Prostate brachytherapy implant quality on biochemical control.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 128-128
Author(s):  
Don Muller ◽  
Paul Monsour
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Biochemical Failure ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prostate Brachytherapy ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Biochemical Control ◽  
Dosimetric Analysis

128 Background: prostate brachytherapy at our institution was analyzed for implant quality on biochemical control. Methods: We treated 368 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent 1 month CT based dosimetric analysis. Follow up data was available on 289 patients with a minimum follow up of 5 years. Gleason score was 6 in 80% (n=233), and 7 in 20% (n=56). Clinical stage was T1c in 90% of cases (n=260), T2a was 8% (n=23), T2b was <1% (n=3), T2c was < 1% (n=2). The initial prostate-specific antigen was < 10 ng/ml in 95% (n=274), 10.1-20 ng/ml in 5% (15).Patients with low risk disease ( clinical stage T1c, Gleason score 6 with a PSA < 10 ng/ml) n=228. Patients with intermediate risk disease Gleason 7 adenocarcinoma or with a PSA> 10 ng/ml < 20 ng/ml )n= 61. All patients were treated with I (125). All patients underwent a 1-month CT-based dosimetric analysis. The implant dose was defined as the dose delivered to 90% of the prostate volume on post implant dosimetry (D(90)). Results: At minimum follow up of 5 years overall freedom from biochemical failure was 91.4%. For Gleason grade 6 freedom from biochemical failure was 95%. For Gleason grade 7 freedom from biochemical failure was 77%. Based on PSA freedom from biochemical failure for PSA <10 ng/ml at diagnosis was 92 % and for PSA >10 ng/ml and <20 ng/ml was 80%. In patients with low risk disease ( clinical stage T1c, Gleason 6 adenocarcinoma with a PSA < 10ng/ml) the freedom from biochemical failure was 94%. In patients with intermediate risk disease (Gleason 7 adenocarcinoma or with a PSA >10 ng/ml <20 ng/ml ) freedom from biochemical failure was 84%. Patients with optimal dose implants n=264 freedom from biochemical failure was 95%. Patients with suboptimal dose implants n=25 freedom from biochemical failure was 52% Conclusions: With a minimum follow up of 5 years our data support the use of implant alone in low risk prostate cancer patients with a freedom from biochemical failure of 94%. Our data also shows the importance of implant quality in achieving optimal out comes.

Prostate cancer

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Cooperberg ◽  
Peter Carroll
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Aggressive Treatment ◽  
Careful Monitoring ◽  
Biopsy Tissue

Management of prostate cancer remains controversial, in large part because of its wide heterogeneity in terms of aggressiveness and prognosis. Early detection efforts based on prostate specific antigen (PSA) and aggressive treatment of high-risk cancers have yielded major improvements in mortality rates, but overtreatment of low-risk cancers—those unlikely to cause symptoms or threaten life if they were never detected—is associated with high rates of avoidable toxicity and cost. Prostate cancer can be effectively risk-stratified based on tools (e.g. nomograms, CAPRA score) integrating the PSA level, Gleason grade, clinical stage, and extent of biopsy tissue involvement. Most men with low-risk tumours are eligible for active surveillance, a programme of careful monitoring based on PSA and follow-up biopsies. Men with higher-risk cancers are best served with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.

Phase 2b trial results of padeliporfin (WST11 or Tookad) vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for partial gland ablation in men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17006-e17006
Author(s):  
Jonathan Coleman ◽  
Daniel D. Sjoberg ◽  
Quinlan Demac ◽  
Catriona ODea ◽  
Marlena McGill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Function Score ◽  
Trus Biopsy ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Partial Gland Ablation ◽  
Targeted Photodynamic Therapy

