Phase I study of indenoisoquinolines LMP776 in adults with relapsed solid tumors and lymphomas.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2558-2558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraldine Helen O'Sullivan Coyne ◽  
Shivaani Kummar ◽  
Robert S. Meehan ◽  
Howard Streicher ◽  
Naoko Takebe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Resistant Cell ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

2558 Background: Indenoisoquinolines (ID) are non-camptothecin inhibitors of topoisomerase (TOP1) identified following a COMPARE analysis of the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) in vitro anticancer drug discovery screen. IDs have improved characteristics over camptothecin top1 inhibitors, with better chemical stability (lacking the labile hydroxylactone E-ring) producing stable DNA breaks that are resistant to reversal of the trapped DNA-TOP1 cleavage complex and at different DNA sequence sites to camptothecins (Kohlhagen et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2005). IDs have shown more activity against camptothecin-resistant cell lines and mouse models, as well as in cells overexpressing the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, and multidrug resistance (MDR-1/ABCB1) genes. A parallel first-in-human Phase I study conducted at the NCI of LMP400 in patients with refractory solid tumors and lymphomas showed this molecule to be well tolerated (Kummar et al, Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016). A trial of LMP776 (NSC725776), has completed accrual. Primary Objectives: define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of LMP776 and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Methods: Phase I trial using Design 4 of the Simon accelerated titration designs (Simon et al. JNCI, 1997), with doses escalated based on toxicity during cycle 1. LMP776 was administered via central line QD over 1 hour on days 1–5 q 28-days. Response is defined by RECIST 1.1 on CT. Results: 32 of 34 patients (pts) were evaluable for toxicity and response. Enrollment was expanded at dose level (DL) 2 to 6 pts due to a hypocalcemia DLT, with subsequent enrollment on a 3+3 design. MTD was established at DL7 (12mg/m2, DLT myelosuppression). Common Grade 3/4 adverse events by CTCAE v.4 included anemia (5 pts, 15%), thrombocytopenia (5), lymphopenia (5) and neutropenia (3 pts, 9%). 12 (37%) pts experienced stable disease (SD), with a median of 4 cycles of treatment (range 2-9). 10 (30%) pts with SD remained on study for ≥4 months, with 4 pts on study ≥6 months. Conclusions: LMP776 is overall well tolerated. Explorative correlatives and additional trials are being considered. Clinical trial information: NCT01051635.

Phase I Assessment of the Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, and Safety of Emitefur in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (19) ◽  
pp. 3423-3434 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Nemunaitis ◽  
R. Eager ◽  
T. Twaddell ◽  
A. Corey ◽  
K. Sekar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Prolonged Exposure ◽  
Circadian Variation ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Profile ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Minimum Effective Concentration ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetic profile of emitefur (BOF-A2) in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: This was a phase I dose-escalating trial in which cohorts of patients received BOF-A2 (cohort 1, 300 mg/m2 orally [PO] tid; cohort 2, 200 mg/m2 PO tid; cohort 3, 200 mg/m2 bid; and cohort 4, 250 mg/m2 bid) for 14 consecutive days followed by 1 week of rest (cycle 1). Pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and tumor response were monitored. RESULTS: Nineteen patients received 110 cycles (three patients in cohort 1, three patients in cohort 2, 10 patients in cohort 3, and three patients in cohort 4). DLT (grade 3 stomatitis, diarrhea, leukopenia) was observed in cohorts 1, 2, and 4. Pharmacokinetics indicated that prolonged systemic expression of fluorouracil (5-FU) is maintained after administration of BOF-A2 at a dose of 200 mg bid for 14 days. The mean steady-state concentration of plasma 5-FU was ≥ 24 ng/mL, which was 184-fold greater than the minimum effective cytotoxic concentration in vitro. Lack of variation of 5-FU trough levels within a day at steady-state indicates suppression of circadian variation. One patient in cohort 3 achieved a partial response and five patients maintained stable disease in excess of 6 months. CONCLUSION: BOF-A2 at a dose of 200 mg PO bid for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest is well tolerated. Prolonged exposure to 5-FU above the predicted preclinical minimum effective concentration is maintained, without evidence of circadian variation. Furthermore, evidence of antitumor activity is suggested.

