Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC): Bridging the community and the tertiary cancer center through genomic consultation (GC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1531-1531
Author(s):  
John M. Kaczmar ◽  
Karen S. Gustafson ◽  
Yu-Ning Wong ◽  
Reetu Mukherji ◽  
Carl J. Minniti ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 477-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea C.B. Silva ◽  
Maria Fernanda B. Vicentini ◽  
Elizabeth Z. Mendoza ◽  
Fernanda K. Fujiki ◽  
Leonardo G. da Fonseca ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15168-e15168
Author(s):  
Kristin Lynn Koenig ◽  
Christina Sing-Ying Wu ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Wendy L Frankel ◽  
Daniel Jones ◽  
...  

e15168 Background: 2-8% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are in younger adults (YAs), patients (pts) less than age 50. However, current understanding of CRC in YAs is inadequate, especially that of sporadic onset. We conducted a study to describe the landscape of genomic alterations in YA CRC pts presenting to a large academic practice. Methods: Adult pts with CRC presenting to The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center oncology clinics were offered next generation sequencing (NGS) through a customized 22-gene Ion AmpliSeq Mutation Panel as part of clinical care. Commonly mutated areas of select genes (including AKT1, ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2/4, FBXW7, FGFR1/2/3, KRAS/NRAS, MET, NOTCH1, PIK3CA, PTEN, TP53) were sequenced from tumor sections. Institutional review board approval was obtained to retrospectively analyze this NGS testing between 1/2013-3/2016. Results: 258 CRC pts underwent genomic profiling. 57 pts (22.1%) were YAs at diagnosis (range 22-49 years); 20 pts (7.8%) were 40 years old or younger. 31 YA pts (54.4%) had metastatic disease. Of the YAs with CRC, 18 pts (31.6%) were diagnosed with R-sided colon, 16 pts (28.1%) with L-sided colon, and 22 pts (38.6%) with rectal cancer. 110 genomic alterations were found in YA pts, with a mean of 1.9 mutations per tumor (range 0-6); 35 (31.8%) of these in 32 (56.1%) YA pts were actionable. Of these 110 alterations, 41.8% were in TP53, 28.2% in KRAS/NRAS, 10.0% in PIK3CA, 3.6% in BRAF, 3.6% in FBXW7, and 2.73% in PTEN. 6 YA pts (10.5%) had microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Only 1 pt had concomitant MSI-H and a BRAF mutation; 4 pts with BRAF mutations were microsatellite stable. Comparing our YA pts to a separate cohort of pts age > 50 who had testing done, no significant difference was seen in mutation incidence in KRAS/NRAS (p = 1.0), TP53 (p = 0.3), PIK3CA (p = 0.128), or BRAF (p = 1.0). Conclusions: Genomic profiling through a targeted NGS panel is feasible as part of routine clinical practice. There is disagreement in the literature on genetic mutations in YA compared to older age CRC pts. Knowledge of the genomic landscape in YAs with CRC will lead to improved understanding of the underlying biology of CRC in YAs as it differs from CRC in older pts, and could impact future care of this cohort.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. v79
Author(s):  
C. Sales ◽  
I. Julião ◽  
A. Rosinha ◽  
D. Marques ◽  
F. Carneiro ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 527-527
Author(s):  
Kohei Akiyoshi ◽  
Yasuhide Yamada ◽  
Naoki Takahashi ◽  
Yoshitaka Honma ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
...  

527 Background: The treatment benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies for patients with KRAS mutations have not been demonstrated. However, some studies have suggested that all KRAS mutations are not equivalent, and that KRAS G13D mutations might have some survival benefit. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of treatment with EGFR monoclonal antibody in 8 patients with KRAS G13D mutations and 5-FU/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (CPT) refractory metastatic colorectal cancer compared with 94 KRAS wild type patients at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Results: Eight patients with KRAS G13D mutations were treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies between July, 2009 and July, 2011. The median age was 66 (42-70); male/female 6/2; PS was 0/1/2, 2/5/1; treatment regimen was cetuximab/ cetuximab+CPT/ panitumumab+CPT, 2/5/1. Response rate (RR) was 12.5% and disease control rate (DCR) was 50.0% with 1 PR, 3 SD, and 4 PD. The PR case treated with cetuximab+CPT showed marked regression of tumor and long duration of treatment (9 months). The progression free survival (PFS) of 2 SD cases was 4.2 and 3.9 months. The other SD case is now on treatment. The median PFS of the 8 patients was 2.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0-5.2). The median overall survival (OS) has not been reached. Grade 3/4 toxicities included 1 hypomagnesemia G4 and 1 rash acneiform G3. Meanwhile, 94 KRAS wild type patients treated with anti EGFR monoclonal antibodies had an RR of 22.3% and DCR was 66.0% with 21 PR, 41 SD, 30 PD, and 2 NE. PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.9-6.3) and OS was 8.6 months (95% CI: 6.5-10.7). Conclusions: In this analysis, we identified one PR to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody in a patient with KRAS G13D mutation and chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. However, we were unable to demonstrate equivalent efficacy in patients with KRAS G13D mutations and KRAS wild type patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and prognosis for this treatment.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 572-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Alberts ◽  
George P. Kim ◽  
Michelle R. Mahoney ◽  
Michael K. Gornet ◽  
Joseph Rubin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document