Measuring cost in the value equation using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18305-e18305
Author(s):  
Nicholas D. Olivieri ◽  
Benjamin D. Frank ◽  
John D. Calhoun ◽  
Alexis B. Guzman ◽  
Justin N. Onwenu ◽  
...  

e18305 Background: The cost of a full cycle of radiation therapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center has not been determined using a bottom-up measurement approach. Due to the complexity and variation in clinical processes, typical costing strategies do not provide the level of detail necessary to evaluate the value equation, defined as outcomes over cost. To address this limitation, we designed and implemented a practice-wide Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) strategy to capture our total direct cost of care for all treatment modalities within each of 9 disease site-specific services. Methods: Process maps were created for each of the 9 disease site-specific services. Care delivery times were captured by treatment modality for each service as determined by multidisciplinary teams routinely performing each step of the process. The data were entered into a standardized tool, which calculated step costs based upon capacity cost rates for each human resource. The costing tool also calculated total direct labor costs for specific treatment plans based on modality, complexity, and fractionation. Results: The analysis took six months to complete and required the use of approximately 1,000 administrative hours, 250 physician hours, 250 clinical staff hours and 100 medical physics hours. Approximately 17 process maps were created for each of the 9 services with each process map receiving further analysis based upon radiation treatment modality. As a result of observed variation in costs between disease-site services, best practices were identified and 15 standardization opportunities were discovered. Additionally, the cost-benefit analysis between high profile modalities within each disease-site service, such as Proton Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) on the Head and Neck service, were easier to complete. Conclusions: Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing is a valid method for calculating direct costs in a large academic radiation oncology practice. Standardized clinical outcome data can be used to complete the value equation and ultimately provide insight for better clinical and administrative decision making.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 79-79
Author(s):  
Shalini Moningi ◽  
Shane Mesko ◽  
Amy Catherine Moreno ◽  
Matthew S. Ning ◽  
Thomas A. Aloia ◽  
...  

79 Background: Since 2010 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC) has been using Time Driven Activity Based Costing (TDABC) to assist in tracking and quantifying changes made to clinical processes to improve efficiency of patient care delivery. Radiation Oncology (RO) providers have recently utilized this method to assist in the growing clinical patient volumes and increasing enrollment in clinical trials. UTMDACC contains disease specific multi-disciplinary centers with separate clinics for different disciplines. Resources are limited which can affect clinical providers’ ability to meet the needs of increasing patient volumes. Implementing efficient clinic work flow models will allow clinicians to provide excellent quality of clinical care even with limited resources. Methods: Standard disease-site specific note templates were created and implemented throughout the entire RO department. Additionally, standardized roles for medical assistants, residents, physician assistants (PAs), attending physicians and nurses were implemented to minimize duplication of responsibilities. Using TDABC methodology, process maps for pre and post implementation pathways were created to illustrate areas of change and possible benefit. Results: Process maps were compared for new consult and follow up and on treatment patient visits. Process times for these patient care visits were compared pre- and post-implementation of templates and clinical roles. Time savings of 110, 18 and 34 minutes were observed for consult visits, follow up visits and on-treatment visits when comparing current to baseline process maps. Conclusions: Standardization of note templates and roles for all members of the care team has led to improvements in process flow and efficiency in the RO clinic setting. Our findings suggest that further implementation of TDABC methodology by having all providers work at the top of their license could can improve clinical efficiency and patient care. Further metrics with a larger sample size is recommended to validate our results. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 287-287
Author(s):  
Patricia H. Hardenbergh

287 Background: The goal of this project is to improve quality of cancer care across the United States by connecting community cancer center radiation oncologists with highly specialized, disease site-specific radiation oncologists through the use of online technology. Methods: We have developed a website named chartrounds.com which allows community radiation oncologists to interact online with disease specialists and their peers on a scheduled basis in order to present and review radiation oncology treatment plans and cases in real time. Disease sites currently include breast, head and neck, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, prostate, central nervous systems, pediatric, lymphoma and lung cancers. At the conclusion of each session, participants are asked to complete a feedback questionnaire requesting feedback on quality and relevance of the session and the manner in which it might result in practice changes. Results: 650 community radiation oncology physician members from 49 states and 19 countries have enrolled online. In the initial 18-month period (12/2010-6/2012), 23 disease specialists have lead 188 chart rounds sessions with an average attendance ratio of 10 community physician members to 1 disease specialist. On a 5 point Likert scale with 5 representing the greatest impact possible, the mean response to feedback questions is as follows: session quality: 4.7, time used effectively: 4.6, discussions relevant to daily practice: 4.7, session is likely to result in a change in practice: 4.0.More specifically, members reported that they would make the following changes in their practice: change in clinical management of the radiation patient: 35%, change in the selection of patients for radiation: 17%, change in radiation fields: 15%, change in radiation prescription dose: 9%. Conclusions: Chartrounds.com appears to be impacting radiation oncology practice resulting in changes in management and treatment of patients in community cancer centers. Future directions of this project are aimed at demonstrating how these changes could result in significant improvements in cancer care across the United States. This work is funded by the Improving Cancer Care Grant of the ASCO Conquer Cancer Foundation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 70-70
Author(s):  
Patricia H. Hardenbergh