e17006 Background: Padeliporfin (WST11) vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) has shown significant clinical benefit as a localized partial gland ablation (PGA) therapy when compared to active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, by curbing progression and the need for radical treatment, leading to its regulatory approval in Europe. This phase 2b trial prospectively investigated WST11-VTP for intermediate-risk cancers. Methods: Men with unilateral Grade Group 2 (GG2) cancers (Gleason 3+4), evaluated with MRI and ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy, underwent up to two WST11-VTP PGA sessions. Eligibility criteria included <cT2b, PSA < 10, and fusion biopsy for PIRADS 3+ lesions on pretreatment MRI. Contralateral very low–risk disease was observed. The primary endpoint was prevalence of any Gleason Grade 4 or 5 (≥GG2) cancer, determined by MRI and systematic, 14-core TRUS biopsy of the entire gland (+/- fusion) at 3 and 12 months after treatment. Treatment safety and patient-reported quality of life for sexual and urinary function were assessed with validated questionnaires (IIEF-15 and IPSS, respectively). The study was powered using β = 0.2 to reject the null hypothesis (r≤70%), using a one-sided exact binomial test with 5% alpha risk. To be valid, 44 evaluable patients were required for the 12-month primary endpoint assessment. Results: Of the 50 men treated, 46 were evaluable for the 12-month primary endpoint. Before 12 months, 1 man proceeded to prostatectomy (treatment failure), 2 men refused 12-month biopsy, and 1 man died of COVID-19. At 3 months, 12/49 (24%) men underwent per protocol second WST11-VTP PGA session for GG2 tumor: 9 for residual cancer and 4 for newly identified contralateral GG2 tumors (1 bilateral). The 12-month biopsy was performed in 45 men; 38 (83%) had no Gleason grade 4 or 5 cancer, including 11/12 (92%) patients who underwent 2 PGA sessions. By 3 months, median decline in erectile function score (IIEF-5) from baseline was -1.0 (IQR -7,0). Median improvement in urinary function score (IPSS) was -1.0 (IQR -1,5), with pad-free continence observed in all patients. Median change in IIEF score by 12-months was -1.0 (IQR -5,0). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 6 (12%) patients. All procedure-related prostate/pelvic pain resolved by 3 weeks. Conclusions: The positive results from this trial show that WST11-VTP is effective for PGA of intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with minimal toxicity or impact on urinary and sexual function, consistent with the phase 3 trial results in low-risk disease. Based on these data, this therapy bears consideration for approval as a conservative therapeutic option for selected cases of intermediate-risk disease. Clinical trial information: NCT03315754.

The impact of neoadjuvant hormone therapy on the permanent 125I-seed brachytherapy for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 201-201
Author(s):  
Ryuta Tanimoto ◽  
Kensuke Bekku ◽  
Shin Ebara ◽  
Motoo Araki ◽  
Hiroyuki Yanai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prostate Brachytherapy ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
The Impact

201 Background: To determine whether neoadjuvant hormonal therapy improves the biochemical outcome for men with low or intermediate risk prostate cancer and undergoing permanent brachytherapy. Methods: From January 2004 to April 2011, 449 patients with low-risk (221 men) or intermediate-risk (228 men) based on NCCN guideline underwent transperineal ultrasonography-guided permanent 125I-seed brachytherapy. Of these patients, 186 received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT). The median patient age was 67 years. The median follow-up (SD) was 48 (20) months (calculated from the day of implantation). Biochemical disease-free (BDF) survival was defined using Phoenix definition. The clinical variables evaluated for BDF survival included presence of NHT, Gleason score, clinical T-stage and pretreatment PSA. Results: For all patients, the 1, 3, 5-year actuarial BDF survival rates were 99.2%, 96.2% and 90% without NHT, 100%, 97.2%, 91.0% with NHT (p=0.954). When stratified by risk group, NHT did not improve the outcome for patients at low risk (P = 0.745) or at intermediate risk (P = 0.888). The duration (<= 5 vs >5 months) or combinations (single vs combined androgen blockade) of hormonal therapy were not statistically significant in predicting biochemical recurrence. In a multivariate analysis (shown below), only the Gleason score was a strong predicting factor, while NHT as well as pretreatment PSA, T stage were insignificant. Conclusions: In patients treated by permanent prostate brachytherapy, NHT did not improve the biochemical outcome for those at low-risk or intermediate-risk features. Furthermore, the duration or combinations of hormonal therapy conferred no additional biochemical advantage. [Table: see text]