Phase I clinical trial of CX-3543, a pro-apoptotic antitumor agent

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3082-3082 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Marschke ◽  
A. D. Ricart ◽  
D. D. Von Hoff ◽  
J. K. Lim ◽  
K. Papadopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Antitumor Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Xenograft Tumor Growth

3082 Background: CX-3543 is a novel small molecule specifically designed to target three dimensional nucleic acid motifs, and thus induce apoptosis in cancer cells. Preclinically, CX-3543 demonstrated potency in suppressing xenograft tumor growth with a broad therapeutic window. The objectives of this phase I study are: to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), to establish the pharmacokinetics (PKs), and to determine the recommended dose for further clinical development of CX-3543. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas whose tumors progressed on standard therapy or for whom there are no standard therapies receive CX-3543 in successive dose cohorts at: 10, 20, 40, 80 and 160 mg/m2. Dosing is by one hour intravenous infusion daily for five consecutive days repeated on a three week cycle. Therapy is continued until the patient shows signs of intolerance to CX-3543 or evidence of advancing disease. Response by RECIST criteria is determined after every 2 cycles. Results: Ten patients with solid tumors (3–4 per cohort) have received intravenous CX-3543. Doses have been well tolerated. Seven grade 3 adverse events have been reported during the study, but none of these are related to CX-3543. To date no objective responses have been observed. One patient with advanced refractory prostate cancer has stable disease of longer than 4 months duration. CX-3543 has demonstrated good linearity in PK parameters between the dose cohorts with a terminal half life of approximately 12 hours following the first dose. Conclusions: To date, CX-3543 has shown no drug related toxicity and has predictable PKs. No DLTs have yet been observed, and the MTD remains to be defined in this Phase I study. Further enrollment to the planned dose escalation cohorts is ongoing. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of c-Met inhibitor ARQ197 in combination with FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2544-2544
Author(s):  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
Carla Kurkjian ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

2544 Background: C-Met protein is a receptor tyrosine kinase which is overexpressed or mutated in a variety of tumor types, causing cell proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis. Tivantinib is an orally bioavailable small molecule which binds to the c-Met protein. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tivantinib in combination with standard dose FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors for which FOLFOX (5-FU IV 400 mg/m2 day 1; 5-FU CIV 2400 mg/m2 day 1; Leucovorin IV 400 mg/m2 day 1; Oxaliplatin IV 85 mg/m2 day 1) would be appropriate chemotherapy received escalating doses of tivantinib BID (days 1-14) in a standard 3 + 3 design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), non-dose-limiting toxicities (NDLTs), safety, and preliminary efficacy were evaluated. Results: Fourteen patients (50% colorectal) were treated across 3 dose levels: 120 mg (n=3); 240 mg (n=5); 360 mg (n=6). No DLTs were observed until the 3rd dose level (treatment delay ≥3 days, secondary to grade 3 neutropenia). Common related adverse events (% grade 1/2; % grade 3/4) included: diarrhea (36%; 0%), neutropenia (0%; 29%), nausea (14%; 14%), vomiting (14%; 14%), dehydration (14%; 7%), and thrombocytopenia (14%; 0%). To date, 7 patients have been evaluated for response including 4 (57%) with stable disease evident at the 8-week evaluation (CRC, 2 patients; unknown primary favoring CRC, 1 patient; esophageal, 1 patient) and 3 (21%) with disease progression. The 4 patients with stable disease are continuing on treatment; three (CRC and unknown primary) had received prior FOLFOX. Conclusions: The addition of tivantinib to standard therapy FOLFOX appears tolerated up to its recommended phase II monotherapy dose of 360 mg. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, and a phase II study is proceeding with this regimen for the first line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01611857.

