cancer

51 Background: Accreditation Canada has adopted four main values for hospice, palliative, and end-of-life services: dignity and respect; information sharing; partnership and participation; and collaboration . These domains, as well as communication and joint decision-making, are important for satisfaction of caregivers for patients with cancer, and can be measured using the FAMCARE questionnaire. We aimed to assess satisfaction of caregivers for patient admitted to an acute palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center in Toronto, Canada. Methods: The FAMCARE questionnaire was administered by a trained volunteer to self-identified caregivers of patients who were admitted for more than five days on the acute palliative care unit. A short, anonymous demographic survey accompanied the FAMCARE questionnaire to gather information on relationship to patient, ethnicity, patient length of stay, and location of residence. The survey package either was completed in the presence of the volunteer, or was left to be completed by the caregiver alone and collected later by the volunteer. Results were reviewed regularly at the quality committee of the palliative care service. Results: From September 2014 to March 2017, 90 caregivers completed the questionnaire. Most caregivers were female (69%), identified as Canadian or Caucasian (57%), and lived in Toronto (63%). In all, 57% were spouses while 31% were children of the patient. Most patients had been admitted between a week and a month (67%). Care was rated as “Satisfied” or “Very satisfied” most of the time on all items (range 81-100%). The availability of nurses and doctors (100% satisfied/very satisfied) and the way tests and treatments were followed-up (99%) were rated highest. Information given about side effects (81%) and referral to specialists (83%) were rated lowest. Conclusions: Despite the nature of the acute palliative care unit, where patients admitted tend to be very ill with complex symptoms and psychosocial issues, caregiver satisfaction was high. Future research will examine whether caregivers of different ethnicities value different aspects of cancer care.

Palliative care referral patterns of adolescent and young adult patients at a comprehensive cancer center.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 63-63
Author(s):  
Bethany Lockwood ◽  
Olanipekun Lanny Ntukidem ◽  
Sarah Ehrman ◽  
Maryam B. Lustberg ◽  
Bhavana Bhatnagar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Adolescent And Young Adult ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Referral Patterns ◽  
Oncology Care

63 Background: Adolescent and young adults (AYA) diagnosed with cancer have distinct physical, developmental and psychosocial needs that are often unmet during oncology treatment. Such needs are further intensified for AYA patients with an advanced cancer diagnosis. Palliative Care (PC), specialized care for patients and families with serious illness, can address these needs throughout the disease trajectory including symptom management, supportive communication, and advance care planning. The incorporation of PC remains suboptimal despite evidence that palliative services can improve quality of life. In an effort to identify strategies to advance access to PC for the AYA population at our institution, the referral pattern to PC was studied. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify referral patterns to PC in the AYA population (ages 18-39) from July 2017 through June 2019 at a National Cancer Institute designated comprehensive cancer center. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize referral patterns and trends. Results: In the past 2 years, 1,894 AYA patients established oncology care at our institution. The most common AYA cancer diagnoses included hematologic 20.8% (n=944), thyroid 10.8% (n=490), brain 9.9% (n=451) and breast 9.1% (n=414). There were 311 (16%) referrals placed to PC, mostly in the inpatient setting (81.4%). Less than half (43%) of the inpatient referrals had a post-discharge follow-up appointment in the PC clinic. Multiple disease-specific service lines were represented including leukemia (40%), colorectal (14.5%), sarcoma (9%) and breast (9%). Quarterly volumetric trends remained static over the 2 years (average number of referrals: 54/quarter). The average age at cancer diagnosis in the AYA population was 30 years and 32.7 years (range 19-39) at time of PC referral. This was consistent with the average length of time from initial diagnosis to PC referral of 2.8 years. Conclusions: Comprehensive oncology care in the AYA population should include PC. Yet, involvement of PC in the AYA population during oncologic treatment was limited. Future research will investigate optimal models of integrative PC to address the unique needs of AYA cancer.

Assessing caregiver satisfaction with care on an acute palliative care unit.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernie Mak ◽  
Patricia Murphy-Kane ◽  
Camilla Zimmermann
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Unit ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Joint Decision ◽  
Caregiver Satisfaction ◽  
Patients With Cancer

180 Background: Accreditation Canada has adopted four main values for hospice, palliative, and end-of-life services: dignity and respect; information sharing; partnership and participation; and collaboration . These domains, as well as communication and joint decision-making, are important for satisfaction of caregivers for patients with cancer, and can be measured using the FAMCARE questionnaire. We aimed to assess satisfaction of caregivers for patient admitted to an acute palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center in Toronto, Canada. Methods: The FAMCARE questionnaire was administered by a trained volunteer to self-identified caregivers of patients who were admitted for more than five days on the acute palliative care unit. A short, anonymous demographic survey accompanied the FAMCARE questionnaire to gather information on relationship to patient, ethnicity, patient length of stay, and location of residence. The survey package either was completed in the presence of the volunteer, or was left to be completed by the caregiver alone and collected later by the volunteer. Results were reviewed regularly at the quality committee of the palliative care service. Results: From September 2014 to May 2018, 116 caregivers completed the questionnaire. Most caregivers were female (66%), identified as Canadian or Caucasian (56%), and lived in Toronto (66%). In all, 52% were spouses while 27% were children of the patient. Most patients had been admitted between a week and a month (68%). Care was rated as “Satisfied” or “Very satisfied” most of the time on all items (range 77-99%). The availability of nurses and doctors (99% satisfied/very satisfied) were rated highest. Information given about side effects (77%) and referral to specialists (84%) were rated lowest. Conclusions: Despite the nature of the acute palliative care unit, where patients admitted tend to be very ill with complex symptoms and psychosocial issues, caregiver satisfaction was high. Developing adequate support for the spouses of patients is important. Future research will examine whether caregivers of different ethnicities value different aspects of cancer care.