Gleason upgrading with time in a large, active surveillance cohort with long-term follow-up.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suneil Jain ◽  
Danny Vesprini ◽  
Alexandre Mamedov ◽  
D. Andrew Loblaw ◽  
Laurence Klotz
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Disease Rate ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

1 Background: Active surveillance (AS) is an accepted management strategy for localized prostate cancer. However, the rate of pathological upgrading has not been well described in mature study cohorts. Furthermore, concern exists over the possibility of prostate cancer dedifferentiation with time in patients on AS. Methods: Patients in our prospectively collected AS database with at least one repeat prostate biopsy were included. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the proportion of patients upgraded (Gleason 6 to 3+4 or higher, Gleason 3+4 to 4+3 or higher) with time from diagnostic biopsy. Results: 593 of 862 patients in our cohort had at least one repeat biopsy. Median follow-up was 6.4 years (max. 20.2 years). The total number of biopsies ranged from 2 to 6. 20% of patients were intermediate risk, 0.3 % high risk, all others low risk. 31.2% of patients were upgraded during active surveillance. The proportion of patients upgraded increased with time, suggesting prostate cancer dedifferentiation occurred at a rate of 1.0%/year (95%CI -0.12 to 2.16%/year). The estimated rate of increase was 2.5 times higher in patients with intermediate risk disease at diagnosis (rate 1.9%/year, 95%CI -0.7-4.6) compared with those with low risk disease (rate 0.75%/year, 95%CI -0.5-2.0). Further analysis is underway. 62% of upgraded patients (n=114) went on to have active treatment. Patients who were upgraded and treated had significantly greater PSA velocities (median 1.2 ng/ml/y vs 0.42 ng/ml/y, p=0.01) and significantly higher Gleason scores when upgraded, than those who remained on surveillance (21.8% vs 2.8% Gleason 8-10, p<0.01). Conclusions: This is the largest re-biopsy cohort, with long-term follow-up, described to date, enabling the first estimates of prostate cancer dedifferentiation in patients on AS. Dedifferentiation rates appear higher in patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer compared with those who are low risk at baseline.

Positive margin length and Gleason grade of tumor focus at the margin predict for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 prostate cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 103-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny N. Nguyen ◽  
Brian Francis Chapin ◽  
Ina N. Prokhorova ◽  
Xuemei Wang ◽  
John W. Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Positive Margin ◽  
Biochemical Failure ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Tumor Focus

103 Background: While three prospective trials have demonstrated benefit from adjuvant radiation (XRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with positive surgical margins (PSM), its use varies amongst physicians. Many rely on clinical acumen to determine the optimal strategy for application of XRT post RP. We aim to determine if the length of PSM and highest Gleason grade (GG) of tumor at the PSM (hGGPSM) can be used to identify patients at greatest risk of biochemical failure (BCF) post RP. Methods: A retrospective review of all RP patients at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2002 to 2010 was performed. After a single pathologist review, patients with organ confined disease (pT2), pathologic N0/Nx and a PSM were included. BCF was defined as 2 sequential PSA values of ≥0.2 or any detectable PSA prompting XRT. Patients receiving adjuvant XRT or with <12 months follow-up were excluded. Results: 205 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median PSA was 5.3 ng/mL (0.5-33) and median follow-up was 64 months (13-130). The majority were low clinical stage (cT1c: 65%), low (11%)/intermediate (82%) grade and had a single site of a PSM (90%). BCF occurred in 47 patients for a 5 yr BCF free survival (BCFFS) of 69%. PSM length was significantly associated with BCFFS (≤1mm vs >1, p=0.02). When accounting for hGGPSM, Gl 3 tumors were less likely to experience BF (5 yr BCFFS-96%) regardless of PSM length, while BCFFS for Gl >3 tumors were significantly lower dependent upon length of PSM ( ≤1mm vs >1mm, p=0.03). On multivariable analysis length of PSM (p=0.05) and hGGPSM (p=0.007) remained independent predictors of BCF (Table). Conclusions: Length of PSM and hGGPSM are independent predictors of BCF. These should be considered when evaluating patients for adjuvant XRT and in risk stratifying patients in prospective clinical trials. [Table: see text]

