Prognostic significance of perirenal fat invasion and tumor size in pT1 to pT3a renal cell carcinoma: Results of a comprehensive multicenter study of the CORONA project—Can we improve prognostic discrimination of patients with stage pT3a tumors?

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 416-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Doris Brookman-May ◽  
Matthias May ◽  
Richard Zigeuner ◽  
Luca Cindolo ◽  
Shahrokh F. Shariat ◽  
...  

416 Background: The renal cell carcinoma (RCC) TNM system merges perirenal fat invasion (PFI) and renal vein invasion (RVI) as stage pT3a despite limited evidence concerning their prognostic equivalence. Additionally, the prognostic value of PFI compared to pT1-pT2 tumors remains controversial. Methods: Data of 7,595 pT1a-pT3a RCC patients undergoing radical nephrectomy or nephron-sparin surgery were pooled from 12 European and U.S. centers (1999-2010). Patients were grouped according to stages and presence of PFI/RVI, i.e., pT1-2N0M0 (n=6,137; 80.8%), pT3aN0M0+PFI (n=1,036; 13.6%), and pT3aN0M0 (RVI±PFI; n=422; 5.6%). Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models, sensitivity and discrimination analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of clinico-pathological parameters on cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Results: Compared to stage pT1-2, patients staged pT3a were significantly more frequently male (58.9 vs. 53.1%), older (65 vs. 62.1 yrs), more often had clear cell RCC (86.1 vs. 77.7%), Fuhrman grade 3-4 (30.5 vs. 13.4%), tumor size >7 cm (39.6% vs. 13%), and less often underwent NSS (7.1 vs. 36.6%; each p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, CSM of both patients with PFI and RVI±PFI was significantly enhanced compared to pT1-2 patients (HR 1.96 and 2.14, resp.; p<0.001), whereas patients featuring PFI only and RVI±PFI did not differ (HR 0.92; p=0.48). Tumor size instead significantly influenced CSM in stage pT3a (HR 1.07; p<0.001) with a 7 cm cut-off yielding the highest c-index. Conclusions: Since the prognostic impact of PFI and RVI on CSM seems to be comparable, merging both as stage pT3a might be justified. Enhanced prognostic discrimination of stage pT3a RCC patients appears to be possible by employing a 7 cm tumor size cut-off within an alternative staging system.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 626-626
Author(s):  
Cedric Michel Lebacle ◽  
Aydin Pooli ◽  
Nagesh Rao ◽  
Erika Louise Wood ◽  
Nils Kroeger ◽  
...  

626 Background: Several tumor-suppressor genes have been mapped to chromosome 10q, including PTEN. While loss of 10q is a frequently seen cytogenetic abnormality noted to occur in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), little is known about its prognostic significance. We investigated the association of loss of 10q with pathological features and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with localized RCC. Methods: All patients from UCLA with primary localized RCC who had tumor cytogenetic analysis were included. Alterations in chromosome 10q was specifically reviewed for this study. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess association of loss of 10q with ISUP grading, and T-stage. Cox proportional hazard modeling and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the impact of loss of 10q on DFS and OS. Recurrence was defined as any local recurrence or development of new metastasis after surgery. Results: A total of 886 patients were included in this study. Loss of 10q occurred in 68 (7.7%) patients and was more commonly seen in chromophobe subtype (24% vs. 6% in non-chromophobe RCC, p < .0001). Loss of 10q was associated with greater tumor size (mean 6.3 vs 5.1 cm, OR = 1.085 [1.024-1.150], p = .008), T3-stage (37% vs 23%, OR = 1.99 [1.17-3.39], p = .011), and ISUP 3-4 (61% vs 37%, OR = 2.64 [1.58-4.40], p < .0001). On survival analysis, after a mean follow-up of 55 months, these patients had a shorter time to recurrence (Log-rank p = .026) and a worse DFS (HR = 2.15 [1.32-3.50], p = .002) than those without loss of 10q. These findings were confirmed on clear-cell RCC subgroup with also a worse OS (HR = 2.00 [1.09-3.67], p = .026) with an estimated 34% risk of death at 5 years for patients with loss of 10q. Conclusions: Loss of chromosome 10q is a prognostic factor associated with larger tumor size, higher grade and T-stage, and worse survival in patients with localized RCC. Identifying patients with loss of 10q can provide additional prognostic information to clinicopathologic variables.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Han Kim ◽  
Boram Park ◽  
Eu Chang Hwang ◽  
Sung-Hoo Hong ◽  
Chang Wook Jeong ◽  
...  

