ETNA (Evaluating Treatment with Neoadjuvant Abraxane) randomized phase III study comparing neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) versus paclitaxel (P) both followed by anthracycline regimens in women with HER2-negative high-risk breast cancer: A MICHELANGO study.

517 Background: This study compared the disease-free survival (DFS) obtained with 2 regimens of adjuvant therapy for patients (pts) with high-risk breast cancer Methods: Women PS 0–1 with local, operable, confirmed stage I-III adenocarcinoma were eligible. Pts may have had primary surgery, with no residual tumor. Therapy was as follows:Arm 1 (AC→T) - doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks for 4 cycles → paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks for 4 cycles; Arm 2 (AT→T) - doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks for 4 cycles → paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly ×12. Results: 1,830 pts were enrolled and treated; n=915 Arm 1 (AC→T) and n=915 Arm 2 (AT→T). Pts were: PS=0 (70%/Arm), ER+/PR+ (54% and 50%, Arms 1 and 2 respectively), ER-/PR- (35% and 34%) with 0 positive nodes (N+) (28% and 27%), 1–3 (N+) (44% and 46%), 4–9 (N+) (21% and 18%) and 10+ (N+) (7% and 8.5%). Most were postmenopausal (57%/Arm); median age was 52 years/Arm. To date 1,655 pts (90%) are alive. 5-year DFS was 80% vs 81% for Arms 1 and 2 Overall 5-year survival was 86% vs 89%, in Arms 1 and 2. Cause of death was recurrence for 76 pts in Arm 1 and 56 pts in Arm 2. The main reasons for pts being taken off study treatment were toxicity (85 pts Arm 1 vs 128 pts Arm 2), recurrence (79 pts Arm 1 vs 52 pts Arm 2), and consent withdrawal (18 pts Arm 1 vs 30 pts Arm 2). The most frequent toxicities were neutropenia, leukopenia, neuropathy, febrile neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, arthralgia, and myalgia. GI toxicities were more frequent in Arm 1. Alopecia occurred in both Arms (77%). Conclusions: At 5-years, the AT→T produced significantly better OS (p=0.054) and improved DFS (p=0.19). Clinically important toxicities were more frequent with AC→T. Given this, AT→T in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer is well tolerated and warranted in place of AC→T in these pts. Research support provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb (Princeton, NJ). No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Phase III Multicenter Trial of Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel Compared With Doxorubicin Plus Paclitaxel Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel As Adjuvant Therapy for Women With High-Risk Breast Cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.24.1000 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 28 (18) ◽

pp. 2958-2965 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

David Loesch ◽

F. Anthony Greco ◽

Neil N. Senzer ◽

Howard A. Burris ◽

John D. Hainsworth ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

High Risk ◽

Adjuvant Therapy ◽

Performance Status ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

High Risk Breast Cancer ◽

High Risk Breast ◽

Risk Breast Cancer

Purpose This study compared disease-free survival (DFS) obtained with two different regimens of adjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer. Methods Women (who had performance status [PS] of 0 to 1) with operable, histologically confirmed, stage I to III adenocarcinoma of the breast were eligible. Patients had undergone primary surgery with no residual tumor. Treatments were as follows: arm 1 was doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for four cycles (ie, AC-P); and arm 2 was doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks. Results Overall, 1,830 patients were enrolled and 1,801 were treated: arm 1 (n = 906; AC→P) and arm 2 (n = 895; AP-WP). Overall, patients had a PS of 0 (88%), had estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor–positive disease (52%), had one to three positive nodes (46%), and were postmenopausal (57%); the median age was 52 years. Currently, 1,640 patients (90%) are alive. The 6-year DFS was 79% to 80% in both groups. Disease relapse was the cause of death for 83 patients in arm 1 and in 66 patients of arm 2. Overall 6-year survival rates were 82% and 87% in arms 1 and 2, respectively. Reasons for patients being taken off study treatment included toxicity (13% in arm 1 v 20% in arm 2), progressive disease or recurrence (7% v 5%), and consent withdrawn (9% v 8%), respectively. The most frequent toxicities were hematologic, including neutropenia and leukopenia followed by neuropathy, myalgia, nausea, fatigue, headache, arthralgia, and vomiting. Conclusion The results indicate that the AP-WP regimen is an equally effective and tolerable option for the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk breast cancer. The substitution of paclitaxel for cyclophosphamide results in comparable effectiveness of the regimen.

Download Full-text