Performance of MRI-TRUS-guided fusion biopsy to detect progression on active surveillance for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Frye ◽  
Nabeel Ahmad Shakir ◽  
Steven Abboud ◽  
Arvin Koruthu George ◽  
Maria J Merino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Fusion Biopsy ◽  
Trus Biopsy ◽  
Guided Biopsy ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

43 Background: Active surveillance (AS) is an established treatment option for men with low risk prostate cancer. Its role in intermediate prostate cancer is still being investigated. Recent studies have shown that multiparametric-MRI (mp-MRI) along with MRI-TRUS fusion-guided biopsy may better assess risk in patients eligible for AS, compared to 12-core biopsy, due to improved detection of clinically significant cancers. The objective is to determine the performance of MRI-TRUS guided biopsy for men on AS with both low and intermediate risk disease. Methods: Between 2007-2014 men on AS were included if they had complete mp-MRI and pathology data for 2 or more MRI-TRUS biopsy sessions. Fusion guided biopsy procedures consisted of MRI identified targeted biopsies as well as random 12 core biopsies. Men were allowed to participate in AS with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer, Gleason score ≤ 3+4=7. Progression was defined by patients with initial Gleason 3+3=6 to any Gleason 4, and Gleason 3+4=7 disease progressing to a primary Gleason 4 or higher. Results: 89 men met our study criteria with an average age of 62 years old (range 45-79). 75 men had low risk Gleason 3+3=6 at the outset of AS by 1st biopsy session with a median PSA 5.1 ng/ml. The other 14 men had intermediate risk prostate cancer Gleason 3+4=7 at the outset of AS and a median PSA 4.6 ng/ml. During follow-up, 25 (33%) low risk men progressed to 3+4 or above at a median of 20.6 months. Of these, 19 were found by targeted biopsy. 6 (43%) of the intermediate risk men progressed to Gleason 4+3=7 at a median of 36.8 months. 4 of these progressed on targeted fusion biopsy. In the intermediate risk men, 84 random biopsy cores were require to detect 1 progression versus 15 targeted biopsy cores to detect 1 progression. Conclusions: The majority of patients on AS who progressed were identified by MRI-TRUS targeted biopsy. Less biopsy cores are required to detect progression with targeted biopsy. These results are preliminary and a larger cohort with longer follow-up would be beneficial.

Long-term experience with 181 patients who received transperineal I-125 implants for prostate cancer: Efficacy and urinary toxicity

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliahu Gez ◽  
Joshua Genesin ◽  
Daniel Shahar ◽  
Valeriya Semenisty ◽  
Tanya Mashiac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Prostate Gland ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prostate Brachytherapy ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk Prostate Cancer

AbstractBackground: In low-risk prostate cancer, the target volume for radiotherapy is the prostate gland only and prostate brachytherapy with an I-125 implant provides the most conformal radiotherapy.Methods: Patients underwent a pre-implant prostate volume study from which a treatment plan was developed 2 weeks prior to implant. A dosimetric study was performed 1 month following the implant. The prescription dose was 145 Gy with the 95% isodose line covering the entire target volume. The maximal dose to the urethra was less than 210 Gy. Follow-up included serum PSA and IPSS evaluation every 3 months during the first year and then every 6 months beginning in the second year.Results: During December 2000–March 2009, 181 patients with early prostate cancer underwent I-125 implant. The median post-implant PSA value of the entire cohort was 0.7 ng/ml. No patient developed clinical failure. In the follow-up, nine patients had biochemical failure according to the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix definition (Nadir + 2.0 ng/ml). Of these, one patient refused hormonal therapy desiring to preserve sexual potency, and eight patients received hormonal therapy with a decreased serum PSA to 0.0 ng/ml. The treatment side effects were primarily urinary disturbances.Conclusion: An I-125 implant is an effective and well-tolerated treatment and should be recommended for patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Changes in Prostate Cancer Grade on Serial Biopsy in Men Undergoing Active Surveillance