70 Background: The goal of this project is to improve the quality of cancer care across the U.S. by connecting community cancer center radiation oncologists with highly specialized, disease site-specific radiation oncologists. Methods: We have developed a website named chartrounds.com that allows community radiation oncologist members to interact online in a peer review forum with disease site-specific specialists on a scheduled basis. At the conclusion of each session, participants are asked to complete a questionnaire which requests feedback on the quality and relevance of the session and the manner in which it might result in changes to their practice. Results: To date, 575 community radiation oncology physician members from 50 states have enrolled online. In the initial 18-month period, nine disease site-specific specialists have led 81 breast-specific chart rounds sessions with an average attendance ratio, during the past six months, of eight community physician members to one breast cancer disease site-specific specialist. From 309 initial responses, on a five-point Likert scale with five representing the greatest impact possible, the mean response to feedback questions is as follows: session quality; 4.7, time used effectively; 4.6, discussions relevant to daily practice; 4.7, session is likely to result in a change in practice; 4.0. More specifically, 139 members reported that they would make the following changes in their practice: change in clinical management of the radiation patient: 37%, change in the selection of patients for radiation: 22%, change in the technical delivery of radiation including target, field and dose adjustments: 20%. Conclusions: The chartrounds.com website appears to be making an impact on individual radiation oncology practices resulting in changes in management and the delivery of treatment to patients in community cancer centers. Future directions of this project are aimed at demonstrating how these changes may result in significant improvements in survival of breast cancer patients across the U.S. This work is funded by the Improving Cancer Care Grant of the ASCO Conquer Cancer Foundation supported by Susan G. Komen for the Cure.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6641-6641
Author(s):  
Patricia H. Hardenbergh ◽  
Calloway B May ◽  
Kimberly Anne Lyons-Mitchell

6641 Background: To improve the quality of cancer care across US by connecting community cancer center oncologists with highly specialized, disease site-specific oncologists through the use of online technology. Methods: Chartrounds.com was developed which allows community oncologists to interact online with disease site-specific oncologists and their peers on a scheduled basis in order to present and review treatment management and specific cases. Disease sites include breast, head and neck, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, prostate, central nervous systems, pediatric, lymphoma, lung cancer and palliative care. At the conclusion of each session, participants are asked to complete a questionnaire which requests feedback on the quality and relevance of the session and the manner in which it might result in practice changes. Results: To date, 825 community radiation oncology physician members from 50 states and 19 countries have enrolled online. In the initial 25-month period (12/2010-1/2013), 35 disease site-specific specialists have lead 256 chart rounds one-hour sessions with an average attendance ratio of 15 community physician members to 1 disease site-specific specialist. On a 5 point scale with 5 representing the greatest impact possible, of 1,756 responses the mean score to feedback questions is as follows: session quality: 4.6, time used effectively: 4.6, discussions relevant to daily practice: 4.6, session is likely to result in a change in practice: 4.0.Members reported that they would make the following changes in their practice: change in clinical management of the radiation patient: 40%, change in the selection of patients for radiation: 10%, change in radiation fields: 15%, change in radiation prescription dose: 10%. Conclusions: The Chartrounds.com program appears to be making an impact on the quality of radiation oncology practices resulting in changes in management and treatment of patients in community cancer centers. Future directions of this project are aimed at continuing to develop the site for medical oncologists and multidisciplinary tumor conferences. This work is funded by the Improving Cancer Care Grant of the ASCO Conquer Cancer Foundation supported by Susan G. Komen for the Cure.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 241-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia H. Hardenbergh ◽  
Brigitta Gehl ◽  
Kimberly Anne Lyons-Mitchell