Phase I study of the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 in combination with capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 475-475
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Lowell L. Hart ◽  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Heat Shock Protein 90 ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

475 Background: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone involved in the maintenance and function of client proteins, many of which are integral to key oncogenic processes. AUY922 is a competitive inhibitor of HSP90, with demonstrated activity in a variety of preclinical models. Further preclinical evidence suggests potential synergy between inhibition of HSP90 and fluorouracil treatment (Burkitt et al. 2007). This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AUY922 in combination with standard dose of capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with refractory solid tumors for which capecitabine was an appropriate therapy received AUY922 with capecitabine in a standard 3+3 dose escalation. Capecitabine 1000mg/m2 was administered twice daily for days 1-14 of 21-day cycles, with escalating doses of AUY922 administered by intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15; the 6th dose level combined the MTD of AUY922 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, and efficacy were evaluated. Results: 23 patients were treated at 6 dose levels: 22mg/m2 (n = 3); 28mg/m2 (n = 3); 40mg/m2 (n = 3); 55mg/m2 (n = 5); 70mg/m2 (n = 3); 70mg/m2 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2 (n = 6). There were no DLTs observed until the 6th dose level (grade 3 diarrhea). Common adverse events (all grades) included: diarrhea (61%), nausea (57%), fatigue (43%), hand-foot skin reaction (39%), anorexia (39%), vomiting (35%), rash (30%), and darkening vision (22%). Myelosuppression was uncommon, with no instances of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, and only 2 patients (9%) with grade 3/4 neutropenia (1 patient each). Of the 19 patients evaluable for response per RECIST 1.1, unconfirmed partial response (PR) was noted in 3 patients (13%; colorectal, 1; breast, 1; stomach, 1), with 1 additional confirmed PR (4%; colorectal); two of these had progressed on prior fluorouracil. Stable disease was noted in 8 patients (35%). Conclusions: The addition of AUY922 to standard dose capecitabine was well-tolerated at doses of up to 70mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, and warrants further investigation of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01226732.

Phase I study of BPM 31510 in advanced solid tumors: Updated analysis of a novel treatment with promising activity.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3015-3015
Author(s):  
Andrew Eugene Hendifar ◽  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Doris Quon ◽  
Victoria S Chua ◽  
Lita Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Grade 3

3015 Background: BPM 31510 is a novel small molecule that targets the metabolic machinery of the cancer microenvironment to reverse the aerobic glycolytic phenotype of cancer cells. Effector downstream signaling results in re-capitulation of BCL-2 mediated apoptosis and disruption in tumor vasculature by modulation of VEGF. (NR Narain et al., Proceedings of AACR Meeting Abstracts 2011). Methods: A standard 3+3 phase I, dose-escalation study design was used in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard treatment. Primary objectives were establishment of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety/pharmacokinetic (PK) correlates. Secondary objectives included exploratory pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy (RECIST-1.1) of BPM 31510 in sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 pts. Results: At time of submission, 34 patients with advanced cancer who had failed multiple chemotherapeutic regimens had been enrolled in 7 dose cohorts (ranging from 5.6 mg/kg to 78.2 mg/kg). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (1-7). 2 patients have had grade 3 elevation in PT/INR, otherwise there have been no grade 3/4 treatment related toxicities to date. The pharmacokinetics of BPM 31510 are linear and there were no sex differences in the parameters normalized by dose and body surface area. Tmax and Cmax are associated with the end of the infusion. The values for t1/2 ranged from 2.18 to 13.3 hr, with little or no dependence of t1/2 on dose. Objective tumor responses have been noted at the dose of 58.6mg/kg with 1 partial response (myxoid liposarcoma) and 1 minor response (pleomorphic sarcoma). Six patients (19%) have had disease stabilization (> 4 months). Conclusions: Interim data from this phase I study indicate that BPM 31510 is well tolerated with no dose limiting toxicities to date. A partial response and minor response were observed and correlates with dose escalation. Taken together, there is strong rationale for further clinical development of this compound as an anti-cancer agent.