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (20) ◽  
pp. 2795-2800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sima P. Porten ◽  
Jared M. Whitson ◽  
Janet E. Cowan ◽  
Matthew R. Cooperberg ◽  
Katsuto Shinohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Sampling Error ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Extended Period ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gleason Grade

Purpose Active surveillance is now considered a viable treatment option for men with low-risk prostate cancer. However, little is known regarding changes in Gleason grade on serial biopsies over an extended period of time. Patients and Methods Men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1998 and 2009 who elected active surveillance as initial treatment, with 6 or more months of follow-up and a minimum of six cores at biopsy, were included in analysis. Upgrading and downgrading were defined as an increase or decrease in primary or secondary Gleason score. Means and frequency tables were used to describe patient characteristics, and treatment-free survival rates were determined by life-table product limit estimates. Results Three hundred seventy-seven men met inclusion criteria. Mean age at diagnosis was 61.9 years. Fifty-three percent of men had prostate-specific antigen of 6 ng/mL or less, and 94% had Gleason score of 6 or less. A majority of men were cT1 (62%), had less than 33% of biopsy cores involved (80%), and were low risk (77%) at diagnosis. Median number of cores taken at diagnostic biopsy was 13, mean time to follow-up was 18.5 months, and 29% of men had three or more repeat biopsies. Overall, 34% (129 men) were found to have an increase in Gleason grade. The majority of men who experienced an upgrade (81%) did so by their second repeat biopsy. Conclusion A proportion of men experience an upgrade in Gleason score while undergoing active surveillance. Men who experience early upgrading likely represent initial sampling error, whereas later upgrading may reflect tumor dedifferentiation.

scholarly journals No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Herkommer ◽  
Nikola Maier ◽  
Donna P. Ankerst ◽  
Stefan Schiele ◽  
Jürgen E. Gschwend ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Detrimental Effect ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Positive Family History ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
History Of

Abstract Purpose To assess whether a first-degree family history or a fatal family history of prostate cancer (PCa) are associated with postoperative upgrading and upstaging among men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk (FIR) PCa and to provide guidance on clinical decision making for active surveillance (AS) in this patient population. Methods Participants in the German Familial Prostate Cancer database diagnosed from 1994 to 2019 with (1) low risk (clinical T1c–T2a, biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GGG) 1, PSA < 10 ng/ml), (2) Gleason 6 FIR (clinical T1c–T2a, GGG 1, PSA 10–20 ng/ml), and (3) Gleason 3 + 4 FIR (clinical T1c–T2a, GGG 2, PSA < 10 ng/ml) PCa who were subsequently treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) were analysed for upgrading, defined as postoperative GGG 3 tumour or upstaging, defined as pT3–pT4 or pN1 disease at RP. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether PCa family history was associated with postoperative upgrading or upstaging. Results Among 4091 men who underwent RP, mean age at surgery was 64.4 (SD 6.7) years, 24.7% reported a family history, and 3.4% a fatal family history. Neither family history nor fatal family history were associated with upgrading or upstaging at low risk, Gleason 6 FIR, and Gleason 3 + 4 FIR PCa patients. Conclusion Results from the current study indicated no detrimental effect of family history on postoperative upgrading or upstaging. Therefore, a positive family history or fatal family history of PCa in FIR PCa patients should not be a reason to refrain from AS in men otherwise suitable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document