AbstractThis retrospective, five-multicenter study was aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of pathologic nodal positivity on recurrence-free (RFS), metastasis-free (MFS), overall (OS), and cancer-specific (CSS) survivals in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (nmRCC) who underwent either radical or partial nephrectomy with/without LN dissection. A total of 4236 nmRCC patients was enrolled between 2000 and 2012, and followed up through the end of 2017. Survival measures were compared between 52 (1.2%) stage pT1-4N1 (LN+) patients and 4184 (98.8%) stage pT1-4N0 (LN−) patients using Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis to determine the prognostic risk factors for each survival measure. During the median 43.8-month follow-up, 410 (9.7%) recurrences, 141 (3.3%) metastases, and 351 (8.3%) deaths, including 212 (5.0%) cancer-specific deaths, were reported. The risk factor analyses showed that predictive factors for RFS, CSS, and OS were similar, whereas those of MFS were not. After adjusting for significant clinical factors affecting survival outcomes considering the hazard ratios (HR) of each group, the LN+ group, even those with low pT stage, had similar to or worse survival outcomes than the pT3N0 (LN−) group in multivariable analysis and had significantly more relationship with RFS than MFS. All survival measures were significantly worse in pT1-2N1 patients (MFS/RFS/OS/CSS; HR 4.12/HR 3.19/HR 4.41/HR 7.22) than in pT3-4N0 patients (HR 3.08/HR 2.92/HR 2.09/HR 3.73). Therefore, LN+ had an impact on survival outcomes worse than pT3-4N0 and significantly affected local recurrence rather than distant metastasis compared to LN− in nmRCC after radical or partial nephrectomy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Chen ◽  
Bing Long Lee ◽  
Hong Hong Huang ◽  
Benjamin Yongcheng Tan ◽  
Lui Shiong Lee ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre I. Karakiewicz ◽  
Claudio Jeldres ◽  
Nazareno Suardi ◽  
George C. Hutterer ◽  
Paul Perrotte ◽  
...  

Objective: Based on combined data for 4880 patients, 2 previous studies reported that advanced age is a predictor of increased renal cell carcinoma–specific mortality (RCC-SM). We explored the effect of age in cubic spline analyses to identify the age groups with the most elevated risk for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Methods: Our study included 3595 patients from 14 European centres who had partial or radical nephrectomies. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to compile life tables, and we performed Cox regression analyses to assess RCC-SM. Covariates included age at diagnosis, sex, TNM (tumour, node, metastasis) stage, tumour size, Fuhrman grade, symptom classification and histological subtype.Results: Age ranged from 10 to 89 (mean 63, median 67) years. The median duration of follow-up was 2.9 years. The median survival for the cohort was 13.4 years. Stage distribution was as follows: 1915 patients (53.3%) had stage I disease, 388 (10.8%) had stage II, 895 (24.9%) had stage III and 397 (11.0%) had stage IV disease. In multivariate analyses, we coded age at diagnosis as a cubic spline, and it achieved independent predictor status (p < 0.001). The risk of RCC-SM was lowest among patients younger than 50 years. We observed an increase in RCC-SM until the age of 50, at which point the level of risk reached a plateau. We observed a second increase among patients aged 75–89 years. We found similar patterns when we stratified patients according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages.Conclusion: The effect of age shows prognostic significance and indicates that follow-up and possibly secondary treatments might need to be adjusted according to the age of the patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document