Phase I study of the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 in combination with capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3564-3564
Author(s):  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Lowell L. Hart ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibition ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3564 Background: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone involved in the maintenance and function of client proteins, many of which are integral to key oncogenic processes. AUY922 is a competitive inhibitor of HSP90. Preclinical evidence suggests potential synergy between HSP90 inhibition and fluorouracil. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AUY922 in combination with standard dose of capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Pts with refractory solid tumors received AUY922 with capecitabine in a standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose levels were capecitabine 1000mg/m2 PO BID d 1-14 of 21-day cycles, with escalating doses of AUY922 IV days 1, 8, and 15; the 6th dose level combined the MTD of AUY922 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, and efficacy were evaluated. Results: 23 pts were treated at 6 dose levels: 22mg/m2 (n = 3); 28mg/m2 (n = 3); 40mg/m2 (n = 3); 55mg/m2 (n = 5); 70mg/m2 (n = 3); 70mg/m2 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2 (n= 6). No DLTs were observed until the 6th dose level (grade 3 diarrhea). Related adverse events (% grade 1/2; % grade 3/4) included: diarrhea (43%; 17%), fatigue (30%; 13%), nausea (39%; 0), hand-foot skin reaction (30%; 5%), anorexia (30%; 4%), vomiting (30%; 0), and darkening vision (26%; 0). Vision darkening, a class effect of HSP90 inhibitors, was reversible with drug hold and retreatment was possible. Two pts (9%) had hematologic G 3/4 events of neutropenia. Of the 19 pts evaluable for response, partial response was noted in 4 patients (colorectal, 2; breast, 1; stomach, 1); 2 had progressed on prior fluorouracil, and remained on treatment for 13-35 wks. Stable disease was noted in 8 pts (35% [colorectal, 5; pancreas, 2; breast, 1]) with a median duration of 25.5 wks (range: 11-44+). All 5 colorectal pts were refractory to 5-FU. Conclusions: The addition of AUY922 to standard dose capecitabine was well-tolerated at doses of up to 70mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, particularly as seen in pts previously resistant to fluorouracil, and warrants further investigation of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01226732.

Phase I study of safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2536-2536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojana Milojkovic Kerklaan ◽  
Martijn P. J. K. Lolkema ◽  
Lot A. Devriese ◽  
Emile E. Voest ◽  
A. Nol-Boekel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Treated Patient ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Oral Topotecan

2536 Background: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the oral anti-angiogenic drug pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan, an inhibitor of topoisomerase-I. Methods: Two-stage, two-arm, dose escalation and pharmacokinetic phase I study of pazopanib and oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors, (NCT00732420, www.clinicaltrials.gov). This interim report describes the bioavailability and safety results for daily pazopanib combined with oral topotecan (days 1, 8, 15) in a 28-day cycle. Results: Twenty-eight of 32 patients completed at least one cycle and were evaluable for analysis. Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred: grade 3 hand-foot-syndrome, diarrhea and neutropenia. Pazopanib 800 mg/topotecan 10 mg exceeded the MTD with two DLTs in six patients. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities were grade 3 anemia (3/28), leukocytopenia, neutropenia and fatigue (2/28 each). One death due to hepatic failure occurred at pazopanib 800mg/toptecan 2mg in a heavily pre-treated patient with sarcoma that may have been related to paracetamol ingestion but attribution to the pazopanib can not be excluded. Topotecan AUC0-∞ increased 1.58-fold (90%CI: 1.09–1.29) and Cmax increased 1.78-fold (90%CI: 1.08-2.92) when given with pazopanib compared to single administration (n=7). Pazopanib AUC0-24 and Cmax ratios were not increased when co-administered with topotecan: 0.98 (90%CI: 0.95-1.02) and 0.96 (90%CI: 0.92-1.01). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response (RECIST): PR (2/23; 9%, both ovarian cancer); SD (13/23; 57%) and PD (8/23; 35%). Pazopanib 800 mg/topotecan 8 mg is currently being explored in an expansion cohort. A second treatment arm of pazopanib 800 mg with topotecan daily x5 is ongoing and will be reported separately. Conclusions: Daily pazopanib and weekly oral topotecan is tolerable with handfoot syndrome, neutropenia and fatigue as dose limited side effects. Pazopanib increased topotecan exposure 1.58-fold (AUC0-∞) and 1.78-fold (Cmax). Clinical trial information: NCT00732420.