241 Background: The purpose of this project is to improve the quality of cancer care by connecting disease site-specific experts with community oncologists through web-based technology. Methods: Chartrounds.com is a conferencing web-site developed to allow community oncologists to present real cases to disease site specialists in oncology on a scheduled basis. Chartrounds was developed initially for radiation oncologists and subsequently has expanded to include multidisciplinary tumor boards and medical oncology specific sessions. Presently 43 disease site expert oncologists including surgeons, medical oncologists and radiation oncologists from 38 academic institutions in the US host sessions. Feedback reports following the completion of each session were designed to assess the impact of the project. Results: Since its inception in December 2010, 43 disease site-specialists have lead 366 sessions, connecting 3,793 participating oncologists from all 50 US states and 24 countries.Broken down by specialty, 348 radiation oncology sessions have linked 3,632 participants, 14 medical oncology specific and multidisciplinary tumor board sessions have included 161 participants. On a 5 point Likert scale with 5 representing the greatest possible impact, the mean response to feedback questions is as follows: session quality: 4.7 for radiation oncology, 4.6 for multidisciplinary; time used effectively: 4.6 for radiation oncology, 4.5 for multidisciplinary; discussions relevant to daily practice: 4.6 for radiation oncology, 4.6 for multidisciplinary; session is likely to result in a change of practice: 4.0 for radiation oncology, 4.0 for multidisciplinary. Chartrounds sessions qualify for 1 CME credit and is approved for a practice quality improvement project by the American Board of Radiology. Conclusions: Chartrounds.com is impacting oncology practices which results in changes in community practice. Future directions of this project include providing chartrounds sessions for oncology nurses and providing a library of video recorded archived sessions. This work has been funded by the Improving Cancer Care Grant of the ASCO Conquer Cancer Foundation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii55-ii55
Author(s):  
Michael Youssef ◽  
Lily Pham ◽  
Mehmet Demirhan ◽  
Rebecca Harrison ◽  
Monica Loghin ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Selection of systemic therapy for recurrent meningiomas with progression after resection and/or radiation therapy represents a challenge. The combination of everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, plus octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR), a somatostatin agonist, suggests synergistic activity in preclinical studies. Its long-term clinical impact in recurrent meningiomas warrants further study. METHODS We reviewed the records of adult patients with recurrent intracranial or spinal meningioma (WHO grade I, II, or III), not candidates for further surgery or radiation therapy, who were treated with everolimus and octreotide, between 1/1/2015 and 06/1/2020 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients received everolimus (10 mg PO daily) each 28-day cycle and octreotide 30 mg SC once monthly. Molecular features were determined by next generation sequencing (T-200–1, Oncomine). RESULTS A total of 18 patients were identified, including WHO grade I tumors (n=4), grade II (n=10), and grade III (n=4); furthermore, 8 patients harbored NF2 mutation, followed by mutations in CREBBP (n=2), NOTCH2 (n=1), MHL1 (n=1), PTEN (n=1), SETD2 (n=1), and TP53 genes (n=1). One patient had spinal meningioma. The 6- and 12-month PFS were 77.8% and 61.1%, 6- and 12-month OS were 94.4% and 83.3% respectively. Seven (38.9%) patients had tolerated treatment for more than 12 cycles, 3 (16.7%) remain on treatment for more than 24 cycles and 1 patient is still on treatment for 31 cycles. Only 1 patient required dose reduction to 7.5 mg daily due to pneumonitis, otherwise there is an acceptable toxicity profile. Four patients had resolution of trigeminal neuralgia. CONCLUSIONS In our patient population, combination treatment with everolimus and octreotide seems to have antitumor activity and proved to be safe without major side effects from long-term exposure. It also contributed to control of neuralgia. Further tissue analysis of the role of mTOR pathway and SSTR2A expression is ongoing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathia Dubron ◽  
Mathilde Verschaeve ◽  
Filip Roodhooft

Abstract Background Recently, time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is put forward as an alternative, more accurate costing method to calculate the cost of a medical treatment because it allows the assignment of costs directly to patients. The objective of this paper is the application of a time-driven activity-based method in order to estimate the cost of childbirth at a maternal department. Moreover, this study shows how this costing method can be used to outline how childbirth costs vary according to considered patient and disease characteristics. Through the use of process mapping, TDABC allows to exactly identify which activities and corresponding resources are impacted by these characteristics, leading to a more detailed understanding of childbirth cost. Methods A prospective cohort study design is performed in a maternity department. Process maps were developed for two types of childbirth, vaginal delivery (VD) and caesarean section (CS). Costs were obtained from the financial department and capacity cost rates were calculated accordingly. Results Overall, the cost of childbirth equals €1894,12 and is mainly driven by personnel costs (89,0%). Monitoring after birth is the most expensive activity on the pathway, costing €1149,70. Significant cost variations between type of delivery were found, with VD costing €1808,66 compared to €2463,98 for a CS. Prolonged clinical visit (+ 33,3 min) and monitoring (+ 775,2 min) in CS were the main contributors to this cost difference. Within each delivery type, age, parity, number of gestation weeks and education attainment were found to drive cost variations. In particular, for VD an age >  25 years, nulliparous, gestation weeks > 40 weeks and higher education attainment were associated with higher costs. Similar results were found within CS for age, parity and number of gestation weeks. Conclusions TDABC is a valuable approach to measure and understand the variability in costs of childbirth and its associated drivers over the full care cycle. Accordingly, these findings can inform health care providers, managers and regulators on process improvements and cost containment initiatives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document