Perceptions of barriers to patient financial hardship screening differ by provider role within gynecologic oncology outpatient care.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 317-317
Author(s):  
Jhalak Dholakia ◽  
Maria Pisu ◽  
Warner King Huh ◽  
Margaret Irene Liang
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Financial Hardship ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Patient Barriers

317 Background: Although approximately half of patients with gynecologic malignancy experience financial hardship (FH) during treatment, best practices to identify and assist patients with FH are lacking. To develop such practices, we assessed oncology provider and staff perspectives about FH screening and provision of assistance. Methods: An anonymous survey was conducted electronically within the Gynecologic Oncology outpatient office at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Potential barriers to patient FH screening and follow-up were assessed within 2 domains: 1) logistic barriers to incorporating FH screening and follow-up into outpatient workflow and 2) perceived patient barriers to FH screening. Responses were elicited on a 5-point Likert scale from ‘very’ to ‘not at all’ significant and dichotomized into significant and not significant barriers. Results: Of 43 providers approached, 37 responded (86% response rate) of which 14 were physicians (MD)/nurse practitioners (NP) and 23 were other staff members (i.e., clinical and research nurses, social workers, pharmacists, care coordinators, lay navigators, and financial counselors). Altogether, 38% worked in their current position for >5 years (n=14), 11% for 3-5 years (n=4), and 51% for <3 years (n=19). For logistic barriers to implementing FH screening and follow-up, the most frequently reported significant barriers included lack of personnel training (69%) and lack of available staff (62%), training regarding follow-up (72%), and case tracking infrastructure (67%). The most frequent significant perceived patient barriers were lack of knowledge of whom to contact (72%), concerns about impact on treatment if FH needs were identified (72%), and lack of patient readiness to discuss financial needs (62%.) Compared to MD/NP, staff members more often indicated the following as significant barriers: difficulty incorporating FH screening into initial visit workflow (31 % vs. 57%, p=0.03), overstretched personnel (29% vs 73%, p=0.005), and patient concerns about influence on treatment (62% vs 86%, p=0.01). Conclusions: Care team members identified barriers to patient FH screening across logistic and patient-centered domains, although MD/NP less so than other staff possibly reflecting different exposures to patient financial needs during clinical encounters or burden of workflow. Implementation of universal FH screening, dedicated personnel, convenient tracking mechanisms, and multi-disciplinary provider and staff training may improve recognition of patient FH and facilitate its integration into oncology care plans.

scholarly journals Antineoplastic therapy use in patients with advanced cancer admitted to an acute palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center

Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (8) ◽  
pp. 2036-2043 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hui ◽  
Ahmed Elsayem ◽  
Zhijun Li ◽  
Maxine De La Cruz ◽  
J. Lynn Palmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Antineoplastic Therapy ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care Unit ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center

Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the mindful self-care scale among Brazilian palliative care providers

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ana Cláudia Mesquita Garcia ◽  
Laura Soares Rodrigues Silva ◽  
Ana Cristina Gonçalves Ferreira ◽  
Vander Monteiro da Conceição ◽  
Everson Meireles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Reliability Indices ◽  
Self Compassion ◽  
Hospice And Palliative Care

Abstract Objective This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS, 33-item) in a Brazilian hospice and palliative care context. Method This was a cross-sectional study with a sample of 336 Brazilian hospice and palliative care providers. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer — Quality of Life Group Translation Procedure protocol was used for the translation and the cultural adaptation process. Psychometric properties supporting the use of the MSCS were examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and correlation analysis with other instruments to assess congruence to related constructs (resilience and self-compassion). The reliability of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the MSCS was assessed using Cronbach's α and composite reliability coefficients. Results The six-factor (33-item) model showed a good fit to the data, with satisfactory reliability indices and adequate representation of the scale's internal structure. Further validity is evidenced in the significant, positive correlations found between the MSCS, and similar well-being constructs, namely the Self-Compassion and Resilience scales. Significance of results The findings reveal that the MSCS (33-item) is a valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate instrument to examine the practice of mindful self-care by hospice and palliative care providers in Brazil. More broadly, it represents a promising instrument for future research into self-care practices and well-being among Brazilian healthcare providers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document