scholarly journals Phase I study of TAS-115, a novel oral multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 1175-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Doi ◽  
Nobuaki Matsubara ◽  
Akira Kawai ◽  
Norifumi Naka ◽  
Shunji Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Bone Scan Index ◽  
Grade 3

SummaryTAS-115 is a novel MET, VEGFR, FMS and PDGFR inhibitor, developed to improve the continuity of drug administration with a relatively short half-life. We assessed its tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and pharmacodynamics in patients with solid tumors. This open-label, dose-escalation phase I study of TAS-115 consisted of three parts: part 1 (TAS-115 was administered orally once daily [SID]); part 2 and an expansion part (SID in a 5 days on/2 days off [5-on/2-off] schedule for 21 days per cycle). In part 1 (200–800 mg SID administered to 21 patients), systemic exposure after single administration increased almost dose-proportionally. Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in three patients: grade 3 rash (650 mg), thrombocytopenia with bleeding, and rash (800 mg). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined as 650 mg SID. In part 2, the 5-on/2-off schedule was evaluated at the MTD to improve treatment exposure. No DLTs were observed and no patients required treatment interruption in cycle 1. During part 2 and the expansion part (N = 61), grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 47 patients, with neutropenia (24.6%), hypophosphatemia (21.3%), anemia, and thrombocytopenia (14.8% each), and leukocytopenia (11.5%) occurring in ≥10% of patients. The best overall response was stable disease in 31 of 82 patients (37.8%). An apparent reduction in fluorodesoxyglucose-uptake and bone scan index was observed in some patients. TAS-115 was generally well tolerated, with manageable toxicities and recommended phase II dose was estimated as 650 mg SID, 5-on/2-off. Furthermore, promising antitumor activity was observed.

Phase I Study of the Combination of Carfilzomib and Panobinostat for Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma: A Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium (MMRC) Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 32-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
Todd Zimmerman ◽  
Cara A Rosenbaum ◽  
Ajay K. Nooka ◽  
Leonard T Heffner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Patients with myeloma ultimately become refractory to current therapies, requiring new approaches to treatment. Carfilzomib is a second generation proteasome inhibitor that has demonstrated significant activity in patients with relapsed and refractory disease. Panobinostat is a pan-deacetylase inhibitor that has been shown to be effective and overcome resistance in combination with bortezomib in refractory patients. In addition, patients treated with a combination of bortezomib/dexamethasone/panobinostat had a significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS) compared to bortezomib/dexamethasone alone. Based on preclinical data supporting combined HDAC and proteasome inhibition, we hypothesized that carfilzomib and panobinostat would be safe and effective in relapsed/refractory myeloma patients. Herein we report the initial findings of the MMRC multicenter phase I study of the combination. Methods: The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib using a standard 3+3 alternate dose escalation design with 4 cohorts. An additional 12 patient expansion group will be treated at the MTD to further assess the activity and safety of the combination. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the extended safety of this combination and to assess response, response duration and progression free survival (PFS). Panobinostat is administered orally three times weekly for three of four weeks, ranging from 15 to 20 mg. Carfilzomib is administered IV days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16, ranging from 20/27 mg/m2 to 20/45mg/m2. Cycles are repeated every 4 weeks. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) are determined in the first cycle, and all adverse events are assessed according to CTCAE V4. Responses are assessed using IMWG criteria (plus MRs as per the EBMT criteria). Results: To date, 20 patients in four cohorts have been enrolled and all have completed the first cycle. Median age is 64.5 years (48-75). All patients had refractory and progressive disease; with a median number of 4) prior treatment lines. Three DLTs occurred. One patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with grade 3 acute kidney injury, one patient developed persistent grade 4 thrombocytopenia without bleeding and one patient had grade 3 diarrhea uncontrolled by maximal medical therapy. The MTD is panobinostat 20 mg and carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m2. The most common grade 3 toxicities were hematologic. Regardless of causality, grade 3 or higher anemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 35%, 35%, and 20% of patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 or higher nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue (15%), anorexia (10%), hyponatremia (10%) and nausea (10%). The overall response rate is 50% with 30% PRs and 20% VGPR or better. The median PFS is 14.3 months. Conclusion: The combination of carfilzomib and panobinostat is well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Response, durability of response, and PFS are encouraging and warrant further study. Disclosures Kaufman: Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Carfilzomib treatment in amyloidosis . Zimmerman:Onyx: Honoraria. Heffner:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dana Farber CI: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Idera: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria, Research Funding; Talon Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Harvey:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Gleason:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Lewis:Array BioPharma: Consultancy. Lonial:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

A phase I study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin (CapOx), and lapatinib (L) in metastatic or advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2579-2579
Author(s):  
T. Dennie ◽  
D. Alberti ◽  
K. Oliver ◽  
N. LoConte ◽  
D. Mulkerin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Daily Oral Administration

2579 Background: CapOx is a standard treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and has been shown to be equivalent to FOLFOX in a phase III study. L is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with targeting of the EGF and Her-2 receptors. Preclinical data suggest there may be synergy between L and Cap as well as L and Ox. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CapOx and L. Methods: Pts eligible for treatment included those with advanced or metastatic cancers, ECOG PS 2 or less, adequate renal and liver function, and ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy regimens. Treatment over a 21-day cycle was as follows: Ox, single IV infusion on Day 1; Cap, twice-daily oral administration on Days 1 through 14; L, continuous once-daily oral administration. Pts were treated with escalating doses of L (starting at 1000 mg daily) and Cap (starting at 1500 mg/m2/day), while Ox was kept at 130 mg/m2. The primary endpoint was determination of MTD. Results: Ten pts (9/10 female, median age 62 yrs.) were enrolled. One pt had breast cancer and the remainder had non- colorectal GI malignancies (esophagus, hepatobiliary, and pancreas). One pt at dose level 0 experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (dehydration, elevated bilirubin, hypokalemia). Two pts at dose level 1 (L 1000, Ox 130, Cap 2000) had DLTs of hypokalemia and diarrhea. At an intermediate dose level of L 1000, Cap 1700, Ox 130, two pts experienced DLTs (grade 2 fatigue/anorexia, grade 3 fatigue and dizziness). The MTD was determined to be L 1000 mg daily, Cap 1500 mg/m2/day, Ox 130 mg/m2. There were no treatment-related grade 4 toxicities. The most common grade 3 toxicity was diarrhea (4 pts). There were no grade 3 neuropathies, hematologic toxicities, or rash, and only one case of grade 3 fatigue. One pt with pancreatic cancer had a confirmed partial response (PR) to treatment, and 3 others had stable disease for > 90 days. Conclusions: The regimen of CapOx and L has efficacy in the treatment of solid tumors with established responsiveness to fluoropyrimidines or Ox. The MTD was L 1000 mg daily, Ox 130 mg/m2, and Cap 1500 mg/m2/day. This regimen will be investigated further in a Phase II study involving pts with mCRC. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document